HE Qinfei,ZHENG Wei,PENG Yuhua,et al.Water-holding Characteristics of Litter Under Main Forest Types in the Middle Reaches of Pearl River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):128-134.
珠江流域中游主要森林类型凋落物持水特性
- Title:
- Water-holding Characteristics of Litter Under Main Forest Types in the Middle Reaches of Pearl River Basin
- 分类号:
- S715.7
- 摘要:
- 采用野外实地调查与室内分析相结合的方法，对珠江流域中游苍梧县的5种森林类型的凋落物累积量和持水量、持水率、吸水速率等持水特性进行了研究。结果表明：不同森林类型凋落物总储量为湿地松（Pinus elliottii）+荷木（Schima superba）混交林（40.18 t/hm2） > 桉树（Eucalyptus）林（11.77 t/hm2） > 马尾松（Pinus massoniana）林（10.97 t/hm2） > 红锥（Castanopsis hystrix）林（8.75 t/hm2） > 大叶栎（Quercus griffithii）林（7.71 t/hm2），且半分解层累积量所占比例均大于未分解层，马尾松林则相反；5种森林类型不同分解程度的凋落物持水量和持水率与浸泡时间均呈对数关系，吸水速率与浸泡时间呈幂函数关系；凋落物最大持水量为13.12～77.09 t/hm2，湿地松+荷木混交林最大，红锥林最小；最大持水率为150.8～187.9%，大叶栎林最大，红锥林最小；有效拦蓄量为8.26～49.31 t/hm2，大小顺序为湿地松+荷木混交林 > 大叶栎林 > 红锥林 > 桉树林 > 马尾松林。综合考虑，研究区5种森林类型中湿地松+荷木针阔混交林持水能力最强，且优势明显，因此，水源涵养林宜优先选择针阔混交林模式。
- Abstract:
- Litter layer plays a significant hydro-ecological role in forest ecosystem. By the field investigation and laboratory analysis, a study was conducted on the accumulation amount, water-holding capacity, water-holding rate and water-absorption rate of the litter under five main forests (Pinus massoniana forest, Eucalyptus forest, Castanopsis hystrix forest, Quercus griffithii forest, Pinus elliottii+Schima superba forest) in the middle reaches of Pearl River. The litter accumulation under the forest decreased in the order of P. elliottii + S. superba forest (40.18 t/hm2) > Eucalyptus forest (11.77 t/hm2) > P. massoniana forest (10.97 t/hm2) > C. hystrix forest (8.75 t/hm2) > Q. griffithii forest (7.71 t/hm2), and the percentage of semi-decomposed litter storage was higher than that of un-decomposed litter, whereas for P. massoniana forest, it was in adverse. The water-holding capacity and water-holding rate of litter at different decomposition degrees changed logarithmically, while the water-absorption rate assumed a power function of soaking time. The maximum water-holding capacity of the litter varied from 13.12 t/hm2 to 77.09 t/hm2, being the highest for P. elliottii + Schima superba forest and the lowest for C. hystrix forest. The maximum water-holding rate of the litter was 150.8~187.9%, being the highest for Q. griffithii forest and the lowest for C. hystrix forest. The effective retaining capacity of the litter ranged from 8.26 t/hm2 to 49.31 t/hm2, and decreased in the order of P. elliottii + S. superba forest > Q. griffithii forest > C. hystrix fores t > Eucalyptus forest > P. massoniana forest. Water conservation capacity of P. elliottii + S. superba forest was the strongest among these forests. So, this study can provide the important basic theory that can select conifer-broadleaf forest needle modes and broadleaved deciduous in improving hydro-ecological effects of water conservation forests.
参考文献/References:
[1] 吴钦孝,赵鸿雁,刘向东,等.森林枯枝落叶层涵养水源保持水土的作用评价[J].水土保持学报,1998,4(2):23-28.
[2] 刘效东,乔玉娜,周国逸,等.鼎湖山3种不同演替阶段森林凋落物的持水特性[J].林业科学,2013,49(9):8-15.
[3] 闫文德,张学龙.祁连山森林枯落物水文作用的研究[J].西北林学院学报,1997,12(2):7-14.
[4] 耿玉清,王保平.森林地表枯枝落叶层涵养水源作用的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2000,22(5):49-52.
[5] 朱金兆,吴钦孝.森林凋落物层水文生态功能研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(5):30-34.
[6] 刘颖,韩士杰,林鹿.长白山四种森林类型凋落物动态特征[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(1):7-11.
[7] 王云琦,王玉杰.三峡库区典型森林植被生态水文功能[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(10):1892-1900.
[8] 鲁绍伟,陈波,潘青华,等.北京山地7种人工纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].内蒙古农业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,34(5):53-59.
[9] 苏彩燕,周勤.珠江流域城市河道的综合整治建议与可持续发展[J].水利规划与设计,2006(3):19-21.
[10] 杨小兰,张天明,童德文.广西珠江流域防护林体系建设现状与对策[J].林业调查规划,2011,36(5):60-62.
[11] 唐玉贵,蒋燚,梁杰森.苍梧县珠江低效防护林形成原因与改造的技术对策研究[J].广西林业科学,2010,39(2):85-87.
[12] 常雅军,曹靖,马建伟,等.秦岭西部山地针叶林凋落物持水特性[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(11):2346-2351.
[13] 薛立,何跃君,屈明,等.华南典型人工林凋落物的持水特性[J].植物生态学报,2005,29(3):415-421.
[14] 杨玉莲,马兴艳,吴庆贵,等.龙门山断裂带主要森林类型凋落物累积量及其持水特性[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(3):69-74.
[15] 魏强,凌雷,张广忠,等.甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物累积量及持水特性[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(10):2589-2598.
[16] 王勤,张宗应,徐小牛.安徽大别山库区不同林分类型的土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(3):59-62.
[17] 刘世荣,温远道,王兵,等.中国森林生态系统水文生态功能规律[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1996.
[18] 田超,杨新兵,李军,等.冀北山地不同海拔蒙古栎林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):221-226.
[19] 韩春华,赵雨森,辛颖,等.阿什河上游小流域主要林分枯落物层的持水特性[J].林业科学研究,2012,25(2):212-217.
[20] 王金建,崔培学,刘霞,等.小流域水土保持生态修复区森林枯落物的持水性能[J].中国水土保持科学,2005,3(1):48-52.
[21] 王佑民.中国林地枯落物持水保土作用研究概况[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(4):108-113.
[22] 顾宇书,邢兆凯,韩友志,等.浑河上游4种典型林分类型枯落物持水特征[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(1):31-36.
[23] 彭云,丁贵杰.不同林龄马尾松林枯落物储量及其持水性能[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2008,32(4):43-46.
[24] 罗新萍.云南泸水5种生态公益林凋落物持水性研究[J].西南林业大学学报,2012,32(4):51-55.
[25] 周祥,赵一鹤,张洪江,等.云南高原典型林分林下枯落物持水特征研究[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(2):248-252.
[26] 鲁绍伟,陈波,潘青华,等.北京山地不同海拔人工油松林枯落物及其土壤水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(6):54-58.
相似文献/References:
[1]崔建国,镡娟.辽西油松蒙古栎林下凋落物现存量及持水能力的研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(02):154.
CUI Jian-guo,CHAN Juan.Studying Litter Standing Crop of Quercus mongolica and Pinus koraiensis in West of Liaoning[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(01):154.
[2]李庆云,余新晓,信忠保,等.黄土高原典型流域不同土地利用类型土壤物理性质分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(06):106.
LI Qing-yun,YU Xin-xiao,XIN Zhong-bao,et al.Analysis on Soil Physical Properties of Different Land Uses in a Typical Watershed of the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(01):106.
[3]刘骄,黄义雄,叶功富,等.福建沿海主要防护林树种的生物量、凋落物及其对林下土壤养分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(01):146.
LIU Jiao,HUANG Yi-xiong,YE Gong-fu,et al.Research on Biomass and Undergrowth Soil Nutrient of Main Tree Species for Shelterbelt along Fujian Coastal Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(01):146.
[4]马瑞,马维伟,李广,等.尕海湿地不同植被退化阶段凋落物分解及其有机碳动态[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):29.
MA Rui,MA Weiwei,LI Guang,et al.Litter Decomposition and Dynamics of Organic Carbon in Degraded Vegetation of Gahai Wetland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):29.
[5]谢育利,陈云明,唐亚坤,等.地表凋落物对油松、沙棘人工林土壤呼吸的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):52.
XIE Yuli,CHEN Yunming,TANG Yakun,et al.Impact of Aboveground Litterfall on Soil Respiration in the Pinus tabulaeformis and Hippophae rhamnoides Plantations[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):52.
[6]张祎,李鹏,刘晓君,等.黄土丘陵区不同植被类型枯落物持水效能研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):100.
ZHANG Yi,LI Peng,LIU Xiaojun,et al.Water Holding Capacity of Litter with Different Vegetation Types in the Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(01):100.
[7]陈治成,宋维峰,魏峥,等.元阳梯田水源区优势树种枯落物水文特性[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(01):135.
CHEN Zhicheng,SONG Weifeng,WEI Zheng,et al.Hydrological Characteristics of the Dominant Tree Species in the Water Source Area of Yuanyang Terrace[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):135.
[8]张凤英,杜芝芝,和加卫,等.紫茎泽兰凋落物提取液对自身种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):291.
ZHANG Fengying,DU Zhizhi,HE Jiawei,et al.Effects of Eupatorium adenophorumii Litter Aqueous Extract on Its Seed Germination and Seedling Growth[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(01):291.
[9]王冬,杨政,郝红敏,等.黄土区退耕草地凋落物-土壤界面水分过程特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):80.
WANG Dong,YANG Zheng,HAO Hongmin,et al.Hydrological Processes of Litter-Soil Interfacial Systems in Restoration Grasslands of the Loess Plateau，China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):80.
[10]陈进,徐明,邹晓,等.贵阳市不同林龄马尾松林凋落物储量及持水特性[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(06):146.
CHEN Jin,XU Ming,ZOU Xiao,et al.Litter layer Reserve and Water Holding Capacity of Pinus massoniana in Different Successional Stages in Guiyang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):146.
[11]崔鸿侠,张卓文,李振芳.巴东县不同森林类型林下灌草和凋落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):203.
CUI Hong-xia,ZHANG Zhuo-wen,LI Zhen-fang.Studies on the Shrub, Herbage and Litter Hydrological Effect Under Different Forest Type in Badong Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(01):203.
[12]赵晓春,刘建军,任军辉,等.贺兰山4种典型森林类型凋落物持水性能研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):107.
ZHAO Xiao-chun,LIU Jian-jun,REN Jun-hui,et al.Study on Water-holding Capacity of Litter in Four Forest Types of Helan Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(01):107.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2016-01-18;改回日期:2016-01-27。
基金项目:“十二五”广西林业科技项目“珠江流域中上游水源涵养林结构及功能研究”（桂林科字[2012]第7号）；国家林业公益性行业科研专项“南方几种森林类型公益林经营技术研究”（201204512）
作者简介:何琴飞(1982-),女,湖南新化人,工程师,硕士,主要从事森林生态研究。E-mail:dragonfly.hqf@126.com
通讯作者:申文辉(1972-),男,湖南安乡人,教授级高工,在读博士,主要从事森林生态、森林培育研究。E-mail:shenwenhui2003@163.com