TONG Shengchun,LI Guorong,LI Jinfang,et al.Soil Basic Characteristics and Wind Erosion in Degraded Barren Patches of Alpine Meadow in the Source of Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(04):10-17.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.022.]
黄河源高寒草甸退化秃斑地土壤基本特征及其风蚀规律
- Title:
- Soil Basic Characteristics and Wind Erosion in Degraded Barren Patches of Alpine Meadow in the Source of Yellow River
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)04-0010-08
- Keywords:
- source region of the Yellow River; alpine meadow; degraded barren patch; basic soil characteristics; soil wind erosion
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]阐明高寒草甸不同类型退化秃斑地的土壤基本特征及其风蚀规律,揭示土壤物理力学特性与土壤风蚀之间的交互影响作用,进而为黄河源区生态植被的修复和保护提供理论依据。[方法]以黄河源7种草甸退化秃斑地及高原鼢鼠鼠丘为研究对象,结合野外调查和原位试验,对不同秃斑地土壤物理力学特征、土壤风蚀规律的差异性及土壤风蚀量与可蚀性因子间的关联度和相关性等进行了分析和讨论。[结果](1)不同退化秃斑地土壤基本物理力学特性指标差异较显著,7种秃斑地的平均土壤含水率、密度、紧实度和黏聚力分别是高原鼢鼠鼠丘的1.3倍、2.6倍、14.2倍和5.0倍,秃斑地中风毛菊的恢复生长对土壤的保水固土能力最强,香薷草和臭蒿相对较弱。(2)风蚀60 min后高原鼢鼠鼠丘土壤的总流失量是退化秃斑地的1.3～4.4倍; 风蚀量的增加幅度随风蚀时间呈先增后减的趋势,风蚀作用的前5～10 min是土壤风蚀的敏感期; 不同退化秃斑地土壤风蚀量与植被恢复类型有关,且与土壤物理力学指标值之间呈反比例关系。(3)退化秃斑地土壤风蚀量与植被覆盖度、土壤含水率和土壤紧实度之间均呈线性负相关关系,与土壤黏聚力间呈指数函数负相关关系; 土壤风蚀量与覆盖度、含水率、紧实度和黏聚力间存在极显著负相关,与土壤密度和土壤平均粒径分别存在显著负相关和显著正相关。[结论]不同类型的退化秃斑地均可通过提升土壤基本物理力学特性,从而对土壤风蚀产生抑制效应,其中风毛菊抑制效果最佳、香薷草和臭蒿相对较弱。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The aims of this study are to clarify the basic characteristics of soil and the pattern of wind erosion in different types of degraded bare patches in alpine meadow, reveal the interaction between soil physical and mechanical properties with soil wind erosion, then provide a theoretical basis for the restoration and protection of ecological vegetation in the source region of the Yellow River. [Methods] Based on the field investigation and in-situ test, the physical and mechanical characteristics of soil, the difference of soil wind erosion pattern and correlation between soil wind erosion and erodibility factors were analyzed and discussed in seven kinds of meadow degraded barren land and plateau zokor mound in the Yellow River source. [Results](1)There were significant differences in the basic physical and mechanical properties of soils in different degraded bald land. The average soil moisture content, density, compactness and cohesion of seven bald land were 1.3 times, 2.6 times, 14.2 times and 5.0 times of plateau zokor hill, respectively. The restoration and growth of Saussurea eopygmaea in bald land had the strongest ability to retain water and soil, while Elsholtzia densa and Artemisia hedinii were relatively weak.(2)After 60 min of wind erosion, the total soil loss of plateau zokor mound was 1.3～4.4 times that of degraded barren land; the increment of wind erosion amount increased first and then decreased with the wind erosion time. The first 5～10 min of wind erosion was the sensitive period of soil wind erosion. Soil wind erosion in different degraded bald spots was related to vegetation restoration types, and was inversely proportional to soil physical and mechanical index values.(3)There was a linear negative correlation between soil wind erosion and vegetation coverage, soil moisture content and soil compaction, and an exponential negative correlation between soil wind erosion and soil cohesion. Soil wind erosion was significantly negatively correlated with soil cover, moisture content, compactness and cohesion, and significantly negatively correlated with soil density and soil average particle size, respectively. [Conclusion] Different types of degraded bare lands have an inhibitory effect on soil wind erosion by improving the basic physical and mechanical properties of soil. Among them, the inhibition effect of Saussurea eopygmaea is the best, and the inhibition effect of Elsholtzia densa and Artemisia hedinii are relatively weak.
参考文献/References:
[1] 管晓祥,刘翠善,鲍振鑫,等.黄河源区植被NDVI演变及其与降水、气温的关系[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(5):268-277.
[2] 刘彩红,王朋岭,温婷婷,等.1960—2019年黄河源区气候变化时空规律研究[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(2):293-302.
[3] Li X L, Gao J, Zhang J. A topographic perspective on the distribution of degraded meadows and their changes on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, West China[J]. Land Degradation and Development, 2018,29:1574-1582.
[4] Li X L, Gao J, Zhang J, et al. Natural and anthropogenic influences on the spatiotemporal change ofdegraded meadows in southern Qinghai Province, West China: 1976—2015[J]. Applied Geography, 2018,97:176-183.
[5] 孙铁军,肖春利,滕文军.不同草地建植模式对荒坡地土壤风蚀及理化性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):44-48.
[6] 李成阳,张文娟,赖炽敏,等.黄河源区不同退化程度高寒草原群落生产力物种多样性和土壤特性及其关系研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(11):4541-4551.
[7] Wiesmair M, Otte A, Waldhardt R. Relationships between plant diversity, vegetation cover and site conditions: Implications for grassland conservation in the Greater Gaucasus[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2017,26(2):273-291.
[8] Wang Y B, Wang G X, Hu H C, et al. Erosion rates evaluated by the 137Cs technique in the high altitude area of the Qinghai-Tibet plateau of China[J]. Environmental Geology, 2008,53(8):1743-1749.
[9] 刘启兴,董国涛,景海涛,等.2000—2016年黄河源区植被NDVI变化趋势及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):86-92.
[10] 王宝山,尕玛加,张玉.青藏高原“黑土滩”退化高寒草甸草原的形成机制和治理方法的研究进展[J].草原与草坪,2007(2):72-77.
[11] 韩立辉,尚占环,任国华,等.青藏高原“黑土滩”退化草地植物和土壤对秃斑面积变化的响应[J].草业学报,2011,20(1):1-6.
[12] 史丽丽,赵成章,樊洁平,等.祁连山地甘肃臭草斑块土壤水分与植被盖度空间格局[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(2):285-291.
[13] 贺丽,黄超,陈德朝,等.不同围封方式初期川西北高寒草甸的群落结构和稳定性[J].草业科学,2022,39(2):268-277.
[14] 徐剑波,宋立生,赵之重,等.近15年来黄河源地区玛多县草地植被退化的遥感动态监测[J].干旱区地理,2012,35(4):615-622.
[15] 张兴禄,李广.高原鼠兔和高原鼢鼠在高寒草甸生态系统的作用[J].草业科学,2015,32(5):816-822.
[16] 刘义花,王振宇,刘彩红,等.气候变暖背景下青海省春季干旱时空变化[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(2):282-290.
[17] 翟辉,李国荣,李进芳,等.黄河源草地退化区2种鼠丘土壤风蚀规律[J].干旱区研究,2022,39(4):1212-1221.
[18] Shahabinejad N, Mahmoodabadi M, Jalalian A, et al. In situ field measurement of wind erosion and threshold velocity in relation to soil properties in arid and semiarid environments[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2019,78(16):1-22.
[19] 陈泽涛,沙占江,王求贵,等.高寒草原草甸区土壤侵蚀及植被覆盖对养分空间分布的影响:以兴海盆地子科滩为例[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):226-234.
[20] Chi W F, Wang Y T, Lou Y X, et al. Effect of land use/cover change on soil wind erosion in the yellow river basin since the 1990s[J]. Sustainability,2022,14(19):12930.
[21] Jouquet P, Bouet C, Labiadh M, et al. Bioturbation and soil resistance to wind erosion in Southern Tunisia[J].Geoderma, 2021,403:115198.
[22] 李国荣,李希来,李进芳,等.黄河源高寒草甸高原鼠兔土丘的土壤风力侵蚀规律[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):110-114.
[23] 马素洁,周建伟,王福成,等.高寒草甸区高原鼢鼠新生土丘水土流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):58-63,71.
[24] 刘艳萍,刘铁军,蒙仲举.草原区植被对土壤风蚀影响的风洞模拟试验研究[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(3):668-672.
[25] 杨元武,李希来,周旭辉,等.高寒草甸植物群落退化与土壤环境特征的关系研究[J].草地学报,2016,24(6):1211-1217.
[26] 邢恩德,马少薇,郭建英,等.植被盖度对典型草原区地表风沙流结构及风蚀量影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(6):331-334.
[27] 杨鼎,齐昊昊,王倩,等.青藏高原高原鼢鼠鼠丘植被恢复过程中植物群落特征的变化[J].草业学报,2020,29(2):114-122.
[28] 李国荣,李希来,陈文婷,等.降雨侵蚀对退化草地土壤养分含量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(2):40-45.
相似文献/References:
[1]李国荣,李希来,陈文婷,等.降雨侵蚀对退化草地土壤养分含量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(02):40.
LI Guorong,LI Xilai,CHEN Wenting,et al.Influences of Rain Erosion on Soil Nutrient Contents of the Deteriorated Grassland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(04):40.
[2]刘启兴,董国涛,景海涛,等.2000-2016年黄河源区植被NDVI变化趋势及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(03):86.
LIU Qixing,DONG Guotao,JING Haitao,et al.Change Trend of Vegetation NDVI and Its Influencing Factors in the Source Region of the Yellow River in the Period from 2000 to 2016[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(04):86.
[3]管晓祥,刘翠善,鲍振鑫,等.黄河源区植被NDVI演变及其与降水、气温的关系[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):268.
GUAN Xiaoxiang,LIU Cuishan,BAO Zhenxin,et al.Variation of Vegetation NDVI and Its Relationship with Climate Factors in the Yellow River Source Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(04):268.
[4]翟 辉,李国荣,李进芳,等.黄河源区高寒退化草地鼠丘对土壤风蚀作用的影响[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(06):14.
ZHAI Hui,LI Guorong,LI Jinfang,et al.Effects of Rodent Mounds on Soil Wind Erosion in Alpine Degraded Grassland of the Yellow River Source Zone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):14.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-06-06 修回日期:2022-06-28
资助项目:青海省科技厅基础研究(2021-ZJ-701); 国家自然科学基金(41662023,42161068)
第一作者:童生春(1998—),男(土族),青海互助人,硕士研究生,研究方向为地质灾害及其防治。E-mail:tong_shengchun@163.com
通信作者:李国荣(1979—),男,青海贵德人,博士,教授,主要从事生态环境保护及地质灾害防治研究。E-mail:qdliguorong@163.com