[1]雷 嫦,周国富,黄启芬,等.都匀市村域“三生空间”结构的时空格局[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):380-386.
　LEI Chang,ZHOU Guofu,HUANG Qifen,et al.Spatial and Temporal Pattern of Level Production-Living-Ecological(PLE)Space in Village of Duyun City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):380-386.
点击复制

都匀市村域“三生空间”结构的时空格局

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 28 期数: 2021年05期 页码: 380-386 栏目: 出版日期: 2021-08-20
Title:
Spatial and Temporal Pattern of Level Production-Living-Ecological(PLE)Space in Village of Duyun City
文章编号:
1005-3409(2021)05-0380-07
作者:
雷 嫦1,周国富1,黄启芬1,刘纯军1,周宇洋2
(1.贵州师范大学 地理与环境科学学院,贵阳 550025; 2.贵州省都匀市自然资源局,贵州 都匀 558000)
Author(s):
LEI Chang1,ZHOU Guofu1,HUANG Qifen1,LIU Chunjun1,ZHOU Yuyang2
(1.School of Geography and Environmental Science,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550025,China; 2.Duyun Natural Resources Bureau,Duyun,Guizhou 558000,China)
关键词:
三生空间;  村域;  结构分析;  时空格局;  都匀市
Keywords:
ecological-production-living space;  village level;  structural analysis;  temporal and spatial pattern;  Duyun City
分类号:
F301.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了实现县域更精细化的土地资源管理,促进喀斯特山区国土空间高效利用。基于都匀市2008年、2018年土地利用变更调查数据,采用土地利用主导功能分类方法构建都匀市村域“三生空间”分类体系,并采用5大计量模型方法计算空间格局指数,对都匀市“三生空间”功能结构的空间分布格局和时间变化特征进行了分析。研究表明:(1)都匀市村域“三生空间”多样化和信息熵指数呈东北部高,西南部低的分布格局,整体水平较高且呈上升趋势; 优势度指数分布格局则相反,整体处于中等偏下水平且呈下降趋势; 利用程度指数东西部差异较大,整体呈上升趋势,但仍处于中等偏下水平。(2)各行政村“三生空间”功能区位意义差异显著,西部地区生态功能区位优势突出,东部及南部地区生产功能区位优势突出,两类空间区位指数均呈下降趋势,北部城区中心生活功能区位优势突出,城郊地区上升明显。(3)都匀市“三生空间”功能结构变化空间分异明显,位于城郊的行政村“三生空间”结构变化显著,城区中心次之,西部及南部经济条件差的行政村未发生明显变化,保持相对稳定状态。研究可为都匀市新一轮的国土空间规划提供科学参考。
Abstract:
In order to realize the refined management of land resources in counties and to promote more efficient national spatial in karst mountainous area,based on the survey data of land use change in Duyun City in 2008 and 2018,we employed the dominant function classification method of land use to construct a classification system of the village-level production-living-ecological(PLE)space in Duyun City,and used five measurement model methods to calculate the spatial pattern index,and analyzed the pattern of spatial distribution and characteristics of temporal changes in the functional structure of the PLE space there. Findings of the research are listed follows.(1)In terms of the functional structure of PLE space,the northeastern area had a higher diversification and information entropy index than the southwestern area,while the overall level was high and showed an upward trend; the distribution pattern of dominance index showed the opposite situation,namely,being at barely medium levels and on a downward trend; the utilization index varied greatly in the eastern and western areas,showing an upward trend on the whole,yet still remained at barely medium levels.(2)The functional location significance of PLE space differed greatly in administrative villages,with the western area possessing an obvious location advantage in the ecological function and eastern and southern areas possessing an obvious location advantages in the production function,yet the indexes of both space types showed a downward trend; the northern downtown area displayed a distinct location advantage in the living function,while the advantage of suburban area was significantly increasing.(3)There was a significant spatial variation of the structure change in the PLE space of Duyun; the structural changes of administrative villages in the suburban area were the most significant,followed by the downtown area,while no significant changes had been observed in poorer administrative villages in the western and southern area,PLE space remained in a relatively stable state. These research results can provide the scientific basis for the new round of national spatial planning in Duyun.

参考文献/References:

[1] 施能浦.台湾的“三生”农业[J].台湾农业探索,1996,2(4):3-6.
[2] 郑百龙,翁伯琦,周琼.台湾“三生”农业发展历程及其借鉴[J].中国农业科技导报,2006,8(4):67-71.
[3] 金星星,陆玉麒,林金煌,等.闽三角城市群生产—生活—生态时空格局演化与功能测度[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4286-4295.
[4] 黄金川,林浩曦,漆潇潇.面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(3):378-391.
[5] 周浩,金平,夏卫生.省级国土空间“三生”功能评价及其分区研究:以河南省为例[J].中国土地科学,2020,34(8):10-17.
[6] 黄安,许月卿,卢龙辉,等.“生产—生活—生态”空间识别与优化研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(3):503-518.
[7] 朱媛媛,余斌,曾菊新,等.国家限制开发区“生产—生活—生态”空间的优化:以湖北省五峰县为例[J].经济地理,2015,35(4):26-32.
[8] 党丽娟,徐勇,高雅.土地利用功能分类及空间结构评价方法:以燕沟流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(5):193-197.
[9] 廖李红,戴文远,陈娟,等.平潭岛快速城市化进程中三生空间冲突分析[J].资源科学,2017,39(10):1823-1833.
[10] 陈仙春,赵俊三,陈国平.基于“三生空间”的滇中城市群土地利用空间结构多尺度分析[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(5):258-264.
[11] 吴宇鑫,赵牡丹,刘婷.眉县“三生用地”分类及其空间结构分析[J].安徽农业大学学报,2019,46(3):478-483.
[12] 陈钱钱,舒晓波,曾凡彬.江西省三生空间结构时空格局的多尺度分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(4):385-391.
[13] 黄娟,李阳兵,徐倩.印江县村域“三生用地”的利用结构与空间格局[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(2):395-402.
[14] 敖登高娃,李跃进,兀良哈·巴雅尔.脆弱草原带农牧交错区村域尺度土地利用结构定量分析[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(6):222-231.
[15] 周宇洋,周国富,黄启芬,等.基于洛伦兹曲线和土地利用转型的喀斯特山区“三生”空间分布研究[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(3):297-304,325.
[16] 刘继来,刘彦随,李裕瑞.中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J].地理学报,2017,72(7):1290-1304.
[17] 梁小英,顾铮鸣,雷敏,等.土地功能与土地利用表征土地系统和景观格局的差异研究:以陕西省蓝田县为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(7):1127-1135.
[18] 于莉,宋安安,郑宇,等.“三生用地”分类及其空间格局分析:以昌黎县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(2):89-96.
[19] 孙凤云,刘淼,胡远满,等.基于多种方法的景观格局动态变化综合分析:以辽宁省铁岭市为例[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(8):2163-2171.
[20] 吴堑虹,刘琼,段雪刚.土地利用结构指标新探及计算程序研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2015,31(1):110-114.
[21] 郭荣中,申海建,杨敏华.长株潭地区土地利用结构信息熵时空测度与演化[J].中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(9):92-100.
[22] 李珊珊,李阳兵,王萌萌,等.基于微空间单元的岩溶峡谷区土地利用结构演变[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(4):908-924.
[23] 宋戈,孙丽娜,雷国平.基于计量地理模型的松嫩高平原土地利用特征及其空间布局[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(3):243-250.
[24] 陈浩,董廷旭.四川省少数民族自治州土地利用结构的计量地理分析[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2016,34(4):1-9.
[25] 马晓冬,李鑫,胡睿,等.基于乡村多功能评价的城市边缘区“三生”空间划分研究[J].地理科学进展,2019,38(9):1382-1392.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘鹏,陈荣蓉,杨朝现,等.基于“三生空间”协调的农村居民点布局优化研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):283.
　LIU Peng,CHEN Rongrong,YANG Chaoxian,et al.Study on Layout Optimization of Rural Settlements Based on Coordination of Production, Living and Ecology Space[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):283.
[2]陈仙春,赵俊三,陈国平.基于“三生空间”的滇中城市群土地利用空间结构多尺度分析[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(05):258.
　CHEN Xianchun,ZHAO Junsan,CHEN Guoping.Analysis of Multi-Scale Spatial Structure of Land Use Based on Ecological-Production-Living Spaces in Urban Agglomeration Area of Central Yunnan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(05):258.
[3]龚亚男,韩书成,时晓标,等.广东省“三生空间”用地转型的时空演变及其生态环境效应[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(03):203.
　GONG Yanan,HAN Shucheng,SHI Xiaobiao,et al.Temporal and Spatial Evolution and Associated Eco-environment Effects of the Land Use Transformation of Ecological-Production-Living Spaces in Guangdong Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(05):203.
[4]刘顺鑫,黄 云.“三生空间”视角下万州区景观生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(06):308.
　LIU Shunxin,HUANG Yun.Evaluation and Coupling Coordination Analysis of Landscape Ecological Security of Wanzhou District from the Perspective of Production-Life-Ecological Space[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(05):308.
[5]牛子浩,周忠发,朱昌丽,等.喀斯特山区乡村性空间分异及发展类型——以贵州省盘州市为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(03):316.
　NIU Zihao,ZHOU Zhongfa,ZHU Changli,et al.Rurality Spatial Distribution and Types of Rural Development in Karst Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):316.
[6]余 洲,李明玉,陈 高,等.图们江地区“三生”用地变化及其生态质量影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(06):301.
　YU Zhou,LI Mingyu,CHEN Gao,et al.Change of Land Use for Ecological-Production-Living and Its Ecological Quality Influence in Tumen River Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):301.
[7]赵寿露,李石华,许新惠,等.耦合MOP-FLUS模型的滇中城市群“三生”空间格局优化[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(04):322.
　ZHAO Shoulu,LI Shihua,XU Xinhui,et al.Production-Life-Ecological Space Pattern Optimization of the Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan Based on Coupled MOP and FLUS Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(05):322.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2020-10-20 修回日期:2020-11-19
资助项目:国家自然科学基金项目“岩溶区山—坝系统土地利用耦合演化机理研究:贵州省案例”(41771115); 贵州省科技计划项目“喀斯特山区坡耕地作物套种模式水土保持机理研究”(黔科合基础[2019]1231号)
第一作者:雷嫦(1994—),女,贵州遵义人,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与国土整治方向。E-mail:1036871937@qq.com
通信作者:周国富(1963—),男,贵州威宁人,教授,硕士生,主要从事水土保持与国土整治方向。E-mail:283000395@qq.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-20