MIAO Qingfeng,NI Dongning,LI Ruiping,et al.Characteristics of Soil Salt Transfer Under Intercropping and Border-Furrow Irrigation Pattern[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(03):108-113.
小麦/玉米间作畦沟分灌土壤盐分迁移特征
- Title:
- Characteristics of Soil Salt Transfer Under Intercropping and Border-Furrow Irrigation Pattern
- 分类号:
- S156.4
- 摘要:
- 针对内蒙古河套灌区小麦/玉米间作常规灌溉模式下农田灌溉水浪费严重、土壤盐碱化日益加剧等农业生产现状，结合垄作沟灌技术，在灌区开展小麦/玉米间作畦沟分灌，并对畦灌和畦沟分灌两种灌水模式下间作群体作物根系区土壤垂向剖面内盐分的动态平衡进行了对比分析。结果表明：间作群体整个生育期，经历多次灌溉后，并未将土壤盐分有效排除农田，反而在灌溉及矿质化地下水补给作用下表现为积盐态势，将灌溉水及矿质化地下水携带的盐分聚集在根区土壤中，畦灌和沟灌玉米田单位面积土体储盐量平均增加211.08 g/m2，300.34 g/m2，差异显著。常规畦灌小麦田和畦沟分灌小麦田储盐量分别增加202.91 g/m2，200.43 g/m2，差异性不显著。畦灌和沟灌玉米土壤储盐量变化分别以0—60 cm和20—60 cm最大，且沟灌玉米整个生育期耕层0—20 cm土壤处于积盐状态，小麦各土层储盐量变化则以0—40 cm最大。研究结果可为畦沟分灌技术在河套灌区的推广应用提供技术支撑。
- Abstract:
- In view of serious water waste and increasing soil salinization in the present agricultural production situation for the wheat/maize intercropping conventional irrigation pattern in Hetao Irrigation District. On the basis of ridge furrow irrigation technology, the wheat/maize intercropping border-furrow irrigation technology was first put forward. The dynamic equilibrium of soil salinity in the vertical section of crop root zone in intercropping population under two irrigation patterns was compared. The results showed that the intercropping group had not effectively eliminated the soil salt after several irrigations in the whole growth period, instead, under the effect of irrigation water salt and mineralized groundwater recharge, the salt accumulation situation was obvious; the soil salt storage for border and furrow irrigation maize field increased by 211.08 g and 300.34 g per unit area on average; salt storage increased 202.91 g and 200.43 g, respectively, the conventional irrigation and border-furrow irrigation wheat, the difference was not significant. By quantitative analysis of salt content in soil profile, it was found that the change of soil salt content in border irrigation and furrow irrigation maize was the largest for 0-60 cm layer and 20-60 cm layer, respectively, and furrow irrigation maize was in the state of salt accumulation in the surface soil of 0-20 cm in the whole growth period. The change of salt storage in each soil layer of wheat was the largest for 0-40 cm. The research results can provide technical support for the application of border-furrow irrigation technology in Hetao Irrigation District.
参考文献/References:
[1] Luciano M, Nicola’s A, Oyonarte. A spreadsheet model to evaluate sloping furrow irrigation accounting for infiltration variability[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2005,76(1):62-75.
[2] 王旭清,王法宏,董玉红,等.小麦垄作栽培的肥水效应及光能利用分析[J].山东农业科学,2002(4):3-5.
[3] Daamen C C. Use of microlysimeters to measure evaporation from sandy soils[J]. Agric. for. Meteorol, 1993,65(3/4):159-173.
[4] 苗庆丰,史海滨,李瑞平,等.河套灌区畦-沟分灌水分利用效率及节水效果试验研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(10):135-139.
[5] 石培泽,杨秀英.垄植玉米控制性隔沟交替灌溉节水高效技术及效应[J].甘肃水利水电技术,1999(1):35-37.
[6] 倪东宁,李瑞平,史海滨,等.套种模式下不同灌水方式对玉米根系区土壤水盐运移及产量的影响[J].土壤,2015,47(4):797-804.
[7] Awal M A, Koshi H, Ikeda T. Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2006,139(1/2):74-83.
[8] 张作为,史海滨,李祯,等.不同灌水处理对间作种植模式下作物水分利用效率及产量的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2014,33(4/5):26-30.
[9] 白岗栓,杜社妮,于健,等.激光平地改善土壤水盐分布并提高春小麦产量[J].农业工程学报,2014,29(8):125-134.
[10] 刘目兴,王静爱,刘连友,等.旱作农田不同结构垄作的生态生产效益研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(6):114-118.
[11] 李玮,王立,姜涛.地下水浅埋区盐碱地滴灌条件下土壤盐分运移研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(5):130-135.
[12] Barnard J H, Van Rensburg L D, Bennie A T P. Leaching irrigated saline sandy to sandy loam apedal soils with water of a constant salinity[J]. Irrigation Science.,2010,28(2):191-201.
[13] 倪东宁.间作畦沟分灌模式下土壤水盐热迁移特征及灌水效果评价[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2016.
[14] 雷廷武,肖娟,詹卫华,等.沟灌条件下不同灌溉水质对玉米产量和土壤盐分的影响[J].水利学报,2004,35(9):118-122.
[15] 彭振阳,黄介生,伍靖伟,等.秋浇条件下季节性冻融土壤盐分运动规律[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(6):77-81.
[16] 梁建财,史海滨,李瑞平,等.覆盖对盐渍土壤冻融特性及秋浇灌水质量影响研究[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(4):98-105.
[17] 孙贯芳,屈忠义,杜斌,等.内蒙古河套灌区不同灌溉模式对土壤温度及盐分的影响[J].节水灌溉,2016(2):28-31.
[18] 马文军,程琴娟,李良涛,等.咸水灌溉下土壤水盐动态及对作物产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(1):73-80.
[19] Katerji N, Hoorn J W V, Hamdy A, et al. Salinity effect on crop development and yield, analysis of salt tolerance according to several classification methods[J]. Agric Water Management, 2003,62(1):37-66.
[20] 余根坚,黄介生,高占义,等.基于HYDRUS模型不同灌水模式下土壤水盐运移模拟[J].水利学报,2013,44(7):826-834.
[21] 王增丽,朱兴平,温广贵,等.垄作沟灌条件下灌溉定额对土壤水盐分布和制种玉米耗水的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(1):50-54.
[22] 袁成福,冯绍元,霍再林,等.咸水非充分灌溉对土壤盐分动态及制种玉米产量的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2013,32(3):114-116,120.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2018-08-02;改回日期:2018-09-13。
基金项目:内蒙古农业大学青年骨干人才项目（No.2017XQG-4）；内蒙古农业大学高层次人才引进项目（NDYB2016-23）；国家自然科学基金项目（51769024）；“十三五”国家重点研发计划（2016YFC0400205）
作者简介:苗庆丰(1989-),男,内蒙古卓资山人,博士研究生,从事灌溉方法及决策方面的研究E-mail:15049121836@126.com
通讯作者:史海滨(1961-),男,山西太谷人,博士,教授,博士生导师,从事节水灌溉原理及应用方面的研究E-mail:shi_haibin@sohu.com