YANG Lu,DU Feng,QIN Jingjing,et al.Research on Shear Strengths of Root-Soil Complexes of Three Dominant Shrubs in Loess Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(01):295-300+310.
黄土区3种优势灌木根土复合体的抗剪强度研究
- Title:
- Research on Shear Strengths of Root-Soil Complexes of Three Dominant Shrubs in Loess Region
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2022)01-0295-06
- Keywords:
- shrub; root system; tensile strength; root-soil complex; shear strength
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 黄土区水土流失严重,生态护坡是比较推崇的防护手段,特别是灌木具有发达的根系,对含根土体有较为明显的抗剪增强作用,因此,比较自然条件下区域适生优势灌木的根土复合体抗剪强度,对于合理选择固土护坡植物具有重要意义。以黄土区常见的优势乡土灌木达乌里胡枝子(Lespedeza davurica)、中国沙棘(Hippophae rhamnoides)和狼牙刺(Sophora viciifolia)为研究对象,野外采用三维土柱挖取灌木的根系,进行不同直径单根抗拉试验和根土复合体的剪切试验。结果表明:(1)达乌里胡枝子、沙棘和狼牙刺的根系集中分布于0—40 cm土层中,它们的根长密度、根表面积密度和生物量密度随着土层深度的增加表现出整体递减的趋势。(2)达乌里胡枝子、沙棘和狼牙刺根系的抗拉力(Tensile Resistance,TR)与抗拉强度(Tensile Strength,TS)都表现为关于直径(D)的幂函数(aDb),其中抗拉力与根径呈正相关(b>1),而抗拉强度与根径呈负相关(b<1)。(3)不同灌木根土复合体的抗剪强度在地下分布是不同的,在根际范围内随土层加深,达乌里胡枝子根土复合体的抗剪强度表现出先增加后减少而后增加又减少的趋势,最大抗剪强度的土层是20—30 cm和50—70 cm,沙棘和狼牙刺根土复合体的抗剪强度表现出先增加后减少的趋势,最大抗剪强度的土层分别是30—50 cm,0—20 cm。说明灌木的细根可以更好地起到固土护坡的作用,建议在黄土区优先选择达乌里胡枝子和沙棘作为护坡植物,从而为生态护坡提供一些参考。
- Abstract:
- Soil erosion in the loess region is serious. Ecological slope protection is a more respected protection method. In particular, shrubs have a developed root system and have obvious shear resistance enhancement to the soil with roots. Therefore, comparing the shear strengths of the root-soil complexes of the regionally suitable dominant shrubs under natural conditions is of great significance for the rational selection of soil-fixing and slope-protecting plants. We took three dominant native shrubs in Loess Region, Lespedeza dahurica, Hippophae rhamnoides and Sophora viciifolia as the research samples, tensile test of single roots with different diameters and shearing test of root-soil columns were conducted. The results showed that:(1)the root systems of Lespedeza dahurica, Hippophae rhamnoides and Sophora viciifolia mainly distributed in the 0—40 cm soil layer; their root length densities, root surface area densities and biomass densities showed overall decrease with the increase of soil depth;(2)the tensile resistances(TR)and tensile strengths(TS)of Lespedeza dahurica, Hippophae rhamnoides and Sophora viciifolia had the power function(aDb)relations with the diameters(D), the tensile strength was positively correlated with the diameter(b>1), while the tensile strength was negatively correlated with the diameter(b<1);(3)the shear strengths of different shrubs root-soil complexes were different in the underground distribution; in the rhizosphere, the shear strength of Lespedeza dahurica root-soil complex showed a trend of first increasing, then decreasing, then increasing and decreasing with the increase of soil layer; the maximum shear strength was found in 20—30 cm and 50—70 cm soil layers; the shear strengths of root-soil complexes of Hippophae rhamnoides and Sophora viciifolia showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing, the maximum shear strength was found in 30—50 cm and 0—20 cm soil layers, respectively. It can be seen that the fine roots of shrubs can better play the roles in soil consolidation and slope protection. It is suggested that Lespedeza davurica and Hippophae rhamnoides should be preferentially selected as slope protection plants in the loess area, so as to provide some references for ecological slope protection.
参考文献/References:
[1] 梁亚红.黄土山区公路滑坡稳定性分析与防治研究[J].建材与装饰,2020(12):238-239.[2] 张家明,陈积普,杨继清,等.中国岩质边坡植被护坡技术研究进展[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):1-7.[3] 赵东晓,蔡建勤,土小宁,等.黄土高原水土保持植被建设问题及建议[J].中国水土保持,2020(5):7-9.[4] Jiao Z, Wang D, Xie H, et al. Experimental analysis of shear strength of undisturbed soil in leucaena forest in Jiangjia Ravine, Yunnan, China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2010,7(4):386-395.[5] 唐娴.公路边坡植物防护的水土保持机理[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(5):64-65.[6] 曹波,曹志东,王黎明,等.植物根系固土作用研究进展[J].水土保持应用技术,2009(1):26-28.[7] 周云艳,陈建平,王晓梅.植物根系固土护坡机理的研究进展及展望[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(6):1171-1177.[8] 王剑敏,沈烈英,赵广琦.中亚热带优势灌木根系对土壤抗剪切力的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2011,35(2):47-50.[9] Ali F H, Osman N. Shear strength of a soil containing vegetation roots[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2008,48(4):587-596.[10] Pollen N. Temporal and spatial variability in root reinforcement of streambanks:Accounting for soil shear strength and moisture[J]. Catena, 2007,69(3):197-205.[11] 李佳,汪霞,贾海霞,等.浅层滑坡多发区典型灌木根系对边坡土体抗剪强度的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(14):5117-5126.[12] 赵玉娇,胡夏嵩,李华坦,等.寒旱环境灌木根系增强边坡土体抗剪强度特征[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(11):174-180.[13] 张晓明,王玉杰,夏一平,等.重庆缙云山典型植被原状土与重塑土抗剪强度研究[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(11):6-9.[14] 王月,杜峰,周敏,等.陕北林草混交根土复合体抗剪强度研究[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(2):213-219.[15] 李建兴,何丙辉,谌芸,等.不同护坡草本植物的根系分布特征及其对土壤抗剪强度的影响[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(10):144-152.[16] 史敏华,王棣,李任敏.石灰岩区主要水保灌木根系分布特征与根抗拉力研究初报[J].山西林业科技,1994(1):17-19.[17] 赵倩,伍红燕,宋桂龙,等.胡枝子和荆条不同植物配置的根系垂直空间分布特征[J].草业科学,2019,36(9):2183-2192.[18] 潘天辉,杜峰,王月.陕北黄土区护坡植物根系分布和抗剪增强分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(3):357-363,371.[19] 周萍,文安邦,严冬春,等.三峡库区紫色土坡耕地草本地埂植物根系分布及抗拉力学特征[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(3):1-6.[20] 薛杨,赵洋毅,王克勤,等.磨盘山典型灌草根系抗拉力学特性及其影响因素研究[J].西南林业大学学报:自然科学,2019,39(2):99-107.[21] 冯国建,沈凡,王世通.护坡植物根系分布特征及抗拉强度研究[J].重庆师范大学学报:自然科学版,2013,30(2):115-118.[22] 徐洪雨,王英宇,宋桂龙,等.华北土石山区公路边坡常见植物根系地下分布特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(2):51-58.[23] 朱海丽,胡夏嵩,毛小青,等.青藏高原黄土区护坡灌木植物根系力学特性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(增2):3445-3452.[24] 刘秀萍,陈丽华,宋维峰.林木根系与黄土复合体的抗剪强度试验研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(5):67-72.[25] 周霞,魏杨,李东嵘,等.黄土区紫花苜蓿根系对土体抗剪性能的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(2):53-59.[26] 赵岩,周文渊,孙保平,等.毛乌素沙地3种荒漠灌木根系分布特征与土壤水分研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):129-133.
相似文献/References:
[1]付明胜,高登宽,马小哲,等.山坡地林草植被配置模式研究[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(04):93.
Fu Mngsheng,Gao Dengkuan,Ma Xiaozhe,et al.The Deposition Model of Grass and Forest in Slope Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(01):93.
[2]林萍,刘世忠,苏现平,等.山丘区灌木保持水土及综合开发效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(03):12.
LIN Ping,LIU Shi-zhong,SU Xian-ping,et al.Water and Soil Conservation of Shrubs and Its Exploiting Benefits on the Hilly Lands[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(01):12.
[3]杨志荣,王明刚,王炳文,等.灌木径流小区试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(03):28.
YANG Zhi-rong,WANG Ming-gang,WANG Bing-wen,et al.Experimental Research on Shrub Runoff-plot[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(01):28.
[4]张健,刘国彬,许明祥,等.黄土丘陵区植被次生演替灌木初期土壤物理性质特征[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(04):101.
ZHANG Jian,LIU Guo-bin,XU Ming-xiang,et al.Soil Physical Properties of Vegetation Secondary Succession on Early Shrub Stage in Loess Hill Gully[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(01):101.
[5]刘芳,黄雅茹,陈海玲,等.内蒙古乌兰布和沙漠主要灌木光合日变化特征比较研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):155.
LIU Fang,HUANG Yaru,CHEN Hailing,et al.Comparative Study on Diurnal Variation Characteristics of Photosynthesis of Main Shrubs in Ulanbuh Desert in Inner Mongolia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):155.
[6]王文栋,李建贵,张毓涛,等.天山林区不同地段6种灌木生物量组成[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(05):127.
WANG Wendong,LI Jiangui,ZHANG Yutao,et al.Biomass Formation of Six Shrub Species in Several Zones of Tianshan Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):127.
[7]曹云生,赵艳玲.不同灌木林分枯落物层与土壤层水源涵养能力研究[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(06):179.
CAO Yunsheng,ZHAO Yanling.Study on Water Conservation Capacities of Litter Layer and Soil Layer in Different Shrub Forests[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(01):179.
[8]高 宙,胡 霞.基于CT扫描研究灌丛根系对土壤大孔隙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(03):315.
GAO Zhou,HU Xia.Influence of Shrub Roots on Soil Macropores Using X-Ray Computed Tomography[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(01):315.
[9]李叶鑫,吕 刚,宁宝宽,等.排土场土体裂缝区植被根系及抗剪强度分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(04):108.
LI Yexin,L Gang,NING Baokuan,et al.Distribution Characteristics of Vegetation Root System and Shear Strength with Ground Fissure in a Dump[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(01):108.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-04-21 修回日期:2021-05-09资助项目:国家自然科学基金(41771322); 国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0504504)第一作者:杨路(1994—),男,山西晋中人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事植物根系构型和抗剪增强的研究。E-mail:xinongyanglu@163.com通信作者:杜峰(1971—),男,内蒙古乌兰察布人,副研究员,博士,主要从事水土保持和群落生态的研究。E-mail:dufeng@ms.iswc.ac.cn