XU Wenxiu,YANG Ling,BAO Yuhai,et al.Tensile Mechanical Properties Single Root of Two Typical Flood-Tolerant Herbs in the Reservoir Riparian Zone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(05):259-264,272.
大型水库消落带2种典型耐淹草本植物单根抗拉力学特性
- Title:
- Tensile Mechanical Properties Single Root of Two Typical Flood-Tolerant Herbs in the Reservoir Riparian Zone
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)05-0259-06
- Keywords:
- herbs; soil consolidation and slope protection; tensile force of single root; stress-strain characteristics of single root; reservoir riparian zone
- 分类号:
- Q947.6; S781.25
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 研究水库消落带2种典型固土护坡草本的单根抗拉力学特性,可为明确草本根系固土护坡的力学机制提供依据。以狗牙根(Cynodon dactylon)、苍耳(Xanthium sibiricum)2种草本植物为对象,通过室内单根拉伸试验,对比观测了不同根径级别条件下单根的抗拉力、抗拉强度、极限延伸率和弹性模量,分析了各力学特性指标与根径间的拟合关系,并探讨了单根拉伸试验过程中的应力—应变特征。结果表明:(1)狗牙根单根抗拉力平均值大于苍耳,在0.30～0.50 mm和0.90～1.00 mm根径范围内两者达到显著性差异(p<0.05),狗牙根单根抗拉力分别比苍耳的大28.06%和9.95%;(2)狗牙根单根抗拉强度平均值是苍耳的1.08倍,在0.40～0.50 mm和0.90～1.00 mm根径范围内两者达到显著性差异(p<0.05),狗牙根单根抗拉强度分别比苍耳大24.10%和18.72%;(3)2种草本单根抗拉力和单根抗拉强度随着根径增大,分别呈幂函数增长和幂函数降低关系;(4)2种草本单根均呈弹塑性材料特征,单根拉伸过程中的应力—应变关系表现为弹性变形、弹塑性变形、塑性变形和突然断裂4个变化阶段,单根弹性变形阶段的极限拉应力约占极限抗拉强度的50%～70%;(5)狗牙根单根极限延伸率显著大于苍耳(p<0.05),分别为(23.59±0.44)%和(14.54±0.38)%,与之相反,狗牙根单根弹性模量显著小于苍耳(p<0.05),分别为(474.79±13.82)MPa和(540.77±14.21)MPa。整体来看,草本单根抗拉力学特性与植物类型、根径大小密切相关,狗牙根单根抗拉力和单根抗拉强度均大于苍耳,其单根抵抗外界拉伸作用的能力强于苍耳,说明狗牙根具有更强的固土护坡能力。
- Abstract:
- To further explore the mechanics mechanism of herb species roots on soil reinforcement and slope protection in the reservoir riparian zone, the mechanical properties of single root tensile of two typical herbs on soil reinforcement and slope protection were studied. The typical herbs(i. e. Cynodon dactylon and Xanthium sibiricum), which were widely grown in the reservoir riparian zone, were selected as the samples of study. Under the condition of different root diameter levels, the mechanical properties of single root tensile(i. e. tensile force, tensile strength, limit extensile rate and elastic modulus)of two herbs in the reservoir riparian zone were measured via single root tensile test. Furthermore, the stress-strain characteristics of single root during the tensile process were further analyzed. The results showed that:(1)the average value of single root tensile force data of Cynodon dactylon was larger than that of Xanthium sibiricum; under the condition of 0.30～0.50 mm and 0.90～1.00 mm root diameter levels, the single root tensile forces of Cynodon dactylon were significantly 28.06% and 9.95% larger than those of Xanthium sibiricum, respectively (p<0.05);(2)the average value of single root tensile strength data of Cynodon dactylon was 1.08 times that of Xanthium sibiricum; under the condition of 0.40～0.50 mm and 0.90～1.00 mm root diameter levels, the single root tensile strengths of Cynodon dactylon were significantly 24.10% and 18.72% larger than those of Xanthium sibiricum, respectively(p<0.05);(3)with the increase of root diameter, the single root tensile force of two herbs significantly increased, and the single root tensile strength the significantly decreased. These relationships can both be well fitted by power function;(4)the stress-strain characteristics of single root of two herbs showed the characteristics of elastoplastic materials, and the stress-strain curves for two herbs could be divided into four stages: elastic deformation, elastic-plastic deformation, strain hardening and fracture failure; the ultimate tensile stress in the elastic deformation stage accounted for about 50%～70% of the ultimate tensile strength;(5)the single root limit extensile rate of Cynodon dactylon was significantly higher than that of Xanthium sibiricum(p<0.05), and the single root limit extensile rates of Cynodon dactylon and Xanthium sibiricum were(23.59±0.44)% and(14.54±0.38)%, respectively; on the contrary, the single root elastic modulus of Cynodon dactylon was significantly lower than that of Xanthium sibiricum(p<0.05), and the single root elastic moduli of Cynodon dactylon and Xanthium sibiricum were(474.79±13.82)MPa and(540.77±14.21)MPa, respectively; the single root tensile mechanical properties of herbs are closely related to plant types and root diameter. On the whole, the single root tensile force and the single root tensile strength of Cynodon dactylon are both greater than those of Xanthium sibiricum. The ability to resist external stretching of Cynodon dactylon single root is stronger than that of Xanthium sibiricum, suggexting that Cynodon dactylon has stronger ability of soil reinforcement and slope protection.
参考文献/References:
[1]De Baets S, Poesen J, Reubens B, et al. Root tensile strength and root distribution of typical Mediterranean plant species and their contribution to soil shear strength[J]. Plant and Soil, 2008,305:207-226.
[2]Tosi M. Root tensile strength relationships and their slope stability implications of three shrub species in the Northern Apennines(Italy)[J]. Geomorphology, 2007,87(4):0-283.
[3]Stokes A, Atger C, Bengough A G, et al. Desirable plant root traits for protecting natural and engineered slopes against landslides[J]. Plant and Soil, 2009,324:1-30.
[4]Mahannopkul K, Jotisankasa A. Influence of root suction on tensile strength of Chrysopogon zizanioides roots and its implication on bioslope stabilization[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2019,16(2):275-284.
[5]李宁,陈丽华,杨苑君.油松、华北落叶松根系抗拉特性的影响因素[J].北京林业大学学报,2015,37(12):77-84.
[6]吕春娟,陈丽华,周硕,等.油松根系固土的基本力学特性[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):17-20.
[7]李建兴,何丙辉,谌芸,等.不同护坡草本植物的根系分布特征及其对土壤抗剪强度的影响[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(10):144-152.
[8]Ye C, Guo Z, Li Z, et al. The effect of Bahiagrass roots on soil erosion resistance of Aquults in subtropical China[J]. Geomorphology, 2017,285:82-93.
[9]刘亚斌,李淑霞,余冬梅,等.西宁盆地黄土区典型草本植物单根抗拉力学特性试验[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):157-166.
[10]刘昌义,胡夏嵩,赵玉娇,等.寒旱环境草本与灌木植物单根拉伸试验强度特征研究[J].工程地质学报,2017,25(1):1-10.
[11]陆桂红,欧国强,杨顺,等.泥石流源区典型草本植物根系抗拉试验[J].山地学报,2014,32(6):725-731.
[12]周萍,文安邦,严冬春,等.三峡库区紫色土坡耕地草本植物根系固结地埂的土力学机制[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):88-93.
[13]钟荣华,鲍玉海,贺秀斌,等.三峡水库消落带4种草本根系抗拉特性及根系粘聚力[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):188-194.
[14]李可,朱海丽,宋路,等.青藏高原两种典型植物根系抗拉特性与其微观结构的关系[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(2):240-249.
[15]叶超,郭忠录,蔡崇法,等.5种草本植物根系理化特性及其相关性[J].草业科学,2017,34(3):598-606.
[16]赵丽兵,张宝贵.紫花苜蓿和马唐根的生物力学性能及相关因素的试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(9):7-12.
[17]Bao Y H, He X B, Wang A B, et al. Dynamic changes of soil erosion in a typical disturbance zone of China's Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Catena, 2018,169:128-139.
[18]钟荣华,贺秀斌,鲍玉海,等.狗牙根和牛鞭草的消浪减蚀作用[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(2):133-140.
[19]贺秀斌,鲍玉海.三峡水库消落带土壤侵蚀与生态重建研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(4):160-168.
[20]刘福全,刘静,姚喜军,等.根系固土主导力学因素与差异性评价[J].生态学报,2015,35(19):6306-6315.
[21]欧阳前超,魏杨,周霞,等.土石山区护坡草本植物根系抗拉力学特性[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(4):35-41.
[22]张双燕,费本华,余雁,等.木质素含量对木材单根纤维拉伸性能的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,34(1):131-134.
[23]李思诗.崩岗侵蚀劣地草本植物根系抗拉特性与微观性质的关系[D].福州:福建农林大学,2018.
[24]宋香静,李胜男,郭嘉,等.环境变化对湿地植物根系的影响研究[J].水生态学杂志,2017,38(2):1-9.
[25]Hathaway R L, Penny D. Root strength in some Populus and Salix clones[J]. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 1975,13(3):333-344.
相似文献/References:
[1]穆兴民,贾恒义,程浦海,等.黄土高原主要草本植物化学元素含量及其聚类分析研究[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(03):111.
Mu Xingmin,Jia Hengyi,Cheng Puhai,et al.A preliminary study on the content of chemical elements and their similarity analysis for major herbs in the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(05):111.
[2]程洪,颜传盛,李建庆,等.草本植物根系网的固土机制模式与力学试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(01):62.
CHENG Hong,YAN Chuan-sheng,LI Jian-qing,et al.An Experimental Study on Mechanic Performance and Mechanism of Soil-reinforcement by Herb Root System[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):62.
[3]秦瑞杰,郑粉莉,卢嘉.草本植物生长发育对土壤团聚体稳定性影响的试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(03):141.
QIN Rui-jie,ZHENG Fen-li,LU Jia.The Effect of Herbaceous Plant Growth on the Soil Aggregate Stability[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(05):141.
[4]陈浩,余毅敏,唐旭栋,等.浦阳江下游江岸草本植物根系对土壤抗冲性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):60.
CHEN Hao,YU Yimin,TANG Xudong,et al.Effect of the Root Systems of Herbaceous Plants on Soil Anti-scourbility in the Riparian Area of Lower Reaches of Puyang River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):60.
[5]钟荣华,吕发友,鲍玉海,等.三峡水库消落带草本植物对若干土壤物理性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(01):17.
ZHONG Ronghua,LYU Fayou,BAO Yuhai,et al.Impacts of Several Grasses on Soil Physical Properties in the Riparian Zone of Three Gorges Reservoir[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(05):17.
[6]秦嘉惠,程谅,曹丹妮,等.两种草本植物根系对土壤可蚀性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(02):55.
QIN Jiahui,CHENG Liang,CAO Danni,et al.Effects of Root System of Two Herbs on Soil Erodibility[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(05):55.
[7]张超波,周霞,李东嵘,等.山西土石山区3种草本植物根拉拨特性[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(03):300.
ZHANG Chaobo,ZHOU Xia,LI Dongrong,et al.Root Pullout Properties of Three Slope-Protecting Herbaceous Plants in Earth-Rock Mountain Area in Shanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(05):300.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-11-18修回日期:2019-12-10
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(41977075,41571278,41771321); 四川省科技计划项目(2018SZ0132); 国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(201810637003)
第一作者:徐文秀(1992—),女,山东昌邑人,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:xuwenxiu0314@163.com;
通信作者:鲍玉海(1981—),男,山东成武人,副研究员,博士,硕士生导师,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:byh@imde.ac.cn