LI Xiaoqing,JIANG Bo,MI Yuan,et al.Characteristics of Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of Coupling Coordination Between Intensive Land Utilization and New Urbanization in Urban Agglomerations in Middle and Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):291-298.
长江中上游城市群土地集约利用及与新型城镇化耦合协调时空分异特征
- Title:
- Characteristics of Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of Coupling Coordination Between Intensive Land Utilization and New Urbanization in Urban Agglomerations in Middle and Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River
- Keywords:
- intensive land utilization; new urbanization; coordinated development degree; urban agglomeration in middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River
- 分类号:
- F293.2
- 摘要:
- 城市群土地集约利用与新型城镇化耦合协调发展是土地管理学研究的核心问题，探讨长江中上游城市群——长江中游和成渝城市群的耦合协调发展水平，以期为中国其他城市群的相关研究提供参考。利用全局主成分分析法、均方差权值法、熵权法进行综合确权以提高评价指标权重精度，采用耦合度模型、协调发展度模型对长江中游和成渝城市群协调发展水平进行了测算、分析与比较，进而利用空间自相关模型探究各城市群土地集约利用与城镇化协调发展水平的空间集聚特征与规律。结果表明：成渝城市群土地集约利用与新型城镇化协调发展水平与长江中游相当，成渝城市群耦合协调态势优于长江中游城市群。具体体现在（1）2004—2013年长江中上游城市群土地集约利用与新型城镇化协调发展水平呈现出持续递增的态势，2013年长江中游和成渝协调发展度相近，均在0.75以上，处于中度协调期，成都、重庆、长沙、武汉、南昌等城市为协调度高值区，德阳、黄石为协调度低值区，其他城市的协调发展水平居中。（2）长江中游协调发展度空间相关性有所降低，由随机分布向弱相异属性集聚转化，而成渝协调发展度空间相关性有所提升，由相异属性集聚向随机分布状态转化，未来有逐步优化为相似属性集聚的态势。
- Abstract:
- The coordinated development level between intensive land use and new urbanization of agglomeration is the core issue in land management. The coordinated development level of middle Yangtze River Region and Chengdu—Chongqing urban agglomeration, which are the urban agglomerations in middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River, was analyzed to provide some relevant references. Generalization Principal Component Analysis and Mean-Squared Deviation Weight were used to improve the accuracy of the index weight. We used coupling degree model and coordinated development degree model to measure, analyze, compare the coordinated development level of the middle Yangtze River region and Chengdu—Chongqing urban agglomeration. Spatial Autocorrelation Model was used to explore the characteristics and rules of spatial agglomeration of coordinated development level. The results show that the coordinated development level in Chengdu—Chongqing urban agglomeration is close with the middle Yangtze River Region. The coupling coordinated situation in Chengdu—Chongqing urban agglomeration is better than the middle Yangtze River Region. (1) The coordinated development level of the urban agglomerations in middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River is showing the trend of sustained growth. The coordination degree between the middle Yangtze River Region and Chengdu—Chongqing urban agglomeration is very close in 2013, its value is greater than 0.75 and the coordination development level is in moderate coordination period. Chengdu, Chongqing, Changsha, Wuhan, Nanchang are the areas with high value of coordinated development. Deyang and Huangshi are areas with the low value of coordinated development. The coordinated development levels in other cities are characterized as the medium level. (2) The spatial correlation of coordinated development degree is reduced in the middle Yangtze River Region, transforming from random distribution to weak diversity attribute clustering. The spatial correlation of coordinated development degree is relatively high in Chengdu—Chongqing urban agglomeration, transforming from diversity attribute clustering to random distribution, it will gradually become similar attribute clustering in the future.
参考文献/References:
[1] 孙平军,吕飞,修春亮,等.新型城镇化下中国城市土地节约集约利用的基本认知与评价[J].经济地理,2015,35(8):178-183.
[2] 李平光,李松,郭路明,等.新疆地区城市土地集约利用与城市化耦合协调性分析[J].浙江农业学报,2014,26(6):1688-1695.
[3] 张超,李丁,魏秀梅,等.西北河谷型城市新型城镇化与土地利用效益耦合协调发展研究:以兰州市为例[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2015,51(2):173-179.
[4] 彭冲,陈乐一,韩峰.新型城镇化与土地集约利用的时空演变及关系[J].地理研究,2014,33(11):2005-2020.
[5] Christoph K, Claudia B, Ulrich C. Effects of urban land use on surface temperature in Berlin:Case study, Journal of Urban Planning & Development, 2007,133(2):128-137.
[6] Susannah G E, Handley J F, Ennos A R, et al. Characterizing the urban environment of UK cities and towns:A template for landscape and urban planning[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008,87(3):210-222.
[7] 曹飞.中国新型城镇化质量与城镇土地集约测度及其协调分析[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(6):349-353.
[8] 张乐勤,陈素平,陈保平,等.城镇化与土地集约利用耦合协调度测度:以安徽省为例[J].城市问题,2014(2):75-82.
[9] 刘浩,张毅,郑文升.城市土地集约利用与区域城市化的时空耦合协调发展评价:以环渤海地区城市为例[J].地理研究,2011,30(10):1805-1817.
[10] 刘学,孙泰森.山西省城市土地集约利用与城市化的耦合协调关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(2):299-304.
[11] 张惠.我国城镇化与城市土地集约利用耦合发展探析[J].华南师范大学学报,2015,47(3):127-133.
[12] Macedo J. Urban land policy and new land tenure paradigms: Legitimacy vs. legality in Brazilian cities[J]. Land Use Policy, 2008,25(2):259-270.
[13] 周青,黄贤金,濮励杰,等.快速城镇化农村区域土地利用变化及驱动机制研究:以江苏省原锡山市为例[J].资源科学,2004,26(1):22-30.
[14] 刘萌,冯长春,曹广忠.中国城市土地投入产出效率与城镇化水平的耦合关系:对286个地级及以上城市行政单元的分析[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(5):50-57.
[15] 丁志伟,张改素,王发曾,等.中国工业化、城镇化、农业现代化、信息化、绿色化“五化”协调定量评价的进展与反思[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(1):4-13.
[16] 丁志伟,张改素,王发曾.中原地区多尺度城乡收入的时空分异[J].地理研究,2015,34(1):131-148.
[17] 范辉,刘卫东,吴泽斌,等.浙江省人口城市化与土地城市化的耦合协调关系评价[J].经济地理,2014,34(12):21-28.
[18] 王聪,朱喜钢,王富喜.基于均方差权值法的山东省县域城镇化水平评价[J].山东师范大学学报:自然科学版,2009,24(4):78-83.
[19] 席娟,张毅,杨小强.陕西省城市土地利用效益与城市化耦合协调发展研究[J].华中师范大学学报:自然科学版,2013,47(1):117-123.
相似文献/References:
[1]郭施宏,王富喜.山东省城市化与城市土地集约利用耦合协调关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):163.
GUO Shi-hong,WANG Fu-xi.Coupled Coordination between Urbanization and Intensive Urban Land Use in Shandong Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):163.
[2]吴妤,姜珊珊.甘肃省土地集约利用与经济耦合协调发展评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):217.
WU Yu,JIANG Shan-shan.Study on Evaluation of Land Intensive Use and Economic Coupling Coordinate Development in Gansu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):217.
[3]王莉,陈浮,陈海燕,等.低碳经济和土地集约利用的脱钩分析体系研究——以江苏省昆山经济开发区为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):218.
WANG Li,CHEN Fu,CHEN Hai-yan,et al.Study on Decoupling Analysis System of Low-carbon Economy and Intensive Land Use-A Case of Kunshan Economic Development Zone of Jiangsu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):218.
[4]化龙雷,雷国平,张慧.煤炭城市土地集约利用评价及其驱动因子分析——以黑龙江省七台河市为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):212.
HUA Long-lei,LEI Guo-ping,ZHANG Hui.Analysis on Evaluation and Driving Factors on Intensive Landuse of the Coal-base City -A Case Study of Qitaihe City of Heilongjiang Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):212.
[5]韩会庆,蔡广鹏,张凤太,等.喀斯特地区县域土地集约利用评价——贵州省绥阳县为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):243.
HAN Hui-qing,CAI Guang-peng,ZHANG Feng-tai,et al.Evaluation of Land Intensive Use on County Scale in Karst Area——A Case Study of Suiyang County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):243.
[6]崔娟敏,季文光.基于AHP的土地集约利用水平模糊综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):122.
CUI Juan-min,JI Wen-guang.AHP-based Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluating for Land Intensive Use Level[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(05):122.
[7]杨磊,张永福,王伯超.乌鲁木齐市土地集约利用潜力评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(03):35.
YANG Lei,ZHANG Yong-fu,WANG Bo-chao.Study on Land Intensive Use and Its Potentiality Evaluation in Urumqi City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(05):35.
[8]王芳萍,师燕,姚步青,等.西宁市土地利用效益与新型城镇化耦合协调度研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):253.
WANG Fangping,SHI Yan,YAO Buqing,et al.Coupling and Coordination Development Between Urban Land Use Benefits and New Urbanization in Xi’ning City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):253.
[9]哈尚辰,阿里木江·卡斯木.城市土地集约利用与用地扩展研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):296.
HA Shangchen,Alimujiang·Kasimu.Research for Urban Intensive Land Use and Urban Land Expansion—A Case Study in Urumqi City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):296.
[10]杜旭,宋戈,李瑞雪,等.黑龙江省煤炭型城市土地集约利用评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(01):139.
DU Xu,SONG Ge,LI Ruixue,et al.Evaluation of Urban Intensive Land Use in the Coal-Mining City of Heilongjiang Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):139.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2017-01-06;改回日期:2017-02-26。
基金项目:教育部人文社科基金青年项目（16YJCZH034）；国家自然科学基金（41101153）；东北农业大学土地资源管理学科团队资助项目
作者简介:李晓庆(1991-),女,山东烟台人,硕士研究生,从事区域发展与土地利用研究。E-mail:923025855@qq.com
通讯作者:姜博(1979-),男,吉林四平人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,从事城市与区域发展。E-mail:jiangbo_1979@163.com