LI Xin,YANG Chaoxian,XIN Guixin,et al.Landscape Ecological Risk Characteristics of Three Gorges Reservoir Area Based on Terrain Gradient[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):156-164.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.019]
基于地形梯度的三峡库区景观生态风险特征
- Title:
- Landscape Ecological Risk Characteristics of Three Gorges Reservoir Area Based on Terrain Gradient
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)02-0156-09
- 分类号:
- F301.2; X171.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 景观生态风险评价可以较好地反映外界压力源对生态系统的负面影响,分析景观生态风险等级在地形梯度上的分布特征,可为三峡库区生态文明建设和人类活动管控提供科学依据。利用Landsat(OLI/ETM+)2000年、2010年、2020年影像数据,采用GIS网格法、克里金插值法构建景观生态风险指数模型,选取高程、坡度、地形位指数,基于地形梯度对三峡库区景观态风险等级特征进行了研究。结果表明:(1)三峡库区景观生态风险等级分布呈现较强的空间分异特征,各景观生态风险等级面积呈现动态变化。整个研究期间,低风险区、中风险区、高风险区面积增加,较低风险区和较高风险区面积减少。(2)景观格局发生改变的区域优势分布集中在地形位指数小于1.24的区域。景观生态风险等级变化类型以稳定型为主,其次是前期变化型、后期变化型、反复变化型、持续变化型,在前期和后期景观生态风险等级转化分别呈现为“较高—高—高”“较高—较高—中”型的转换特征。(3)景观生态风险等级地形梯度特征表现为库区上游的低风险区向地形位指数大于0.62的区域扩散较多,较低风险区的分布向地形位指数小于1.03的区域集中,库区中下游的较高风险区则主要向高风险区和中风险区转化,向高风险区转化的区域集中在地形位指数大于1.03的区域,向中风险区转的区域则集中在地形位指数小于1.03的区域。整体来看,三峡库区的景观生态风险值升高,整体生态环境承受较大压力,景观格局的改变集中在前期以及地形位指数小于1.24的区域。
- Abstract:
- Landscape ecological risk assessment can better reflect the negative impact of external stressors on the ecosystem, and analyze the distribution characteristics of landscape ecological risk levels on the terrain gradient, which can provide scientific basis for ecological civilization construction and human activities control in the Three Gorges reservoir area. Based on Landsat(OLI/ETM+)image data in 2000, 2010 and 2020, the landscape ecological risk index model was built by using GIS grid method and Kriging interpolation method, and the characteristics of landscape risk grade in Three Gorges reservoir area were studied by selecting elevation, slope and topographic index. The results show that:(1)the distribution of landscape ecological risk grades in the Three Gorges reservoir area showed strong spatial differentiation characteristics, and the area of each landscape ecological risk grade showed dynamic changes; during the whole study period, the areas with low-risk, medium-risk and high-risk increased, while the areas of lower-risk and higher-risk areas decreased;(2)the areas where the landscape pattern changed concentrated in areas where the topographic index was less than 1.24; the change type of landscape ecological risk level was mainly stable, followed by early change type, late change type, repeated change type and continuous change type; in the early and late stage, the transformation of landscape ecological risk level was characterized by ‘high-high-high' and ‘high-high-medium', respectively;(3)the characteristics of landscape ecological risk grade terrain gradient showed that the low-risk areas in the upper reaches of the reservoir area spread more to areas with topographic index greater than 0.62, and the distribution of low-risk areas concentrated in areas with topographic index greater than 1.03, while the higher-risk areas in the middle and lower reaches of the reservoir area mainly transformed into high-risk areas and medium-risk areas, with the areas transformed into high-risk areas concentrated in areas with topographic index less than 1.03 and those transformed into medium-risk areas concentrated in areas with topographic index less than 1.03. On the whole, the risk value of landscape ecology in the Three Gorges Reservoir area has increased, and the overall ecological environment has been under great pressure. The changes of landscape pattern concentrated in the early stage and the areas with topographic index less than 1.24.
参考文献/References:
[1] 张月,张飞,周梅,等.干旱区内陆艾比湖区域景观生态风险评价及时空分异[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(1):233-242.
[2] Peng J, Pan Y, Liu Y, et al. Linking ecological degradation risk to identify ecological security patterns in a rapidly urbanizing landscape[J]. Habitat International, 2018,71:110-124.
[3] 熊鹰,汪敏,袁海平,等.洞庭湖区景观生态风险评价及其时空演化[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(7):1292-1301.
[4] 巩杰,谢余初,赵彩霞,等.甘肃白龙江流域景观生态风险评价及其时空分异[J].中国环境科学,2014,34(8):2153-2160.
[5] 于海洋,张飞,曹雷,等.基于乡镇尺度的土地生态安全时空格局评价研究:以博尔塔拉蒙古自治州为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(19):6355-6369.
[6] 康紫薇,张正勇,位宏,等.基于土地利用变化的玛纳斯河流域景观生态风险评价[J].生态学报,2020,40(18):6472-6485.
[7] 王燕,刘彦斌,赵红雪,等.宁夏沙湖水质评价及水污染特征[J].湿地科学,2020,18(3):362-367.
[8] 韩善红,王超,刘晓鹏,等.连云港市水稻产区土壤重金属分布特征及污染评价[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2021,46(8):74-78.
[9] 贾佳瑜,刘小芳,赵勇钢,等.汾河流域下游农田土壤重金属空间分布特征与污染评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(8):132-137.
[10] 高彬嫔,李琛,吴映梅,等.川滇生态屏障区景观生态风险评价及影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(5):1603-1613.
[11] 杨庚,张振佳,曹银贵,等.晋北大型露天矿区景观生态风险时空异质性[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(1):187-198.
[12] 杨斌,王占岐,姚小薇,等.鄂西北山区土地利用的地形梯度效应与空间结构特征[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(2):313-321.
[13] 张平,陆龙妹,王世航,等.基于地形梯度的皖南地区土地利用分布特征[J].土壤,2018,50(5):1041-1045.
[14] 程辉.不同土地利用方式对三峡库区消落带库湾生态系统的影响研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2017.
[15] 李桂媛.三峡库区城镇空间多维耦合关系研究[D].武汉:武汉大学,2015.
[16] 李辉,张晓媛,国洪磊.基于土地利用的三峡库区近30年生态系统服务价值时空变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):309-318.
[17] 邹欣怡,赵伟,蒲海霞.三峡库区重庆段土地利用转型及生态服务功能价值时空分异特征[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):267-275.
[18] 龚熊波,杨波,刘雨先,等.湘西州山区土地利用类型的地形梯度效应与景观格局分析[J].生态科学,2020,39(4):137-144.
[19] 王敏,吴映梅,胡平平.地形梯度视域下的云南山区土地利用时空格局变化研究[J].江西农业学报,2020,32(4):123-131.
[20] 王权,李阳兵,刘亚香,等.基于地形梯度的岩溶槽谷区土地利用空间格局分析[J].生态学报,2019,39(21):7866-7880.
[21] 崔闪闪,刘庆,王静.滨海开发带景观格局指数的尺度效应及对土地利用变化的响应:以江苏省大丰市为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2016,32(6):87-93.
[22] 赵兵,赵鹏蕾,韦薇.花桥典型地块景观格局及植被群落结构指数评价与制图研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(8):1169-1179.
[23] 阳华.三峡库区生态系统服务价值与经济发展的重心演变特征及耦合研究[D].重庆:重庆工商大学,2021.
[24] 梁彦庆,官洋溢,黄志英,等.京津冀土地绿色利用与经济增长耦合协调的时空异质性研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(12):1522-1531.
[25] 邵明超,宋宏利,尚明,等.多源土地覆被数据类别一致性及景观格局差异性:以京津冀区域为例[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(11):3881-3889.
相似文献/References:
[1]孙丽娜,宋戈.松嫩高平原黑土区土地利用/覆被变化及其景观生态风险分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):148.
SUN Li-na,SONG Ge.Land Use/Cover Change and Its Landscape Ecological Risk Analysis in the Black Soil Region of Songnen High Plain——A Case Study of Bayan County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):148.
[2]田颖,李冰,王水.江苏沿海地区景观格局的生态风险研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):241.
TIAN Ying,LI Bing,WANG Shui.Study on Landscape Ecological Risk of the Coastal Areas of Jiangsu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(02):241.
[3]谢刚,谢元贵,廖小锋,等.基于水土流失敏感性的岩溶地区景观生态风险评价——以黔南州为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):298.
XIE Gang,XIE Yuangui,LIAO Xiaofeng,et al.Ecological Risk Assessment Based on Soil and Water Loss in Karst Area—A Case Study of Qiannan Prefecture[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):298.
[4]刘迪,陈海,张敏,等.生态脆弱区景观生态风险时空分异及其地形梯度分析——以陕西省米脂县为例[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(04):239.
LIU Di,CHEN Hai,ZHANG Min,et al.Analysis of Spatial-temporal Distribution of Landscape Ecological Risk in Ecologically Vulnerable Areas and Its Terrain Gradient—A Case Study of Mizhi County of Shaanxi Province.[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(02):239.
[5]李小燕,柳书俊,王志杰.南水北调中线汉中市水源地景观生态风险评价与特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(05):181.
LI Xiaoyan,LIU Shujun,WANG Zhijie.Landscape Ecological Risk Characteristics of Water Source Site in Hanzhong City of the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project of China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(02):181.
[6]郑金涛,彭 涛,董晓华,等.三峡库区气象干旱演变特征及致灾因子危险性评价[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):213.
ZHENG Jintao,PENG Tao,DONG Xiaohua,et al.Evolution Characteristics of Meteorological Drought and Assessment of Risk of Disaster Factors in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):213.
[7]官冬杰,孙灵丽,周李磊.三峡库区生态系统服务与农户生计耦合模型构建及应用[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(06):269.
GUAN Dongjie,SUN Lingli,ZHOU Lilei.Construction and Application of Coupling Model of Ecosystem Service and Farmers' Livelihood in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):269.
[8]庞 敏,周启刚,马泽忠,等.三峡库区蓄水前后土地利用与经济发展协调度[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):66.
PANG Min,ZHOU Qigang,MA Zezhong,et al.Coordination Degree of Land Use and Economic Development Before and After Storing Water in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):66.
[9]高 斌,肖伟华,鲁 帆,等.基于GAMLSS模型的三峡库区主汛期降雨非一致性分析[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):152.
GAO Bin,XIAO Weihua,LU Fan,et al.Analysis of Rainfall Non-stationary in the Main Flood Season in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area Based on GAMLSS Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):152.
[10]刘栩位,周启刚,周 浪,等.基于RSEI的三峡库区重庆段水土保持生态功能区生态环境质量动态监测[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):278.
LIU Xuwei,ZHOU Qigang,ZHOU Lang,et al.RSEI-Based Dynamic Monitoring of Ecological Quality of the Soil and Water Conservation Functional Area in the Chongqing Section of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):278.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-12-07 修回日期:2021-12-30
资助项目:国家自然科学基金“土地综合整治驱动下乡村要素融合机理与空间重构效应评价”(42171257)
第一作者:李鑫(1998—),男,四川泸州人,硕士,研究方向为土地利用规划。E-mail:2245264387@qq.com
通信作者:杨朝现(1971—),男,四川安岳人,博士,副教授,主要从事土地利用规划和国土整治研究。E-mail:yangcx@swu.edu.cn