SU Yuan,JIAO Ju-ying,WANG Zhi-jie,et al.Dynamic Variation of Seedling Bank under Different Erosion Environments in the Hill-gully Loess Plateau Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(04):1-7,12.
黄土丘陵沟壑区不同侵蚀环境下幼苗库动态变化特征
- Title:
- Dynamic Variation of Seedling Bank under Different Erosion Environments in the Hill-gully Loess Plateau Region
- Keywords:
- the hilly-gully Loess Plateau; seedling bank; seedling density; species diversity; dynamic variation
- 分类号:
- Q142
- 摘要:
- 幼苗是植物生活史中一个不可缺失的阶段，对自然植被恢复起着非常重要的作用。为了探索黄土丘陵沟壑区不同侵蚀环境下幼苗库的动态变化特征，选择5种不同侵蚀环境（阳沟坡、阳峁坡、峁顶、阴峁坡、阴沟坡）下的15个样地，通过野外定点跟踪调查，运用单因素方差分析法对幼苗物种数、幼苗密度、物种多样性进行了分析。结果表明：（1）不同侵蚀环境下幼苗物种数从阴沟坡到阴峁坡、峁顶、阳峁坡、阳沟坡依次减少，且幼苗物种组成存在差异；生长季内不同月份间幼苗物种数呈现先波动性增大后降低的动态变化趋势，最大值出现在9月初。（2）不同侵蚀环境间幼苗密度差异性显著，阴峁坡最大，阳沟坡最小；不同月份间幼苗密度具有明显的先升后降的动态变化特征，最大值出现在7月初，最小值出现在4月初或11月中旬。（3）不同侵蚀环境间阴坡幼苗物种丰富多样，阳坡幼苗物种较为单一；不同月份间幼苗物种多样性指数和丰富度指数呈现出4—9月份逐渐增大至峰值，10月初和11月中旬稍有降低的趋势。
- Abstract:
- Seedling is an indispensable stage in plant life cycle and important in natural vegetation restoration. To explore dynamic variation of seedling characteristics under different erosion environments(sunny gully slope, sunny Mao slope, Mao top, shady Mao slope, shady gully slope) in the hill-gully Loess Plateau region, five different erosion environments and 15 plots were investigated monthly, and One-Way ANOVA was used to analyze seedling species number, seedling density, species diversity. The results showed that: (1) the number of seedling species decreased from shady gully slope to shady Mao slope, Mao top, sunny Mao slope, sunny gully slope in different erosion environments and seedling species composition existed differences; in different months, seedling species number increased volatility first and then decreased, the maximum appeared in early September; (2) the difference of seedling density in different erosion environments was significant, shady Mao slope was maximum, sunny gully slope was minimum; in different months, seedling density had obvious dynamic variation characteristics of increasing first and then decreasing. Maximum appeared in early July, minimum appeared in early April or middle November; (3) in different erosion environments, seedling species was rich in shady Mao slope, relatively single in sunny gully slope; in different months, diversity index and richness index increased gradually to the peak from April to September, and then reduced slightly in early October and middle November.
参考文献/References:
[1] 邝高明,朱清科,刘中奇,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区微地形对土壤水分及生物量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):74-77.
[2] 秦伟,朱清科,刘中奇,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植被自然演替系列及其植物物种多样性特征[J].干旱区研究,2008,25(4):507-513.
[3] 王国梁,刘国彬,刘芳,等.黄土沟壑区植被恢复过程中植物群落组成及结构变化[J].生态学报,2003,23(12):2550-2557.
[4] 吕仕洪,向悟生,李先琨,等.红壤侵蚀区植被恢复研究综述[J].广西植物,2003,23(1):83-89.
[5] 马祥华,焦菊英.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地自然植被恢复植被特征及其与土壤环境的关系[J].中国水土保持科学,2005,3(2):15-22.
[6] 朱显谟.迅速全面恢复植被是根除河害之本[J].中国水土保持,1999(10):29-31.
[7] 郑粉莉.子午岭林区植被破坏与恢复对土壤演变的影响[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(5):41-44.
[8] 彭少麟.恢复生态学与退化生态系统的恢复[J].中国科学院院刊,2000,20(3):188-192.
[9] 赵丽娅,李锋瑞.围封沙质草甸土壤种子库与幼苗库的特征[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(10):1725-1730.
[10] Hector G S, Escarre J, Sans F X. Factors that limit the emergence and establishment of the related aliens Senecio inaequidens and S.pterophorus and the native S.malacitanus in Mediterranean climate[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,2004,82(9):1346-1355.
[11] 程积民,万惠娥,胡相明.黄土高原草地土壤种子库与草地更新[J].土壤学报,2006,43(4):679-683.
[12] 黄忠良,彭少麟,易俗.影响季风常绿阔叶林幼苗定居的主要因素[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2001,9(2):123-128.
[13] 崔长美,王孝安.黄土高原天然柴松纯林不同坡位幼苗更新特性研究[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(4):48-52.
[14] 康冰,王得祥,崔宏安,等.秦岭山地油松群落更新特征及影响因子[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(7):1659-1667.
[15] 谢佳彦,邓志平.杭州五云山米槠种群幼苗大小结构及空间分布格局研究[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(5):35-39.
[16] Tara A, Daniel F. Seedling establishment and life history trade-offs in alpine plants[J]. American Journal of Botany,2004,91(7):1147-1153.
[17] Matthew A, Brian C. Seedling establishment shapes the distribution of shade-adapted forest herbs across a topographical moisture gradient[J]. Journal of Ecology,2009,97(5):1037-1049.
[18] Jia Y F, Jiao J Y, Wang N. Relationship between Seedling and Mature Vegetation on the Hilly-gullied Loess Plateau[C]//2010 international conference on combating land degradation in agricultural areas,Xi’an,China,2010:1-5.
[19] 王宁,贾艳峰,白文娟,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地土壤种子库特征与季节变化[J].草业学报,2009,18(3):42-52.
[20] 焦峰,温仲明,王飞,等.黄土丘陵县域尺度整体景观格局分析[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2):167-170.
[21] 张振国,黄建成,焦菊英,等.安塞黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植物群落土壤抗蚀性分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(1):28-31.
[22] 贾燕锋,焦菊英,张振国,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区沟沿线边缘植被特征初步研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(4):39-43.
[23] 焦菊英,马祥华,白文娟,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植物群落与土壤环境因子的对应分析[J].土壤学报,2005,42(5):744-752.
[24] 马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法:Ⅰ.α多样性的测度方法(上)[J].生物多样性,1994,2(3):162-168.
[25] 焦菊英,张振国,贾燕锋,等.陕北丘陵沟壑区撂荒地自然恢复植被的组成结构与数量分类[J].生态学报,2008,28(7):2981-2997.
[26] 杨涛,王得祥,周金星,等.陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植物群落演替规律及物种多样性动态研究[J].西北林学院学报,2009,24(5):10-15.
[27] 朱志诚.黄土高原森林草原的基本特征[J].地理科学,1994,14(2):152-156.
[28] 张瑞,曹华,王云强,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域土壤水分空间变异性及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(5):52-57.
[29] 周萍,刘国彬,侯喜禄.黄土丘陵区侵蚀环境不同坡面及坡位土壤理化特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):7-12.
[30] 田媛,李建贵,潘丽萍.梭梭萌生与初期存活的关键影响因素[J].生态学报,2010,30(18):4898-4904.
[31] 王红梅,谢应忠,陈来祥.黄土高原坡地土壤水分动态特征及影响因素[J].宁夏农学院学报,2004,25(4):62-66.
[32] 王凯博,陈美玲,秦娟.子午岭植被自然演替中植物多样性变化及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(10):2089-2096.
[33] 陈宇,焦菊英,王宁,等.黄土丘陵区撂荒地不同侵蚀带土壤种子库特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):1-5.
相似文献/References:
[1]苏嫄,焦菊英,马祥华.黄土丘陵沟壑区主要群落地上生物量季节变化及其与土壤水分的关系[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):7.
SU Yuan,JIAO Ju-ying,MA Xiang-hua.Seasonal Variation of Aboveground Biomass of Main Plant Communities and Its Relationship with Soil Moisture in the Hill-gully Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):7.
[2]王巧利,贾燕锋,王宁,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区自然恢复坡面植物根系的分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):16.
WANG Qiao-li,JIA Yan-feng,WANG Ning,et al.Distribution of Root on Vegetation Recovery Slope in the Hilly and Gully Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):16.
[3]张瑞,曹华,王云强,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域土壤水分空间变异性及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):52.
ZHANG Rui,CAO Hua,WANG Yun-qiang,et al.Spatial Variability of Soil Moisture and Its Influence Factors in Watershed of Gully Region on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):52.
[4]邝高明,朱清科,刘中奇,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区微地形对土壤水分及生物量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):74.
KUANG Gao-ming,ZHU Qing-ke,LIU Zhong-qi,et al.Effect of Microrelief on the Soil Water and Vegetation Arrangement in Loess Hilly and Gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):74.
[5]王占礼,邵明安.黄土丘陵沟壑区第二副区山坡地土壤侵蚀特征研究[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(04):11.
Wang Zhanli,Shao Mingan.Soil Erosion Characters of Slope Land in the 2nd Sub-region of Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(04):11.
[6]张兴昌.黄土丘陵沟壑区水平沟耕作效益研究[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(04):52.
Zhang Xingchang.The Benefit of Level Trench Tillage in Hilly-gully Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(04):52.
[7]李忠武,蔡强国,唐政洪,等.晋西黄土丘陵沟壑区作物生产力影响因子研究——以王家沟流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(04):70.
LI Zhong-wu,CAI Qiang-guo,TANG Zheng-hong,et al.Analysis of Affecting Factors on Crop Production in Hilly Loess Region——Taking Wangjiagou Watershed as an Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(04):70.
[8]张维江,孙保平,郭文锋,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域治沟骨干工程淤积量预报模型探讨[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):107.
ZHANG Wei-jiang,SUN Bao-ping,GUO Wen-feng,et al.Approach to the Sediments Prediction Model of Check Dam in Loess Hilly-gully Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(04):107.
[9]李旭霖,张复明,郝晋.黄土丘陵沟壑区生态环境建设探讨[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(03):146.
LI Xulin,ZHANG Fuming,HAO Jinmin.Research on Building Eco-environment in Loess Hilly-gully Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(04):146.
[10]马祥华,焦菊英,温仲明,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地土壤速效N的分布特征及其与物种多样性的关系[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(01):13.
MA Xiang-hua,JIAO Ju-ying,WEN Zhong-ming,et al.Distribution Characteristics of Soil Available Nitrogen and Its Correlation with Plant Species Diversity in Abandoned Lands in Hilly and Gully Regions on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(04):13.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2013-01-22;改回日期:2013-02-23。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重点项目（41030532）；中国科学院重要方向项目（KZCX2-EW-406）
作者简介:苏嫄(1986-),女,陕西延安人,在读硕士,主要研究方向为流域管理。E-mail:suyuangood0124@126.com
通讯作者:焦菊英(1965-),女,陕西宝鸡人,研究员,主要研究方向为土壤侵蚀与植被关系、水土保持环境效益评价。E-mail:jyjiao@ms.iswc.ac.cn