[1]谢育利,陈云明,唐亚坤,等.地表凋落物对油松、沙棘人工林土壤呼吸的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):52-61.
　XIE Yuli,CHEN Yunming,TANG Yakun,et al.Impact of Aboveground Litterfall on Soil Respiration in the Pinus tabulaeformis and Hippophae rhamnoides Plantations[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(06):52-61.
点击复制

地表凋落物对油松、沙棘人工林土壤呼吸的影响

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年06期 页码: 52-61 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-11-24
Title:
Impact of Aboveground Litterfall on Soil Respiration in the Pinus tabulaeformis and Hippophae rhamnoides Plantations
作者:
谢育利1, 陈云明1,2, 唐亚坤2, 吴旭1, 温杰3
1. 中国科学院 教育部 水土保持与生态环境研究中心, 陕西 杨凌 712100;
2. 西北农林科技大学 水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌 712100;
3. 西北农林科技大学 林学院, 陕西 杨凌 712100
Author(s):
XIE Yuli1, CHEN Yunming1,2, TANG Yakun2, WU Xu1, WEN Jie3
1. Research Center of Institute of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Education, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
3. College of Forestry, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
关键词:
凋落物; 人工林; 土壤呼吸; 土壤温度; 土壤含水量
Keywords:
litterfall; plantation; soil respiration; soil temperature; soil water content
分类号:
S718.55
摘要:
通过对黄土丘陵区油松、沙棘人工林自然组（含凋落物）和去凋组（不含凋落物）土壤呼吸、5 cm土壤温度和含水量的监测，研究地表凋落物对土壤呼吸的影响。在两种林分内分别设置20 m×20 m样地，样地内随机设置5个观测点，于2015年6月到2016年5月使用LI-8100系统进行监测。结果表明：（1）自然组油松林和沙棘林土壤呼吸季节动态及日动态均表现为单峰型变化曲线，沙棘土壤呼吸年均值[2.10 μmol/（m2·s）]显著高于油松[1.56 μmol/（m2·s），p<0.05]；去除凋落物后，两种林分土壤呼吸与自然组具有相似的季节及日动态特征，但土壤呼吸年均值不存在显著性差异。（2）沙棘林自然组土壤呼吸年均值显著高于去凋组[1.58 μmol/（m2·s），p<0.05]，凋落物呼吸对土壤总呼吸的贡献率为15.81%；油松林自然组与去凋组土壤呼吸年均值差异不显著，凋落物呼吸对土壤总呼吸的贡献率仅为1.61%。（3）自然组和去凋组中油松、沙棘林土壤呼吸与温度均存在显著指数关系（p<0.05），与含水量则存在显著线性负相关关系（p<0.05）；两组处理土壤温度和含水量对土壤呼吸的单独解释量均较低（0.05%~37.82%），土壤呼吸主要受到温度和含水量共同作用的影响（8.01%~66.44%）。地表凋落物显著提高了沙棘林土壤呼吸的Q10和土壤呼吸量，但仅显著提高了油松林的Q10，对土壤呼吸量并未显著增加。油松林作为黄土丘陵区水土保持及生态恢复的造林树种更有利于该地区林地碳汇功能的提升。
Abstract:
The effects of surface litterfall on the soil respiration (Rs) were studied base on observation of Rs, soil temperature(T) and soil water content (W) at 5 cm depth under natural group (with litterfall) and exclusive group (without litterfall) treatments in Pinus tabulaeformis and Hippophae rhamnoides plantations in the hilly Loess Plateau region. Two plots (20 m×20 m) were established in these two plantations with 5 sampling points randomly set up in each plot. Rs, T and W were simultaneously monitored by LI-8100 soil flux system from June 2015 to May 2016 in these plots. The results showed that:(1) the seasonal and daily variation of Rs in the two plantations under natural group exhibited unimodal curve, and the annual average Rs in H.rhamnoides plantation[2.10 μmol/(m2·s)] was significantly higher than that in P.tabulaeformis plantation[1.56 μmol/(m2·s),p<0.05]. After removal of the litterfall, seasonal and daily dynamic of Rs in the two plantations were similar to that in natural group, and the annual average Rs in exclusive group did not exhibit significant differences for both forest stands; (2) the annual average Rs in natural group was significantly higher than in exclusive group[1.58 μmol/(m2·s),p<0.05] for H.rhamnoides plantation, with a contribution of 15.81% occupied by litterfall respiartion; however, no significant difference of annual average Rs between natural and exclusive group was observed in P.tabulaeformis plantation,and the contribution of litterfall to soil respiration was only 1.61%; (3) Rs under natural and exclusive groups were both exponentially correlated with T and negative linearly correlated with W on daily and seasonal scales in these two plantations (p<0.05); T and W (8.01%~66.44%) together could better explain the variation of Rs than T or W alone (0.05%~37.82%) in both plantations under natural and exclusive group; litterfall significantly enhanced both the temperature sensitivity of Rs and Rs amount in H.rhamnoides plantation, but only significantly improved temperature sensitivity of Rs in the P.tabulaeformis plantation. As an important tree species for soil and water conservation and ecological restoration in the hilly Loess Plateau region, the P.tabulaeformis was more conducive to the improvement of carbon sequestration function of forestland in the region.

参考文献/References:

[1] Jenkinson D S, Adams D E, Wild A. Model estimates of CO2 emissions from soil in response to global warming[J]. Nature, 1991,351(6324):304-306.
[2] 王新源,李玉霖,赵学勇,等.干旱半干旱区不同环境因素对土壤呼吸影响研究进展[J].生态学报,2012,32(15):4890-4901.
[3] 赵昕,张万军,沈会涛,等.针阔树种人工林地表凋落物对土壤呼吸的贡献[J].中国生态农业学报,2014,22(11):1318-1325.
[4] Deforest J L, Chen J, Mcnulty S G. Leaf litter is an important mediator of soil respiration in an oak-dominated forest[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2009,53(2):127-134.
[5] Raich J W, Nadelhoffer K J. Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems:Global trends[J]. Ecology, 1989,70(5):1346-1354.
[6] 余再鹏,万晓华,胡振宏,等.亚热带杉木和米老排人工林土壤呼吸对凋落物去除和交换的响应[J].生态学报,2014,34(10):2529-2538.
[7] Xu S, Liu L L, Sayer E J. Variability of above-ground litter inputs alters soil physicochemical and biological processes:A meta-analysis of litterfall-manipulation experiments[J]. Biogeosciences, 2013,10(11):7423-7433.
[8] Kuzyakov Y. Priming effects:Interactions between living and dead organic matter[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010,42(9):1363-1371.
[9] Jassal R S, Black T A, Novak M D, et al. Effect of soil water stress on soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity in an 18-year-old temperate Douglas-fir stand[J]. Global Change Biology, 2008,14(6):1305-1318.
[10] Yuste J C, Janssens I A, Carrara A, et al. Interactive effects of temperature and precipitation on soil respiration in a temperate maritime pine forest[J]. Tree Physiology, 2003,23(18):1263-1270.
[11] Hallett P D, Young I M. Changes to water repellence of soil aggregates caused by substrate-induced microbial activity[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 1999,50(1):35-40.
[12] Drenovsky R E, Vo D, Graham K J, et al. Soil water content and organic carbon availability are major determinants of soil microbial community composition[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2004,48(3):424-430.
[13] Liu W, Zhang Z, Wan S. Predominant role of water in regulating soil and microbial respiration and their responses to climate change in a semiarid grassland[J]. Global Change Biology, 2009,15(1):184-195.
[14] Moyano F E, Vasilyeva N, Bouckaert L, et al. The moisture response of soil heterotrophic respiration:Interaction with soil properties[J]. Biogeosciences, 2012,9(3):1173-1182.
[15] 周小刚,郭胜利,车升国,等.黄土高原刺槐人工林地表凋落物对土壤呼吸的贡献[J].生态学报,2012,32(7):2150-2157.
[16] 李晓杰,刘小飞,熊德成,等.中亚热带杉木人工林和米槠次生林凋落物添加与去除对土壤呼吸的影响[J].植物生态学报,2016,40(5):447-457.
[17] 杨庆朋,徐明,刘洪升,等.土壤呼吸温度敏感性的影响因素和不确定性[J].生态学报,2011,31(8):2301-2311.
[18] 姚辉,胡雪洋,朱江玲,等.北京东灵山3种温带森林土壤呼吸及其20年的变化[J].植物生态学报,2015,39(9):849-856.
[19] 颜廷武,尤文忠,张慧东,等.辽东山区落叶松人工林非生长季土壤呼吸及其影响因子研究[J].辽宁林业科技,2015,(1):20-22,52.
[20] 高强,马明睿,韩华,等.去除和添加凋落物对木荷林土壤呼吸的短期影响[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(5):1189-1197.
[21] 熊莉,徐振锋,杨万勤,等.川西亚高山粗枝云杉人工林地上凋落物对土壤呼吸的贡献[J].生态学报,2015,35(14):4678-4686.
[22] 陈云明,刘国彬,徐炳成.黄土丘陵区人工沙棘林水土保持作用机理及效益[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(4):595-599.
[23] Shi W Y, Yan M J, Zhang J G, et al. Soil CO2emissions from five different types of land use on the semiarid Loess Plateau of China, with emphasis on the contribution of winter soil respiration[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2014,88:74-82.
[24] Zhou Z, Zhang Z, Zha T, et al. Predicting soil respiration using carbon stock in roots, litter and soil organic matter in forests of Loess Plateau in China[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013,57(2013):135-143.
[25] 魏书精,罗碧珍,孙龙,等.森林生态系统土壤呼吸时空异质性及影响因子研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(4):689-704.
[26] Shi X, Zhang X, Yang X, et al. Contribution of winter soil respiration to annual soil CO2 emission in a Mollisol under different tillage practices in northeast China[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2012,26(2):1029-2011.
[27] Wei Y F, Fang J, Liu S, et al. Stable isotopic observation of water use sources of Pinus sylvestris var. Mongolica in Horqin Sandy Land, China[J]. Trees, 2013,27(5):1249-1260.
[28] 吴旭,陈云明,唐亚坤.黄土丘陵区刺槐和侧柏人工林树干液流特征及其对降水的响应[J].植物生态学报,2015,39(12):1176-1187.
[29] 车升国,郭胜利,张芳,等.黄土区夏闲期土壤呼吸变化特征及其影响因素[J].土壤学报,2010,47(6):1159-1169.
[30] 杨万勤,邓仁菊,张健.森林凋落物分解及其对全球气候变化的响应[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(12):2889-2895.
[31] Janssens I A, Carrara A, Ceulemans R. Annual Q10 of soil respiration reflects plant phenological patterns as well as temperature sensitivity[J]. Global Change Biology, 2004,10(2):161-169.
[32] 韩其晟,任宏刚,刘建军.秦岭主要森林凋落物中易分解和难分解植物残体含量及比值研究[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(5):6-10.
[33] Balser T C, Wixon D L. Investigating biological control over soil carbon temperature sensitivity[J]. Global Change Biology, 2009,15(12):2935-2949.
[34] 张海涵,唐明,陈辉,等.黄土高原5种造林树种菌根根际土壤微生物群落多样性研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,30(3):85-90.

相似文献/References:

[1]胡建忠.山杨混交类型生产力及土壤质量综合评价[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(01):44.
　Hu Jianzhong.Integrative Evaluation on Soil Quality and productivity of Populus davidiana Dode Mixed Forest[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1995,2(06):44.
[2]章异平,徐军亮,康慕谊,等.近自然林业的研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(03):214.
　ZHANG Yi-ping,XU Jun-liang,KANG Mu-yi,et al.Review on Progress in Near-Nature Forestry[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):214.
[3]崔鸿侠,张卓文,李振芳.巴东县不同森林类型林下灌草和凋落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):203.
　CUI Hong-xia,ZHANG Zhuo-wen,LI Zhen-fang.Studies on the Shrub, Herbage and Litter Hydrological Effect Under Different Forest Type in Badong Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):203.
[4]尹娜,魏天兴,张晓娟.黄土丘陵区人工林土壤养分效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(02):209.
　YIN Na,WEI Tian-xing,ZHANG Xiao-juan.The Characteristics of Soil Nutrient in Artificial Forest Land in the Hilly Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(06):209.
[5]刘骄,黄义雄,叶功富,等.福建沿海主要防护林树种的生物量、凋落物及其对林下土壤养分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(01):146.
　LIU Jiao,HUANG Yi-xiong,YE Gong-fu,et al.Research on Biomass and Undergrowth Soil Nutrient of Main Tree Species for Shelterbelt along Fujian Coastal Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):146.
[6]赵晓春,刘建军,任军辉,等.贺兰山4种典型森林类型凋落物持水性能研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):107.
　ZHAO Xiao-chun,LIU Jian-jun,REN Jun-hui,et al.Study on Water-holding Capacity of Litter in Four Forest Types of Helan Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):107.
[7]岳学文,方海东,钱坤建,等.金沙江干热河谷人工林土壤水分研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):125.
　YUE Xue-wen,QIAN Kun-jian,FANG Jin,et al.A Study on Soil Moisture in Different Plantations in Dry-Hot Valley of Jinsha River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):125.
[8]吴光艳,成婧,祝振华,等.黄土高原南部人工林林冠对降雨特征的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):32.
　WU Guang-yan,CHENG Jing,ZHU Zhen-hua,et al.Rainfall Characteristics under Canopy of Plantation Forest in the Southern Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):32.
[9]何聪,熊伟,王彦辉,等.六盘山北侧华北落叶松林分的水分利用效率研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):112.
　HE Cong,XIONG Wei,WANG Yan-hui,et al.The Water Use Efficiency of Larix principis-rupprechtii Plantation in the Northern Liupan Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):112.
[10]于法展,李保杰,尤海梅,等.徐州泉山自然保护区人工林下土壤容重与孔隙度时空变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):164.
　YU Fa-zhan,LI Bao-jie,YOU Hai-mei,et al.Study on Spatial-Temporal Changes on Undergrowth the Plantation Soil Bulk Density and Soil Porosity of Quanshan Nature Reserve in Xuzhou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):164.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2016-12-12;改回日期:2017-01-07。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金“黄土丘陵区油松和沙棘人工林的水分来源变化及其生理响应研究”（41501576）；公益性行业（国家气象局）科研专项（重大专项）“干旱气象科学研究—我国北方干旱致灾过程及机理”（GYHY2015060013）
作者简介:谢育利(1989-),女,广西玉林人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:人工林土壤呼吸。E-mail:1406599313@qq.com
通讯作者:陈云明(1967-),男,陕西渭南人,博士,研究员,主要研究方向:黄土高原植被与水土保持。E-mail:ymchen@ms.iswc.ac.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01