[1]王云霓,何聪,熊伟,等.宁夏六盘山3种典型植物群落水分利用特征及其组分的季节变化[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(04):34-40.
　WANG Yunni,HE Cong,XIONG Wei,et al.The Water Use Characteristics of Three Representative Plant Communities and their Seasonal Variation in Liupan Mountains,Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(04):34-40.
点击复制

宁夏六盘山3种典型植物群落水分利用特征及其组分的季节变化

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 22 期数: 2015年04期 页码: 34-40 栏目: 出版日期: 2015-08-28
Title:
The Water Use Characteristics of Three Representative Plant Communities and their Seasonal Variation in Liupan Mountains,Ningxia
作者:
王云霓1, 何聪2, 熊伟1, 王彦辉1, 于澎涛1, 童鸿强3
1. 中国林业科学研究院 森林生态环境与保护研究所 国家林业局森林生态环境重点实验室, 北京 100091;
2. 海南省林业厅信息中心, 海口 570203;
3. 江西省宜春市水利局, 江西 宜春 336000
Author(s):
WANG Yunni1, HE Cong2, XIONG Wei1, WANG Yanhui1, YU Pengtao1, TONG Hongqiang3
1. Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forestry Ecology and Environment of State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100091, China;
2. Information Center, Hainan Forestry Department, Haikou 570203, China;
3. Yichun Water Conservancy Bureau, Yichun, Jiangxi 336000, China
关键词:
蒸散; 水分利用; 组分; 蒸腾与蒸散比; 人工林; 草地
Keywords:
evapotranspiration; water use; partitioning; Tr/ET; plantation; grassland
分类号:
S714.5
摘要:
为深入认识干旱缺水区水通量分配和植被类型变化对群落水分利用特征的影响，在宁夏六盘山叠叠沟小流域，利用热扩散技术、微型蒸渗仪、树干径向变化记录仪及文献资料等方法研究了三种典型植物群落的蒸腾（Tr）、蒸散（ET）和水分利用效率（WUE）及组成的季节变化。结果表明：生长季三种植物群落ET（mm）为：华北落叶松林（429.7） > 沙棘林（379.3） > 草地（206.9），分别大于、约等于、小于同期的降雨量，均呈现低—高—低的月变化趋势。冠层蒸腾是蒸散的主要分量，生长季Tr/ET为：华北落叶松（48%） > 沙棘（39%）；华北落叶松林Tr/ET随季节持续降低，沙棘林Tr/ET随季节先升高后降低，最大为50.4%。生长季WUE（g/kg）为：草地（3.1） > 华北落叶松林（2.7） > 沙棘林（2.35）。其中，华北落叶松林WUE变化与其Tr/ET月变化相同，从WUE在林分各层的分布来看，乔木层WUE为4.04 g/kg，草本层为1.36 g/kg；沙棘林WUE表现为生长季前、中期较高而后期较低的变化趋势，其中灌木层WUE为2.32 g/kg，草本层WUE为2.37 g/kg；草地WUE在生长季前、中期均保持在3.2~4.8 g/kg。研究表明：无论是在水分充足季节（生长季中期），还是水分有限季节（生长季初期和末期），植被不可能完全利用所有的降水，但水分利用特征存在种间差异。
Abstract:
To understand the characteristics of water use of vegetation and the relationship between water use and community structures in dryland, three typical types of vegetation including Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation, Hippophae rhamnoides plantation and natural grassland were selected to estimate the seasonal variations of transpiration (Tr), evapotranspiration (ET), water use efficiency (WUE) and their partitioning of vegetation by using thermal dissipation technique, micro lysimeter, dendrometer and document literature in the Diediegou catchment of Liupan Mountains, Ningxia. The results indicated that the ETs of three types of vegetation during the growing season arranged as:L. principis-rupprechtii forest (429.7) > H. rhamnoides forest (379.3) > grassland (206.9), respectively, greater than, almost equal to, less than the same period of rainfall. The total ETs of three types of vegetation showed a low-high-low seasonal trend. The Tt/ET ratios of two planted forests had remarkable difference with the order of L. principis-rupprechtii forest (48%) > H. rhamnoides forest (39%). The Tr/ET ratio of H. rhamnoides forest had the similar seasonal pattern with its ET, the highest was observed in September(50.4%), but the Tr/ET ratio of L. principis-rupprechtii forest decreased over time during the growing season. The order of the WUE of three types of vegetation during the growing season followed as:grassland (3.1 g/kg) > L. principis-rupprechtii plantation (2.7 g/kg) > H. rhamnoides plantation (2.35 g/kg). The WUE of L. principisrupprechtii forest decreased over time during the growing season. The WUE of tree layer of L. principisrupprechtii forest was 4.04 g/kg, while that of herbaceous layer was only 1.36 g/kg. The WUE of H. rhamnoides forest showed a high value in the early and middle of growing season, but a low values in the later growing season. And WUE of the shrub layer was 2.32 g/kg, while it was 2.37 g/kg for herbaceous layer. WUE of the natural grassland ranged 3.2 ~ 4.8 g/kg from May to August, then decreased to 0 in September. It is implied that plants do not use all of the precipitation input not only in water-sufficient season (the early and late stage of the growing season), but also in water-limited season (the medium stage of the growing season), and also showed interspecific difference.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李机密,黄儒珠,王健,等.陆生植物水分利用效率[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(8):1655-1663.
[2] 曹生奎,冯起,司建华,等.植物叶片水分利用效率研究综述[J].生态学报,2009,29(7):3882-3892.
[3] 王云霓,熊伟,王彦辉,等.六盘山主要树种叶片稳定性碳同位素组成的时空变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):42-47.
[4] 胡中民,于贵瑞,王秋凤,等.生态系统水分利用效率研究进展[J].生态学报,2009,29(3):1498-1507.
[5] Yu G R, Song X, Wang Q F, et al. Water-use efficiency of forest ecosystems in eastern China and its relations to climatic variables[J]. New Phytologist, 2008,177(4):927-937.
[6] Reichstein M, Tenhunen J D, Roupsard O, et al. Severe drought effects on ecosystem CO2 and H2O fluxes at three Mediterranean evergreen sites:revision of current hypotheses[J]. Global Change Biology, 2002,8(10):999-1017.
[7] Ponton S, Flanagan L B, Alstad K P, et al. Comparison of ecosystem water-use efficiency among Douglas-fir forest, aspen forest and grassland using eddy covariance and carbon isotope techniques[J]. Global Change B iology, 2006,12(2):294-310.
[8] Scanlon T M,Albertson J D. Canopy scale measurements of CO2 and water vapor exchange along a precipitation gradient in southern Africa[J]. Global Change Biology, 2004,10(3):329-341.
[9] Hui D F, Luo Y Q, Cheng W X, et al. Canopy radiation-and water-use efficiencies as affected by elevated[CO2] [J]. Global Change Biology, 2001,7(1):75-91.
[10] Raz-Yaseef N, Yakir D, Schiller G, et al. Dynamics of evapotranspiration partitioning in a semi-arid forest as affected by temporal rainfall patterns[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2012,157(15),77-85.
[11] Reynolds J F, Kemp P R, Tenhunen J D. Effects of long-term rainfall variability on evapotranspiration and soil water distribution in the Chihuahuan Desert:a modeling analysis[J]. Plant Ecology, 2000,150(1/2):145-159.
[12] Mitchell P J, Veneklaas E, Lambers H, et al. Partitioning of evapotranspiration in a semi-arid eucalypt woodland in south-western Australia[J]. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology, 2009,149(1):25-37.
[13] Cavanaugh M L, Kurc S A, Scott R L. Evapotranspiration partitioning in semiarid shrubland ecosystems:a two-site evaluation of soil moisture control on transpiration[J]. Ecohydrology, 2011,4(5):671-681.
[14] Staudt K, Serafimovich A, Siebicke L, et al. Vertical structure of evapotranspiration at a forest site:A case study[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011,151(6):709-729.
[15] Kostner B. Evaporation and transpiration from forests in Central Europe-relevance of patch-level studies for spatial scaling[J]. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2001,76(1/2):69-82.
[16] Moran M S, Scott R L, Keefer T O, et al. Partitioning evapotranspiration in semiarid grassland and shrubland ecosystems using time series of soil surface temperature[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2009,149(1):59-72.
[17] Raz-Yaseef N, Rotenberg E, Yakir D. Effects of spatial variations in soil evaporation caused by tree shading on water flux partitioning in a semi-arid pine forest[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2010,150(3):454-462.
[18] Wang L X, Caylor K K, Villegas J C, et al. Partitioning evapotranspiration across gradients of woody plant cover:assessment of a stable isotope technique[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2010,37(9):L09401.
[19] Huxman T E, Wilcox B P, Breshears D D, et al. Ecohydrological implications of woody plant encroachment[J]. Ecology, 2005,86(2):308-319.
[20] Kato T, Kimura R, Kamichika M. Estimation of evapotranspiration, transpiration ratio and water-use efficiency from a sparse canopy using a compartment model[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2004,65(3):173-191.
[21] 何聪,熊伟,王彦辉,等.六盘山北侧华北落叶松林分的水分利用效率研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):112-118,123.
[22] 何聪.六盘山北侧叠叠沟小流域三种典型植被水分利用效率研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2011.
[23] 郭明春.六盘山叠叠沟小流域森林植被坡面水文影响的研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2005.
[24] 杜阿朋.六盘山叠叠沟小流域坡面植被水文影响与模拟[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2009.
[25] 黄辉,孟平,张劲松,等.华北低丘山地人工林蒸散的季节变化及环境影响要素[J].生态学报,2011,31(13):3569-3580.
[26] 王幼奇,樊军,邵明安,等.黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区三种植被蒸散特征[J].生态学报,2009,29(10):5386-5394.
[27] 熊伟.六盘山北侧主要造林树种耗水特性研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2003.
[28] 王彦辉,熊伟,于澎涛,等.干旱缺水地区森林植被蒸散耗水研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(4):19-25.
[29] 张淑兰,于澎涛,王彦辉,等.泾河上游流域实际蒸散量及其各组分的估算[J].地理学报,2011,66(3):385-395.
[30] 魏焕奇,何洪林,刘敏,等.基于遥感的千烟洲人工林蒸散及其组分模拟研究[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(5):778-789.
[31] 于贵瑞,孙晓敏.中国陆地生态系统碳通量观测技术及时空变化特征[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[32] Laio F, Porporato A, Ridolfi L, et al. Plants in water-controlled ecosystems:active role in hydrologic processes and response to water tress:Ⅱ. Probabilistic soil moisture dynamics[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2001,24:707-723.
[33] Kurc S A, Small E E. Dynamics of evapotranspiration in semiarid grassland and shrubland ecosystems during the summer monsoon season, central New Mexico[J]. Water Resources Research, 2004,40(9):WO9305.
[34] 王百田,贺康宁,史常青,等.节水抗旱造林[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2004.
[35] Law B E, Falge E, Gu L H, et al. Environmental controls over carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of terrestrial vegetation[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2002,113(1/4):97-120.
[36] 卢玲,李新,黄春林,等.中国西部植被水分利用效率的时空特征分析[J].冰川冻土,2007,29(5):777-784.
[37] 陈世苹,白永飞,韩兴国.稳定性碳同位素技术在生态学研究中的应用[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(5):549-560.

相似文献/References:

[1]龚元石,李保国.农田水量平衡模型对作物根系吸水函数及蒸散公式的敏感性[J].水土保持研究,1996,3(03):1.
　Gong Yuanshi,Li Baoguo.Sensibility of the Field Water Budget Model to Water Extraction Function by Roots and Evapotranspiration form[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1996,3(04):1.
[2]刘忠民,山仑,马国忠,等.提高宁南半干旱区旱地春小麦产量及水分利用的综合技术途径研究[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(01):55.
　Liu Zhongmin,Shan Lun,Ma Guozhong,et al.Comprehensive Technique Approaches to Raise Grain Yield and Water Use of Spring Wheat in the Semiarid Area of South Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(04):55.
[3]马良吉,魏莉.浅谈山丘区解决农业干旱缺水的措施[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(03):62.
　MA Liang-ji,WEI Li.Discussion on Solutions to Agricultural Drought in Hilly Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(04):62.
[4]杨文文,张学培,王洪英.晋西黄土区刺槐蒸腾、光合与水分利用的试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(01):72.
　YANG Wen-wen,ZHANG Xue-pei,WANG Hong-ying.Study on Robinia pseudoscacia L.Transpiration, Photosynthesis and Water Use Efficiency[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(04):72.
[5]李红寿,汪万福,张国彬,等.水分蒸散耗散结构的初步验证[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(06):200.
　LI Hong-shou,WANG Wan-fu,ZHANG Guo-bin,et al.The Primary Proof-Testing of the Evapotranspiration Dissipative Structure in the Extreme Dry Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(04):200.
[6]侯兰功,肖洪浪,邹松兵,等.黑河流域水循环特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):254.
　HOU Lang-gong,XIAO Hong-lang,ZOU Song-bing,et al.Study on the Features of Water Cycle in Heihe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(04):254.
[7]何聪,熊伟,王彦辉,等.六盘山北侧华北落叶松林分的水分利用效率研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):112.
　HE Cong,XIONG Wei,WANG Yan-hui,et al.The Water Use Efficiency of Larix principis-rupprechtii Plantation in the Northern Liupan Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(04):112.
[8]王勇.集雨补灌对旱地冬小麦产量和水分利用的影响[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(01):104.
　WANG Yong.Effect of the Supplemental Irrigation of Harvested Rainwater on Dryland Winter Wheat Yield and Water Use[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(04):104.
[9]邓西平.渭北地区冬小麦的有限灌溉与水分利用研究[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(01):41.
　Deng Xiping.The Study of Limited Irrigation on the Winter Wheat and Water Utilization[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1999,6(04):41.
[10]杨永辉,武继承,赵世伟,等.不同保墒与土壤结构改良措施对土壤结构及小麦、玉米水分利用的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(02):220.
　YANG Yonghui,WU Jicheng,ZHAO Shiwei,et al.Effects of Different Soil Moisture Conservation and Soil Structure Improvement Measures on Soil Structure and Water Use of Wheat and Maize[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(04):220.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2014-10-07;改回日期:2014-10-14。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重点项目（41230852）；国家自然科学基金重大项目（41390461）
作者简介:王云霓(1987-),女,山东日照人,博士生,研究方向:生态水文与水资源管理,植物生理。E-mail:yunni5186@126.com
通讯作者:熊伟(1970-),男,甘肃兰州人,副研究员,研究方向:植物生理,生态水文过程。E-mail:xwcaf@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01