[1]刘艳中,孙荣泽,陈章,等.临湘市“三生”用地变化及其生态系统服务价值响应[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(06):303-310.
 LIU Yanzhong,SUN Rongze,CHEN Zhang,et al.Change of Ecological-Living-Industrial Land and Its Response to Ecosystem Service Value in Linxiang City[J].,2019,26(06):303-310.
点击复制

临湘市“三生”用地变化及其生态系统服务价值响应()
分享到:

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P]

卷:
26卷
期数:
2019年06期
页码:
303-310
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-10-17

文章信息/Info

Title:
Change of Ecological-Living-Industrial Land and Its Response to Ecosystem Service Value in Linxiang City
作者:
刘艳中1 孙荣泽1 陈章1 陈勇1 张祚2 李晓林3
1. 武汉科技大学 资源与环境工程学院/冶金矿产资源高效利用与造块湖北省重点实验室, 武汉 430081;
2. 华中师范大学 公共管理学院, 武汉 430079;
3. 湖北沐源科技有限公司, 湖北 宜昌 443000
Author(s):
LIU Yanzhong1 SUN Rongze1 CHEN Zhang1 CHEN Yong1 ZHANG Zuo2 LI Xiaolin3
1. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering/Hubei Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Utilization and Agglomeration of Metallurgical Mineral Resources, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China;
2. College of Public Administration, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China;
3. Hubei Muyuan Technology Co., Ltd., Yichang, Hubei 443000, China
关键词:
三生用地生态系统服务价值价值量法临湘市
Keywords:
ecological-living-industrial landecosystem service valuevalue methodLinxiang City
分类号:
X171.1
摘要:
针对生态系统服务价值研究中,土地功能与生态系统服务功能内在联系模糊的问题,探索了生态系统服务价值对"三生"用地变化的响应。构建了"三生"用地分类体系,采用当量因子修正的生态系统服务价值模型,分析了2009-2016年临湘市"三生"用地变化对生态系统服务价值的影响。结果表明:(1)临湘市生态系统服务总价值逐年递减,生态用地和生态生产用地的生态系统服务价值减少较快,生产生态用地和生活生产用地的服务价值增长较慢;(2)4类"三生"用地的生态系统服务价值与其面积变化总体呈正相关,生态用地变化对服务价值影响最明显;(3)不同时期,生态生产用地的生态系统服务价值始终最高,生态用地次之,两者占总价值九成以上。研究表明,生态系统服务价值对生态用地、生态生产用地变化的响应较为显著。合理调控"三生"用地结构,保护生态功能性用地,可为生态系统服务保护、土地利用规划与管理等提供科学依据与决策参考。
Abstract:
In view of the ambiguous relationship between land function and ecosystem service function in the study of ecosystem service value, we explored the response of ecosystem service value to the change of ecological-living-industrial land. An ecological-living-industrial land classification system was developed, and the adjusted equivalent factor valuation model of ecosystem service was used to analyze the impact of the ecological-living-industrial land use change on the ecosystem service value in Linxiang City from 2009 to 2016. The results showed that:(1) the total ecosystem service value in Linxiang City was decreasing year by year, the ecosystem service value of ecological land and ecological-industrial land decreased rapidly, and the ecosystem service value of industrial-ecological land and living-industrial land grew slowly; (2) the value of ecosystem service of these four types of lands was positively correlated with their change of land use area; the change of ecological land had the most obvious impact on ecosystem service value; (3) in different periods, the ecosystem service value of ecological-industrial land was always the highest, followed by ecological land, which accounted for more than 90% of the total ecosystem service value. This research indicated that the ecosystem service value was more responsive to the changes of ecological land use and ecological-industrial land. The study on rationally regulating the structure of the ecological-living-industrial land and protecting ecological functional land can provide the scientific basis and decision-making reference for ecosystem service protection, land use planning and management.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李晓炜,侯西勇,邸向红,等.从生态系统服务角度探究土地利用变化引起的生态失衡:以莱州湾海岸带为例[J].地理科学,2016,36(8):1197-1204.
[2] 何玲,贾启建,李超,等.基于生态系统服务价值和生态安全格局的土地利用格局模拟[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(3):275-284.
[3] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment:Frameworks[M]. Washington DC, USA:World Resources Institute,2005.
[4] Costanza R, D’Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. World Environment,1997,387(6630):253-260.
[5] Ning Z H, Chambers R, Abdollahi K, et al. Modeling air pollutant removal, carbon storage, and CO2 sequestration potential of urban forests in Scotlandville, Louisiana[J]. Forest Biogeosciences and Forestry, 2016,9(6):860-867.
[6] Sherrouse B C, Semmens D J. Social Values for Ecosystem Services, Version 3.0:Documentation and User Manual[Z]. Reston, Va, USA:Geological Survey, 2015.
[7] Tallis H T, Ricketts T, Guerry A D, et al. InVEST 2.1 Beta User’s Guide[Z]. Palo Alto, California, USA:Stanford, the Natural Capital Project, 2011.
[8] 欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5):607-613.
[9] 李文华.生态系统服务功能价值评价的理论、方法与应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[10] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[11] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
[12] 祖皮艳木·买买提,赛迪古丽·哈西木,玉米提·哈力克,等.1976-2011年博斯腾湖小湖区湿地生态系统服务价值变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(3):328-332,337.
[13] Yin J, Yin Z, Zhong H, et al. Monitoring urban expansion and land use/land cover changes of Shanghai metropolitan area during the transitional economy (1979-2009) in China[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2011,177(1/4):609-621.
[14] 杨锁华,胡守庚,瞿诗进.1990-2014年长江中游经济带生态系统服务价值时空变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):164-169.
[15] 肖强,肖洋,欧阳志云,等.重庆市森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].生态学报,2014,34(1):216-223.
[16] 陈明叶,刘素红,于连海,等.大清河阜平流域生态系统结构变化的服务价值响应研究[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(8):1376-1389.
[17] 王爽,丁建丽,王璐,等.基于遥感的艾比湖流域近20年生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(5):144-149.
[18] 王考,姚云峰,包金兰.县级尺度"三生"用地动态变化及其空间集聚特征[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1):306-312,329.
[19] 刘彦随,刘玉,陈玉福.中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制[J].地理学报,2011,66(10):1379-1389.
[20] 唐秀美,陈百明,路庆斌,等.北京市土地利用生态分类方法[J].生态学报,2011,31(14):3902-3909.
[21] 陈婧,史培军.土地利用功能分类探讨[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2005,41(5):536-540.
[22] 张红旗,许尔琪,朱会义.中国"三生用地"分类及其空间格局[J].资源科学,2015,37(7):1332-1338.
[23] 于莉,宋安安,郑宇,等."三生用地"分类及其空间格局分析:以昌黎县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(2):89-96.

相似文献/References:

[1]谭君,李世平.铜川市土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):131.
 TAN Jun,LI Shi-ping.Analysis on Impacts of Land Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in Tongchuan City[J].,2012,19(06):131.
[2]张晓楠,宋宏利,李振杰.基于地统计学的区域生态服务价值空间分异规律研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):168.
 ZHANG Xiao-nan,SONG Hong-li,LI Zhen-jie.Study on Spatial Distribution of Regional Ecosystem Service Value Based on Geostatistics[J].,2012,19(06):168.
[3]章后甜,杜会石,王世东,等.长白山地区土地利用及生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):242.
 ZHANG Hou-tian,DU Hui-shi,WANG Shi-dong,et al.Study on the Land Use Change and Ecosystem Services Value in Changbai Mountain[J].,2012,19(06):242.
[4]陈颖,石培基,潘竟虎,等.高原生态城土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响研究——以甘肃省民乐县为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):154.
 CHEN Ying,SHI Pei-ji,PAN Jing-hu,et al.Analysis on the Effect of Land-use Change on Ecosystem Service Value in the Plateau Eco-city——A Case Study of Minle County[J].,2012,19(06):154.
[5]汤蕾,许东,母学征.辽河三角洲生态系统服务价值变化[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(05):108.
 TANG Lei,XU Dong,MU Xue-zheng.Change in Ecosystem Service Values in Liaohe River Delta[J].,2006,13(06):108.
[6]姜永华,江洪,曾波,等.三峡库区(重庆段)土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(04):234.
 JIANG Yong-Hua,JIANG Hong,ZENG Bo,et al.Effects of Land Use Change on the Ecosystem Services Value of Three Gorges Reservoir Area (the part of Chongqing)[J].,2008,15(06):234.
[7]苏朝阳,苗长虹.开封市土地利用时空变化的生态系统服务价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(05):116.
 SU Chao-yang,MIAO Chang-hong.Evaluation on Ecosystem Services Value of Spatial-Temporal Feature of Land Use Changes in Kaifeng[J].,2008,15(06):116.
[8]张芳怡,邢元志,濮励杰,等.苏州市土地利用变化的生态环境效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(05):98.
 ZHANG Fang-yi,XING Yuan-zhi,PU Li-jie,et al.Study on the Eco-environmental Effect of Land Use Change in Suzhou[J].,2009,16(06):98.
[9]王亚娟,刘小鹏,赵大磊.基于生态系统服务价值的固原市市辖区土地利用规划环境影响评价[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):222.
 WANG Ya-juan,LIU Xiao-peng,ZHAO Da-lei.Environment Impact Assessment of Guyuan Municipal Districts Land Use Program Based on Ecosystem Services Value[J].,2010,17(06):222.
[10]邓伟,杨华,崔艳君.重庆主城区近30年土地利用变化的生态环境效应评价[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):232.
 DENG Wei,YANG Hua,CUI Yan-jun.Assessment of Ecological Environmental Effects on Landuse Change in Chongqing City Nearly 30 Years[J].,2010,17(06):232.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-01-25;改回日期:2019-02-25。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金"基于互联网搜索的住房价格公众关注度——城际网络特征与内在机理"(71774066)
作者简介:刘艳中(1979-),男,山西吕梁人,教授,博士,主要从事区域生态安全评价研究。E-mail:Liuyanzhong@wust.edu.cn
通讯作者:陈勇(1968-),男,湖北武汉人,教授,博士,主要从事矿区生态安全研究。E-mail:Yongchen1968@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01