WANG Limei,ZHANG Qian,BAI Lihua,et al.Effects of Three Artificial Vegetation Types on Soil Particle Composition and Carbon Fixation in the Mu Us Sandy Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(01):88-94.
毛乌素沙地3种人工植被类型对土壤颗粒组成和固碳的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Three Artificial Vegetation Types on Soil Particle Composition and Carbon Fixation in the Mu Us Sandy Land
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)01-0088-07
- Keywords:
- vegetation restoration; soil particle composition; soil organic carbon; soil inorganic carbon; Mu Us Sandy Land
- 分类号:
- S151+3; S728.4
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 植被恢复会对干旱半干旱区土壤固碳过程产生重要影响,探讨植被恢复对不同土壤颗粒碳含量的影响有利于进一步揭示荒漠土壤演变过程。选择毛乌素沙地东南缘人工植被恢复区的乔木林、灌木林、草地和流沙地为样地,对0—30 cm的土壤进行了分层取样分析。结果表明:乔木、灌木和草地的恢复均会降低土壤粗颗粒(细砂粒、粗砂粒)含量,增加团聚体和粉黏粒含量; 植被恢复后土壤有机碳(SOC)和无机碳(SIC)含量均显著增加,其中最大值均出现在乔木样地,分别达到流沙地的3.96倍和2.08倍; 植被恢复对土壤有机碳密度(SOCD)的影响较土壤无机碳密度(SICD)更为明显; 乔木有利于粗砂粒和细砂粒有机碳的累积,灌木更有利于粉黏粒和团聚体有机碳的累积; 各粒级SOC含量在细砂粒中增幅最为明显; SIC含量在粉黏粒中增幅最为明显; 粉黏粒有机碳对总有机碳的贡献率较为显著。总之,不同类型植被的恢复均会提高土壤有机和无机含量,从增加土壤固碳的角度出发,乔木为毛乌素沙地的最佳植被恢复类型。
- Abstract:
- Vegetation restoration has an important impact on soil carbon sequestration in arid and semi-arid regions. Exploring the effects of vegetation restoration on soil carbon content of different particles is helpful to further reveal the evolution process of desert soils. The arbor forest, shrub forest, grassland and shifting sandy land were selected in the artificial vegetation restoration area on the southeastern margin of the Mu Us Sandy Land, and top 0—30 cm soils were collected and analyzed layer by layer. The results showed that the restoration of arbors, shrubs and grassland can reduce the content of soil coarse particles(fine and coarse sand particles)and increase the content of aggregates, silt and clay; the contents of soil organic carbon(SOC)and soil inorganic carbon(SIC)significantly increased after vegetation restoration, and the highest values of soil carbon were observed in the arbor forest, which were 3.96 times and 2.08 times higher than that of shifting sandy land; the effect of vegetation restoration on SOC density was more obvious than SIC density; arbor forest was beneficial for organic carbon accumulation in coarse sand and fine sand, and shrub forest was more beneficial for organic carbon accumulation in silt and clay and aggregates; SOC contents of each particle size increased most obviously in fine sand and SIC contents of each particle size increased most obviously in silt and clay; the contribution rate of organic carbon in silt and clay to total organic carbon was more significant. In summary, the restoration of three different types of vegetation can increase the SOC and SIC, planting arbor is the best choice for vegetation restoration from the perspective of increasing soil carbon sequestration in the Mu Us Sandy Land.
参考文献/References:
[1] 苏志珠,刘蓉,梁爱民,等.晋西北沙化土地土壤机械组成与有机质的初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):61-67.
[2] Lal R. Potential of desertification control to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect[J]. Climatic Change, 2001,51(1):35-72.
[3] Wang Z H, Daun C, Yuan L, et al. Assessment of the restoration of a degraded semi-humid evergreen broadleaf forest ecosystem by combined single-indicator and comprehensive model method[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2010,36(6):757-767.
[4] Wei Y, Yu L F, Zhang J C, et al. Relationship between vegetation restoration and soil microbial characteristics in degraded karst regions:A case study[J]. Pedosphere, 2011,21(1):132-138.
[5] 李玉进,胡澍,焦菊英,等.黄土丘陵区不同侵蚀环境下土壤有机碳对植被恢复的响应[J].生态学报,2017,37(12):4100-4107.
[6] 陈永乐,张志山,赵洋.人工固沙区土壤碳分布及其与土壤属性的关系[J].中国沙漠,2017,37(2):296-304.
[7] 余健,房莉,卞正富,等.土壤碳库构成研究进展[J].生态学报,2014,34(17):4829-4838.
[8] Paul K I, Polglase P J, Nyakuengama J G, et al. Change in soil carbon following afforestation[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002,168(1):241-257.
[9] 许冬梅,许新忠,王国会,等.宁夏荒漠草原自然恢复演替过程中土壤有机碳及其分布的变化[J].草业学报,2017,26(8):35-42.
[10] 李衍青,蒋忠诚,罗为群,等.植被恢复对岩溶石漠化区土壤有机碳及轻组有机碳的影响[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(4):158-163.
[11] Gao Y, Tian J, Pang Y, et al. Soil inorganic carbon sequestration following afforestation is probably induced by pedogenic carbonate formation in Northwest China[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017,8:1282.
[12] Lal R. Carbon sequestration in dryland ecosystems[J]. Environmental Management, 2004,33(4):528-544.
[13] He N P, Ling W, Wang Y S, et al. Changes in carbon and nitrogen in soil particle-size fractions along a grassland restoration chronosequence in northern China[J]. Geoderma, 2009,150(3):302-308.
[14] von Lützow M, K?gel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, et al. SOM fractionation methods:relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2007,39(9):2183-2207.
[15] 蔡岸冬,徐香茹,张旭博,等.不同利用方式下土壤矿物结合态有机碳特征与容量分析[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(21):4291-4299.
[16] 武天云, Jeff J, Schoenau,等.土壤有机质概念和分组技术研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4):717-722.
[17] 樊红柱,张建辉,王勇,等.川北山区坡耕地侵蚀耕作对土壤团聚体碳的影响[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(11):157-164.
[18] 花可可,朱波,杨小林,等.长期施肥对紫色土旱坡地团聚体与有机碳组分的影响[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(10):167-174.
[19] Hirotsugu A, Naoko T. Soil organic carbon accumulation following afforestation in a Japanese coniferous plantation based on particle-size fractionation and stable isotope analysis[J]. Geoderma, 2010,159(3):425-430..
[20] 马建业,佟小刚,李占斌,等.毛乌素沙地沙漠化逆转过程土壤颗粒固碳效应[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(11):3487-3494.
[21] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.30-34,202-204.
[22] 兰志龙,赵英,张建国,等.陕北黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式下土壤碳剖面分布特征[J].环境科学,2018,39(1):339-347.
[23] Gale W J, Cambardella C A. Carbon dynamics of surface residue and root-derived organic matter under simulated notill[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000,66(1):190-195.
[24] 李秋嘉,薛志婧,周正朝.宁南山区植被恢复对土壤团聚体养分特征及微生物特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(1):137-145.
[25] 张铜会,赵哈林,白户,等.沙质草地连续放牧后某些土壤性质的变化[J].中国草地,2003,25(1):9-12.
[26] Harry J P, Roger L P, Neal A S. Factors controlling soil carbon levels in New Zealand Grasslands:Is clay content important[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000,64(5):1623-1630.
[27] Callesen I, Liski J, Raulund‐Rasmussen K, et al. Soil carbon stores in Nordic well drained forest soils:Relationships with climate and texture class[J]. Global Change Biology, 2003,9(3):358-370.
[28] 邓彩云,王玉刚,牛子儒,等.开垦年限对干旱区土壤理化性质及剖面无机碳的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):254-259.
[29] 魏彬萌,王益权,李忠徽.种植苹果树对渭北果园土壤胶结物质分布的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2018,26(11):1692-1700.
[30] 热依拉·木民,玉米提·哈力克,塔依尔江·艾山,等.基于分形维数的不同林龄新疆杨对土壤理化特性的影响分析[J].土壤通报,2018,49(2):313-319.
[31] 李少华,王学全,高琪,等.植被恢复对高寒沙区土壤性质的影响[J].林业科学研究,2016,29(4):553-559.
[32] 华瑞,徐学选,张少妮,等.不同退耕年限林草地土壤颗粒分形特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):206-209.
[33] Wu H B, Guo Z T, Gao Q, et al. Distribution of soil inorganic carbon storage and its changes due to agricultural land use activity in China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2008,129(4):413-421.
相似文献/References:
[1]李晶,高照良,张小娟,等.宝牛高速公路路域植被恢复效果调查分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):100.
LI Jing,GAO Zhao-liang,ZHANG Xiao-juan,et al.Investigation and Assessment on Vegetation Restoration along the Baoniu Highway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):100.
[2]查轩,唐克丽,白红英.植被恢复对土壤抗侵蚀特性影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):37.
Zha Xuan,Tang Keli,Bai Hongying.The Effect of Vegetation Restoration on Properties of Soil Resistance in Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(01):37.
[3]郑粉莉,张科利,唐克丽,等.植被破坏与恢复对坡面浅沟侵蚀影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):54.
Zheng Fenli,Zhang Keli,Tang Keli,et al.Impact of Vegetation Destruction and Restoration on Shallow Gully Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(01):54.
[4]郭晓敏,牛德奎,刘苑秋,等.江西省红壤侵蚀劣地植被恢复技术及综合治理效果研究[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(02):108.
Guo Xiaomin,Niu Dekui,Liu Yuanqiu,et al.Restoring Technique of Vegetation on Eroded Red Soil in Jiangxi and Benefits From Its Comprehensive Harnessing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(01):108.
[5]王改玲,白中科.安太堡露天煤矿排土场植被恢复的主要限制因子及对策[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):38.
WANG Gai-ling,BAI Zhong-ke.Main Limiting Factors for Re-vegetation and Measures of Dumping Site in Antaibao Opencast Mine[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(01):38.
[6]梁杰明,林建平,陈海平,等.珠海建设迹地岩土坡植被恢复的生态效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(03):175.
LIANG Jie-ming,LIN Jian-ping,CHEN Hai-ping,et al.Study on Ecological Effect by Revegetation on Rock/Soil Slope Left by Project Construction in Zhuhai[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(01):175.
[7]陈浩,蔡强国,周金星,等.黄河中游侵蚀产沙环境要素临界与交互作用研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(04):54.
CHEN Hao,CAI Qiang-guo,ZHOU Jin-xing,et al.Research Progress of Interactive Influence and Thresholds of Geographic Environmental Elements on Sediment Yield of Drainage Basins in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(01):54.
[8]马祥华,焦菊英.黄土高原植被恢复与土壤环境相互作用研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(04):157.
MA Xiang-hua,JIAO Ju-ying.Research Progresses in Interaction Between Vegetation Restoration and Soil Environment in the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(01):157.
[9]马祥华,焦菊英,温仲明,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植被恢复中土壤物理特性变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(01):17.
MA Xiang-hua,JIAO Ju-ying,WEN Zhong-ming,et al.The Changes of Soil Physical Properties in Abandoned Lands During Vegetation Restoration in Hilly and Gully Regions on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):17.
[10]安韶山,黄懿梅,刘梦云,等.宁南宽谷丘陵区植被恢复中土壤酶活性的响应及其评价[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(03):31.
AN Shao-shan,HUANG Yi-mei,LIU Meng-yun,et al.The Responses and Evaluation of Soil Enzymatic Activities to Plant Rehabilitation in Ningxia Loess Hilly-gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):31.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-02-28 修回日期:2019-04-08
资助项目:国家自然科学基金“塔克拉玛干沙漠咸水滴灌林地土壤碳时空分布与淋溶过程研究”(41877541);“塔里木沙漠公路防护林土壤盐结皮的生态环境效应与作用机制”(41471222);中科院水土保持研究所青年人才专项
第一作者:王丽梅(1992—),女,山东潍坊人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为荒漠土壤环境。E-mail:wanglimei@nwafu.edu.cn
通信作者:张建国(1981—),男,山东菏泽人,博士,副教授,博士生导师.主要研究方向为荒漠化防治。E-mail:zhangjianguo21@nwafu.edu.cn