WANG Yong,YANG Rui,QU Shuang,et al.Analysis of Soil Physical Characteristics and Water Conservation Function of Different Vegetation Types in Nangan Natural Reserve[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(06):183-188.
楠杆自然保护区不同植被类型土壤物理特性及涵养水源功能分析
- Title:
- Analysis of Soil Physical Characteristics and Water Conservation Function of Different Vegetation Types in Nangan Natural Reserve
- 分类号:
- S714
- 摘要:
- 为了研究楠杆自然保护区不同植被类型的土壤物理性质与涵养水源功能，选择了保护区6种典型的植被类型（落叶阔叶林、针阔混交林、针叶林、灌木林、竹林和草坡）下的土壤物理性质、土壤蓄水能力和土壤渗透能力等进行了研究，运用综合评价法对不同植被类型进行了综合评价。结果表明：6种不同植被类型的土壤密度为0.97 1.55 g/cm3，土壤总孔隙度为35.73%～69.25%，最大持水量为357.32~692.45 g/kg。不同植被类型的土壤物理性质、土壤蓄水能力和渗透能力有明显差异。综合评价分析表明：在不同植被类型中，落叶阔叶林（∑Pi2=0.468）土壤水源涵养功能最好，其次是竹林（∑Pi2=0.784）、针阔混交林（∑Pi2=0.914）、针叶林（∑Pi2=0.984）、灌木林（∑Pi2=1.005），没有植被覆盖的草坡（∑Pi2=1.431）上的土壤水源涵养功能综合能力相对较差。
- Abstract:
- In order to examine the soil physical properties and water conservation functions of different vegetation types in Nangan Nature Reserve, soil physical properties, soil water capacity and soil infiltration capacity etc of 6 kinds of typical vegetation types (deciduous broad-leaved forest, coniferous forest, coniferous forest, shrub forest, bamboo forest and grass) were measured. The comprehensive evaluation of different vegetation types was carried out by using the comprehensive evaluation method. The results showed that the soil densities of 6 different vegetation types ranged from 0.97 g/cm3 to 1.55 g/cm3, and the total porosity of soil varied from 35.73% to 69.25%, the maximum water holding capacities ranged from 357.32 mm to 692.45 g/kg. Soil physical properties, soil water storage capacities and osmosis abilities of different vegetation types were obvious different. Comprehensive evaluation analysis showed that soil water conservation function in deciduous broad-leaved forest is the best (∑Pi2=0.468) among different vegetation types, followed by bamboo (∑Pi2=0.784), coniferous forest (∑Pi2=0.914), coniferous forest (∑Pi2=0.984), shrub (∑Pi2=1.005), comprehensive soil water conservation ability on the slope with sparse grass was relatively poor (∑Pi2=1.431).
参考文献/References:
[1] 薛立,梁丽丽,任向荣,等.华南典型人工林的土壤物理性质及其水源涵养功能[J].土壤通报,2008,39(5):986-989.
[2] 刘明.凤凰山林场小流域试验场森林土壤涵养水源效益研究[J].林业资源管理,1998,9(6):51-54.
[3] 徐萍,刘霞,张光灿,等.鲁中山区小流域不同土地利用类型的土壤分形及水分入渗特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(5):89-95.
[4] 陈奇伯,齐实,孙立达,等.黄土丘陵区坡耕地土地退化研究[J].水土保持通报,2004,24(1):12-15.
[5] 陈瑶,张科利,罗利芳,等.黄土坡耕地弃耕后土壤入渗变化规律及影响因素[J].泥沙研究,2005,1(5):45-50.
[6] 李斌兵,郑粉莉.黄土坡面不同土地利用下的降雨入渗模拟与数值计算[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(5):118-123.
[7] 郑江坤,魏天兴,陈致富,等.陕北生态退耕区植被群落土壤贮水量与入渗特性[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):162-165.
[8] 孙艳红,张洪江,程金花,等.缙云山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):106-109.
[9] 张志强,余新晓,赵玉涛,等.森林对水文过程影响研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(1):113-116.
[10] 阮伏水,吴雄海.关于土壤可蚀性指标的讨论[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(6):68-72.
[11] 高岗,秦富仓,姚云峰,等.农牧交错带小流域防护林水源涵养功能研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(8):180-185.
[12] 汪永英,段文标.小兴安岭南坡3种林型林地水源涵养功能评价[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(5):31-36.
[13] 蒋文伟,姜志林,余树全,等.安吉主要森林类型水源涵养功能的分析与评价[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2002,26(4):71-74.
[14] 李永宁,张宾兰,秦淑英,等.郁闭度及其测定方法研究与应用[J].世界林业研究,2008,21(1):40-46.
[15] McCulloch J S G, Robinson M. History of forest hydrology[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1993,15(1):189-216.
[16] 刘宇,郭建斌,邓秀秀,等.秦岭火地塘林区3种土地利用类型的土壤潜在水源涵养功能评价[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(3):73-80.
[17] 李阿瑾.黄浦江上游近自然林与纯林涵养水源能力比较[D].上海:华东师范大学,2013.
[18] 王鹏程.三峡库区森林植被水源涵养功能研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2007.
相似文献/References:
[1]夏海江,肇普兴.聚丙烯酰胺对土壤物理性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(04):81.
Xia Haijiang,Zhao Puxing.Polyacrylamide Effect on Soil Physical Nature[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(06):81.
[2]张健,刘国彬,许明祥,等.黄土丘陵区植被次生演替灌木初期土壤物理性质特征[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(04):101.
ZHANG Jian,LIU Guo-bin,XU Ming-xiang,et al.Soil Physical Properties of Vegetation Secondary Succession on Early Shrub Stage in Loess Hill Gully[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(06):101.
[3]刘尧让,于法展,李淑芬,等.苏北山丘区森林群落次生演替中土壤物理性质及其持水性能研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):135.
LIU Yao-rang,YU Fa-zhan,LI Shu-fen,et al.Research on Physical Properties and Water-holding Capacity of the Soil in Forest Community Secondary Succession in the Northern Hilly Area in Jiangsu[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(06):135.
[4]谢元贵,车家骧,孙文博,等.煤矿矿区不同采煤塌陷年限土壤物理性质对比研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):26.
XIE Yuan-gui,CHE Jia-xiang,PENG Xi.Comparison Study of Mining Subsidence Years on Soil Physical Properties of in Mining Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):26.
[5]张宾宾,郭建斌,蒋坤云,等.新型土壤改良剂Arkadolith对沙质土壤主要物理性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):59.
ZHANG Bin-bin,GUO Jian-bin,JIANG Kun-yun,et al.Effect of New Soil Modifier Arkadolith on Physical Properties of Sandy Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):59.
[6]李春艳,张晓丽,安树杰,等.松材线虫入侵后马尾松根际土壤性质相关分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(03):89.
LI Chun-yan,ZHANG Xiao-li,AN Shu-jie,et al.Relevant Analysis of Soil Characters in Forest Land Invaded by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):89.
[7]朱毅,韩敬.蒙山不同树种对改良土壤物理性状的影响[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(03):97.
ZHU Yi,HAN Jing.Effects of Different Tree Species of Meng Moutain on Soil Physical Properties Improvement[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(06):97.
[8]吴钦孝,刘向东,赵鸿雁.山杨林地土壤的物理性质和水分特性[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):79.
Wu Qinxiao,Liu Xiangdong,Zhao Hongyan.SOIL FHY SICAL FROPERTIES AND ITS WATER CHARACTERISTICS IN MOUNTAIN POPLAR FOREST LAND[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(06):79.
[9]汪然,万书勤,康跃虎,等.喷灌配套耕作措施对土壤物理性质及玉米生长的影响[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):106.
WANG Ran,WAN Shuqin,KANG Yuehu,et al.Influence of Matching Tillage Measures on Soil Characteristics and Maize Growth Under Sprinkler[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(06):106.
[10]裴忠雪,武燕,王琼,等.松嫩平原土壤孔隙指标与其他土壤指标的相关关系[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(02):134.
PEI Zhongxue,WU Yan,WANG Qiong,et al.Correlations Between Soil Porosity-Related Parameters and Other Soil Parameters in Songnen Plain, Northeastern China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(06):134.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2018-01-21;改回日期:2018-02-26。
基金项目:贵州省重大专项（黔科合重大专项字[2016]3022-06号，黔科合JZ字[2014]200211）；贵州省科技计划项目（黔科合SY字[2013]3165号）
作者简介:王勇(1991-),男,贵州务川人,硕士生,研究方向为森林可持续经营管理。E-mail:2470991501@qq.com
通讯作者:杨瑞(1979-),男,贵州六盘水人,博士,副教授,主要从事森林经营与森林生态研究。E-mail:yr553017@163.com