LIANG Shuangshuang,LIN Jinshi,HUANG Yanhe,et al.Splash Erosion Characteristics of Different Soil Layers on the Collapsing Wall Under Simulated Raindrop[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):43-48.
模拟雨滴条件下崩壁不同土层的溅蚀特征
- Title:
- Splash Erosion Characteristics of Different Soil Layers on the Collapsing Wall Under Simulated Raindrop
- Keywords:
- splash erosion; raindrop intensity; splash distance; size distribution
- 分类号:
- S152;S153;S157.1
- 摘要:
- 崩壁是崩岗侵蚀的重要组成部分，为了研究崩壁不同土层的溅蚀特征，采用自制雨滴发生装置模拟不同直径雨滴，分析了不同雨滴大小和雨强下崩壁3个土层溅蚀量、溅蚀土壤颗粒特征的差异。结果表明：崩壁3个土层的溅蚀土粒均大都分布在0—5 cm的范围内，其中，红土层的溅蚀量随雨滴强度的变化率最大，碎屑层次之，砂土层最小；通过双因素方差分析可知，土壤特性对溅蚀量的影响大于雨滴强度；溅蚀土粒中砂粒（0.05～2 mm）百分比最大，而黏粒（< 0.002 mm）百分比最小，可以推测出使溅蚀量达到最大的粒径范围；崩壁3个土层的溅蚀土粒中，随着溅蚀距离的增加，砾石（> 2 mm）最不易被溅移，粉粒（0.002～0.05 mm）和黏粒（< 0.002 mm）最易被溅移。
- Abstract:
- Collapsing wall is an important part of the collapsing hill erosion. In order to study splash erosion characteristics in different soil layers of collapsing wall, a raindrop generator was made to simulate different diameter raindrops, and we studied the splash amount and different characteristics of the soil particles in different soil layers of collapsing wall under the raindrop size and different raindrop intensities. The result shows that the soil particles of splash erosion present the concentrated distribution in the range of 0 to 5 cm, among which the red soil splash erosion with the rate change of rain intensity is the maximum, the second is the clastic, and the minimum is the sand layer. By two-factor variance analysis, the influence of soil characteristic on splash erosion amount is greater than the rain intensity. The mass percentage of particles with size of 0.05～2 mm was the most, while the mass percentage of particles with size less than 0.002 mm was the least, which can speculate the size range that makes splash amount reach the maximum. With the increase of splash erosion distance, soil particles with size more than 2 mm are the most difficult to be moved due to splash, while soil particles with size of 0.002～0.05 mm and with size less than 0.002 mm are the most vulnerable to be moved through splash.
参考文献/References:
[1] 梁音,刘宪春,曹龙熹,等.中国水蚀区土壤可蚀性K值计算与宏观分布[J].中国水土保持,2013(10):35-40.
[2] 牛德奎.华南红壤丘陵区崩岗发育的环境背景与侵蚀机理研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2009.
[3] 王秋霞,丁树文,赵欣,等.花岗岩风化土不同土层抗蚀性差异分析[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(3):6-9.
[4] 吴志峰,邓南荣.崩岗侵蚀地貌与侵蚀过程[J].中国水土保持,1999(4):10-12.
[5] Ma B, Liu Y, Liu X, et al. Soil splash detachment and its spatial distribution under corn and soybean cover[J]. Catena,2015,127:142-151.
[6] 蒋芳市,黄炎和,林金石,等.坡度和雨强对花岗岩崩岗崩积体细沟侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):1-5.
[7] 尹武君,王健,刘旦旦.地表水层厚度对雨滴击溅侵蚀的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2011,30(4):115-117.
[8] 吴普特,周佩华.地表坡度与薄层水流侵蚀关系的研究[J].水土保持通报,1993,13(3):1-5.
[9] 唐泽军,雷廷武,张晴雯,等.雨滴溅蚀和结皮效应对土壤侵蚀影响的试验研究[J].土壤学报,2004,41(4):632-635.
[10] 宋维秀,樊萍,魏国良.单雨滴降雨对结皮土壤溅蚀的影响[J].青海大学学报:自然科学版,2005,23(1):59-61.
[11] 秦越,程金花,张洪江,等.雨滴对击溅侵蚀的影响研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):74-78.
[12] 赵晓光,吴发启.单雨滴击溅规律及其对溅蚀土粒的分选作用[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(1):43-45.
[13] 程琴娟,蔡强国,胡霞.不同粒径黄绵土的溅蚀规律及表土结皮发育研究[J].土壤学报,2007,44(3):392-396.
[14] 秦百顺,李占斌,刘海波.扰动土与原状土侵蚀产沙规律研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(5):78-81.
[15] 高学田,包忠谟.降雨特性和土壤结构对溅蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(3):24-26.
[16] 林金石,庄雅婷,黄炎和,等.不同剪切方式下崩岗红土层抗剪特征随水分变化规律[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):106-110.
[17] Morgan R P C. Field studies of rain splash erosion[J]. Earth Surface Processes,1978,3(3):295-299.
[18] 周一杨.典型黑土击溅侵蚀特征的研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2009.
[19] 程金花,秦越,张洪江,等.华北土石山区模拟降雨下土壤溅蚀研究[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(2):153-161.
[20] Van Dijk A, Meesters A, Bruijnzeel L A. Exponential distribution theory and the interpretation of splash detachment and transport experiments[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2002,66(5):1466-1474.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2016-01-06;改回日期:2016-03-16。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金（41001169，41571272）；国家科技支撑计划项目（2014BAD15B0303）
作者简介:梁双双(1988-),女,河北定州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为土壤侵蚀与治理。E-mail:317252227@qq.com
通讯作者:林金石(1980-),男,福建武夷山人,博士,副教授,主要从事土壤侵蚀与治理研究。E-mail:linjs18@163.com