[1]毕海洋,李波,南箔,等.土地功能调控与生态政绩考核研究——以华阳河湖群地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(02):171-177.
　BI Haiyang,LI Bo,NAN Bo,et al.Study on Land Function Regulation and Ecological Performance Evaluation System of Huayang Lake Group[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(02):171-177.
点击复制

土地功能调控与生态政绩考核研究——以华阳河湖群地区为例

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 22 期数: 2015年02期 页码: 171-177 栏目: 出版日期: 2015-04-28
Title:
Study on Land Function Regulation and Ecological Performance Evaluation System of Huayang Lake Group
作者:
毕海洋1, 李波1, 南箔1, 妙丹2, 赵丽琴2, 卢书兵1
1. 北京师范大学 资源学院, 北京 100875;
2. 四川师范大学 地理与资源科学学院, 成都 610000
Author(s):
BI Haiyang1, LI Bo1, NAN Bo1, MIAO Dan2, ZHAO Liqin2, LU Shubing1
1. College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2. College of Geography and Resource Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610000, China
关键词:
土地生态; 土地功能调控; 三生用地分类; 生态政绩考核; 华阳河湖群
Keywords:
land ecology; land use regulation; land classification; ecological performance evaluation system; Huayang Lake Group
分类号:
F301.22
摘要:
科学的政绩观、土地功能的优化调控，是协调资源保护与利用、促进区域可持续发展的重要途径之一。以华阳河湖群地区为例，基于遥感解译、GIS和“三生”土地分类法、土地利用转移矩阵法和重心转移法探索了县域以下尺度主体功能区土地功能调控和生态政绩考核方法。结果表明：1）1990—2010年华阳河湖群地区生态用地比例减少，生活用地稳定，生产用地增加；2）由重心模型得到各类用地空间变化情况，滩涂地重心向下仓镇移动；3）限制开发区和优化开发区生态用地比例符合区域功能定位；4）基于乡镇尺度主体功能区的结构和三生用地分布及其比例关系，确立了各乡镇生态政绩考核标准和生态补偿方案，建立了生态政绩考核体系。基于三生用地分类的土地功能调控以及生态政绩考核体系建立，具有数据便于得到、可操作性强的特点，为县域以下尺度主体功能区划的落实提供了一种途径，也尝试对“协调资源综合利用与保护矛盾”的理论思路和实践途径进行了探讨。
Abstract:
This study aims at exploring the methods to regulate the land function and evaluate the ecological performance of major function oriented zones at sub-country scale. Huangyang Lake Group was taken as the study area and the employed methods include remote sensing image interpretation, land use classification, land use transfer matrix and gravity center model. The results showed that: 1) the proportions of land used for ecological purposes, residence and production decreased, stabilized and increased, respectively, in Huayang Lake Group area from 1990 to 2010, the main changes were the conversion of lake to cultivated land, inland tidal flats, reservoir pits and construction land; 2) gravity model showed the sharpened imbalance of the spatial distributions of forestland, grassland and reservoir, and the gradually increased imbalance of the spatial distributions of inland tidal flats, construction land and farmland; 3) the proportions of the ecological land of restricted and optimized development zones met the requirements, the ecological land of prohibited development zone needed to be improved; 4) the proportions of the ecological land of most towns had been decreasing, especially Gaoling and Chengling; 5) the ecological performance evaluation weights of prohibited, restricted, key and optimized development zones were 1, 0.8, 0.3 and 0.2, respectively. In conclusion, the land regulation based on ecological, living and production land classification and ecological performance evaluation system at town levels provided a reference for implementing major function oriented zoning at sub-county scales. However, the implementation of the land function regulation of major function oriented zones requires the coordination of government departments. The indexes and weights of ecological performance evaluation system need further investigations.

参考文献/References:

[1] 范树平,程久苗,戴支银,等.土地利用分区与主体功能分区协调探讨:以县级为例[J].云南地理环境研究,2010,22(1):76-81.
[2] 樊杰.我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J].地理学报,2007,62(4):340-349.
[3] Zhang Z, Sherman R, Yang Z, et al. Integrating a participatory process with a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for protected area zoning in China[J]. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2013,21(4):225-240.
[4] 王万茂.土地用途管制的实施及其效益的理性分析[J].中国土地科学,1999,13(3):9-12.
[5] 张全景,欧名豪,王万茂.中国土地用途管制制度的耕地保护绩效及其区域差异研究[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(9):8-13.
[6] 周晓飞,雷国平,徐珊.城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍度诊断:以哈尔滨市为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):126-130.
[7] Gallent N, Kim K S. Land zoning and local discretion in the Korean planning system[J]. Land Use Policy, 2001,18(3):233-243.
[8] 白燕.主体功能区建设与财政生态补偿研究:以安徽省为例[J].环境科学与管理,2010,35(1):155-158.
[9] 齐晔,蔡琴.可持续发展理论三项进展[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(4):110-116.
[10] 王秀兰,包玉海.土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J].地理科学进展,1999,18(1):81-87.
[11] 邓红兵,陈春娣,刘昕,等.区域生态用地的概念及分类[J].生态学报2009,29(3):1519-1524.
[12] 董雅文,周雯,周岚,等.城市化地区生态防护研究:以江苏省,南京市为例[J].城市研究,1999,2(2):6-10.
[13] 陈婧,史培军.土地利用功能分类探讨[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2006,41(5):536-540.
[14] 王振健,李如雪.城市生态用地分类,功能及其保护利用研究:以山东聊城市为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(6):306-308.
[16] 王世东,慎利,王新闯.基于RS与GIS的生态用地评价:以辽宁省大洼县为例[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(5):628-637.
[17] 吕立刚,周生路,周兵兵,等.区域发展过程中土地利用转型及其生态环境响应研究:以江苏省为例[J].地理科学,2013,33(12):1442-1449.
[18] 张晓平,朱道林,许祖学.西藏土地利用多功能性评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(6):185-194.
[19] 王文,王鸿雁.浅议生态政绩考核[J].郧阳师范高等专科学校学报,2012,31(5):97-100.
[20] 国家统计局关于2013年粮食产量的公告[EB/OL].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/201311/t20131129_475486.html.
[21] 全国粮油价格监测系统周报[EB/OL], 2013-11-29. http://price.cngrain.net/sinoprice/zhoubao.aspx?Date=2013-9&PriceType=1&PriceTypeName=%b2%fa%c7%f8%b0%f5%b3%d3%ca%d5%b9%ba%bc%db,2014-06-27.
[22] 王重玲,朱志玲,王梅梅,等.基于生态服务价值的宁夏隆德县生态补偿研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):208-212.
[23] 郑德凤,臧正,孙才志.改进的生态系统服务价值模型及其在生态经济评价中的应用[J].资源科学,2014,36(3):0584-0593.
[24] 岳东霞,杜军,巩杰,等.民勤绿洲农田生态系统服务价值变化及其影响因子的回归分析[J].生态学报,2011,31(9):2567-2575.
[25] 李双成,黄姣,邵晓梅,等.区域生态补偿与土地生态安全[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(5):39-41.

相似文献/References:

[1]袁磊,雷国平,张小虎.大庆油田区土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):216.
　YUAN Lei,LEI Guo-ping,ZHANG Xiao-hu.Evaluation on Land Ecological Security of the Daqing Oil Field Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):216.
[2]余敦,陈文波.鄱阳湖生态经济区土地生态安全研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):107.
　YU Dun,CHEN Wen-bo.Research for Land Ecological Security in Poyang Lake Ecological Economic Zone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(02):107.
[3]张茹,戴文婷,刘兆顺,等.我国北方农牧交错区土地生态安全评价——以白城市为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):259.
　ZHANG Ru,DAI Wenting,LIU Zhaoshun,et al.Evaluation of Land Ecological Security in Agro-Pastoral Zone of Northern China—A Case Study of Baicheng City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):259.
[4]秦伟霞,王新闯,马守臣,等.基于功能分区的土地生态质量障碍因子诊断——以新乡市为例[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(04):148.
　QIN Weixia,WANG Xinchuang,MA Shouchen,et al.Obstacle Factors Diagnosis of Land Ecological Quality Based on Functional Partition—A Case Study of Xinxiang City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(02):148.
[5]方相林,冯凤英,于斌,等.河南省东北部农用地肥力分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(04):49.
　FANG Xiang-lin,FENG Feng-ying,YU Bin,et al.Soil Fertility Analysis of Agricultural Land in the Northeast of He’nan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(02):49.
[6]刘凌冰,李世平.西北荒漠化地区土地生态安全评价——以酒泉市为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):190.
　LIU Ling-bing,LI Shi-ping.Evaluation on Land Ecological Security in Desertification Areas of Northwest China—A Case Study of Jiuquan City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(02):190.
[7]葛亮,高扬,陆春锋,等.京杭大运河江苏段沿线土地生态空间差异及响应[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(01):330.
　GE Liang,GAO Yang,LU Chunfeng,et al.The Spatial Difference and Response of the Land Ecological Space Along Jiangsu Section of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(02):330.
[8]张驭航,李 玲,王秀丽,等.基于模糊伽马模型的河南省生态空间辨识与格局优化[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(06):211.
　ZHANG Yuhang,LI Ling,WANG Xiuli,et al.Ecological Spatial Identification and Pattern Optimization in Henan Province Based on Fuzzy Gamma Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):211.
[9]余 敦,梁珍宝,肖志娟,等.基于景观生态思维的南昌市土地生态风险时空特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):213.
　YU Dun,LIANG Zhenbao,XIAO Zhijuan,et al.Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Land Ecological Risk in Nanchang City Based on Landscape Ecology[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):213.
[10]侯 蕊,李红波,高艳丽.基于景观格局的武汉市江夏区土地利用生态风险评价[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(01):323.
　HOU Rui,LI Hongbo,GAO Yanli.Ecological Risk Assessment of Land Use in Jiangxia District of Wuhan Based on Landscape Pattern[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):323.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2014-09-15;改回日期:2014-10-13。
基金项目:教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金（20120003110017）
作者简介:毕海洋(1991-),女,山东济宁人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:土地利用与生态安全。E-mail:oceanbi@mail.bnu.edu.cn
通讯作者:李波(1965-),男,四川乐至县人,教授/博士后/博士生导师,主要研究方向:生态系统管理,土地资源管理,资源生态与经济。E-mail:libo@bnu.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01