Fu Rong,Liang Yujie,Xie Zhiguo,et al.Spatial and Temporal Changes in the Ecological Security of the Hanjiang River Basin and Its Influencing Factors[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(06):139-148,160.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.06.004]
汉江流域生态安全时空变化及其影响因素
- Title:
- Spatial and Temporal Changes in the Ecological Security of the Hanjiang River Basin and Its Influencing Factors
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)06-0139-10
- Keywords:
- ecological security; ecological security index; comprehensive index method; Hanjiang River Basin
- 分类号:
- X826
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探究汉江流域生态安全时空变化特征,探讨人类活动对该区域生态安全变化的影响,为汉江流域生态修复工作提供依据。[方法]以汉江流域为研究对象,利用PSR模型和综合指数法,结合土地利用及景观格局指数,从时空变化的角度对2001—2020年汉江流域生态安全状况进行了评估。[结果](1)2001—2020年汉江流域主要土地利用方式为森林与草地,占国土总面积的71.82%,主要的土地利用转移方向为草地转变为森林。相比2001年、2020年森林的面积增加幅度最大,增加了1 221.87 km2。湿地、水体及城市用地的面积总体呈现增长的趋势,耕地面积有所下降。(2)2001—2015年汉江流域生态安全状况呈现逐渐变好的趋势,在2015年生态安全水平达到了20年内最佳水平,一般安全及以上生态安全区面积从2001年的27 623.86 km2增加至2020年的38 514.67 km2。总体来说,生态安全等级差的区域占比最大,生态安全状况仍需提升。(3)2001—2020年汉江流域生态安全指数的莫兰指数值分别为0.187,0.174,0.185,0.180和0.133,存在显著的空间正相关关系及空间聚集性。(4)地理探测器结果显示研究期间内对生态安全指数解释程度最强的因子主要为植被覆盖度、最大斑块指数及景观蔓延度。因子之间存在着显著的交互增强效应,年降水量和其他因子交互作用时对生态安全指数的解释力得到了显著提升。[结论]汉江流域生态安全水平仍需提升,需要提升植被覆盖度,改善气候条件,优化土地利用模式,促进汉江流域生态安全建设和可持续发展。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]This study aims to investigate the characteristics of spatiotemporal changes in ecological security in the Hanjiang River Basin, to explore the influence of human activities on ecological security changes in the region, so as to provide a basis for ecological restoration work in the Hanjiang River Basin. [Methods]Hanjiang River Basin was taken as the research object. The ecological security status of the Hanjiang River Basin from 2001 to 2020 was evaluated from the perspective of spatial and temporal changes by using the PSR model and the comprehensive index method, combining with the index of land use and landscape pattern. [Results](1)From 2001 to 2020, the main land use modes in the Hanjiang River Basin were forest and grassland, accounting for 71.82% of the total land area. The main direction of land use transfer was the change from grassland to forest. Compared with 2001, in 2020, the area of forests increased the most, with an increase of 1 221.87 km2. The area of wetlands, water bodies and urban land showed a general trend of growth, while the area of arable land declined.(2)The ecological security status of the Hanjiang River Basin from 2001 to 2015 showed a trend of gradual improvement. In 2015, the ecological safety level reached the best level in 20 years, and the area of general safety and above ecological safety areas increased from 27 623.86 km2 in 2001 to 38 514.67 km2 in 2020. In general, the area with poor ecological safety grade accounted for the largest proportion. The ecological safety status still needs to be improved.(3)The values of Moran's I of ESI in the Hanjiang River Basin from 2001 to 2020 were 0.187, 0.174, 0.185, 0.180 and 0.133, respectively, with significant positive spatial correlation and spatial aggregation.(4)The results of the Geodetector showed that the strongest factors explaining the ESI during the study period were vegetation cover, maximum patch index and landscape spread. There was a significant interaction enhancement effect between the factors, and annual precipitation interacted with other factors to enhance the interpretation of the ecological security index. [Conclusion]The ecological security level of the Hanjiang River basin still needs to be improved. It is necessary to enhance the vegetation cover, to improve the climate conditions, to optimize the land use pattern, and to promote the construction of ecological security and sustainable development of the Hanjiang River Basin.
参考文献/References:
[1]肖笃宁,陈文波,郭福良.论生态安全的基本概念和研究内容[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(3):354-358.
Xiao D N, Chen W B, Guo F L. On the basic concepts and contents of ecological security[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002,13(3):354-358.
[2]王如松,欧阳志云.对我国生态安全的若干科学思考[J].中国科学院院刊,2007,22(3):223-229.
Wang R S, Ouyang Z Y. Some considerations with scientific views on ecological security in China[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2007,22(3):223-229.
[3]Cao S X, Zhang J Z, Chen L, et al. Ecosystem water imbalances created during ecological restoration by afforestation in China, and lessons for other developing countries[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016,183(3):843-849.
[4]王韩民,郭玮,程漱兰,等.国家生态安全:概念、评价及对策[J].管理世界,2001(2):149-156.
Wang H M, Guo W, Cheng S L, et al. National ecological security: Concept, evaluation and countermeasures[J]. Journal of Management World, 2001(2):149-156.
[5]谢华晶,李克飞,李继清,等.基于DPSIR模型的滇池流域水生态安全评价[J].环境保护科学,2021,47(6):94-99.
Xie H J, Li K F, Li J Q, et al. Water ecological security evaluation of Dianchi Lake Basin based on DPSIR model[J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2021,47(6):94-99.
[6]杨友宝,郭付友,韩国圣.我国主体功能限制开发区域旅游生态安全动态演变及其驱动因素:以张家界为例[J].生态学报,2023,43(20):8404-8416.
Yang Y B, Guo F Y, Han G S. Dynamic evolution and driving factors of tourism ecological security in the region of major function restricted development: A case study of Zhangjiajie[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(20):8404-8416.
[7]Qiu M, Zuo Q T, Wu Q S, et al. Water ecological security assessment and spatial autocorrelation analysis of prefectural regions involved in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022,12:5105.
[8]张志苗,刘孝富,邱文婷,等.基于植被指数开展汉江流域生态恢复力评估研究[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(2):436-442.
Zhang Z M, Liu X F, Qiu W T, et al. Evaluation of ecological resilience of Hanjiang River Basin based on vegetation index[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2022,12(2):436-442.
[9]曹文平,刘喜坤,赵天晴,等.基于压力-状态-响应(PSR)模型的潘安湖湿地水环境健康评价[J].环境工程,2021,39(5):231-237,245.
Cao W P, Liu X K, Zhao T Q, et al. Evaluation of water environmental health of Pan'an Lake wetland based on Pressure-State-Response(PSR)model[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2021,39(5):231-237,245.
[10]Cheng H R, Zhu L K, Meng J J. Fuzzy evaluation of the ecological security of land resources in mainland China based on the pressure-state-response framework[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2022,804:150053.
[11]吴映梅,李琛,高彬嫔,等.高原湖泊城市生态安全格局构建:以大理市为例[J].生态学报,2023,43(19):8153-8166.
Wu Y M, Li C, Gao B P, et al. Construction of urban ecological security pattern in highland lakes cites: The case of Dali City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(19):8153-8166.
[12]刘希朝,李效顺,蒋冬梅.基于土地利用变化的黄河流域景观格局及生态风险评估[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(4):265-274.
Liu X Z, Li X S, Jiang D M. Landscape pattern identification and ecological risk assessment using land-use change in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021,37(4):265-274.
[13]梁加乐,陈万旭,李江风,等.黄河流域景观破碎化时空特征及其成因探测[J].生态学报,2022,42(5):1993-2009.
Liang J L, Chen W X, Li J F, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of landscape fragmentation and causes in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(5):1993-2009.
[14]肖钊富,李瑞,吕宛青.成渝城市群旅游生态安全时空格局演化研究[J].世界地理研究,2023,32(10):122-133.
Xiao Z F, Li R, Lv W Q. Study on temporal and spatial pattern evolution of tourism ecological security in Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration[J]. World Regional Studies, 2023,32(10):122-133.
[15]吴恒飞.青海湖流域生态系统健康评价研究[D].西宁:青海师范大学,2021.
Wu H F. Study on Ecosystem Health Assessment in Qinghai Lake River Basin[D]. Xining: Qinghai Normal University, 2021.
[16]向丽,周伟,任君,等.基于DPSIRM模型的高原城市湿地生态安全评价:以湟水流域西宁段为例[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(10):2064-2071.
Xiang L, Zhou W, Ren J, et al. Ecological security evaluation of plateau urban wetland based on DPSIRM model: With Xining section of Huangshui Basin as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022,41(10):2064-2071.
[17]田甜,牟凤云,王俊秀,等.重庆市主城区土地利用变化对地表径流的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(4):128-135.
Tian T, Mou F Y, Wang J X, et al. Impact of land use change on surface runoff in the main urban area of Chongqing[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,28(4):128-135.
[18]杨帅琦,何文,王金叶,等.基于MCR模型的漓江流域生态安全格局构建[J].中国环境科学,2023,43(4):1824-1833.
Yang S Q, He W, Wang J Y, et al. Ecological security pattern construction in Lijiang River Basin based on MCR model[J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,43(4):1824-1833.
[19]石金鑫,梁小英,李辉蔷,等.陕北黄土高原景观格局对生态系统服务权衡关系的影响[J].生态学报,2023,43(21):8958-8972.
Shi J X, Liang X Y, Li H Q, et al. Impact of landscape pattern on ecosystem service trade-offs in the Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(21):8958-8972.
[20]朱金峰,周艺,王世新,等.1975年—2018年白洋淀湿地变化分析[J].遥感学报,2019,23(5):971-986.
Zhu J F, Zhou Y, Wang S X, et al. Analysis of changes of Baiyangdian wetland from 1975 to 2018 based on remote sensing[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2019,23(5):971-986.
[21]王博,黄晓军,刘萌萌.区域建设用地开发强度格局演化及影响因素分析:以陕西省为例[J].干旱区地理,2020,43(6):1635-1647.
Wang B, Huang X J, Liu M M. Pattern evolution and influencing factors of regional construction land development intensity: A case of Shaanxi Province[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020,43(6):1635-1647.
[22]施斌,井发明,张浩宽.基于GIS的乡镇工业用地空间分布研究[J].地理空间信息,2023,21(4):82-84.
Shi B, Jing F M, Zhang H K. Research on spatial distribution of industrial land in towns based on GIS[J]. Geospatial Information, 2023,21(4):82-84.
[23]王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.
Wang J F, Xu C D. Geodetector: Principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(1):116-134.
[24]李鑫磊,李瑞平,王秀青,等.基于地理探测器的河套灌区林草植被覆盖度时空变化与驱动力分析[J].干旱区研究,2023,40(4):623-635.
Li X L, Li R P, Wang X Q, et al. Spatiotemporal change and analysis of factors driving forest-grass vegetation coverage in Hetao Irrigation District based on geographical detector[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023,40(4):623-635.
[25]姚材仪,何艳梅,程建兄,等. 基于MCR模型和重力模型的岷江流域生态安全格局评价与优化建议研究[J].生态学报,2023,43(17):1-14.
Yao C Y, He Y M, Cheng J X, et al. Evaluation of ecological security pattern and optimization suggestions in Mingjiang River Basin on MCR model and gravity model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(17):1-14.
[26]高长波,陈新庚,韦朝海,等.区域生态安全:概念及评价理论基础[J].生态环境,2006,15(1):169-174.
Gao C B, Chen X G, Wei C H, et al. Regional ecological security: The concept and assessment theoretical basis[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2006,15(1):169-174.
[27]鞠昌华,裴文明,张慧.生态安全:基于多尺度的考察[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(5):626-634.
Ju C H, Pei W M, Zhang H. Ecological security: Investigation based on multi-scale[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2020,36(5):626-634.
[28]孟晓璐,张艳芳.景观格局变化下陕西汉江流域生态价值与风险的相关性研究[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(3):190-200.
Meng X L, Zhang Y F. Study on correlation between ecological value and risk of Hanjiang River Basin in Shaanxi Province under landscape pattern change[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,37(3):190-200.
[29]Han Q G, Zhang J S, Shi X J, et al. Ecological function-oriented vegetation protection and restoration strategies in China's Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022,323:116290.
[30]袁梓裕,张路,廖李容,等.黄土高原草地植物多样性与群落稳定性的关系及其驱动因素[J].生态学报,2023,43(1):60-69.
Yuan Z Y, Zhang L, Liao L R, et al. Relationship between grassland plant diversity and community stability and its driving factors on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(1):60-69.
相似文献/References:
[1]盛东,李桂元,徐义军.湖南省小流域生态安全综合评价指标体系研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(02):58.
SHENG Dong,LI Gui-yuan,XU Yi-jun.Evaluation Index System of Ecological Security in the Watershed of Hu’nan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(06):58.
[2]李闯,刘吉平.霍林河流域中下游土地利用变化及生态安全响应[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):174.
LI Chuang,LIU Ji-ping.Land Use/Cover Change and Responses of Eco-security in the Middle-Lower Reaches of Huolin River Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):174.
[3]马三保.西部生态项目区可持续发展研究[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(04):178.
MA San Bao.Research on Sustainable Development in Western Eco-environment Construction Parts of China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(06):178.
[4]高桂芹,韩美.区域土地资源生态安全评价——以山东省枣庄市中区为例[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(05):271.
GAO Gui-qin,HAN Mei.Evaluation on Ecological Security of Regional Land Resource——A Case Study of Center District of Zaozhuang, Shandong Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(06):271.
[5]李苏楠,赵延治,史培军.西藏高原生态安全评价方法与应用—以西藏自治区曲松县为例[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(06):142.
LI Su-nan,ZHAO Yan-zhi,SHI Pei-jun.Method and Application of Ecological Security Analysis in Tibet Plateau——A Case Study in Qusum County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(06):142.
[6]田静毅,耿世刚,王立新,等.秦皇岛市生态安全问题与对策[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(01):126.
TIAN Jing-yi,GENG Shi-gang,WANG Li-xin,et al.The Problems and Countermeasure of Ecological Security in Qinhuangdao and Suggestion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):126.
[7]田静毅,王立新,王继彬.小流域生态安全景观指标的提取方法研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):40.
TIAN Jing-yi,WANG Li-xin,WANG Ji-bin.The Extraction Methods of Ecological Security Landscape Metrics in Small Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):40.
[8]曹心静,安超,米文宝.落后山区建设开发区的生态安全研究——闽北山区建设产业集中区引发的思考[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):57.
CAO Xin-jing,AN Chao,MI Wen-bao.An Ecological Security Study on the Backward Mountain Constructing Development Zone——Reflection from Constructing Industry Centralized Area in the Minbei Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):57.
[9]许月卿,崔丽.小城镇土地生态安全评价研究——以贵州省猫跳河流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):345.
XU Yue-qing,CUI Li.Evaluation on Ecological Security of Land Resources in Towns——A Case Study of Maotiao River, Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):345.
[10]牛传军,贾芳芳,马好霞,等.土地整理对区域生态环境的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(01):193.
NIU Chuan-jun,JIA Fang-fang,WANG Xiu-ru.Analysis on the Regional Eco-environmental Impact of Land Consolidation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(06):193.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-11-18 修回日期:2024-01-10
资助项目:陕西省林业科技创新重点专项(SXLK2022-02-7); 国家自然科学基金(42107512)
第一作者:符蓉(2001—),女,甘肃陇南人,硕士研究生,研究方向为生态恢复研究。E-mail:1585321335@qq.com
通信作者:张伟(1990—),男,重庆巫山人,副教授,博士,主要从事植被恢复生态重建研究。E-mail:zwgwyd@163.com；刘洋洋(1991—),男,河南洛阳人,副教授,博士,主要从事植被生态水文研究。E-mail:hnlylcbtks@163.com