Zhao Zulun,Luo Junhua,Li Wei,et al.Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value and Influencing Factors in Karst Mountainous Urban Agglomeration[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(05):410-420.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.013]
喀斯特山地城市群生态系统服务价值演变及影响因素
- Title:
- Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value and Influencing Factors in Karst Mountainous Urban Agglomeration
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)05-0410-11
- 关键词:
- 生态系统服务价值; Markov-FLUS模型; 土地利用模拟; 地理探测器; 黔中城市群
- Keywords:
- ecosystem service value; Markov-FLUS model; land use simulation; Geodetector; urban agglomeration of central Guizhou Province
- 分类号:
- X826, P901
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]研究喀斯特城市群城镇化背景下的生态系统服务价值(Ecosystem service value,ESV)演变及影响因素,为区域生态环境保护、生态功能区划和生态补偿决策提供科学依据。[方法]基于黔中城市群2000—2020年土地利用数据,从自然和社会经济角度选取16个土地利用变化驱动因子,构建Markov-FLUS模型模拟自然发展和生态约束情景下的2030年土地利用格局,然后采用修正的ESV系数评估ESV时空演变规律,利用地理探测器分析ESV空间分异影响因素。[结果](1)2000—2020年人造地表对耕地(53%)、林地(12%)和草地(10%)侵占严重; 生态约束情景下重要自然保护区得到有效保护,人造地表增加5.55万hm2,增速有所放缓。(2)ESV整体呈现先升后降的趋势,其中调节服务(71.08%)>支持服务(23.59%)>文化服务(4.51%)>供给服务(0.82%); 自然发展情景下2030年ESV值为592.11亿元,生态约束情景下ESV值为589.06亿元。(3)ESV空间分异因子解释力分别为区县面积(0.79)>农林牧渔增加值(0.51)>第一产业增加值(0.50)>GDP(0.41)>人均GDP(0.30)>建成区面积(0.09)>常住人口(0.04),区县面积、农林牧渔增加值和第一产业增加值与ESV呈显著正相关,人均GDP与ESV呈显著负相关关系,影响因素的交互对于ESV具有非线性增强和双因子增强的解释作用。[结论]区域生态系统服务类型主要为调节服务,水域与林地生态系统对于整体ESV的影响较大,是区域环境保护与生态建设的重心。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]The aims of this study are to investigate the evolution of ecosystem service value(ESV)and its influencing factors urbanization in the Karst city cluster and to provide a scientific basis for regional eco-environmental protection, ecological function zoning, and ecological compensation decision-making. [Methods]Based on the land use data of urban agglomeration of central Guizhou Province from 2000 to 2020, 16 drivers were selected from natural and socio-economic perspectives, and a Markov-FLUS model was constructed to simulate the land use pattern in 2030 under the scenarios of natural development and ecological constraints. Then, the modified ESV coefficients were used to assess the spatial and temporal evolution of ESV and analyze the factors influencing the spatial differentiation of ESV using Geodetector. [Results](1)The artificial surface seriously encroached on cropland(53%), forest land(12%), and grassland(10%)from 2000 to 2020. Under the ecological constraint scenario, significant nature reserves were effectively protected, and the artificial surface increased by 55 500 hectares, with a slower growth rate.(2)The ESV as a whole showed a trend of rising and then falling, with regulating services(71.08%)>supporting services(23.59%)>cultural services(4.51%)>supplying services(0.82%). The value of ESV in 2030 under the natural development scenario was 59.211 billion yuan, and that was 58.906 billion yuan under the ecological constraint scenario.(3)The explanatory power of ESV spatial differentiation factors followed the order:area of districts and counties(0.79)>value-added of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery(0.51)>value-added of primary industry(0.50)>GDP(0.41)>GDP per capita(0.30)>area of built-up area(0.09)>resident population(0.04). The area of districts and counties, value-added of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery, and value-added of primary industry were significantly and positively correlated with ESV, and GDP was significantly and positively correlated with ESV. The area of districts and counties, value-added of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery, and value-added of primary industry were significantly positively correlated with ESV, and GDP was significantly negatively correlated with ESV. [Conclusion]Regional ecosystem services are mainly regulating services, and water and woodland ecosystems have a more significant impact on the overall ESV, which is the center of gravity of regional environmental protection and ecological construction.
参考文献/References:
[1]Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014,26:152-158.
[2]Aziz T, Nimubona A D, Van Cappellen P. Comparative valuation of three ecosystem services in a Canadian watershed using global, regional, and local unit values[J]. Sustainability, 2023,15(14):11024.
[3]Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387:253-260.
[4]Sharma S, Hussain S, Singh A N. Impact of land use and land cover on urban ecosystem service value in Chandigarh, India:A GIS-based analysis[J]. Journal of Urban Ecology, 2023,9(1):juac030.
[5]欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5):607-613.
Ouyang Z Y, Wang X K, Miao H. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999,19(5):607-613.
[6]周鹏,周婷,彭少麟.生态系统服务价值测度模式与方法[J].生态学报,2019,39(15):5379-5388.
Zhou P, Zhou T, Peng S L. Measurement modalities and methodologies of ecosystem services valuation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(15):5379-5388.
[7]韩然,叶长盛.珠江三角洲典型基塘生态系统服务价值演变:以佛山市为例[J].热带地理,2020,40(3):562-574.
Han R, Ye C S. Evolution of ecosystem service value of typical dike-pond in the Pearl River Delta:A case study of Foshan[J]. Tropical Geography, 2020,40(3):562-574.
[8]Schenau S, van Berkel J, Bogaart P, et al. Valuing ecosystem services and ecosystem assets for The Netherlands[J]. One Ecosystem, 2022,7:e84624
[9]谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[10]谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
Xie G D, Zhen L, Lu C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008,23(5):911-919.
[11]谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1740-1746.
Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang C S, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resources Science, 2015,37(9):1740-1746.
[12]刘志涛,王少剑,方创琳.粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务价值的时空演化及其影响机制[J].地理学报,2021,76(11):2797-2813.
Liu Z T, Wang S J, Fang C L. Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing mechanism of ecosystem service value in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021,76(11):2797-2813.
[13]封清,周忠发,陈全,等.基于易地扶贫搬迁视角的喀斯特生态脆弱区生态系统服务价值的时空演变[J].生态学报,2022,42(7):2708-2717.
Feng Q, Zhou Z F, Chen Q, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution research of ecosystem service value in ecologically vulnerable Karst regions under the perspective of poverty alleviation relocation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(7):2708-2717.
[14]Kulaixi Z, Chen Y N, Wang C, et al. Spatial differentiation of ecosystem service value in an arid region:A case study of the Tarim River Basin, Xinjiang[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023,151:110249.
[15]韩会庆,苏志华.喀斯特生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(3):352-358.
Han H Q, Su Z H. Research progress and prospects of Karst ecosystem services[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017,36(3):352-358.
[16]黄木易,岳文泽,方斌,等.1970—2015年大别山区生态服务价值尺度响应特征及地理探测机制[J].地理学报,2019,74(9):1904-1920.
Huang M Y, Yue W Z, Fang B, et al. Scale response characteristics and geographic exploration mechanism of spatial differentiation of ecosystem service values in Dabie Mountain Area, central China from 1970 to 2015[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(9):1904-1920.
[17]Liang X, Liu X P, Li X, et al. Delineating multi-scenario urban growth boundaries with a CA-based FLUS model and morphological method[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018,177:47-63.
[18]Liu X P, Liang X, Li X, et al. A future land use simulation model(FLUS)for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017,168:94-116.
[19]李立,胡睿柯,李素红.基于改进FLUS模型的北京市低碳土地利用情景模拟[J].自然资源遥感,2023,35(1):81-89.
Li L, Hu R K, Li S H. Simulations of the low-carbon land use scenarios of Beijing based on the improved FLUS model[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2023,35(1):81-89.
[20]张晓瑶,张潇,李冬花,等.城市土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值影响的多情景模拟:以深圳市为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(6):2086-2097.
Zhang X Y, Zhang X, Li D H, et al. Multi-scenario simulation of the impact of urban land use change on ecosystem service value in Shenzhen[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(6):2086-2097.
[21]谢凌凌,许进龙,臧俊梅,等.基于Markov-FLUS模型的广西土地利用变化模拟预测[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(2):249-254,264.
Xie L L, Xu J L, Zang J M, et al. Simulation and prediction of land use change in Guangxi based on Markov-FLUS model[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(2):249-254,264.
[22]牟燕,冯飞.基于土地利用的北京市多情景模拟下生态服务价值影响评估[J].北京林业大学学报,2023,45(5):14-24.
Mou Y, Feng F. Impact assessment of ecological service value under multi scenario simulation in Beijing based on land use[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023,45(5):14-24.
[23]袁雪.基于PLUS模型的武汉市土地利用变化情景模拟与景观生态风险研究[D].抚州:东华理工大学,2022.
Yuan X. Scenario Simulation of land use change and landscape ecological risk research in Wuhan based on PLUS model[D]. Fuzhou:East China Institute of Technology, 2022.
[24]周寒冰,王志泰,王志杰,等.喀斯特山地城市生态系统服务价值地形梯度响应:以贵阳市中心城区为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(6):337-347.
Zhou H B, Wang Z T, Wang Z J, et al. Response of ecosystem service value of Karst mountainous city to terrain gradient—a case study of downtown of Guiyang city[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,28(6):337-347.
[25]韩会庆,刘悦,蔡广鹏,等.快速城镇化背景下山地城市生态系统服务价值变化梯度特征:以贵阳市为例[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):295-303.
Han H Q, Liu Y, Cai G P, et al. Characteristics of gradient change of the value of mountain ecosystem services with the rapid urbanization in urban area:A case study of Guiyang[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020,27(5):295-303.
[26]谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
Xie G D, Lu C X, Leng Y F, et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003,18(2):189-196.
[27]王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.
Wang J F, Xu C D. Geodetector:Principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(1):116-134.
相似文献/References:
[1]谭君,李世平.铜川市土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):131.
TAN Jun,LI Shi-ping.Analysis on Impacts of Land Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in Tongchuan City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):131.
[2]张晓楠,宋宏利,李振杰.基于地统计学的区域生态服务价值空间分异规律研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):168.
ZHANG Xiao-nan,SONG Hong-li,LI Zhen-jie.Study on Spatial Distribution of Regional Ecosystem Service Value Based on Geostatistics[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):168.
[3]章后甜,杜会石,王世东,等.长白山地区土地利用及生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):242.
ZHANG Hou-tian,DU Hui-shi,WANG Shi-dong,et al.Study on the Land Use Change and Ecosystem Services Value in Changbai Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):242.
[4]陈颖,石培基,潘竟虎,等.高原生态城土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响研究——以甘肃省民乐县为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):154.
CHEN Ying,SHI Pei-ji,PAN Jing-hu,et al.Analysis on the Effect of Land-use Change on Ecosystem Service Value in the Plateau Eco-city——A Case Study of Minle County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):154.
[5]汤蕾,许东,母学征.辽河三角洲生态系统服务价值变化[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(05):108.
TANG Lei,XU Dong,MU Xue-zheng.Change in Ecosystem Service Values in Liaohe River Delta[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):108.
[6]姜永华,江洪,曾波,等.三峡库区(重庆段)土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(04):234.
JIANG Yong-Hua,JIANG Hong,ZENG Bo,et al.Effects of Land Use Change on the Ecosystem Services Value of Three Gorges Reservoir Area (the part of Chongqing)[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(05):234.
[7]苏朝阳,苗长虹.开封市土地利用时空变化的生态系统服务价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(05):116.
SU Chao-yang,MIAO Chang-hong.Evaluation on Ecosystem Services Value of Spatial-Temporal Feature of Land Use Changes in Kaifeng[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(05):116.
[8]张芳怡,邢元志,濮励杰,等.苏州市土地利用变化的生态环境效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(05):98.
ZHANG Fang-yi,XING Yuan-zhi,PU Li-jie,et al.Study on the Eco-environmental Effect of Land Use Change in Suzhou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(05):98.
[9]王亚娟,刘小鹏,赵大磊.基于生态系统服务价值的固原市市辖区土地利用规划环境影响评价[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):222.
WANG Ya-juan,LIU Xiao-peng,ZHAO Da-lei.Environment Impact Assessment of Guyuan Municipal Districts Land Use Program Based on Ecosystem Services Value[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(05):222.
[10]邓伟,杨华,崔艳君.重庆主城区近30年土地利用变化的生态环境效应评价[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):232.
DENG Wei,YANG Hua,CUI Yan-jun.Assessment of Ecological Environmental Effects on Landuse Change in Chongqing City Nearly 30 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(05):232.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-10-07 修回日期:2023-11-01
资助项目:贵州科技计划项目(黔科合基础-ZK[2022]一般277); 贵州科技计划项目(黔科合基础-ZK[2024]一般628); 贵州科技计划项目(黔科合支撑[2023]一般199; 黔科合支撑[2023]一般198); 贵州科学院青年科学基金项目(黔科院J字[2024]13号)
第一作者:赵祖伦(1993—),男,贵州毕节人,硕士,助理研究员,主要研究方向为3S技术与生态环境应用。E-mail:769301533@qq.com
通信作者:赵卫权(1982—),男,甘肃庆阳人,博士,研究员,主要研究方向为资源环境与3S技术应用、喀斯特生态环境。E-mail:zwq82@163.com