YANG Kun,LIU Pengfei.Analysis on Influencing Factors on Land-Lost Farmers' Livelihood Sustainability in Underdeveloped Region-A Case Study of Anning District in Lanzhou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):342-348.
欠发达地区失地农民可持续生计影响因素分析——以兰州安宁区为例
- Title:
- Analysis on Influencing Factors on Land-Lost Farmers' Livelihood Sustainability in Underdeveloped Region-A Case Study of Anning District in Lanzhou
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)04-0342-07
- Keywords:
- land-lost farmers; underdeveloped region; sustainable livelihood; entropy evaluation method
- 分类号:
- F062.2
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 探索快速城市化扰动下欠发达地区失地农民可持续生计研究,对中国城市化健康协调发展和实现乡村振兴有着重要意义。基于可持续生计内涵,从人均可支配收入、生计多样性、家庭劳动力就业率与参保率4个指标构建生计可持续评价体系,以兰州市安宁区为研究区域,采用参与式农村评估法通过实地调研获取相关数据,运用熵值法定量评价研究区失地农户当前生计维持能力及可持续能力,并就其差异性原因进行了回归分析。结果表明:(1)当前大部分失地农户家庭可以实现生计维持目标,但距离实现生计可持续发展还存在一定差距;(2)生计多样性与家庭劳动力就业率在可持续生计评价中占有较大权重,其中生计多样性是样本区失地农户可持续生计评价结果差异性的主要来源;(3)人力资本、物质资本、金融资本以及社会资本的增加对生计可持续性的改善具有不同程度的正向影响作用,是今后提升该地区农户生计可持续程度的关键点和突破点。
- Abstract:
- Exploring the land-lost farmers' sustainable livelihood in underdeveloped areas is of the significance for regulating the healthy and coordinated development of China urbanization and the realization of rural revitalization. Based on the conception and analytical framework, we developed an indicator system to evaluate livelihood sustainability from four indicators including the per capita income level, the livelihood diversity, the employment rate land-lost and the enrollment rate of the family, we used entropy method to quantitatively evaluate the farmers' current livelihood maintenance ability and sustainability, and performed the regression analysis on the reasons for their differences of livelihood sustainability by using the data obtained from field investigation through using participatory rural appraisal in Anning District, Gansu Province. The results show that:(1)most land-lost farmers were able to achieve livelihood maintenance goals, but there was still a gap between the maintenance goal and the sustainability goal;(2)livelihood diversity and employment rate occupied a large weight in the sustainable livelihood evaluation, while livelihood diversity was the main source of the differences in the sustainable livelihood evaluation results;(3)human capital, material capital, financial capital and social capital have different positive effects on the improvement of livelihood sustainability, which were the key factors impacting the land-lost farmers livelihood sustainability in Anning District.
参考文献/References:
[1] 联合国开发计划署(UNDP),中国社会科学院城市发展与环境研究所.2013中国人类发展报告:可持续与宜居城市[M].北京:中国对外翻译出版有限公司,2013.
[2] 牛文元.中国可持续发展的理论与实践[J].中国科学院院刊,2012,27(3):280-289.
[3] 吴一凡,刘彦随,李裕瑞.中国人口与土地城镇化时空耦合特征及驱动机制[J].地理学报,2018,73(10):41-55.
[4] 陈堂,陈光.成都经济区城镇化进程中失地农民再就业影响因素研究[J].成都大学学报:社会科学版,2017,9(6):46-51.
[5] DFID. Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets[R]. London:Department for International Development, 1999.
[6] 韦惠兰,祁应军.农户生计资本与生计策略关系的实证分析:以河西走廊沙化土地封禁保护区外围为例[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(2):540-548.
[7] 宁泽逵.农户可持续生计资本与精准扶贫[J].华南农业大学学报:社会科学版,2017,16(1):86-94.
[8] 杨振山,王玉璇.开发区流动人口生计资本测量及生计空间特征分析:以广州南沙新区为例[J].地理研究,2018,37(11):31-42.
[9] 侯雨峰,陈传明.自然保护区农户生计资本的调查与评价:以福建省武夷山国家级自然保护区为例[J].闽南师范大学学报:自然版,2018,31(1):118-127.
[10] Jackson E T, Khan R. Seeking sustainable livelihoods: constructing a role for community economic development in technology cluster growth[M]. Canada: Caledon Institute of Social Policy, 2003.
[11] 兰州市统计局,国家统计局兰州调查队.兰州统计年鉴(1998—2017)[Z].北京:中国统计出版社,1998—2017.
[12] Chambers R, Conway G. Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century[R]. Ids Discussion Paper 296, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, 1992.
[13] 周洁,姚萍,黄贤金,等.基于模糊物元模型的南京市失地农民可持续生计评价[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(11):72-79.
[14] 叶静怡,薄诗雨,刘丛,等.社会网络层次与农民工工资水平:基于身份定位模型的分析[J].经济评论,2012(4):31-42.
[15] 李小云,董强,饶小龙,等.农户脆弱性分析方法及其本土化应用[J].中国农村经济,2007(4):32-39.
[16] 汤青,徐勇,李扬.黄土高原农户可持续生计评估及未来生计策略:基于陕西延安市和宁夏固原市1076户农户调查[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(2):161-169.
[17] Ellis F, Mdoe N. Livelihoods and rural poverty reduction in Tanzaia[J]. World Development, 2003,31(8):1367-1384.
[18] Tran T, Vu H. Farmland loss, nonfarm diversification and inequality:A micro-econometric analysis of household surveys in Vietnam[R]. Mpra Paper No,47596,2013.
[19] Mohamed A, Adel B Y, Cuong N. Does urbanization reduce rural poverty? Evidence from Vietnam [J]. Economic Modelling, 2017,60:253-270.
[20] 王芳.城镇化背景下失地农民社会保障问题研究[J].现代经济探讨,2016(11):60-63,73.
[21] 杨风,燕浩扬.失地农民城市融入的障碍与路径:以山东省为例[J].农村经济,2015(5):103-107.
[22] 冯娇,陈勇,周立华,等.基于可持续生计分析框架的贫困农户脆弱性研究:以甘肃省岷县坪上村为例[J].中国生态农业学报,2018,26(11):156-166.
[23] 陈江生,崔彩贤.农户层面多子是否多福的数量经济新检验[J].西北人口,2014,35(2):83-87.
[24] 刘冰,陈金亮.失地农民就业自身影响因素研究:基于湘潭市的问卷调查数据[J].湖南农业大学学报:社会科学版,2014,15(2):47-51.
[25] 陈姿,罗荷花.人力资本与家庭收入[J].财务与金融,2019(4):67-71,95.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-10-29 修回日期:2019-11-19
资助项目:国家社会科学基金(17BJY133); 甘肃省社会科学规划项目(YB111); 兰州城市学院年青年教师科研资助项目(LZCU-QN2018-18)
第一作者:杨琨(1984—),女,湖南浏阳人,在读博士生,讲师,研究方向为生态经济、可持续经济研究。E-mail:yangkun.lz@foxmail.com