Li Huyue,Dai Quanhou,Hu Zeyin,et al.Evaluation and Prediction of Ecosystem Service Value in Urban Agglomeration of Central Guizhou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):248-257.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.034]
黔中城市群生态系统服务价值评估及预测
- Title:
- Evaluation and Prediction of Ecosystem Service Value in Urban Agglomeration of Central Guizhou
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)04-0248-10
- Keywords:
- urban agglomeration of central Guizhou; land use; PLUS model; ESV
- 分类号:
- X171.1; F301.2
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探究生态系统服务价值(ESV)对土地利用变化的响应,提高黔中地区生态系统服务功能的可持续性。[方法]以黔中城市群为例,利用统计分析和空间自相关法评估了2000—2020年黔中城市群的土地利用变化及ESV时空演变特征,并耦合PLUS模型预测了2030年不同发展情景下土地利用空间格局及其ESV变化。[结果](1)2000—2020年研究区土地利用变化主要表现为耕地、草地向建设用地和水域转化,受土地利用变化的影响,2000—2020年研究区ESV增加了11.28亿元,呈波动上升趋势,水域和建设用地面积扩张是引起研究区ESV变化的主要原因。(2)2000—2020年ESV减少区主要分布在经济发展较好的中心城区,增加区主要分布在河流、湖泊等水域附近。空间自相关分析表明,研究区高集聚区和低集聚区分布范围较广且集聚性较强,高高集聚区主要集中在研究区西北部,低低集聚区主要集中在研究区中部。(3)2030年自然情景、耕地保护和生态保护情景下的ESV分别为710.22亿元、705.33亿元、720.62亿元,生态保护情景下对研究区ESV增长具有明显的积极作用。[结论]未来黔中城市群在生态环境方面,可继续加强退耕还林政策提高生态系统服务价值,在城市发展方面,应该制定更加合理的综合发展战略,在经济发展的同时又能兼顾生态保护。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]The aims of this study are to explore the response of ecosystem service value(ESV)to land use change, and to improve the sustainability of ecosystem service function in central Guizhou. [Methods]In this study, urban agglomeration of central Guizhou was taken as an example. Statistical analysis and spatial autocorrelation method were used to assess the land use change and ESV spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of urban agglomeration of central Guizhou from 2000 to 2020, and the spatial pattern of land use and its ESV change under different development scenarios in 2030 was predicted by coupling with PLUS model. [Results](1)The land use change in the study area from 2000 to 2020 was mainly manifested in the transformation of cropland and grassland to construction land and waters, and affected by the land use change, the ESV of the study area increased by 11.28 hundred million yuan from 2000 to 2020, showing a fluctuating upward trend, and the expansion of waters and construction land area was the main reason for the change of ESV in the study area.(2)The decrease area of ESV from 2000 to 2020 was mainly distributed in the center urban area with better economic development, and the increase area was mainly distributed near rivers, lakes and other waters. The spatial autocorrelation analysis showed that the high and low agglomeration areas in the study area were widely distributed and strongly clustered, with the high and high agglomeration areas mainly concentrated in the northwestern part of the study area and the low and low agglomeration areas mainly concentrated in the central part of the study area.(3)The ESV under the nature scenario, cropland protection and ecological protection scenarios in 2030 are 710.22 hundred million, 705.33 hundred million and 720.62 hundred million yuan, respectively, and the ecological protection scenario has an obvious positive effect on the growth of ESV in the study area. [Conclusion]In the future, the urban agglomeration of central Guizhou can continue to strengthen the policy of returning farmland to forests to improve the value of ecosystem services in terms of ecological environment, and it should formulate a more reasonable and comprehensive development strategy in terms of urban development, which can take into account ecological protection while the economy develops.
参考文献/References:
[1]谢高地,肖玉,鲁春霞.生态系统服务研究:进展、局限和基本范式[J].植物生态学报,2006,30(2):191-199.
Xie G D, Xiao Y, Lu C X. Study on ecosystem services:Progress, limitation and basic paradigm[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006,30(2):191-199.
[2]Costanza R, D'Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387:253-260.
[3]朱文博,张静静,崔耀平,等.基于土地利用变化情景的生态系统碳储量评估:以太行山淇河流域为例[J].地理学报,2019,74(3):446-459.
Zhu W B, Zhang J J, Cui Y P, et al. Assessment of territorial ecosystem carbon storage based on land use change scenario:A case study in Qihe River Basin[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(3):446-459.
[4]Leh M D K, Matlock M D, Cummings E C, et al. Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2013,165:6-18.
[5]孔琳,苏世伟.基于土地利用的杭州市生态系统服务价值时空动态[J].环境污染与防治,2022,44(11):1539-1545.
Kong L, Su S W. Spatiotemporal variation of ecosystem service value in Hangzhou based on land use[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2022,44(11):1539-1545.
[6]谈旭,王承武.伊犁河谷生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动因素[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(10):2747-2756.
Tan X, Wang C W. Temporal and spatial evolution of ecosystem service value in Ili Valley and its driving factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023,34(10):2747-2756.
[7]严长安,杨汝兰,付潇华,等.土地利用变化对滇池流域生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2023,43(15):6194-6202.
Yan C A, Yang R L, Fu X H, et al. Impact of land-use change on ecosystem services value in Dianchi Lake Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(15):6194-6202.
[8]Promila, Mothi Kumar K E, Sharma P. Assessment of ecosystem service value variation over the changing patterns of land degradation and land use/land cover[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2023,82(1):54.
[9]Shrestha S, Poudyal K N, Bhattarai N, et al. An assessment of the impact of land use and land cover change on the degradation of ecosystem service values in kathmandu valley using remote sensing and GIS[J]. Sustainability, 2022,14(23):15739.
[10]周寒冰,王志泰,王志杰,等.喀斯特山地城市生态系统服务价值地形梯度响应:以贵阳市中心城区为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(6):337-347.
Zhou H B, Wang Z T, Wang Z J, et al. Response of ecosystem service value of Karst mountainous city to terrain gradient:A case study of downtown of Guiyang City[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,28(6):337-347.
[11]刘家福,席兰兰,张尧,等.基于CA-Markov与InVEST模型的吉林省生态系统服务价值模拟及预测[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(6):153-159,329-330.
Liu J F, Xi L L, Zhang Y, et al. A study on simulation and prediction of ecosystem service value in Jilin Province based on CA-Markov and InVEST model[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020,40(6):153-159,329-330.
[12]Hakim A M Y, Baja S, Rampisela D A, et al. Quantifying future environmental carrying capacity based on land use/land cover data and ecosystem services valuation:A case study in Makassar City, Indonesia[J]. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 2022,79(4):686-697.
[13]牛潜,周旭,许幼霞,等.基于土地利用的贵州省乌江流域生态系统服务价值演变分析[J].生态科学,2018,37(5):165-173.
Niu Q, Zhou X, Xu Y X, et al. Analysis of ecosystem service value evolution of Wujiang River Basin of Guizhou Province based on land use[J]. Ecological Science, 2018,37(5):165-173.
[14]祁育汀,张平,刘雷,等.关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(9):2507-2517.
Qi Y T, Zhang P, Liu L, et al. Multi-scenario optimization of land use structure and prediction of ecosystem service value in Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023,34(9):2507-2517.
[15]El-Hamid H T A, Nour-Eldin H, Rebouh N Y, et al. Past and future changes of land use/land cover and the potential impact on ecosystem services value of Damietta governorate, Egypt[J]. Land, 2022,11(12):2169.
[16]杨伟青,张会兰.基于GeoSOS-FLUS的涪江流域生态系统服务价值评估及多情景模拟[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(5):253-262.
Yang W Q, Zhang H L. Ecosystem service value assessment and multi-scenario simulation of Fujiang River Basin based on GeoSOS-FLUS[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(5):253-262.
[17]Liang X, Guan Q F, Clarke K C, et al. Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation(PLUS)model:A case study in Wuhan, China[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2021,85:101569.
[18]Tian L, Tao Y, Fu W X, et al. Dynamic simulation of land use/cover change and assessment of forest ecosystem carbon storage under climate change scenarios in Guangdong Province, China[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022,14(10):2330.
[19]Basu T, Das A, Das K, et al. Urban expansion induced loss of natural vegetation cover and ecosystem service values:A scenario-based study in the siliguri municipal corporation(Gateway of North-East India)[J]. Land Use Policy, 2023,132:106838.
[20]Broadbent C D, Brookshire D S, Goodrich D, et al. Developing ecological endpoints for valuation of semi-arid riparian ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2023,66(13):2760-2777.
[21]王媛,周长威.黔中城市群景观生态安全格局构建[J].生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(9):1111-1117.
Wang Y, Zhou C W. Landscape ecological security pattern in central Guizhou urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019,35(9):1111-1117.
[22]王志杰,代磊.黔中喀斯特山地城市土地利用/覆被变化及其生态效应评价:以贵阳市花溪区为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(9):3429-3440.
Wang Z J, Dai L. Assessment of land use/cover changes and its ecological effect in Karst mountainous cities in central Guizhou Province:Taking Huaxi District of Guiyang City as a case[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(9):3429-3440.
[23]周长威,陈祁蔚.黔中城市群生态旅游资源开发适宜性评价[J].湖南科技大学学报:自然科学版,2022,37(1):109-117.
Zhou C W, Chen Q W. Suitability evaluation of ecotourism resources development in central Guizhou urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology:Natural Science Edition, 2022,37(1):109-117.
[24]谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[25]孟斌,王劲峰,张文忠,等.基于空间分析方法的中国区域差异研究[J].地理科学,2005,25(4):393-400.
Meng B, Wang J F, Zhang W Z, et al. Evaluation of regional disparity in China based on spatial analysis[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2005,25(4):393-400.
[26]赵霁雨,崔柳,王佳,等.基于土地利用模拟预测模型分析的城市绿色空间发展多情景模拟及建设时序研究:以湛江市中心城区为例[J].生态学报,2023,43(15):6307-6320.
Zhao J Y, Cui L, Wang J, et al. Multi-scenario simulation of urban green space development and construction Timeline based on PLUS model analysis:A case study of the central Zhanjiang City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(15):6307-6320.
[27]丁星明,朱诗渊.赣州不同情景土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值影响[J].北京测绘,2023,37(3):415-419.
Ding X M, Zhu S Y. Impact of land use change on ecosystem service value in different scenarios[J]. Beijing Surveying and Mapping, 2023,37(3):415-419.
[28]陈万旭,李江风,朱丽君.长江中游地区生态系统服务价值空间分异及敏感性分析[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(2):325-337.
Chen W X, Li J F, Zhu L J. Spatial heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis of ecosystem services value in the middle Yangtze River Region[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(2):325-337.
[29]张晓瑶,张潇,李冬花,等.城市土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值影响的多情景模拟:以深圳市为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(6):2086-2097.
Zhang X Y, Zhang X, Li D H, et al. Multi-scenario simulation of the impact of urban land use change on ecosystem service value in Shenzhen[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(6):2086-2097.
[30]姜栋栋,杨帆,马伟波,等.大娄山区生态系统服务价值变化与情景预测[J].环境科学研究,2022,35(7):1670-1680.
Jiang D D, Yang F, Ma W B, et al. Evolution and scenario prediction of ecosystem service value in dalou mountain area[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2022,35(7):1670-1680.
相似文献/References:
[1]衣 强,李越梅,闫俊飞,等.不同土地利用类型对豫西黄土丘陵区坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(04):67.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.030]
Yi Qiang,Li Yuemei,Yan Junfei,et al.Effects of Different Land Uses on Runoff and Sediment on Sloping Land in Loess Hilly Area of Western Henan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):67.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.030]
[2]王 丹,兰安军,范泽孟,等.典型喀斯特区域土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的响应情景模拟[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(04):308.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.036]
Wang Dan,Lan Anjun,Fan Zemeng,et al.Scenario Modeling of Response of Land Use Change to Ecosystem Service Values in A Typical Karst Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):308.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.036]
[3]尚雅婕,王 蕾,贾 佳,等.宾县三生空间格局演变的碳流转路径动态研究[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(04):326.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.040]
Shang Yajie,Wang Lei,Jia Jia,et al.Study on Carbon Flow Transfer Path of the Evolution of the Spatial and Temporal Pattern of the Production-Living-Ecological Space in Bin County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):326.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.040]
[4]孙耀鹏,周忠发,赵宇鸾,等.喀斯特山区土地利用演变与石漠化分布格局[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(01):311.
SUN Yaopeng,ZHOU Zhongfa,ZHAO Yuluan,et al.Evolution and Distribution Pattern of Land Use and Rocky Desertification in Karst Mountainous Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):311.
[5]冉娇娇,黄 平,陈成龙,等.“稻转旱”对低山丘陵区氮素流失通量的影响——以三峡库区渠溪小流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):70.
RAN Jiaojiao,HUANG Ping,CHEN Chenglong,et al.Conversion of Rice Paddy into Dry Land and Its Influence on Nitrogen Fluxes in the Low Hilly Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):70.
[6]曾 晨,李扬镳,段雪雯,等.长江流域中部地区生态系统服务价值评估与综合驱动力分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):362.
ZENG Chen,Li Yangbiao,DUAN Xuewen,et al.Assessment and Driving Force Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value in the Urban Agglomeration Along the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):362.
[7]魏梦瑶,张卓栋,刘瑛娜,等.基于CSLE模型的广西土壤侵蚀规律[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):15.
WEI Mengyao,ZHANG Zhuodong,LIU Yingna,et al.Characteristics of Soil Erosion in Guangxi Based on CSLE[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):15.
[8]李 懿,杨子松.岷江流域不同土地利用方式下的土壤微生物特征及其与土壤养分的关系[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):33.
LI Yi,YANG Zisong.Soil Nutrients and Soil Microbial Characteristics and Their Relationships Under Different Land Use Types in Minjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):33.
[9]文可可,张仕超,薛秀峰.三位一体视角下三峡库区耕地资源内外转换轨迹和特征——以江津区为例[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(02):175.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.014]
WEN Keke,ZHANG Shichao,XUE Xiufeng.Trajectories and Characteristics of Internal and External Transformation of Cultivated Land Resources in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area from the Perspective of the Trinity[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(04):175.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.014]
[10]张 洋,李 鹏,马文东,等.黄河上游西柳沟流域土壤侵蚀对土地利用变化响应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(05):70.
ZHANG Yang,LI Peng,MA Wendong,et al.Research on the Response of Soil Erosion to Land Use Change in Xiliugou Watershed of the Upper Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):70.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-09-15 修回日期:2023-10-07
资助项目:国家自然科学基金“喀斯特碳酸盐岩与碎屑岩交互区坡面土壤侵蚀过程与机理”(42167044)
第一作者:李胡跃(1998—),男,贵州毕节人,硕士研究生,研究方向为水土保持与生态恢复。E-mail:3011221452@qq.com
通信作者:戴全厚(1969—),男,陕西长武人,博士,教授,主要从事水土保持与生态修复研究。E-mail:qhdairiver@163.com