[1]郭宇伦,师学义,璩路路,等.基于PSR-CPM模型的市域土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(04):108-112.
　GUO Yulun,SHI Xueyi,QU Lulu,et al.Evaluation of Land Ecological Security in Jincheng Based on the Model of PSR-CPM[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):108-112.
点击复制

基于PSR-CPM模型的市域土地生态安全评价

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年04期 页码: 108-112 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-08-28
Title:
Evaluation of Land Ecological Security in Jincheng Based on the Model of PSR-CPM
作者:
郭宇伦, 师学义, 璩路路, 刘畅
中国地质大学(北京) 土地科学技术学院, 北京 100083
Author(s):
GUO Yulun, SHI Xueyi, QU Lulu, LIU Chang
College of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
关键词:
土地生态安全评价; 突变级数法; PSR模型; 晋城市
Keywords:
evaluation of land ecological security; catastrophe progression method; PSR model; Jincheng City
分类号:
X821
摘要:
以PSR模型为基础，构建目标层、准则、因素层和指标层4级评价体系，运用突变级数法（CPM）对2005—2014年晋城市土地生态安全水平进行了评价。结果表明：2005—2008年，晋城市土地生态安全水平呈上升趋势，达到临界安全状态；2008—2009年，土地生态安全呈下降趋势，降低到较不安全水平；2009—2013年，土地生态安全水平呈上升趋势，并稳定在较安全水平；2013—2014年土地生态安全水平略有下降趋势，再次降低到较不安全状态。2005—2008年的变化主要是晋城市开展造林工程和产业结构改革的结果；2008—2009年的变化主要是受经济危机和旱灾的影响；2009—2013年的变化主要是由于经济、粮食产量的恢复和工业污染得到有效控制；2013—2014年的变化主要是经济发展减缓和人口增长所造成的。针对主要限制因素，晋城市今后应更加注重产业结构转型，控制工业污染排放和增加农业灌溉设施这三个方面的工作。
Abstract:
Based on the PSR model, the four-level model of target, criterion, factor and index was built, and land ecological security level of Jincheng City from 2005 to 2014 was evaluated by using catastrophe progression method. The results show that from 2005 to 2008, the ecological security level of land in Jincheng City was rose, and reached to the critical security state; from 2008 to 2009, the ecological security of the land declined and fell to less secure; from 2009 to 2013, land ecological security level was rose, and stabilized at relatively safe level; from 2013 to 2014, the level of land ecological security had a slight downward trend, and reduced to a less secure state again. The change was mainly the result of the afforestation project and industrial structure reform in Jincheng City in the period from 2005 to 2008. The change was mainly due to the economic crisis and drought in the period from 2008 to 2009. The change was mainly due to the recovery of economic, food production and industrial pollution in the period from 2009 to 2013. The change was mainly due to economic slow down and population growth in ther period from 2013 to 2014. In view of the main restrictive factors, Jincheng City should pay more attention to the transformation of industrial structure, control the industrial pollution emissions and increase the agricultural irrigation facilities.

参考文献/References:

[1] 梁留科,张运生,方明.我国土地生态安全理论研究初探[J].云南农业大学学报,2005,20(6):81-86.
[2] 曲福田,赵海霞,朱德明.江苏省土地生态安全问题及对策研究[J].环境保护,2005(2):57-59.
[3] 傅伯杰.土地生态系统的特征及其研究的主要方面[J].生态学杂志,1985(1):35-38.
[4] 张小虎,雷国平,袁磊,等.黑龙江省土地生态安全评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2009,19(1):88-93.
[5] 陈静,刘秀华,刘勇.基于PSR-TOPSIS模型的三峡库区土地生态安全评价:以丰都县为例[J].湖北农业科学,2015,54(24):6226-6230.
[6] 孙德亮,张凤太.基于DPSIR-灰色关联模型的重庆市土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):191-197.
[7] 郑奇洋,王纯彬,蒋丽钠,等.基于DPSIR修正模型下的土地生态安全评价:以舟山市为例[J].湖北农业科学,2016(16):4158-4164.
[8] 赵春容,赵万民.模糊综合评价法在城市生态安全评价中的应用[J].环境科学与技术,2010(3):179-183.
[9] 李希灿,王静,白兰,等.土地生态安全多目标多层次灰色关联度评价模型[C]//全国灰色系统学术会议,2008.
[10] 乔蕻强,程文仕.基于熵权物元模型的土地生态安全评价[J].土壤通报,2016,47(2):302-307.
[11] 张玉虎,李义禄,贾海峰.永定河流域门头沟区景观生态安全格局评价[J].干旱区地理,2013,36(6):1049-1057.
[12] 角媛梅,肖笃宁.绿洲景观空间邻接特征与生态安全分析[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(1):31-35.
[13] 黄海,刘长城,陈春.基于生态足迹的土地生态安全评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(1):193-196,201.
[14] 何亚芬.基于格网的南昌市土地生态承载力评价[D].南昌:江西农业大学,2015.
[15] 刘伟玮.土地利用变化与土地生态安全评价研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2013.
[16] 刘畅,师学义,梁旭琴,等.基于物元模型的资源型城市土地利用效益动态评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(4):122-126,131.
[17] 丁庆华.突变理论及其应用[J].黑龙江科技信息,2008(35):11-23.
[18] 高奇.基于CPM-RBF模型的区域土地生态安全预警研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2015.
[19] 徐美,朱翔,周军.基于突变理论的湖南省土地生态安全格局分析[J].自然灾害学报,2012,21(6):199-207.
[20] 张红侠,肖杰,张孝存.基于PSR的商洛市各县区土地生态安全分析[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(36):306-308.

相似文献/References:

[1]许月卿,崔丽.小城镇土地生态安全评价研究——以贵州省猫跳河流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):345.
　XU Yue-qing,CUI Li.Evaluation on Ecological Security of Land Resources in Towns——A Case Study of Maotiao River, Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(04):345.
[2]杨东,焦金鱼,田娜.基于突变理论的岷县山区泥石流危险性区划研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(04):5.
　YANG Dong,JIAO Jin-yu,TIAN Na.Research on Debris Flow Harzard Zonation Based on Catastrophe Theory in the Min County, Gansu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(04):5.
[3]王磊,郭灿,李慧明.基于PSR-TOPSIS模型的宁夏回族自治区土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):154.
　WANG Lei,GUO Can,LI Huiming.Evaluation of Land Security in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Based on PSR-TOPSIS Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):154.
[4]黄海,谭晶今,陈春,等.基于TOPSIS方法的山东省土地生态安全动态评价[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):220.
　HUANG Hai,TAN Jingjin,CHEN Chun,et al.Land Ecological Security Appraisal for Shandong Province Based on TOPSIS Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):220.
[5]韩蕾,孔祥斌,郭洪峰,等.西南山区生态敏感区土地生态安全评价——以秀山县为例[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):229.
　HAN Lei,KONG Xiangbin,GUO Hongfeng,et al.Study on Land Eco-security Evaluation of Ecological Sensitive Area in Southwest Mountains -A Case Study in Xiushan County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(04):229.
[6]汤洁,刘岩岩,王博,等.基于突变基数法的辽河重污染支流生态安全研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(03):251.
　TANG Jie,LIU Yan-yan,WANG Bo,et al.Research for Ecological Security of the Heavily Polluted Tributary of Liaohe Based on Catastrophe Progression Method[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(04):251.
[7]翁翎燕.基于突变级数法的江苏省资源环境承载力评价及障碍因素诊断[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):354.
　WENG Lingyan.Evaluation of Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity Based on Catastrophe Progression Method and Diagnosis of Its Obstacle Indicators in Jiangsu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(04):354.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2017-01-21;改回日期:2017-02-26。
基金项目:国土资源部公益性行业科研专项经费课题“北方村庄压煤山丘区土地综合整治技术研究”（201411007）
通讯作者:师学义(1960-),男,山西晋中人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为土地利用规划与土地利用工程。E-mail:shixueyi60@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01