LI Pengfei,ZHANG Xiaochen,DANG Xu,et al.Investigation of Erosion Processes on the Slope-Gully System Using 3D Laser Scanning[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):13-21.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.050]
基于三维激光扫描的坡沟系统侵蚀产沙过程研究
- Title:
- Investigation of Erosion Processes on the Slope-Gully System Using 3D Laser Scanning
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)02-0013-09
- Keywords:
- soil erosion; 3D laser scanning; spatiotemporal pattern; slope-gully system; Loess Plateau
- 分类号:
- P237
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了探究野外自然坡沟系统土壤侵蚀过程,研究于黄土丘陵沟壑区典型流域辛店沟内自然坡面开展5场放水冲刷试验,利用地面三维激光扫描技术(Terrestrial laser scanning,TLS)获取高精度地形信息,并采用DEM of difference(DoD)地形变化监测方法计算产沙量,利用实测产沙量评估TLS的监测精度,并探讨了坡沟系统侵蚀/沉积的变化特征。结果表明:(1)累积场次中,DoD不确定性(即level of detection,LoD)平均值(范围)为16.5 mm(16.2～16.8 mm)。单场次中,LoD值平均值为16.4 mm(16.2 ～16.6 mm);(2)累积场次中,梁峁坡、沟谷坡、坡沟系统TLS扫描所得产沙量相对误差的平均值(范围)为52.63%(26.06%～106.98%),56.68%(30.26%～75.49%)和56.28%(33.37%～73.28%),与实测数据显著相关(R2>0.9,p<0.05)。单场次TLS扫描相对误差波动范围更大且平均值高于累积场次,其值分别为83.70%(4.08%～190.40%),91.41%(0.95%～225.09%)和87.58%(4.09%～215.55%),与实测值非显著相关(R2<0.57,p>0.05),表明TLS更适合于坡沟系统累积场次侵蚀产沙监测,而单场次监测精度较差;(3)随冲刷次数的增加,梁峁坡、沟谷坡和坡沟系统侵蚀产沙均呈增长趋势,但沟谷坡和坡沟系统沉积量快速增长后趋于平稳。(4)梁峁坡侵蚀区域主要位于梁峁坡上中部,沉积主要分布于梁峁坡中下方,沟谷坡大部分区域侵蚀剧烈,沉积主要分布于沟底,梁峁坡和沟谷坡侵蚀区占地形变化区域的比例均高于79%。结果可为黄土高原土壤侵蚀监测与机理研究提供参考。
- Abstract:
- In order to explore the soil erosion process of in-situ slope-gully systems, five runoff scouring experiments were undertaken on a slope-gully system plot established on a natural slope of a small catchment(i.e. Xindiangou Catchment)in the hilly-gully region of Loess Plateau, while the terrestrial laser scanning(TLS)was employed to acquire the ultra-high resolution terrain information of the slope-gully system. The digital elevation model(DEM)of difference(DoD)algorithm was used to derive the sediment yield of the plot. The accuracy of the derived sediment yield was then assessed by using the measured sediment yield. The spatial pattern of erosion-deposition within the slope-gully system was also investigated based on the DoD results. The results showed that:(1)DoD uncertainty(i. e. level of detection, LoD)ranged between 16.2 mm and 16.8 mm(average value is 16.5 mm)for a cumulative erosion monitoring, while LoD ranged between 16.2 mm and 16.6 mm with an average value of 16.4 mm for the consecutive erosion monitoring;(2)TLS-derived and measured cumulative sediment yields were highly correlated(R2>0.9, p<0.05), and the mean(minimum-maximum)relative errors of TLS-derived values for the hillslope, the gully slope and the whole of the slope-gully system were found to be 52.63%(26.06%～106.98%), 56.68%(30.26%～75.49%)and 56.28%(33.37%～73.28%), respectively; no significant relation(R2<0.57, p>0.05)was found between TLS-derived and measured consecutive sediment yield, and the mean(minimum-maximum)relative errors of TLS-derived values were 83.70%(4.08%～190.40%), 91.41%(0.95%～225.09%)and 87.58%(4.09%～215.55%), which demonstrated that TLS was more suitable for a monitoring of cumulative sediment yield rather than consecutive sediment yield in the slope-gully system;(3)the amounts of erosion and sediment yield on hillslope, gully slope and slope-gully system increased with the progress of runoff scouring, while depositions on gully slope and the whole of the slope-gully system stabilized after a rapid increase in the first experiments;(4)on the hillslope, erosion mainly occurred on the upper and middle parts while deposition primarily occurred on the lower part; intensive erosion was found on most area of the gully slope, while the deposition was mainly found on the bottom of the gully. The area with erosion accounted for over 79% of the area with topographic changes. These results can provide the useful reference for erosion monitoring and erosion process studies on the Chinese Loess Plateau.
参考文献/References:
[1] 张素,熊东红,吴汉,等.基于RUSLE模型的孙水河流域土壤侵蚀空间分异特征[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):24-30.
[2] Li P F, Mu X M, Joseph H, et al. Comparison of soil erosion models used to study the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2017,170:17-30.
[3] Zhao G J, Gao P, Tian P, et al. Assessing sediment connectivity and soil erosion by water in a representative catchment on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena, 2020,185:104284.
[4] Wang H, Wang J, Zhang G H. Impact of landscape positions on soil erodibility indices in typical vegetation-restored slope-gully systems on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Catena, 2021,201:105235.
[5] 苏远逸,李鹏,李占斌,等.坡面植被格局对坡沟系统能量调控及水沙响应关系的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):32-39.
[6] 王承书,高峰,孙文义,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区坡沟系统不同降雨类型的土壤入渗特征[J].生态学报,2021,41(8):3111-3122.
[7] Li P F, Hao M K, HU J F, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of hillslope erosion investigated based on field scouring experiments and terrestrial laser scanning[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021,13(9):1674.
[8] 张凯,王瑄,周丽丽,等.径流冲刷条件下冻融坡面产沙时空分布[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):139-144.
[9] Bryan R B. Soil erodibility and processes of water erosion on hillslope[J]. Geomorphology, 2000,32(3):385-415.
[10] Rejman J, Brodowski R. Rill characteristics and sediment transport as a function of slope length during a storm event on loess soil[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2005,30(2):231-239.
[11] Miernecki M, Wigneron J P, Lopez-baeza E, et al. Comparison of SMOS and SMAP soil moisture retrieval approaches using tower-based radiometer data over a vineyard field[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014,154:89-101.
[12] 韩鹏,倪晋仁,李天宏.细沟发育过程中的溯源侵蚀与沟壁崩塌[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2002,10(2):115-125.
[13] Wells R R, Momm H G, Rigby J R, et al. An empirical investigation of gully widening rates in upland concentrated flows[J]. Catena, 2013,101:114-121.
[14] James L A, Watson D G, Hansen W F. Using LiDAR data to map gullies and headwater streams under forest canopy: South Carolina, USA[J]. Catena, 2007,71(1):132-144.
[15] 肖海,夏振尧,朱晓军,等.三维激光扫描仪在坡面土壤侵蚀研究中的应用[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(3):198-200.
[16] 游智敏,伍永秋,刘宝元.利用GPS进行切沟侵蚀监测研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(5):91-94.
[17] 胡刚,伍永秋,刘宝元,等.GPS和GIS进行短期沟蚀研究初探:以东北漫川漫岗黑土区为例[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(4):16-19,41.
[18] Chico G, Clutterbuck B, Midgley N, et al. Application of terrestrial laser scanning to quantify surface changes in restored and degraded blanket bogs[J]. Mires and Peat, 2019,24(14),1-24.
[19] 郑粉莉,徐锡蒙,覃超.沟蚀过程研究进展[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(8):48-59,116.
[20] Passalacqua P, Belmont P, Staley D M, et al. Analyzing high resolution topography for advancing the understanding of mass and energy transfer through landscapes:A review[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2015,148:174-193.
[21] 霍云云,吴淑芳,冯浩,等.基于三维激光扫描仪的坡面细沟侵蚀动态过程研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(2):32-37,46.
[22] 赵龙山,侯瑞,吴发启.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀研究进展与展望[J].中国水土保持,2017(9):47-51,67.
[23] 刘希林,张大林.基于三维激光扫描的崩岗侵蚀的时空分析[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(4):204-211.
[24] 谢谟文,胡嫚,杜岩,等. TLS技术及其在滑坡监测中的应用进展[J].国土资源遥感,2014,26(3):8-15.
[25] 朱建东,吴礼舟,李绍红,等.2种雨型的黄土坡面侵蚀室内试验[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):92-98.
[26] 付金霞,王静,张宝利,等.砒砂岩原状坡面不同季节复合侵蚀动力的贡献研究[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(11):66-73.
[27] 党维勤,党恬敏.辛店沟水土保持科技示范园景观资源及其美学意境分析[C]//2015海峡两岸水土保持学术研讨会论文集(上),中国山西太原,2015.
[28] 王伟,李志能,李鹏,等.连续极端暴雨事件下小流域侵蚀泥沙流失规律研究[J].西安理工大学学报,2020,36(3):286-293.
[29] 杨帆,潘成忠.黄土丘陵沟壑区多年生草地的保水固土效益[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(2):300-306.
[30] Sun W, Shao Q, Liu J, et al. Assessing the effects of land use and topography on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau in China[J]. Catena, 2014,121:151-163.
[31] Gong J G, Jia Y W, Zhou Z H, et al. An experimental study on dynamic processes of ephemeral gully erosion in loess landscapes[J]. Geomorphology, 2011,125(1):203-213.
[32] Girardeau-Montaut D, Roux M, Marc R, et al. Change detection on points cloud data acquired with a ground laser scanner[C]//International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Germany, 2005.
[33] Barnhart T, Crosby B. Comparing two methods of surface change detection on an evolving thermokarst using high-temporal-frequency terrestrial laser scanning, Selawik River, Alaska[J]. Remote Sensing, 2013,5(6):2813-2837.
[34] Lague D, Brodu N, Leroux J. Accurate 3 D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner:Application to the Rangitikei canyon(N-Z)[J]. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2013,82:10-26.
[35] Wheaton J M, Brasington J, Darby S E, et al. Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys:improved sediment budgets[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2010,35(2):136-156.
[36] Nourbakhshbeidokhti S, Kinoshita A, Chin A, et al. A Workflow to estimate topographic and volumetric changes and errors in channel sedimentation after disturbance[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019,11(5):586.
[37] Milan D J, Heritage G, Hetherington D. Application of a 3 D laser scanner in the assessment of erosion and deposition volumes and channel change in a proglacial river[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2007,32(11):1657-1674.
[38] Milan D J, Heritage G, Large A R G, et al. Filtering spatial error from DEMs: Implications for morphological change estimation[J]. Geomorphology, 2011,125(1):160-171.
[39] Lane S, Westaway R M, Hicks M. Estimation of erosion and deposition volumes in a large, gravel-bed, braided river using synoptic remote sensing[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2003,28(3):249-271.
[40] Collins B D, Corbett S C, Fairley H C, et al. Topographic change detection at select archeological sites in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, 2007—2010[R]. U. S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, 2012.
[41] Cavalli M, Goldin B, Comiti F, et al. Assessment of erosion and deposition in steep mountain basins by differencing sequential digital terrain models[J]. Geomorphology, 2017,291:4-16.
[42] Lane S, Westaway R M, Hicks M. Estimation of erosion and deposition volumes in a large, gravel-bed, braided river using synoptic remote sensing[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2003,28(3):249-271.
[43] Wheaton J M, Brasington J, Darby S E, et al. Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys:improved sediment budgets[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2009,35(2):136-156.
[44] Rengers F K, Tucker G E, Moody J A, et al. Illuminating wildfire erosion and deposition patterns with repeat terrestrial lidar[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface, 2016,121(3):588-608.
[45] 朱建东,吴礼舟,李绍红,等.2种雨型的黄土坡面侵蚀室内试验[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):92-98.
[46] Winiwarter L, Anders K, Höfle B. M3 C2-EP:Pushing the limits of 3D topographic point cloud change detection by error propagation[J]. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2021,178:240-258.
[47] Abellán A, Jaboyedoff M, Oppikofer T, et al. Detection of millimetric deformation using a terrestrial laser scanner: Experiment and application to a rockfall event[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2009,9(2):365-372.
[48] 王玲玲,姚文艺,王文龙,等.黄丘区坡沟系统不同时间尺度下的侵蚀产沙特征[J].水利学报,2013,44(11):1347-1351.
[49] Li M, Yao W Y, Ding W F, et al. Effect of grass coverage on sediment yield in the hillslope-gully side erosion system[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2009,19(3):321-330.
[50] 杨春霞,李莉,王佳欣,等.坡沟系统侵蚀时空分布特征试验研究[J].人民黄河,2017,39(1):95-97.
[51] 丁文峰,李勉,张平仓,等.坡沟系统侵蚀产沙特征模拟试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(3):10-14.
[52] 张光辉.切沟侵蚀研究进展与展望[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):1-13.
[53] Allen P M, Arnold J, Auguste L, et al. Application of a simple headcut advance model for gullys[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2017,43(7):202-217.
相似文献/References:
[1]罗婷,王文龙,李宏伟,等.开发建设中扰动地面新增水土流失研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):30.
LUO Ting,LI Hong-wei,BAI Yun.Study on the Newly Occurred Soil and Water Loss on the Disturbed Lands in the Site of Development and Construction[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):30.
[2]王斌科,唐克丽.子午岭林区的植被破坏与侵蚀产沙特点[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):68.
Wang Binke,Tang Keli.Characteristics of Vegetation Destruction by Human Beingand Soil Erosion and Yield Sediment in Ziwuling Forest Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(02):68.
[3]吴普特,刘普灵,武春龙,等.坡面侵蚀垂直分布特征动态变化过程初步研究[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(02):41.
Wu Pute,Liu Puling,Wu Chuniong,et al.Study on the Changeable Process of Soil Erosion Spatial Distribution Characteristics on the Slope Surface[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(02):41.
[4]余新晓,秦永胜.森林植被对坡地不同空间尺度侵蚀产沙影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(04):66.
YU Xin-xiao,QIN Yong-sheng.Effect of Forest Cover on Sediment Yield Produced by Erosion in Different Spatial Scales[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(02):66.
[5]田磊,戴静,祁永刚.流域侵蚀产沙模型述评[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):77.
TIAN Lei,DAI Jing,QI Yong-gang.Comment on Model of Erosion and Sediment Production in Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(02):77.
[6]刘前进,蔡强国,刘纪根.不同空间尺度上侵蚀产沙模型研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(02):69.
LIU Qian-jin,CAI Qiang-guo,LIU Ji-gen.Study of Soil Erosion Modeling in Different Spatial Scales[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(02):69.
[7]王占礼,黄新会,牛振华.国内主要流域侵蚀产沙模型评述[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(04):28.
WANG Zhan-li,HUANG Xin-hui,NIU Zhen-hua.Review of Models of Soil Erosion and Sediment Yield in Catchment in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(02):28.
[8]肖培青,郑粉莉,姚文艺.坡沟产沙关系及其侵蚀机理研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(04):101.
XIAO Pei-qing,ZHENG Fen-li,YAO Wen-yi.Research Progress on Relationship of Sediment Yield and Erosion Mechanism Between Hill Slope and Gully Slope System[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(02):101.
[9]陆中臣,陈劭锋,陈浩.黄土高原侵蚀产沙的地貌临界[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(01):1.
LU Zhong-chen,CHEN Shao-feng,CHEN Hao.The Geomorphic Thresholds of Erosional Sediment in the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):1.
[10]陈劭锋,陆中臣.黄土高原多沙粗沙区侵蚀产沙的临界问题[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(03):206.
CHEN Shao-feng,LU Zhong-chen.Thresholds of the Erosion Sediment Yield in the Area with Abundant and Coarse Sediment of the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(02):206.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-04-06 修回日期:2022-05-03
资助项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41977059; 41807063); 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2022JQ-259)
第一作者:李朋飞(1986—),男,陕西渭南人,博士,副教授,主要从事地貌遥感与水土保持研究。E-mail:pengfeili@xust.edu.cn
通信作者:胡晋飞(1992—),男,山西运城人,博士,讲师,研究方向为地貌遥感与水土保持研究。E-mail:jinfeih@163.com