CHEN Sun-hua.Soil Physiochemical Characteristics in Different Restoration Stages on Sloping-land with Purple Soils in Hengyang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):57-60.
衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地不同恢复阶段土壤理化特征
- Title:
- Soil Physiochemical Characteristics in Different Restoration Stages on Sloping-land with Purple Soils in Hengyang
- 分类号:
- S153
- 摘要:
- 以衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地不同恢复阶段的典型植被为研究对象，采用空间代替时间序列方法，选用立地条件基本一致、植被恢复阶段迥异的裸荒地、草地、灌木林和森林，通过调查取样和实验分析，探讨了衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地不同恢复阶段及同一恢复阶段不同土层土壤理化特征的时空变化；分析了不同植被恢复阶段的植被类型和土壤理化特性变化的内在联系及其互作效应。结果表明：随着植被恢复演替的进行，土壤黏粒含量总体增加，其中表层增加较多，亚表层、下层增加不明显；土壤容重逐渐减小，表层土壤容重小于亚表层与下层；土壤有机质逐渐增加，但随土层深度的增加而递减，表现出明显的表聚性；土壤全氮、速效磷和速效钾含量均呈上升趋势，由于植物根系及枯落物数量的差异，各营养成分的垂直分布各异。这将丰富该地区植物生态学与恢复生态学的内容，为衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地生态系统的恢复与重建提供了重要依据。
- Abstract:
- By using the space series to replace time courses, four typical sample plots: the bare land, herbaceous community, shrubby community and arboreal community in similar sites in the sloping land with purple soil in Hengyang, standing for four different restoration stages, were selected as the study sites to explore the relationship and interaction effects of plant communities with the soil physiochemical characteristics in different restoration stages. The spatial change of soil physiochemical characteristics was studied in different restoration stages and different soil layers at the same restoration stages. The results showed that the soil clay contents increased in general, which increased considerably in surface layers but increased very little in sub-surface and lower surface layers; the soil bulk density decreased with the succession of different restoration stages, and the bulk density in surface soil was lower than that in sub-surface and lower surface; the soil organic matter(SOM) increased with the succession of different restoration stages in general, but the SOM declined with the increase of soil depth, which showed a clear concentration of SOM in the topsoil; the soil TN, AP and AK increased with the successions of different restoration stages; the differences of plant root and litter amount distributions resulted in the differences in profile distributions of each soil nutrient. This study could enriched and broadened the research field of vegetation ecology and restoration ecology in this area to some extent and provided an important theoretical basis for ecosystem restoration and reconstruction in sloping-land with purple soil in Hengyang.
参考文献/References:
[1] Mcquilkin W E. The natural establishment of pine in abandoned fields in the Piedmour Plateau Region[J]. Ecology,1940,21(2):135-147.
[2] Yang N, Li J G. Growth dynamics of rapeseed leaves based on MATLAB[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology,2008,9(5):96-98.
[3] 曲国辉,郭继勋.松嫩平原不同演替阶段植物群落和土壤特性的关系[J].草业学报,2003,12(1):18-22.
[4] Nihlgrad B. Pedological influence of spruce planted on former beech forest soil in Scania[J]. South Sweden Oikos,1971,22(3):302-314.
[5] 张庆费,宋永昌,由文辉.浙江天童植物群落次生演替与土壤肥力的关系[J].生态学报,1999,19(2):174-178.
[6] Kellner O, Redbo-torstensson P R. Effects of elevated nitrogen deposition on field-layer vegetation in coniferous forests[J]. Ecological Bulletins,1995,44(1):227-237.
[7] 杨小波,张桃林,吴庆书.海南琼北地区不同植被类型物种多样性与土壤肥力的关系[J].生态学报,2002,22(2):190-196.
[8] 侯扶江,南志标,肖金玉,等.重牧退化草地的植被、土壤及其耦合特征[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):915-922.
[9] 王琳,张金屯,上官铁梁,等.历山山地草甸的物种多样性及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2004,10(1):18-22.
[10] 杨文文,李学培,王洪英.东北黑土区坡耕地水土流失及防治技术研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(5):232-236.
[11] 杨宁,邹冬生,李建国.衡阳盆地紫色土丘陵坡地植物群落数量分类及物种多样性研究[J].农业现代化研究,2009,30(5):615-619.
[12] 杨宁,邹冬生,李建国.衡阳盆地紫色土丘陵坡地自然恢复灌丛阶段主要种群空间分布格局[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(3):996-1001.
[13] 杨宁,邹冬生,李建国,等.衡阳盆地紫色土丘陵坡地主要植物群落自然恢复演替进程中种群生态位动态[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(4):87-93.
[14] 杨宁,邹冬生,李建国.衡阳盆地紫色土丘陵坡地土壤水分变化动态研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(6):16-21.
[15] 安慧,韦兰英,刘勇,等.黄土丘陵区油松人工林和白桦天然林细根垂直分布及其与土壤养分的关系[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2007,13(4):611-619.
[16] 廖利平,邓士坚,于小军,等.不同连栽代数杉木人工林细根生长、分布与营养物质分泌特征[J].生态学报,2001,21(4):569-573.
[17] 杨宁,邹冬生,李建国.衡阳盆地紫色土丘陵坡地主要植物群落生物量特征[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2009,35(5):466-469.
[18] 陈文庆,李鹏,张良恩,等.林木细根分布规律与土壤水分响应关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(6):92-96.
[19] 杨宁,邹冬生,杨满元,等.贵州雷公山秃杉的种群结构和空间分布格局[J].西北植物学报,2011,31(10):2100-2105.
[20] 陈志阳,杨宁,姚先铭,等.贵州雷公山秃杉种群生活史特征与空间分布格局[J].生态学报,2012,32(7):2158-2165.
[21] 李灵,张玉,江慧华,等.旅游干扰对武夷山风景区土壤质量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(6):56-62.
[22] 杨宁,彭晚霞,邹冬生,等.贵州喀斯特土石山区水土保持生态经济型植被恢复模式[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(S1):474-477.
[23] 杨宁,邹冬生,李建国.衡阳盆地紫色土丘陵坡地植被恢复模式建设[J].草业科学,2010,27(10):10-16.
[24] 白军红,邓伟,张玉霞.莫英格湿地土壤氮磷空间分布规律研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(4):79-81.
[25] 陈宗伟,江玉林,张洪江.青藏高原高速公路建设中弃土场土壤流失量特征:以青海平阿高速公路为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(6):4-6.
[26] 熊汉锋,王运华.梁子湖湿地土壤养分的空间异质性[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(5):584-589.
[27] 杨宁,李建国.基于MATLAB分析油菜若干性状之间的关系[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(9):36-38.
相似文献/References:
[1]李青,狄晓艳.晋北丘陵风沙区不同植被恢复模式的土壤化学特征与生态恢复效应[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(05):88.
LI Qing,DI Xiaoyan.Soil Chemical Characteristics and Ecological Restoration Effects of Different Revegetation Patterns in the Hilly Sandy of North Shanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):88.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2012-07-08;改回日期:2012-09-08。
基金项目:湖南省重点项目“衡邵盆地生态公益林重点建设区植被恢复研究与示范”（62020608001）；湖南省科技厅项目“湖南省紫色土荒山坡地植被恢复技术研究”（S2006N332）；湖南环境生物职业技术学院院长科研基金青年资助项目“衡阳盆地紫色土丘陵坡地自然恢复灌丛阶段主要种群生态位特征”（Z09-01）
作者简介:陈孙华(1972-),男,湖南茶陵人,讲师,主要从事林业技术与园林的教学与研究工作。E-mail:chensunhua1@sina.com