[1]蔺雨阳,王得祥,雷瑞德,等.秦岭西段天然油松种群的数量特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(04):180-185.
　LIN Yu-yang,WANG De-xiang,LEI Rui-de,et al.Study on the Characteristics of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. Population on the Western Section of Qinling Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(04):180-185.
点击复制

秦岭西段天然油松种群的数量特征研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 16 期数: 2009年04期 页码: 180-185 栏目: 出版日期: 2009-08-20
Title:
Study on the Characteristics of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. Population on the Western Section of Qinling Mountains
作者:
蔺雨阳1, 王得祥2, 雷瑞德2, 雍小华1
1. 西北农林科技大学 资源与环境学院, 陕西 杨陵 712100;
2. 西北农林科技大学 林学院, 陕西 杨陵 712100
Author(s):
LIN Yu-yang1, WANG De-xiang2, LEI Rui-de2, YONG Xiao-hua1
1. College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
2. College of Forestry, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
关键词:
种群统计; 生命表; 生存分析; 谱分析; 油松
Keywords:
population statistics; life table; survival analysis; spectral analysis; Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.
分类号:
S718.542
摘要:
秦岭是我国南北气候和植被过渡带，油松群落是顶级群落之一，研究油松种群表现出来的特有结构和生命周期，将有助于深入理解在该区域油松能够成为主要建群种之一的机理。根据对秦岭西段油松种群的调查资料，利用生存分析理论，编制静态生命表，绘制生存曲线和死亡率曲线，同时应用谱分析方法分析种群数量的动态变化。结果表明：（1）油松种群存活曲线符合DeeveyⅢ，阳坡油松由于密度效应会导致种群自疏，出现“一张一弛”现象，阴坡油松种群在弱光照的胁迫下，弱化了密度效应的作用；（2）油松种群死亡率的波动周期为15 a，在时间格局上也一致，这对油松林的可持续经营具有理论参考价值；（3）谱分析表明不同坡向的油松种群生长周期不同（阳坡>阴坡），同时大周期内有小周期的波动。可见油松种群本身在结构上存在内调节机制，用以有效配置资源形成稳定种群。其研究结果有助于从种群学角度上解释油松群落成为顶级群落的稳定性。
Abstract:
Based on the investigation data on Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. population in the western section of Qinling Mountains, the theory of survival analysis and the method of spectral analysis, the static life table, the curves of survival and mortality rate were drawn in this paper. Meanwhile, authors also analyzed the population dynamics by the method of spectral analysis. The results showed that the curve of survival generally tended to the Deevey Ⅲ, and the competition would lead to self-thinning of the population by different degree. The fluctuation period of mortality was 15 year in all aspects and the temporal pattern was same. However, spectral analysis showed the fluctuation period of survival was different between sunny and shady slope (Sunny>Shady), and the minor period existed in the main period. In conclusion, the structure of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. population could keep stable through the efficient resource allocation adjusted by interior mechanism.

参考文献/References:

[1] 毕晓丽,洪伟,吴承祯,等.黄山松种群统计分析[J].林业科学,2002,38(1):61-66.
[2] 宋萍,洪伟,吴承祯,等.珍稀濒危植物桫椤种群结构与动态研究[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(3):413-418.
[3] Johnsion E A,Miyanishi K,Kleb H.The hazards of interpretation of static age structures as shown by stand reconstructions in a Pinus contorta-Picea engelmannⅡ forest[J].Journal of Ecology,1994,82:923-931.
[4] Duncan R P.Flood disturbance and the coexistence of species in lowland pod carp forest,south Westland Newland [J].Journal of Ecology,1993,81: 403-416.
[5] Frelich L E,Graumlich L J.Age-class distribution and spatial patterns in an old-growth hemlock-hardwood forest[J].Canadian journal of forest research,1994,24: 1939-1947.
[6] Stewart G H.Population dynamics of a montane conifer forest,western Cascade Range,Oregon,USA[J].Ecology,1986,67: 534-544.
[7] 吴承祯,洪伟,谢金寿,等.珍稀濒危植物长苞铁杉种群生命表分析[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(3):333-336.
[8] 雷瑞德,尚廉斌,刘建军,等.秦岭南坡中山地带原生植被主要乔木种群的空间分布及相互关系[J].西北林学院学报,1996,S1:17-25.
[9] 侯琳,雷瑞德.秦岭林区天然油松林结构研究初报[J].陕西林业科技,1994(4):4-8.
[10] 杨茂生,李秋元.陕西秦岭西段南坡油松林的数量分类[J].西北林学院学报,1995,10(1):21-26.
[11] 吴明作,刘玉萃.栓皮栎种群数量动态的谱分析与稳定性 [J].生态学杂志,2000,19(4):23-26.
[12] 江洪.云杉种群生态学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1992.
[13] 周纪伦,郑师章,杨持.植物种群生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1993.
[14] 伍业钢,韩进轩.阔叶红松林种群动态的谱分析[J].生态学杂志,1988,7(1): 19-23.
[15] 郭连金,徐卫红.武夷山米槠种群结构及谱分析 [J].植物研究,2007,27(3):325-330.
[16] Agren J,Zackarisson O.Age and size structure of Pinus sylvestris populations on mires in Central and Northern Sweden[J].Journal of Ecology,1990,78: 1049-1062.
[17] 刘金福,洪伟.格氏栲种群增长动态预测研究 [J].应用与环境生物学报,1999,5(3):247-253.
[18] 闫桂琴,赵桂仿,胡正海,等.秦岭太白红杉种群结构与动态的研究.应用生态学报,2001,12(6):824-828.
[19] Wretten S.D.Field and laboratory exercise in ecology[M].New York: Edward Arnod,1980:66-105.
[20] 张文辉,祖元刚.濒危种裂叶沙参种群生命表和存活曲线的研究及其与广布种泡沙参的对照[J].植物生态学报,1999,23(1):76-86.
[21] 张文辉,王延平,康永祥,等.濒危植物太白红杉种群年龄结构及其时间序列预测分析[J].生物多样性,2004,12(3):361-369.
[22] 申仕康,马海华,王跃华,等.濒危植物猪血木自然种群结构及动态[J].生态学报,2008,28(5):2404-2412.
[23] Diaz S,Mercado C,Alvarez-cardenas S.Structure and population dynamics of Pinus lagunae M.-F Passini[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2000,134:249-256.
[24] 赖江山,张谧,谢宗强.三峡库区常绿阔叶林优势种群的结构和格局动态[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1073-1079.
[25] 张文辉,卢彦昌,周建云,等.巴山北坡不同干扰条件下栓皮栎种群结构与动态[J].林业科学,2008(7):11-16.
[26] 汪殿蓓,暨淑仪,陈飞鹏,等.仙湖苏铁种群年龄判断及年龄结构特征[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(3):476-480.
[27] Legendre L,Legendre P.Numerical Ecology [M].Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company,1998:195-197.
[28] Sonia B,Anabela A,Francisco A.The narrow endemic Scrophularia valdesⅡ Ortega Olivencia & Devesa (Scrophulariaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula: an evaluation of its conservation status[J].Biodiversity and Conservation,2006,15: 4027-4043.

相似文献/References:

[1]卢杰,潘刚,罗大庆,等.濒危植物急尖长苞冷杉种群生命表分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(05):212.
　LU Jie,PAN Gang,LUO Da-qing,et al.Analysis to the Life Table of Endangered Population Abies Georgei[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(04):212.
[2]张志录,刘中华,陈明辉,等.河南伏牛山区天然红豆杉种群结构与动态研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):262.
　ZHANG Zhilu,LIU Zhonghua,CHEN Minghui,et al.Research on the Population Structure and Dynamics of the Natural Taxus chinensis in Funiushan Mountain Area of He’nan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):262.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2008-02-23。
基金项目:国家科技部科技基础专项秦巴山区生态群落及野生种质资源调查（2007FY110800）；秦岭生态站及其所在省区森林生态质量状况评估技术项目资助（2006BAD03A0702/wb04）
作者简介:蔺雨阳（1984-），男，甘肃定西人，在读硕士，主要从事森林生态和群落学的研究。E-mail：yuyang_lin@163.com
通讯作者:王得祥（1966-），男，青海乐都人，教授，博士生导师，主要从事森林生态和森林可持续经营教学和研究。E-mail：wangdx@126.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01