LI Wenbin,ZHU Lang,XIE Jia,et al.Effects of Adding Amphoteric Magnetized Carbon on Forage Growth and Soil Copper Availability[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):349-356.
两性磁化炭对牧草生长及土壤铜有效性的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Adding Amphoteric Magnetized Carbon on Forage Growth and Soil Copper Availability
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)03-0349-08
- Keywords:
- amphoteric magnetized carbon; purple soil; sudan grass; ryegrass; Cu2+ content
- 分类号:
- X592
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了探究材料添加对植物修复过程中的牧草生长和土壤铜有效性特征的影响,采用盆栽试验研究7种土壤Cu2+污染水平[0,100,200,400,800,1 200,1 600 mg/L]下,两性磁化炭表施(0—3 cm)和混施对苏丹草(Sorghum sudanense(Piper)Stapf.)和黑麦草(Lolium multiflorum L.)发芽率、株高和生物量的影响,并分析了盆栽土壤中水溶态和酸提取态铜含量的变化特征。结果表明:(1)在未经Cu2+处理时,表施和混施两性磁化炭都能大幅度提高黑麦草的发芽率和成活率; Cu2+处理后,表施两性磁化炭有利于苏丹草的发芽,但不利于其成活,混施能够提高苏丹草在Cu2+浓度400～800 mg/L内的成活率;(2)各土样上的苏丹草和黑麦草株高前期增长迅速(2 cm/d左右),25 d后趋于缓和。单施两性磁化炭更有利于黑麦草的生长,其中表施的作用尤为显著。(3)混施两性磁化炭能增加苏丹草在Cu2+400～800 mg/L区间中的生物量,而Cu2+浓度低于200 mg/L时,表施和混施两性磁化炭都有利于两种牧草生长;(4)土壤水溶态Cu2+含量和酸提取态Cu2+含量均保持上层高于下层的趋势,黑麦草降低土壤中Cu2+含量的能力强于苏丹草。综上,在铜污染地区表施两性磁化炭并种植黑麦草对土壤的修复效果最佳。
- Abstract:
- In order to explore the effects of material addition on forage growth and soil copper availability during phytoremediation, potting experiments were conducted to study the effects of surface application(0—3 cm)and mixed application of amphoteric magnetized carbon on the germination rate, plant height and biomass of sudan grass[Sorghum sudanense(Piper)Stapf.]and ryegrass(Lolium perenne L.)under different Cu2 pollution levels [0, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1 200 and 1 600 mg/L], and the variation characteristics of copper content in water-soluble state and acid extracted state of of different soil layers were analyzed. The results showed that:(1)the germination rate and survival rate of ryegrass could be improved by both surface and mixed application of amphoteric magnetized carbon without Cu2+ in soil; after Cu2+ treatment, surface application of amphoteric magnetized carbon enhanced the germination of sudan grass, but was not beneficial to its survival; mixed application of amphoteric magnetized carbon could improve the survival rate of sudan grass under 400～800 mg/L Cu2+ treatment;(2)the height of sudan grass and ryegrass rapidly increased in the early growth stage(about 2 cm/d), and tended to moderate in the remaining stages(after 25 d); application of amphoteric magnetized carbon was more beneficial to the growth of ryegrass, especially by surface application;(3)mixed application of amphoteric magnetized carbon could improve the biomass of sudan grass under 400～800 mg/L Cu2+ treatment; when the concentration of Cu2+ was less than 200 mg/L, both surface and mixed application of amphoteric magnetized carbon were favorable for the growth of two herbage species;(4)Cu2+ contents in water-soluble state and acid-extracted state all maintained the trend that the contents of upper soil layer was higher than those of the subsoil layer, and ryegrass was more capable of reducing the Cu2+ content in soil than Sudan grass. In conclusion, surface application of amphoteric magnetized carbon and planting ryegrass in copper-polluted areas had the best effect on soil remediation.
参考文献/References:
[1] Fakoyade S, Onianwa P. Heavy metal contamination of soil and bioaccumulation in Guinea grass(Panicum maximum)around Ikeja Industrial Estate, Lagos, Nigeria[J]. Environmental Geology, 2002,43(1/2):145-150.
[2] 邓红艳,李文斌,郑莹,等.两性膨润土增强不同层次紫色土吸附Cu2+的研究[J].地球与环境,2018,46(4):403-409.
[3] 程望斌,周勇,邹丹,等.食品中常见的重金属污染及检测方法研究[J].湖南理工学院学报:自然科学版,2012,25(3):69-72.
[4] Li W B, He H X, Deng H Y, et al. Physiological characteristics of two pastures on different copper polluted purple soils[J]. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 2018,27(7):4789-4796.
[5] 黄益宗,郝晓伟,雷鸣,等.重金属污染土壤修复技术及其修复实践[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32(3):409-417.
[6] Peraltavidea J R, Lopez M L, Narayan M, et al. The biochemistry of environmental heavy metal uptake by plants:implications for the food chain[J]. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cellbiology, 2009,41(8):1665-1677.
[7] 柯文山,王万贤,杨毅.海洲香薷种群微量金属元素的累积分布特征[J].环境科学与技术,2000,90(S1):41-44.
[8] 李锋民,熊治廷,胡洪营.海州香薷对铜的蓄积及铜的毒性效应[J].环境科学,2003,24(3):30-34.
[9] 魏树和,周启星,王新.18种杂草对重金属的超积累特性研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2003,11(2):152-160.
[10] 樊有赋,陈晔,詹寿发,等.超积累植物与重金属污染的植物修复技术[J].河北农业科学,2007,11(5):73-75.
[11] 彭红云,杨肖娥.香薷植物修复铜污染土壤的研究进展[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(5):197-201.
[12] 王璐,何琳燕,盛下放.耐铜苏丹草根内生细菌的分离筛选及其生物学特性研究[J].土壤,2016,48(1):95-101.
[13] 高柱,王小玲,刘腾云,等.重金属Cu污染对苏丹草种子发芽及幼苗生长的影响[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(25):199-204.
[14] 王小玲,高柱,黄益宗,等.铜胁迫对3种草本植物生长和重金属积累的影响[J].生态毒理学报,2014,9(4):699-706.
[15] Santibáñez C, Verdugo C, Ginocchio R. Phytostabilization of copper mine tailings with biosolids:implications for metal uptake and productivity of Lolium perenne[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2008,395(1):1-10.
[16] 谷超,梁隆超,陈卓.4种牧草植物对红枫湖底泥中重金属污染的植物修复研究[J].环境工程,2015,33(7):148-151.
[17] 王友保,吴亭亭,燕傲蕾,等.镧对铜尾矿区黑麦草铜耐性与积累特性的影响[J].土壤通报,2012,43(3):731-736.
[18] 郝秀珍,周东美,薛艳,等.天然蒙脱石和沸石改良对黑麦草在铜尾矿砂上生长的影响[J].土壤学报,2005,42(3):434-439.
[19] 郭文娟,梁学峰,林大松,等.土壤重金属钝化修复剂生物炭对镉的吸附特性研究[J].环境科学,2013,34(9):3716-3721.
[20] Regmi P, Moscoso J L G, Kumar S, et al. Removal of copper and cadmium from aqueous solution using switchgrass biochar produced via hydrothermal carbonization process[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012,109(17):61-69.
[21] Inyang M, Gao B, Yao Y, et al. Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by biochars derived from anaerobically digested biomass[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012,110(2):50-56.
[22] 吕宏虹,宫艳艳,唐景春,等.生物炭及其复合材料的制备与应用研究进展[J].农业环境科学学报,2015,34(8):1429-1440.
[23] Chen B L, Chen Z M, Lv S F. A novel magnetic biochar efficiently sorbs organic pollutants and phosphate[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010,102(2):716-723.
[24] Tan X F, Liu Y G, Gu Y L, et al. Biochar-based nano-composites for the decontamination of wastewater:A review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016,212(4):318-333.
[25] 江美琳,金辉,邓聪,等.生物炭负载Fe3 O4纳米粒子的制备与表征[J].农业环境科学学报,2018,37(3):592-597.
[26] Pandey V, Patel A, Patra D D. Biochar ameliorates crop productivity, soil fertility, essential oil yield and aroma profiling in basil(Ocimum basilicum, L.)[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016,90(6):361-366.
[27] 李帅霖,王霞,王朔,等.生物炭施用方式及用量对土壤水分入渗与蒸发的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(14):135-144.
[28] 李文斌,孟昭福,吴琼,等.添加复合吸附剂对塿土吸附菲和Cr(Ⅵ)的影响[J].环境科学,2016,37(11):4419-4427.
[29] 王悦满,高倩,薛利红,等.生物炭不同施加方式对水稻生长及产量的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2018,35(1):58-65.
[30] Wan D, Li W B, Wang G H, et al. Adsorption and heterogeneous degradation of rhodamine B on the surface of magnetic bentonite material[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2015,349(9):988-996.
[31] 李婷,孟昭福,张斌.两性修饰膨润土对苯酚的吸附及热力学特征[J].环境科学,2012,33(5):1632-1638.
[32] 李玉宝,夏锦梦,论东东.土壤重金属污染的4种植物修复技术[J].科技导报,2017,35(11):47-51.
[33] Romanowska E, Wróblewska B, Dro./zak A, et al. Effect of Pb ions on superoxide dismutase and catalase activities in leaves of pea plants grown in high and low irradiance[J]. Biologia Plantarum, 2008,52(1):80-86.
[34] Seregin I V, Kozhevnikova A D. Physiological role of nickel and its toxic effects on higher plants[J]. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2006,53(2):257-277.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-06-27 修回日期:2019-08-26资助项目:南充市科技计划项目(18YFZJ0048); 西华师范大学基本科研业务费资金(17E057); 四川省科技厅项目(2018JY0224); 国家自然科学基金(41271244)第一作者:李文斌(1985—),男,陕西蒲城人,博士,讲师,主要从事土壤污染修复研究。E-mail:lwb062@163.com通信作者:康乐(1985—),女,陕西华阴人,博士,讲师,主要从事土壤污染修复研究。E-mail:klhongshu@163.com