LIU Gang,ZHANG Weilong,SONG Ziheng.Response Characteristics of Soil, Crops and Microorganisms at the Fracture Edge of the Coal mining Subsidence Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):127-134,145.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.009]
采煤沉陷区裂缝边缘带土壤、作物、微生物响应
- Title:
- Response Characteristics of Soil, Crops and Microorganisms at the Fracture Edge of the Coal mining Subsidence Area
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)03-0127-08
- 分类号:
- S154.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]研究采煤沉陷区裂缝边缘带土壤、作物、微生物变化特征,为开展沉陷区生态减损与自修复提供理论依据。[方法]以神东矿采煤沉陷区作为研究对象,采用野外监测结合室内分析从裂缝产生初始阶段(LFC)至裂缝发育相对稳定阶段(LFW)15 d内,裂缝边缘带土壤、作物、微生物响应特征。[结果]裂缝边缘带表层10 cm深度范围内土壤含水率在裂缝产生3 d后损失殆尽且后期无法恢复,20 cm以下深度的土壤含水率虽受影响,但并不显著。沉陷区裂缝对土壤理化指标及酶活性产生了扰动影响,但并不显著。沉陷区裂缝发育对边缘带土壤微生物造成了扰动影响,使得土壤微生物群落均匀度、相对丰度降低,细菌相对丰度大于1%的优势菌门少了装甲菌门(Armatimonadetes)、和厚壁菌门(Firmicutes); 真菌相对丰度大于1%的优势菌门少了芽枝霉门(Blastocladiomycota)。RDA分析表明,土壤T,OM,AK,AP,pH,AN是驱动土壤微生物群落结构变化的核心因子。Pearson相关性分析表明裂缝边缘带作物遭受土壤水分和温度胁迫显著,体内可溶性糖SS、超氧化物歧化酶SOD、可溶性蛋白SP、丙二醛MAD含量上升,且受胁迫程度为:玉米>卷心菜>土豆。[结论]沉陷区裂缝发育是推动裂缝边缘带土壤环境因子、微生物群落及作物产生联动响应的源动力。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]The response characteristics of soil, crops and microorganisms at the fracture zone of the subsidence area was studied in order to provide a theoretical basis for ecological damage reduction and self-repair in the subsidence area. [Methods] The coal mining subsidence area of Shendong was taken as the research site, the response characteristics of soil, crops and microorganisms at the fracture edge of the subsidence area within 15 days from LFC to LFW were studied by using field monitoring and indoor analysis.[Results] The surface soil moisture content within the depth of 10 cm was completely lost and could not be recovered after 3 days of subsidence and fracture generation, soil moisture was also affected within the depth of 20 cm, but not significantly. The development of fracture in the subsidence area had a disturbing effect on soil physicochemial indexes and enzyme activities, but it was not significant. The development of fracture in the subsidence area caused disturbance to soil microorganisms, which reduced the uniformity and relative abundance of soil microbial communities,the dominant phyla of bacteria with a relative abundance greater than 1% were lacked of Armatimonadetes and Firmicutes,the dominant phyla of fungi with a relative abundance greater than 1% was lacked of Blastocladiomycota. RDA analysis showed that soil T, OM, AK, AP, pH, and AN were the critical factors driving the changes of soil microbial community structure. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the crops at the fracture edge of the subsidence area were significantly stressed by soil water and temperature, and the contents of SS, SOD, SP and MAD in the crops increased significantly, and the stress degree was corn>cabbage>potato. [Conclusion] Fracture development in the area of the subsidence is the source driver of the linkage response of soil environmental factors, microbial communities and crops in the fracture margin zone.
参考文献/References:
[1] 党晓宏,刘阳,蒙仲举,等.风沙采煤沉陷区地表生物结皮土壤碳排放对水热因子变化的响应[J].煤炭学报,2021,46(5):1498-1507.
[2] 王强民,董书宁,王皓,等.西部风沙区采煤塌陷地裂缝影响下的土壤水分运移规律及调控方法[J].煤炭学报,2021,46(5):1532-1540.
[3] 骆占斌.黄土高原矿区采煤扰动后土壤微生物群落结构变化及驱动机制研究[D].江苏徐州:中国矿业大学,2019.
[4] 胡海峰,廉旭刚,蔡音飞,等.山西黄土丘陵采煤沉陷区生态环境破坏与修复研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2020,48(4):70-79.
[5] 聂小军,吕洋,刘昌华,等.土地利用与裂缝对采煤沉陷土壤养分的影响[J].河南理工大学学报:自然科学版,2017,36(3):73-78.
[6] 韩煜,肖能文,赵伟,等.呼伦贝尔草原采煤沉陷对土壤—植物系统的影响及评价[J].环境科学研究,2021,34(3):687-697.
[7] 张静,可文静,刘娟,等.不同深度土壤控水对稻田土壤微生物区系及细菌群落多样性的影响[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2019,27(2):277-285.
[8] 秦朝亮,龙建辉,经明,等.采煤塌陷区内地质灾害与生态环境的综合治理方案[J].煤炭技术,2015,34(3):320-323.
[9] 刘哲荣,燕玲,贺晓,等.采煤沉陷干扰下土壤理化性质的演变:以大柳塔矿采区为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(11):133-138.
[10] 毕银丽,申慧慧.西部采煤沉陷地微生物复垦植被种群自我演变规律[J].煤炭学报,2019,44(1):307-315.
[11] 蔡凌雁,汤国安,熊礼阳,等.基于DEM的陕北黄土高原典型地貌分形特征研究[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(3):141-144.
[12] 安琪琪,乔文英,李维军,等.灌丛化对黄土高原草地植物群落结构和地上生物量的影响[J].西北植物学报,2021,41(4):664-671.
[13] 黄雅茹,董杰,汪季,等.神府东胜煤田沉陷区3种人工林生长状况比较研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(2):115-120.
[14] 冯建雄,常静,李海平,等.外源茉莉酸诱导对油菜防御酶活性和4种物质含量及植株生长的影响[J].植物保护,2021,47(1):128-134.
[15] 高福元,张吉立,刘振平.冬季低温对4种彩叶植物SOD,POD活性影响的研究[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(5):169-173.
[16] 秦立刚,李雪,李韦瑶,等.PEG干旱胁迫对3种葱属植物种子萌发期渗透调节物质及酶活性的影响[J].草地学报,2021,29(1):72-79.
[17] 彭志红,彭克勤,胡家金,等.渗透胁迫下植物脯氨酸积累的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2002,18(4):80-83.
[18] 马静,卢永强,张琦,等.黄土高原采煤沉陷对土壤微生物群落的影响[J].土壤学报,2021,58(5):1278-1288.
[19] 张艳如,李国庆,刘冠,等.陕西省延安市燕沟流域水系分形与地貌侵蚀发育研究[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(2):7-10.
[20] 许传阳,马守臣,张合兵,等.煤矿沉陷区沉陷裂缝对土壤特性和作物生长的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(5):597-604.
[21] 苏贝贝,张英,道日娜.4种豆科植物根际土壤真菌群落特征与土壤理化因子间相关性分析[J].草地学报,2021,29(12):2670-2677.
[22] 王志刚,郭洋楠,毕银丽,等.接种AM真菌对采煤沉陷区复垦植物生长及土壤化学生物性状的影响[J].北方园艺,2016(24):163-170.
[23] Balesdent J, Chenu C, Balabane M. Relationship of soil organic matter dynamics to physical protection and tillage[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2000,53(3/4):215-230.
[24] 宋世杰,张玉玲,王双明,等.陕北煤矿区采动地裂缝对土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].煤炭学报,2021,46(5):1630-1640.
[25] 郭晓明,赵同谦.采煤沉陷区耕地土壤微生物数量及酶活性的空间特征[J].环境工程学报,2010,4(12):2837-2842.
[26] 周伟伟,王雁,杜静.干旱胁迫对景天属植物生理生化特性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2009,22(6):829-834.
相似文献/References:
[1]王 芳,张 宇,梁 静.三江平原土壤湿度变化及其对气象条件的响应[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):172.
WANG Fang,ZHANG Yu,LIANG Jing.Changes of Soil Moisture in Sanjiang Plain and Its Response to Meteorological Condition[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):172.
[2]马志良,顾国军,赵文强,等.青藏高原东缘乔灌交错带地被物和土壤碳氮储量特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):17.
MA Zhiliang,GU Guojun,ZHAO Wenqiang,et al.Carbon and Nitrogen Storage of Ground Covers and Soils in the Forest-Shrub Ecotone of Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):17.
[3]贺 燕,魏 霞,魏 宁,等.祁连山区主要下垫面土壤粒径分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(02):42.
HE Yan,WEI Xia,WEI Ning,et al.Characteristics of Soil Particle Size Distribution of Main Land Surfaces in Qilian Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):42.
[4]刘 敬,刘澄静,角媛梅,等.基于GIS的元阳梯田空间分布及其自然要素分异研究[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(02):337.
LIU Jing,LIU Chengjing,JIAO Yuanmei,et al.Study on the Spatial Distribution Rules and Variation of Natural Factors of Hani Rice Terrace in Yuanyang County Based on GIS Spatial Data[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):337.
[5]于宗民,武桂芝,黄明翔,等.地表水-地下水交互下傍河土壤硝酸盐氮迁移规律试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):67.
Experimental Study on Nitrate Nitrogen Migration in Soils Along the River Under Interaction of Surface Water and Groundwater[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):67.
[6]刘忠玲,刘建明,吕跃东.倭肯河上游两种林型枯落物和土壤持水特性[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):235.
Characteristics of Litter and Soil Water-Holding of Two Types Forest Stand in Upstream of Woken River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):235.
[7]赵 阳,王 飞,齐 瑞,等.白龙江、洮河林区5种典型森林枯落物与土壤层水源涵养效应[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(03):118.
ZHAO Yang,QI Rui,WANG Fei,et al.Water Conservation Effect of Litter and Soil Layer of Five Typical Forests in Bailongjiang and Taohe River Forest of Gansu[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):118.
[8]李晓娜,王 超,万秀云,等.延怀盆地不同土地利用类型土壤风蚀物特征[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(01):14.
LI Xiaona,WANG Chao,WAN Xiuyun,et al.Characteristics of Wind Erosion Dust Under Different Land Uses of Yanhuai Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):14.
[9]李彦杰,蒋梦芸,杨俊年,等.不同修复植被类型的三峡库区消落带土壤细菌群落分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):112.
LI Yanjie,JIANG Mengyun,YANG Junnian,et al.Analysis of Soil Bacterial Communities in Water Level Fluctuating Zone of Three Gorges Reservoir Area with Different Re-vegetation Types[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):112.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-03-24 修回日期:2022-04-21
资助项目:国家自然科学基金基础科学中心项目(72088101); 煤炭开采水资源保护与利用国家重点实验室自主研发资助项目(GJNY-18-77)
第一作者:刘刚(1988—),男,陕西榆林人,工程师,硕士,主要从事矿山生态修复研究。E-mail:kate0048@126.com
通信作者:宋子恒(1989—),男,山东济南人,工程师,博士,主要从事矿山生态修复研究。E-mail:20047004@chnenergy.com.cn