Xu Shengxian,Zhang Qingwei,Li Wenling,et al.Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Measured by Strain-Controlled Direct Shear Apparatus and Micro-Vane Shear Apparatus[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):205-213.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.023]
应变式直剪仪与微型十字板剪切仪测定土壤抗剪强度的对比分析
- Title:
- Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Measured by Strain-Controlled Direct Shear Apparatus and Micro-Vane Shear Apparatus
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)04-0205-09
- Keywords:
- strain-controlled direct shear apparatus; micro-vane shear apparatus; shear force; cohesion; internal friction angle
- 分类号:
- S152.9
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]分析两种仪器(应变式直剪仪与微型十字板剪切仪)测得的土壤抗剪强度指标(土壤黏聚力值c、内摩擦角φ、土壤剪切力τ)特征,并建立直剪仪测得的c和φ与十字版仪测得的τ之间的函数关系,以期深化对土壤抗剪强度的认识,提高土壤抗剪强度指标测定效率。[方法]选取黄土高原3种典型质地类型土壤(杨凌黏黄土、安塞黄绵土、定边沙黄土),每种土壤设5个含水量梯度(12%,16%,20%,24%,28%),分别用上述两种仪器测定不同处理下土壤抗剪强度指标c,φ和τ,探究了3指标对土壤质地、土壤含水量的响应特征以及3指标间的函数关系。[结果](1)试验条件下,c值在16.88～27.12 kPa范围,φ值在5.03°～21.30°范围,τ值在1.76～7.72 kPa范围变化;(2)不同土壤类型下,c和τ均随含水量的增大呈现先增大后减小趋势,而φ随含水量增大呈现逐渐降低趋势;(3)总体来看,安塞黄绵土的τ,c,φ值略高于定边沙黄土,但它们均显著大于杨凌黏黄土。(4)3种土壤类型下,微型十字板剪切仪所测定的τ值与直剪仪测定的c值均具有较强的线性相关关系(R2>0.90); 而φ值与τ值间并无显著相关关系。如不考虑土壤类型差异,τ与c之间仍有较强的相关性,关系式为c=1.59τ+14.10(R2=0.51,p<0.01)。[结论]应变式直剪仪测得的黏聚力c值和微型十字版仪测得的土壤剪切力τ值对土壤质地、含水量的响应相似,且二者有显著的相关关系,在一定条件下可以用快速便捷的微型十字版仪测得的τ值估算原本需用直剪仪测的c值。研究结果可为野外极端条件下提高土壤抗剪强度测定效率方面提供参考。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]This study aims to analyze the characteristics of soil shear strength parameters obtained by strain-controlled direct shear apparatus and micro-vane shear apparatus, respectively(soil cohesive force c, internal friction angle φ, and soil shear force τ), and then establish the relationship between c, φ and τ. This can deepen the understanding of soil shear strength, and have important significance for improving the efficiency of soil shear strength measurement. [Methods]Three typical texture types of soil(Yangling clayey soil, Ansai loessial soil, Dingbian sandy soil)from the Loess Plateau, and five levels of soil moisture(12%, 16%, 20%, 24% and 28%)were designed to obtained their soil shear strength using the above mentioned apparatuses. The responses of soil shear strength to soil types and soil moisture, as well as relationships between c, φ and τ were then analyzed. [Results](1)Under experiment conditions, the values of c, φ and τ range between 16.88～27.12 kPa, 5.03°～21.30°, 1.76～7.72 kPa, respectively.(2)In the three soil types, the c and τ firstly increase and then decrease with the increase of soil moisture. While, the φ decreases gradually with the soil moisture increase.(3)The c, τ, and φ of Ansai loessial soil are similar or slightly higher than those in Dingbian sandy soil, while they are significantly higher than those in Yangling clay soil.(4)In the three types of soil, there is a significant linear correlation between the τ and c(R2>0.93), while there is no significant correlation between the φ and τ. Without considering the difference of soil type, there is still a strong linear correlation between τ and c, and its relation can be described by c=1.59τ+14.10(R2=0.51, p<0.01). [Conclusion]The responses of c to soil type and soil moisture were similar to that of τ, and a significant relation are found between c and τ. It implies that researchers can use τ, conveniently obtained by micro-vane shear apparatus, to assess c, obtained by strain-controlled direct shear apparatus slowly under some conditions. The results can provide reference for improving the measurement efficiency of soil shear strength under extreme field conditions.
参考文献/References:
[1]Rachman A, Anderson S H, Gantzer C J, et al. Influence of long term cropping systems on soil physical properties related to soil erodibility[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2003,67(2):637-644.
[2]Wei Y J, Wu X L, Xia J W, et al. The effect of water content on the shear strength characteristics of granitic soils in South China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2019,187:50-59.
[3]Su X M, Zhou Z C, Liu J E, et al. The role of roots traits of climax community species to shear strength in the Loess Hilly Region, China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2022,221:105417.
[4]郭文召,刘亚坤,徐向舟,等.水蚀风蚀交错区黄土抗剪强度敏感性分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):23-28.
Guo W Z, Liu Y K, Xu X Z, et al. Sensitivity on shear strength of the Loess in the ecotone of wind-water erosion[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,25(3):23-28.
[5]雷洁,张国明,刘连友,等.土壤抗剪强度测定与影响因素研究进展[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2016,52(4):486-492.
Lei J, Zhang G M, Liu L Y, et al. Measuring soil shear strength and impact factors[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University:Natural Science, 2016,52(4):486-492.
[6]潘剑君.利用土壤入渗速率和土壤抗剪力确定土壤侵蚀等级[J].水土保持学报,1995(2):93-96
Pan J J. Determination of soil erosion class using soil infiltration rate and soil shear resistance[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1995(2):93-96.
[7]邢书昆,张光辉,朱平宗.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕年限对根-土复合体抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):41-48,54.
Xing S K, Zhang G H, Zhu P Z. Effects of vegetation restoration age on shear strength of root-soil system in hilly and Gully Region of the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(4):41-48,54.
[8]Yi F, Hong C, Zou X Y, et al. Shear strength of Aeolian sand sediments[J]. Transactions of the ASABE,2018,61(2):583-590.
[9]姜佳豪,冯少杰,吕腾锋.浅谈土体直剪试验的缺陷及影响因素[J].科技风,2015(6):34.
Jiang J H, Feng S J, Lv T F. Defects and influencing factors of direct shear test of soil[J]. Technology Wind, 2015(6):34.
[10]Fasinmirin J T, Olorunfemi I E, Olakuleyin F. Strength and hydraulics characteristics variations within a tropical Alfisol in Southwestern Nigeria under different land use management[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018,182:45-56.
[11]Horn R. Stress-strain effects in structured unsaturated soils on coupled mechanical and hydraulic processes[J]. Geoderma, 2003,116:77-88.
[12]Khaboushan E A, Emami H, Mosaddeghi M R, et al. Estimation of unsaturated shear strength parameters using easily-available soil properties[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018,184:118-127.
[13]Mouazen A M, Ramon H, Baerdemaeker J D. Effects of bulk density and moisture content on selected mechanical properties of sandy loam soil[J]. Biosystems Engineering., 2002,83(2):217-224.
[14]王振红,张昆,朱泓,等.微型十字板在海洋软土中的应用[J].水利学报,2015,46(S1):205-208.
Wang Z H, Zhang K, Zhu H, et al. Application of miniature vane in seabed soft soil[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2015,46(S1):205-208.
[15]刘东生.黄土的物质成分和结构[M].北京:科学出版社,1996.
Liu D S. Material Composition and Structure of Loess[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1996.
[16]罗姆他捷.砂土和黏土的物理力学性试验法[M]. 饶鸿雁,译.北京:人民铁道出版社,1953.
Lomtatidze V D. Test Method for Physical and Mechanical Properties of Sands and Clays [M]. Rao H Y, Translated. Beijing:China Railway Publishing House, 1953.
[17]Manuwa S I, Olaiya O C. Evaluation of shear strength and cone penetration resistance behavior of tropical silt loam soil under uni-axial compression[J]. Open Journal of Soil Science, 2012,2(2):95-99.
[18]韩鹏.关于十字板剪切强度与含水率的相关性研究[J].山西建筑,2016,42(15):79-80.
Han P. Study on the relativity of vane shear strength and moisture content[J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2016,42(15):79-80.
[19]范兴科,蒋定生,赵合理.黄土高原浅层原状土抗剪强度浅析[J].水土保持学报,1997,3(4):69-75.
Fan X K, Jiang D S, Zhao H L. Analysis on anti-shear strength of shallow original state soil in the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1997,3(4):69-75.
[20]廖建华,李丹勋,王兴奎,等.黄土高原侵蚀产沙与高含沙水流空间分异对比分析[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(1):100-111.
Liao J H, Li D X, Wang X K, et al. Comparative analysis of spatial distribution between the specific sediment yield and the hyperconcentrated flow frequency in the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010,25(1):100-111.
[21]Mitchell J K, Soga K. Fundamentals of Soil Behavior[M]. 3rd edition. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
[22]王为,李小昱,王转卫.农业土壤抗剪强度的试验研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2002,20(1):125-127.
Wang W, Li X Y, Wang Z W. An experimental study on the resistance to shear of agricultural soil[J]. Agricultural Reseach in the Arid Areas, 2002,20(1):125-127.
[23]刘洋,王国强,周健.增湿条件下合肥膨胀土的强度特性[J].勘察科学技术,2004(6):17-19.
Liu Y, Wang G Q, Zhou J. Relationship between shear strength and water content of Hefei expansive soil[J]. Site Investigation Science and Technology, 2004(6):17-19.
[24]陈红星,李法虎,郝仕玲等.土壤含水率与土壤碱度对土壤抗剪强度的影响[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(2):21-25.
Chen H X, Li F H, Hao S L, et al. Effects of soil water content and soil sodicity on soil shearing strength[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007,23(2):21-25.
[25]罗爽,黄选华,高华端.黔中喀斯特坡耕地土壤含水量对土力学性质的影响[J].西南农业学报,2020,33(12):2879-2884.
Luo S, Huang X H, Gao H D. Effect of soil moisture content on soil mechanical properties in Karst slope cropland of central Guizhou[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020,33(12):2879-2884.
[26]曾召田,潘斌,吴昱东,等.土中结合水对红黏土抗剪强度特性的影响机制[J].地下空间与工程学报,2022,18(5):1565-1572,1579.
Zeng Z T, Pan B, Wu Y D, et al. Influence mechanism of bound water on shear strength characteristics of lateritic clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2022,18(5):1565-1572,1579.
[27]李旭东,黄雪峰,杨佳,等.延安新区压实黄土抗剪强度试验研究[J].河北工程大学学报:自然科学版,2018,35(1):19-23.
Li X D, Huang X F, Yang J, et al. Experimental study of the shear strength of compacted loess in Yan'an new district fracture energy of concrete[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Engineering:Natural Science Edition, 2018,35(1):19-23.
[28]胡斐南,魏朝富,许晨阳,等.紫色土区水稻土抗剪强度的水敏性特征[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(3):107-114.
Hu F N, Wei C F, Xu C Y, et al. Water sensitivity of shear strength of purple paddy soils[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013,29(3):107-114.
[29]赵洲,郑思苗,坚亚博.基于田口方法的砂土抗剪强度特征分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(1):103-110.
Zhao Z, Zheng S M, Jian Y B. Analysis of characteristics of sand shear strength based on Taguchi method[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022,36(1):103-110.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-08-28 修回日期:2023-09-24
资助项目:国家自然科学基金“黄土区坡面细沟间侵蚀粒径分选动力学过程研究”(42107362)
第一作者:徐圣贤(2001—),男,河北保定人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为土壤侵蚀。E-mail:1335965095@qq.com
通信作者:张庆玮(1993—),女,陕西榆林人,博士,副教授,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:zhangqingwei@nwsuaf.edu.cn