[1]高春莲,胡宝清,黄思敏,等.山江海耦合关键带生态系统服务价值时空变化及其权衡研究[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(02):264-274,286.
　Gao Chunlian,Hu Baoqing,Huang Simin,et al.Spatio-temporal Changes and Trade-offs of Ecosystem Service Value in Mountain-River-Sea Coupling Key Zone Research[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):264-274,286.
点击复制

山江海耦合关键带生态系统服务价值时空变化及其权衡研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 31 期数: 2024年02期 页码: 264-274,286 栏目: 出版日期: 2024-03-20
Title:
Spatio-temporal Changes and Trade-offs of Ecosystem Service Value in Mountain-River-Sea Coupling Key Zone Research
文章编号:
1005-3409(2024)02-0264-11
作者:
高春莲1,2, 胡宝清1, 黄思敏1,2, 黄丽芳1,2, 李彩茶1,2
(1.南宁师范大学 北部湾环境演变与资源利用教育部重点实验室/广西地表过程与智能模拟重点实验室, 南宁 530001; 2.南宁师范大学 地理科学与规划学院, 南宁 530001)
Author(s):
Gao Chunlian1,2, Hu Baoqing1, Huang Simin1,2, Huang Lifang1,2, Li Caicha1,2
(1.Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Ministry of Education, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Intelligent Simulation, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China; 2.School of Geography and Planning, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China)
关键词:
生态系统服务价值;  土地利用;  时空变化;  权衡/协同;  山江海耦合关键带
Keywords:
ecosystem service value;  landuse;  temporal and spatial changes;  balancing synergy;  mountain-river-sea coupling key zone
分类号:
K903
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[目的]量化和分析山江海耦合关键带生态系统服务价值及时空变化,有助于深入了解其生态系统服务现状,进而阐明山江海耦合关键带生态服务之间的权衡/协同关系,对提高生态系统服务之间相互作用的认识,促进区域全面可持续发展和生态环境保护与修复具有重要意义。[方法]基于1990—2020年7期土地利用数据及结合修订后的当量因子表,运用网格法、地理加权回归等方法分析了山江海耦合关键带1990—2020年ESV时空变化和各项生态系统服务相互关系及其空间分异特征。[结果]1990—2020年山江海耦合关键带总ESV从788.55亿元增加至792.30亿元,增幅为0.48%,林地、耕地、水域地类ESV较高,为区内总ESV主要贡献因子,建设用地ESV较低,ESV在空间上呈现从西北向东南降低的趋势; 1990—2020年各项生态系统服务相互关系以协同关系为主,约占85.45%,其中权衡高值区主要分布在山江海耦合关键带中部及南部地区,低值区主要分布在百色市喀斯特山区; 协同低值区主要分布在人口密集、人类活动频繁、经济较为发达的市县级城区及沿海地区。[结论]1990—2020年山江海耦合关键带生态系统服务整体协调且保持动态平衡,食物生产活动会影响其他生态服务的能力,未来地方应严格把控生产活动开发边界,注重对生产地区的环境保护与修复。
Abstract:
[Objective] Quantifying and analyzing the value and spatiotemporal changes of ecosystem services in the key coupling zone of mountain-river-sea is helpful to understand the current situation of ecosystem services, and then clarify the trade-off / synergy relationship between ecosystem services in the key coupling zone of mountain-river-sea. It is of great significance to improve the understanding of the interaction between ecosystem services and promote the comprehensive sustainable development of the region and the protection and restoration of ecological environment. [Methods] Based on the landuse data from 1990 to 2020 and the revised equivalent factor table, the grid method and geographically weighted regression were used to analyze the spatial and temporal changes of ESV and the relationship between various ecosystem services and their spatial differentiation characteristics in the mountain-river-sea coupling key zone from 1990 to 2020. [Results] From 1990 to 2020, the total ESV in the key zone of mountain-river-sea coupling increased from CNY 78.855 billion to CNY 79.230 billion, with an increase of 0.48%. The ESV of forest land, cultivated land and water land was higher, which was the main contribution factor of the total ESV in the area. The ESV of construction land was lower, and the ESV showed a trend of decreasing from northwest to southeast in space. From 1990 to 2020, the interrelationships of various ecosystem services were mainly synergistic, accounting for about 85.45%. The high-value areas of trade-offs mainly distributed in the central and southern regions of the mountain-river-sea coupling key zone, and the low-value areas mainly distributed in the karst mountainous area of Baise City; the synergistic low-value areas mainly distributed in urban and coastal areas with dense population, frequent human activities and relatively developed economy. [Conclusions] From 1990 to 2020, the ecosystem services in the key coupling zone of mountain-river-sea were coordinated and maintained a dynamic balance. Food production activities would affect the ability of other ecological services. In the future, local governments should strictly control the development boundary of production activities and pay attention to environmental protection and restoration of production areas.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张波,曲建升,丁永建.国际临界带研究发展回顾与美国临界带研究进展介绍[J].世界科技研究与发展,2010,32(5):723-728.
Zhang B, Qu J S, Ding Y J. Review of international critical zone research and its development in America[J]. World Sci-Tech R&D, 2010,32(5):723-728.
[2] 王立伟,张志强,安培浚,等.基于文献计量的地球关键带研究态势分析[J]. 世界科技研究与发展,2017,39(2):202-208.
Wang L W, Zhang Z Q, An P J, et al. Bibliometrical Analysis of Earth Critical Zone Research[J]. World Sci-Tech R &D, 2017, 39(2): 202-208.
[3] 安培浚,张志强,王立伟.地球关键带的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(12): 1228-1234.
An P J, Zhang Z Q, Wang L W. Review of Earth Critical Zone Research[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2016, 31(12): 1228-1234.
[4] Nie W, Guo H, Yang L, et al. Economic valuation of earth's critical zone:A pilot study of the Zhangxi Catchment, China[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(4): 1699. DOI:10.3390/su12041699.
[5] 张丽,夏炎,陈琪,等.基于地球关键带科学的土壤生态系统服务评价方法研究[J]. 南京大学学报:自然科学, 2021, 57(3): 345-355.
Zhang L, Xia Y, Chen Q, et al. Research on soil ecosystem service assessment method based on Earth's Critical Zone science[J]. Journal of Nanjing University: Natural Science, 2021, 57(3): 345-355.
[6] 陈琪,王晓丹,夏炎,等.地球关键带生态系统服务评价方法研究[J]. 南京大学学报:自然科学, 2022, 58(6): 1070-1086.
Chen Q, Wang X D, Xia Y, et al. Research on the evaluation method of the ecosystem services of Earth's critical zone[J]. Journal of Nanjing University: Natural Science, 2022, 58(6): 1070-1086.
[7] 陈金珂,蒲俊兵,李建鸿,等.基于土地利用情景模拟的喀斯特关键带生态系统服务权衡与协同分析:以蒙自喀斯特断陷盆地为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2023, 42(1): 94-108.
Chen J K, Pu J B, Ling J H, et al. Trade-off and synergy of ecosystem services of a karst critical zone based on landuse scenario simulation: Take Mengzi karst graben basin as a study case[J]. Karst of China, 2023, 42(1): 94-108.
[8] Nie W, Guo H, Banwart S A. Economic valuation of earth's critical zone:framework, theory and methods[J]. Environmental Development, 2021,40:100654.
[9] Alcamo J. Ecosystems and human well-being:a framework for assessment[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2003.
[10] 杨顺华,宋效东,吴华勇,等.地球关键带研究评述: 现状与展望[J]. 土壤学报: 1-14.
Yang S H, Song X D, Wu H Y, et al. A Review and Discussion on the Earth's Critical Zone Research: Status Quo andProspect[J]. Journal of Soil Science, 1-14.
[11] 李晓亮,吴克宁,冯喆,等.陆地表层系统分类研究进展:从土地类型到地球关键带类型[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(3): 531-542.
Li X L, Wu K N, Feng Z, et al. Research progress of land surface system classification: From land type to Earth's critical zone type[J]. Progress in Geographic Science, 2022, 41(3): 531-542.
[12] Tian Y, Wang S, Bai X, et al. Trade-offs among ecosystem services in a typical Karst watershed, SW China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 566: 1297-1308.
[13] Sterling S M, Ducharne A, Polcher J. The impact of global land-cover change on the terrestrial water cycle[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3(4): 385-390.
[14] Tian Y, Wang S, Bai X, et al. Trade-offs among ecosystem services in a typical Karst watershed, SW China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 566:1297-1308.
[15] 涂小松,龙花楼.2000—2010年鄱阳湖地区生态系统服务价值空间格局及其动态演化[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(12): 2451-2460.
Tu X S, Long H L. Spatial patterns and dynamic evolution of ecosystem service values in Poyang Lake Region from 2000 to 2010[J]. Resource Science, 2015, 37(12): 2451-2460.
[16] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919.
Xie G d, Zhen L, Lu C X, et al. Expert Knowledge Based Valuation Method of Ecosystem Services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5): 911-919.
[17] 陈田田,黄强,王强.基于地理探测器的喀斯特山区生态系统服务关系分异特征及驱动力解析: 以贵州省为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(17): 6959-6972.
Chen T T, Huang Q, Wang Q. Differentiation characteristics and driving factors of ecosystem services relationships in karst mountainous area based on geographic detector modeling: A case study of Guizhou Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(17): 6959-6972.
[18] 邓伟,张少尧,张昊,等.人文自然耦合视角下过渡性地理空间概念、内涵与属性和研究框架[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(4): 761-771.
Deng W, Zhang S Y, Zhang H, et al. Transitional geospace from the perspective of human-nature coupling: Concept, connotations, attributes, and the research framework[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(4): 761-771.
[19] 张泽,胡宝清,丘海红,等.基于山江海视角与SRP模型的桂西南—北部湾生态环境脆弱性评价[J]. 地球与环境, 2021, 49(3): 297-306.
Zhang Z, Hu B Q, Qiu H H, et al. Ecological Environment Vulnerability Assessment of Southwest Guangxi-Beibu Gulf Based on the Perspective of mountain-river-sea and SRP Model[J]. Earth and Environment, 2021, 49(3): 297-306.
[20] Yang J, Huang X. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2021, 13(8): 3907-3925.
[21] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.
Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang L M, et al. Improvement of the Evaluation Method for Ecosystem Service Value Based on Per Unit Area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1234-1254.
[22] 刘桂林,张落成,张倩.长三角地区土地利用时空变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(12): 3311-3319.
Liu G L, Zhang L C, Zhang Q. Spatial and temporal dynamics of landuse and its influence on ecosystem service value in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(12): 3311-3319.
[23] 王航,秦奋,朱筠,等.土地利用及景观格局演变对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(4): 1286-1296.
Wang H, Qin F, Zhu J, et al. The effects of landuse structure and landscape pattern change on ecosystem service values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(4): 1286-1296.
[24] 邓元杰,侯孟阳,谢怡凡,等.退耕还林还草工程对陕北地区生态系统服务价值时空演变的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(18): 6597-6612.
Deng Y J, Hou M Y, Xie Y F, et al. Impact of the Grain for Green Project on the temporal and spatial evolution of ecosystem service value in northern Shaanxi[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 40(18): 6597-6612.
[25] 高振斌,王小莉,苏婧,等.基于生态系统服务价值评估的东江流域生态补偿研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(6): 563-570.
Gao Z B, Wang X L, Su J, et al. Ecological Compensation of Dongjiang River Basin Based on Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Value[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(6): 563-570.
[26] 郑德凤,郝帅,吕乐婷,等.三江源国家公园生态系统服务时空变化及权衡—协同关系[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(1): 64-78.
Zhen D F, Hao S, Lv L T, et al. Spatial-temporal change and trade-off/synergy relationships among multiple ecosystem services in Three-River-Source National Park[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(1): 64-78.
[27] 刘祗坤,吴全,苏根成.土地利用类型变化与生态系统服务价值分析: 以赤峰市农牧交错带为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2015, 36(3): 56-61.
Liu D S, Wu Q, Su G C. Study on the landuse changes and econsystem services value of ecotone between agriculture and animal husbandryin chifeng city[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2015, 36(3): 56-61.
[28] Dou H, Li X, Li S, et al. Mapping ecosystem services bundles for analyzing spatial trade-offs in inner Mongolia, China-ScienceDirect[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256[2023-07-17]. DOI: 10.1016/ j. jclepro. 2020. 120444.
[29] 陈相标,丁文荣.石林喀斯特岩溶区生态系统服务时空演变及权衡协同关系[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(2): 285-293.
Chen X B, Ding W R. Spatial-temporal Evolution and Trade-off Synergy Relationships of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of Shilin[J]. Research on Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(2): 285-293.
[30] 丘海红,胡宝清,张泽.基于土地利用变化的广西近20年生态系统服务价值研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(5): 1455-1465.
Qiu H H, Hu B Q, Zhang Z. Study on ecosystem service value of Guangxi in the past 20 years based on landuse change[J]. Journal of Environmental engineering Technology, 2022, 12(5): 1455-1465.
[31] 王永琪,马姜明.基于县域尺度珠江—西江经济带广西段土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响研究[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(21):7826-7839.
Wang Y Q, Ma J M. Effects of land use change on ecosystem services value in Guangxi section of the Pearl River-West River Economic Belt at the county scale[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(21): 7826-7839.
[32] Zhang L L, Hu B Q, Zhang Z, et al. Research on the spatiotemporal evolution and mechanism of ecosystem service value in the mountain-river-sea transition zone based on“production-living-ecological space”: Taking the Karst-Beibu Gulf in Southwest Guangxi, China as an example[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 148: 109889.
[33] 袁周炎妍,万荣荣.生态系统服务评估方法研究进展[J]. 生态科学, 2019, 38(5): 210-219.
Yuan Z Y Y, Wang R R. A review on the methods of ecosystem service assessment[J]. Ecological Science, 2019, 38(5): 210-219.

相似文献/References:

[1]谭君,李世平.铜川市土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):131.
　TAN Jun,LI Shi-ping.Analysis on Impacts of Land Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in Tongchuan City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):131.
[2]张晓楠,宋宏利,李振杰.基于地统计学的区域生态服务价值空间分异规律研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):168.
　ZHANG Xiao-nan,SONG Hong-li,LI Zhen-jie.Study on Spatial Distribution of Regional Ecosystem Service Value Based on Geostatistics[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):168.
[3]章后甜,杜会石,王世东,等.长白山地区土地利用及生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):242.
　ZHANG Hou-tian,DU Hui-shi,WANG Shi-dong,et al.Study on the Land Use Change and Ecosystem Services Value in Changbai Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):242.
[4]陈颖,石培基,潘竟虎,等.高原生态城土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响研究——以甘肃省民乐县为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):154.
　CHEN Ying,SHI Pei-ji,PAN Jing-hu,et al.Analysis on the Effect of Land-use Change on Ecosystem Service Value in the Plateau Eco-city——A Case Study of Minle County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):154.
[5]汤蕾,许东,母学征.辽河三角洲生态系统服务价值变化[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(05):108.
　TANG Lei,XU Dong,MU Xue-zheng.Change in Ecosystem Service Values in Liaohe River Delta[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):108.
[6]姜永华,江洪,曾波,等.三峡库区(重庆段)土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(04):234.
　JIANG Yong-Hua,JIANG Hong,ZENG Bo,et al.Effects of Land Use Change on the Ecosystem Services Value of Three Gorges Reservoir Area (the part of Chongqing)[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(02):234.
[7]苏朝阳,苗长虹.开封市土地利用时空变化的生态系统服务价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(05):116.
　SU Chao-yang,MIAO Chang-hong.Evaluation on Ecosystem Services Value of Spatial-Temporal Feature of Land Use Changes in Kaifeng[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(02):116.
[8]张芳怡,邢元志,濮励杰,等.苏州市土地利用变化的生态环境效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(05):98.
　ZHANG Fang-yi,XING Yuan-zhi,PU Li-jie,et al.Study on the Eco-environmental Effect of Land Use Change in Suzhou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):98.
[9]王亚娟,刘小鹏,赵大磊.基于生态系统服务价值的固原市市辖区土地利用规划环境影响评价[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):222.
　WANG Ya-juan,LIU Xiao-peng,ZHAO Da-lei.Environment Impact Assessment of Guyuan Municipal Districts Land Use Program Based on Ecosystem Services Value[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(02):222.
[10]邓伟,杨华,崔艳君.重庆主城区近30年土地利用变化的生态环境效应评价[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):232.
　DENG Wei,YANG Hua,CUI Yan-jun.Assessment of Ecological Environmental Effects on Landuse Change in Chongqing City Nearly 30 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(02):232.
[11]曾 晨,李扬镳,段雪雯,等.长江流域中部地区生态系统服务价值评估与综合驱动力分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):362.
　ZENG Chen,Li Yangbiao,DUAN Xuewen,et al.Assessment and Driving Force Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value in the Urban Agglomeration Along the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):362.
[12]谢 梦,吴伟成.赣东北土地利用及景观格局变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(03):331.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.019]
　Xie Meng,Wu Weicheng.Impacts of Change in Land Use and Landscape Pattern on Ecosystem Service Value in Northeast of Jiangxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):331.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.019]

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2023-04-25 修回日期:2023-05-22
资助项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目“喀斯特峰丛洼地土壤养分过程及其生态系统服务权衡”(42071135); 广西科技基地与人才专项(桂A19110142); 国家自然科学基金项目“北部湾红树林潮滩响应陆海水沙变化的沉积动力过程”(41930537); 国家社会科学基金项目(21XGL015); 自然资源数字产业学院建设项目
第一作者:高春莲(1999—),女,广西钦州人,硕士研究生,研究方向资源开发与国土整治。E-mail:Gaochunlian25@163.com
通信作者:胡宝清(1966—),男,江西抚州人,教授,研究方向为脆弱环境与整治。E-mail:hbq1230@nnnu.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-04-20