[1]张茹,戴文婷,刘兆顺,等.我国北方农牧交错区土地生态安全评价——以白城市为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):259-266.
　ZHANG Ru,DAI Wenting,LIU Zhaoshun,et al.Evaluation of Land Ecological Security in Agro-Pastoral Zone of Northern China—A Case Study of Baicheng City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):259-266.
点击复制

我国北方农牧交错区土地生态安全评价——以白城市为例

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年02期 页码: 259-266 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-04-28
Title:
Evaluation of Land Ecological Security in Agro-Pastoral Zone of Northern China—A Case Study of Baicheng City
作者:
张茹1, 戴文婷1, 刘兆顺2, 董霁红1
1. 中国矿业大学 环境与测绘学院, 江苏 徐州 221000;
2. 吉林大学 地球科学学院, 长春 130000
Author(s):
ZHANG Ru1, DAI Wenting1, LIU Zhaoshun2, DONG Jihong1
1. School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221000, China;
2. College of Earth Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130000, China
关键词:
农牧交错区; 土地生态; 安全评价; PSR模型; 白城市
Keywords:
agro-pastoral zone; land ecology; security evaluation; PSR model; Baicheng City
分类号:
X171.1
摘要:
白城市位于北方农牧交错区，生态环境脆弱。为了解其土地生态安全状况，基于压力—状态—响应（pressure-state-response简称PSR）模型，共选取21个指标构建了土地生态安全评价指标体系，对2007—2012年白城市及其所辖5个县区土地生态安全变化情况进行评价分析。结果表明：（1）各县（市、区）土地生态压力—状态—响应情况不同，镇赉县、大安县及洮北区土地生态压力安全值较高，对安全综合值贡献率在38%以上；洮南市土地生态状态安全值较高，贡献率在36%以上；通榆县土地生态压力—状态—响应安全值分布比较均衡，贡献比为35：34：31。（2）2007—2012年，白城市土地生态安全综合值由0.712 2提高至0.780 4，土地生态环境有所改善，但土地安全等级仍处于敏感级，生态环境比较脆弱。（3）白城市土地生态安全状况的改善有赖于实施有效的人口政策，控制人口规模；引进人才，鼓励农民发展新型绿色农业，减轻土地污染压力；提高环境保护意识，加大环保投资力度，促进土地生态恢复。
Abstract:
Baicheng City is located in agro-pastoral zone in northern China. The ecological environment of this city is fragile. In order to understand the status of land ecological security in Baicheng City, we selected 21 indexes to construct the evaluating index system of land ecological security based on pressure-state-response model (PSR), and to evaluate and analyze the changes of land ecological security in Baicheng City and 5 counties (cities, districts) under its jurisdiction from 2007—2012. The results showed that:(1) statuses of land ecological pressure-state-response in different counties (cities, districts) were not same, the land ecological pressure values of Zhenlai County, Da’an County and Taobei District were higher, their contribution rates for comprehensive value were more than 38%; the land ecological state value of Taonan City was higher, and it’s contribution rate was more than 36%; the distribution of land ecological pressure-state-response value of Tongyu County was balanced, their contribution ratio was 35:34:31; (2) during the period from 2007 to 2012, the comprehensive value of land ecological security of Baicheng City increased from 0.712 2 to 0.780 4, and the land ecological environment had improved, but the land security level was still at the sensitive level, the ecological environment was fragile; (3) the improvement of land ecological security situation of Baicheng City depended on the implementation of effective population policy for controlling population scale, reducing the pollution pressure of land by introducing talent and encouraging farmers to develop new green agriculture, promoting ecological restoration of land by raising awareness and increasing investment in environmental protection.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘彦随.保障我国土地资源安全的若干思考[J].中国科学学院刊,2006,21(5):379-384.
[2] 张利,陈影,王树涛,等.滨海快速城市化地区土地生态安全评价与预警:以曹妃甸新区为例[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(8):2445-2454.
[3] 余健,房莉,仓定邦,等.熵权模糊物元模型在土地生态安全评价中的应用[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(5):260-266.
[4] 陈西蕊,张蓉珍.基于P-S-R模型的陕西省土地资源生态安全动态评价[J].南方农业学报,2011,42(2):224-228.
[5] 许国平.中国土地资源安全评价研究进展及展望[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):276-279.
[6] 范瑞锭,陈松林,戴菲,等.福建省土地利用生态安全评价[J].福建师范大学学报:自然科学版,2010,26(5):97-101+108.
[7] 杜会石,滕泽宇,王华,等.吉林省白城市生态系统服务价值预测研究[J].浙江农业学报,2014,26(6):1583-1589.
[8] Rapport D J, Singh A. An Ecohealth-based framework for State of Environment Reporting[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2006,6(2):409-428.
[9] 陈美球,刘桃菊,许莉.基于PSR框架模型的流域生态系统健康评价研究现状及展望[J].江西农业大学学报:社会科学版,2011,10(3):83-89.
[10] 袁丽娟.土地资源生态安全评价研究综述[J].西部资源,2013(3):179-181.
[11] 刘凌冰,李世平.西北荒漠化地区土地生态安全评价:以酒泉市为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(4):190-194.
[12] 张锐,郑华伟,刘友兆.基于PSR模型的耕地生态安全物元分析评价[J].生态学报,2013,33(16):5090-5100.
[13] 汤洁,朱云峰,李昭阳,等.东北农牧交错带土地生态环境安全指标体系的建立与综合评价:以镇赉县为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(1):119-124.
[14] 孙晓庆,陈刚.吉林西部土地利用变化的生态环境效应评价[J].吉林水利,2011,354(11):1-5.
[15] 臧立娟.吉林西部土地利用结构优化配置研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2010.
[16] 李秀霞,张希.基于熵权法的城市化进程中土地生态安全研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(9):13-17.
[17] 张祥义,许皞,赵文廷.基于PSR模型的河北省土地生态安全评价的分区[J].贵州农业科学,2013,41(8):207-211.
[18] 李宗杰,田青,宋玲玲,等.基于水土保持的甘肃省生态安全评价[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(5):1420-1426.
[19] 马瑛.北方农牧交错带土地利用生态安全评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2007,21(7):53-58.
[20] 张松男.吉林省四平市土地生态安全评价研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2013.
[21] 张军以,苏维词,张凤太.基于PSR模型的三峡库区生态经济区土地生态安全评价[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(6):1039-1044.

相似文献/References:

[1]夏照华,张克斌,李瑞,等.基于NDVI的农牧交错区植被覆盖度变化研究——以宁夏盐池县为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(06):178.
　XIA Zhao-hua,ZHANG Ke-bin,LI Rui,et al.Study on the Change of Vegetation Fraction in Agro-pastoral Transition Area Based on NDVI——A Case Study in Yanchi County, Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):178.
[2]秦作栋,王孟本,薛占金.晋北地区土地沙化现状及其成因分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(02):168.
　QIN Zuo-dong,WANG Meng-ben,XUE Zhan-jin.An Analysis of Present Situation and Causes of Sandification in North Shanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(02):168.
[3]袁磊,雷国平,张小虎.大庆油田区土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):216.
　YUAN Lei,LEI Guo-ping,ZHANG Xiao-hu.Evaluation on Land Ecological Security of the Daqing Oil Field Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):216.
[4]王林林,董立峰,宋芙蓉,等.库布齐沙漠典型农牧交错区沙漠化动态研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(03):121.
　WANG Lin-lin,DONG Li-feng,SONG Fu-rong,et al.Dynamics Analysis of Desertification in Typical Farming-Pastoral Ecotone of Hobq Desert[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):121.
[5]王同顺,郭建英,孙保平,等.农牧交错区退耕还林地土壤恢复特征的研究——以内蒙古卓资县为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(06):134.
　WANG Tong-shun,GUO Jian-ying,SUN Bao-ping,et al.The Research of Characteristics of Soil Restoration of Conversion Cropland to Forest in the Farming-pastoral Zone—Taking Example of Zhuozi County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):134.
[6]赵艳霞,刘欣,秦彦杰,等.河北省农牧交错区LUCC及其对生态脆弱性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):205.
　ZHAO Yan-xia,LIU Xin,XU Quan-hong.LUCC and Its Impact on Vulnerability of Agro-pastoral Areas in Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(02):205.
[7]余敦,陈文波.鄱阳湖生态经济区土地生态安全研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):107.
　YU Dun,CHEN Wen-bo.Research for Land Ecological Security in Poyang Lake Ecological Economic Zone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(02):107.
[8]程中秋,张克斌,常进,等.农牧交错区天然草地植被的波动[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):189.
　CHENG Zhong-qiu,ZHANG Ke-bin,CHANG Jin,et al.Fluctuation of Vegetation in Natural Grassland of Farming-pastoral Ecotone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(02):189.
[9]毕海洋,李波,南箔,等.土地功能调控与生态政绩考核研究——以华阳河湖群地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(02):171.
　BI Haiyang,LI Bo,NAN Bo,et al.Study on Land Function Regulation and Ecological Performance Evaluation System of Huayang Lake Group[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(02):171.
[10]秦伟霞,王新闯,马守臣,等.基于功能分区的土地生态质量障碍因子诊断——以新乡市为例[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(04):148.
　QIN Weixia,WANG Xinchuang,MA Shouchen,et al.Obstacle Factors Diagnosis of Land Ecological Quality Based on Functional Partition—A Case Study of Xinxiang City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(02):148.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2016-04-07;改回日期:2016-05-06。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目（51374208）；土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室开放课题（Y412201432）
作者简介:张茹(1993-),女,陕西渭南人,硕士研究生,主要从事乡村景观研究。E-mail:18361279750@163.com
通讯作者:董霁红(1967-),女,山西芮城人,博士,教授,主要从事生态安全评价方面的研究。E-mail:dongjihong@cumt.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01