MIAO Bao-he,ZHENG Yan-hai,FU Fang,et al.Ecological Evaluation on Vegetation Restoration in Bare Lands of Limekiln Site and Road Slope in Mentougou District of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):125-128.
北京市门头沟区石灰窑遗址及公路边坡裸露地表植被修复模式的生态评价
- Title:
- Ecological Evaluation on Vegetation Restoration in Bare Lands of Limekiln Site and Road Slope in Mentougou District of Beijing
- 分类号:
- X171.1;F062.2
- 摘要:
- 研究对北京市门头沟区石灰窑废弃地及公路边坡裸露地表8种生态修复模式中的植被生态学特征及生态恢复效果进行了调查评价。结果表明：石灰窑遗址人工景观再建模式、框格+植被模式及无土碎石挡土墙灌浆模式修复效果较好，容器苗修复模式和挂网喷播模式效果最差。8种生态修复模式中，植被物种丰富度以客土移栽模式最高(29±1.15)，石灰窑人工景观再建模式次之(23.6±2.02)，保育棒模式最低(7±1.1)；植被盖度以石灰窑人工景观再建模式(88.3%)和框格+植被模式(87%)最高，植生袋模式和挂网喷播模式最低，分别为48%和32%；植被高度以客土移栽模式最高(546.3 cm)，人工景观模式次之(316 cm)；挂网喷播和植生袋最低，分别为44.97 cm和54.13 cm。综合评价结果认为，石灰窑人工景观再建、框格+植被和挡土墙灌浆模式是门头沟区石灰窑及公路边坡裸露地表生态恢复较适合的修复模式。
- Abstract:
- An investigation on evaluating the vegetation restoration effects among 8 different modes(referred as A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H) was conducted in Mentougou District of Beijing. The results showed that D, E and F were much better than the others, A and H were the worst among those modes. Among those 8 vegetation restoration modes, species richness of B was the highest(29±1.15), with A in the second place(23.6±2.02) and G was the lowest(7±1.1). Vegetation coverage of E and F was significantly higher than the others(87% and 88.3%, respectively), but that of A and C was much lower than the others(32% and 48%, respectively). The plant height of B was the highest(546.3 cm), with F in the second place(316 cm), A and C were much lower than the others(44.97 cm and 54.13 cm, respectively). In conclusion, those results suggested that D, E and F were better than the others in vegetation restoration in bare lands of limekiln site and road slope in Mentougou District of Beijing.
参考文献/References:
[1] 朱海鹰, 徐国钢, 张军.高速公路边坡生态防护施工技术[J].中外公路, 2003, 23(3):83-85.
[2] 刘春霞, 韩烈保.高速公路边坡植被恢复研究进展[J].生态学报, 2007, 27(5):2090-2098.
[3] Matesanz S, Valladares F. Improving revegetation of gypsum slopes is not a simple matter of adding native species: Insights from a multispecies experiment[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2007, 30:67-77.
[4] 张文波, 孙楠.门头沟区生态修复及生态城建设模式探讨[J].生态人类, 2010(3):3-4.
[5] Wang Z Q, Wu L H, Liu T T. Revegetation of steep rocky slopes: Planting climbing vegetation species in artificially drilled holes[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2009, 35:1079-1084.
[6] Yang M H. Landscape design of highway[J]. Journal of China and Foreign Highway, 1998, 18(1):1-4.
[7] Pu Z. The application of planting on highway slope[J]. Gansu Shuili Shuidian Jishu, 2003, 39(4):335-338.
[8] 余新晓, 秦永胜, 陈丽华, 等.北京山地森林生态系统服务功能及其价值初步研究[J].生态学报, 2002, 22(5):627-630.
[9] 李永庚, 蒋高明.矿山废弃地生态重建研究进展[J].生态学报, 2004, 24(1):95-100.
[10] Brooker R W, Maestre F T, Callaway R M. Facilitation in plant communities: The past, the present, and the future[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2008, 96:18-34.
[11] 冯朝阳, 高吉喜, 田美荣, 等.京西门头沟区自然植被滞尘能力及效益研究[J].环境科学研究, 2007, 20(5):155-159.
[12] 史作民, 程瑞梅, 刘世荣.宝天曼落叶阔叶林种群生态位特征[J].应用生态学报, 1999, 10(3):265-269.
[13] 方精云.中国森林生产力及其对全球气候变化的响应[J].植物生态学报, 2000, 24(5):513-517.
[14] 侯英雨, 柳钦火, 延昊, 等.我国陆地植被净初级生产力变化规律及其对气候的响应[J].应用生态学报, 2007, 18(9):1546-1553.
[15] Kreuter U P, Harris H G, Matlock M D, et al. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39:333-346.
[16] 周广胜, 张新时.全球气候变化的中国自然植被的净第一性生产力研究[J].植物生态学报, 1996, 20(1):11-19.
[17] Tormo J, Garcia-Fayos P, Bochet E. Relative importance of plant traits and ecological filters in road embankment revegetation under semiarid Mediterranean conditions[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2008, 33:258-264.
[18] 周冰冰, 李忠魁, 侯元兆, 等.北京市森林资源价值[M].北京:中国林业出版社, 2000.
[19] 郑元润, 周广胜.基于NDVI的中国天然森林植被净第一性生产力模型[J].植物生态学报, 2000, 24(1):9-12.
[20] Armas C, Pugnaire F I. Plant interactions govern population dynamics in semi-arid plant community[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2005, 93:978-989.
[21] 黄银晓, 林舜华, 韩荣庄, 等.北京主要绿化植物和土壤对大气中硫的积累特点及其指示、净化作用[J].植物学报, 1990, 32(5):380-389.
[22] Nemani R R, Kelling C D, Hashimoto H, et al. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999[J]. Science, 2003, 300:1560-1563.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2011-6-20;改回日期:2011-7-14。
基金项目:北京市科技计划项目“门头沟生态修复产业化涵养发展研究与示范工程”(Z090006040310001)
作者简介:保河(1969- )，男，博士，主要研究方向：植物生态学。E-mail：miaobaohe@163.com
通讯作者:李永庚(1970- )，男，副研究员，主要研究方向：植被生态学。E-mail：liyonggeng@ibcas.ac.cn