Wang Jun,Man Xiuling.Short Term Effects of Litter and Sod Layer Removal on Soil Active Organic Carbon in Typical Forests in Cold Temperate Zone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(01):168-177.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.044]
去除凋落物和草毡层对寒温带典型森林土壤活性有机碳的短期影响
- Title:
- Short Term Effects of Litter and Sod Layer Removal on Soil Active Organic Carbon in Typical Forests in Cold Temperate Zone
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)01-0168-10
- Keywords:
- forest soil; remove litter; remove sod layer; activated organic carbon
- 分类号:
- S714.2
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探究去除凋落物和草毡层对寒温带森林土壤活性有机碳的影响,为我国寒温带森林土壤碳循环的研究提供科学参考。[方法]以大兴安岭北部3种典型森林(白桦林、樟子松林和兴安落叶松林)为研究对象,在3种林型中设置对照、去除凋落物、去除草毡层以及去除凋落物和草毡层4种处理,于2021年9月对各处理不同土层(0—10 cm和10—20 cm)土壤进行取样,研究其土壤活性有机碳组分及其影响因子。[结果]在0—10 cm土层,与对照相比,去除凋落物后土壤可溶性有机碳和易氧化有机碳含量在白桦林和樟子松林中无显著变化,而在兴安落叶松林中显著降低了25.49%和39.40%; 土壤微生物量碳含量在白桦林和兴安落叶松林中显著降低了19.26%和18.86%,而在樟子松林中无显著变化。去除草毡层后土壤可溶性有机碳和易氧化有机碳含量在白桦林和樟子松林中显著降低了16.08%,60.69%和17.38%,17.33%,而在兴安落叶松林中的变化不显著; 土壤微生物量碳含量在3种林型中显著降低了19.47%～42.02%。同时去除凋落物和草毡层后3种林型土壤微生物量碳和易氧化有机碳含量极显著降低了22.03%～27.01%和52.22%～57.01%; 土壤可溶性有机碳含量降低了11.25%～22.18%,其中白桦林和樟子松林达显著水平; 在10—20 cm土层,不同去除处理对3种林型土壤可溶性有机碳和微生物量碳含量均无显著影响,白桦林和樟子松林土壤易氧化有机碳含量分别在去除草毡层以及同时去除凋落物和草毡层后显著降低,而兴安落叶松林土壤易氧化有机碳含量无明显变化。3种林型土壤活性有机碳各组分与土壤总有机碳、全氮、含水量呈显著正相关,与土壤pH则呈显著负相关。[结论]去除凋落物和草毡层降低了土壤活性有机碳含量,凋落物和草毡层的存在有利于土壤活性有机碳的形成与累积。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The aims of this study are to explore the effects of litter and sod layer removal on soil active organic carbon in cold temperate forests, and to provide scientific reference for the study of soil carbon cycle in cold temperate forests in China. [Methods] Three typical forests(Betula platyphylla forest, Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forest and Larix gmelinii forest)in the northern part of the Greater Khingan Mountains were taken as the research objects. Four treatments were set up in the three forest types, including control, litter removal, sod layer removal and both litter and sod layer removal. Soil samples were collected from different soil layers(0—10 cm and 10—20 cm)of each treatment in September 2021 to study the soil active organic carbon components and their influencing factors. [Results] In the 0—10 cm soil layer, compared with the control, there was no significant change in the contents of soil soluble organic carbon and readily oxidizable organic carbon after litter removal in the Betula platyphylla forest and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forest, but significantly decreased by 25.49% and 39.40% in the Larix gmelinii forest. Soil microbial biomass carbon in Betula platyphylla forest and Larix gmelinii forest decreased by 19.26% and 18.86%, respectiveley, but varied slightly in Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forest in litter removal treatment. The contents of soil dissolved organic carbon and readily oxidizable organic carbon decreased significantly by 16.08%, 60.69% and 17.38%, 17.33% in Betula platyphylla forest and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forest, respectively, after removing the sod layer, but there was no significant change in Larix gmelinii forest. Soil microbial biomass carbon contents were significantly reduced by 19.47%～42.02% in the three forest types. The contents of soil microbial biomass carbon and readily oxidizable organic carbon in the three forest types were significantly reduced by 22.03%～27.01% and 52.22%～57.01%, respectiveley, after removing litter and sod layer at the same time. The contents of soil dissolved organic carbon decreased by 11.25%～22.18%, among which the Betula platyphylla forest and the Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forest forest reached a significant level. In the 10—20 cm soil layer, there were no significant differences in soil dissolved organic carbon and soil microbial biomass carbon among all treatments in three typical forests. Sod layer removal treatment and both litter layer and sod layer removal treatment significantly decreased soil readily oxidized organic carbon in Betula platyphylla forest and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forest, respectively. There was no significant differences in soil readily oxidized organic carbon among different treatments in Larix gmelinii forest. The components of soil active organic carbon in the three forest types were significantly positively correlated with soil total organic carbon, total nitrogen and water content, and significantly negatively correlated with soil pH. [Conclusion] The removal of litter and sod layer reduced the contents of soil active organic carbon, and the existence of litter and sod layer were beneficial to the formation and accumulation of soil active organic carbon.
参考文献/References:
[1] 周国逸,陈文静,李琳.成熟森林生态系统土壤有机碳积累:实现碳中和目标的一条重要途径[J].大气科学学报,2022,45(3):345-356.
Zhou G Y, Chen W J, Li L. Soil organic carbon accumulation in mature forest ecosystems: an important way to achieve the goal of carbon neutral[J]. Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 2022,45(3):345-356.
[2] Xiao S, Zhang J, Duan J, et al. Soil organic carbon sequestration and active carbon component changes following different vegetation restoration ages on severely eroded red soils in subtropical China[J]. Forests, 2020, 11(12):1304.
[3] Cai H, Di X, Chang S X, et al. Carbon storage, net primary production, and net ecosystem production in four major temperate forest types in northeastern China[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2016,46(2):143-151.
[4] Evans L R, Pierson D, Lajtha K. Dissolved organic carbon production and flux under long-term litter manipulations in a Pacific Northwest old-growth forest[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2020,149(1):75-86.
[5] Zhao S, Ta N, Li Z, et al. Varying pyrolysis temperature impacts application effects of biochar on soil labile organic carbon and humic fractions[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2018,123:484-493.
[6] 陈子豪,焦泽彬,刘谣,等.凋落物季节性输入对川西亚高山森林土壤活性有机碳的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2021,27(3):594-600.
Chen Z H, Jiao Z B, Liu Y, et al. Influences of seasonal litter input on soil active organic carbon in subalpine forests in western Sichuan[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2021,27(3):594-600.
[7] 郑卫国,薛立,许鹏波,等.加勒比松林地土壤对凋落物的响应[J].华南农业大学学报,2011,32(1):120-123.
Zheng W G, Xue L, Xv P B, et al. Soil response to litter in a Pinus caribaea woodland[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2011,32(1):120-123.
[8] 王清奎.碳输入方式对森林土壤碳库和碳循环的影响研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(4):1075-1081.
Wang Q K. Responses of forest soil carbon pool and carbon cycle to the changes of carbon input[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011,22(4):1075-1081.
[9] 张磊,贾淑娴,李啸灵,等.凋落物和根系输入对亚热带米槠天然林土壤有机碳组分的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):244-251.
Zhang L, Jia S X, Li X L, et al. Effects of litter and root inputs on soil organic carbon fractions in a subtropical natural forest of Castanopsis carlesii[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(3):244-251.
[10] 李常准,陈立新,段文标,等.凋落物处理对不同林型土壤有机碳全氮全磷的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2020,18(1):100-109.
Li C Z, Chen L X, Duan W B, et al. Effects of litter treatment on soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and total phosphorus in different forest types[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020,18(1):100-109.
[11] 阮超越,刘小飞,吕茂奎,等.杉木人工林凋落物添加与去除对土壤碳氮及酶活性的影响[J].土壤学报,2020,57(4):954-962.
Ruan C Y, Liu X F, Lv M K, et al. Effects of litter carbon, nitrogen and enzyme activity in soil under Chinese fir[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2020,57(4):954-962.
[12] Zhi J, Zhang G, Yang F, et al. Predicting mattic epipedons in the northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau using Random Forest[J]. Geoderma Regional, 2017,10:1-10.
[13] 龚子同.中国土壤系统分类:理论.方法.实践[M].北京:科学出版社,1999:614-615.
Gong Z T. Chinese Soil Taxonomy: Theory, Method, Practice[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1999:614-615.
[14] 苏培玺,周紫鹃,侍瑞,等.高寒草毡层基本属性与固碳能力沿水分和海拔梯度的变化[J].生态学报,2018,38(3):1040-1052.
Su P X, Zhou Z J, Shi R, et al. Variation in basic properties and carbon sequestration capacity of an alpine sod layer along moisture and elevation gradients[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(3):1040-1052.
[15] 尤全刚,薛娴,彭飞,等.高寒草甸草地退化对土壤水热性质的影响及其环境效应[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(5):1183-1192.
You Q G, Xue X, Peng F et al. Alpine meadow degradation effect on soil thermal and hydraulic properties and its environmental impacts[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2015,35(5):1183-1192.
[16] 杨永胜,张莉,未亚西,等.退化程度对三江源泽库高寒草甸土壤理化性质及持水能力的影响[J].中国草地学报,2017,39(5):54-61.
Yang Y S, Zhang L, Wei Y X, et al. Effects of degradation degree on soil physicochemical properties and soil water-holding capacity in zeku alpine meadow in the headwater region of three rivers in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2017,39(5):54-61.
[17] 高明磊,满秀玲,段北星.林下植被和凋落物对我国寒温带天然林土壤CO2通量的短期影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2021,43(3):55-65.
Gao M L, Man X L, Duan B X. Short-term effects of understory vegetation and litter on soil CO2 flux of natural forests in cold temperate zone of China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021,43(3):55-65.
[18] 刘明慧,孙雪,于文杰,等.长白山不同海拔原始红松林土壤活性有机碳含量的生长季动态[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2018,42(2):67-74.
Liu M H, Sun X, Yu W J, et al. Seasonal dynamics of soil active organic carbon content in the original Pinus koraiensis forest in Changbai Mountains,China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2018,42(2):67-74.
[19] 林宝平,何宗明,郜士垒,等.去除根系和凋落物对滨海沙地3种防护林土壤碳氮库的短期影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(12):4061-4071.
Lin B P, He Z M, Gao S L, et al. Short-term effects of root exclusion and litter removal on sandy soil carbon and nitrogen pools in three coastal plantation forests[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(12):4061-4071.
[20] Blair G J, Lefroy R D B, Lisle L. Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation, and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1995,46(7):1459-1466.
[21] Pang D, Cui M, Liu Y, et al. Responses of soil labile organic carbon fractions and stocks to different vegetation restoration strategies in degraded karst ecosystems of southwest China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2019,138:391-402.
[22] García F, Sveshtarova B, Oliva M. Seasonal effects on soil organic carbon dynamics in a tropical deciduous forest ecosystem in western Mexico[J]. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 2003,19(2):179-188.
[23] Feng W, Zou X, Schaefer D. Above-and belowground carbon inputs affect seasonal variations of soil microbial biomass in a subtropical monsoon forest of southwest China[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009,41(5):978-983.
[24] 魏翠翠,刘小飞,林成芳,等.凋落物输入改变对亚热带两种米槠次生林土壤酶活性的影响[J].植物生态学报,2018,42(6):692-702.
Wei C C, Liu X F, Lin C F, et al. Response of soil enzyme activities to litter input changes in two secondary Castanopsis carlessii forests in subtropical China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018,42(6):692-702.
[25] 李英年,王勤学,杜明远,等.草毡寒冻雏形土有机质补给、分解及大气CO2通量交换[J].草地学报,2006,14(2):165-169.
Li Y N, Wang Q X, Du M Y, et al. A study on replenishment and decomposition of organic matter in and mat-cryic cambisols CO2 flux between vegetation and atmosphere[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2006,14(2):165-169.
[26] 唐仕姗,杨万勤,殷睿,等.中国森林生态系统凋落叶分解速率的分布特征及其控制因子[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(6):529-539.
Tang S S, Yang W Q, Yin R, et al. Spatial characteristics in decomposition rate of foliar litter and controlling factors in Chinese forest ecosystems[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014,38(6):529-539.
[27] Xiong X, Zhou G, Zhang D. Soil organic carbon accumulation modes between pioneer and old-growth forest ecosystems[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020,57(12):2419-2428.
[28] 梁艺凡,万晓华,桑昌鹏,等.滨海防护林土壤氮组分对凋落物和根系去除的响应[J].森林与环境学报,2019,39(2):127-134.
Liang Y F, Wan X H, Sang C P, et al. Response of soil nitrogen pool to litter and root exclusion in costal protection forest[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2019,39(2):127-134.
[29] 陈玉平,吴佳斌,张曼,等.枯落物处理对森林土壤碳氮转化过程影响研究综述[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2012,7(2):84-94.
Chen Y P, Wu J B, Zhang M, et al. Research advances of effects of detritus input and removal on dynamics of carbon and nitrogen in forest soils[J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment,2012,7(2):84-94.
相似文献/References:
[1]余定坤,胡绍平,杨清培,等.江西信丰森林健康示范区主要林分类型土壤水源涵养功能[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):98.
YU Ding-kun,HU Shao-ping,YANG Qing-pei,et al.Water Conservation of Soils in Main Forest Types at the Demonstration Area of Forest Health Management Project in Xinfeng, Jiangxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):98.
[2]杨清云,曾锋.森林土壤空间变异性及其样本容量的确定[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(03):54.
YANG Qing-yun,ZENG Feng.A Research on Spatial Variability of Forest Soil and Determining Number of Sample[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(01):54.
[3]田育新,李锡泉,吴建平,等.小流域森林生态系统林地土壤渗透性能研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):173.
TIAN Yu-xin,LI Xi-quan,WU Jian-ping,et al.Soil Permeability Research on Small Area Forest Watershed Ecosystem[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(01):173.
[4]周玉成,刘硕,田育新,等.湘西南山地典型植物群落森林土壤渗透性能研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):286.
ZHOU Yu-cheng,LIU Shuo,TIAN Yu-xin,et al.Soil Permeability at Typical Forest Community in Mountainous Areas of South West Hu’nan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(01):286.
[5]程永珍,宫渊波,陈林武,等.嘉陵江上游低山暴雨区不同植被类型土壤磷素的比较[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):202.
CHEN Yong-zhen,GONG Yuan-bo,CHEN Lin-wu,et al.Comparison of Soil Organic Matter and Phosphorus of Different Vegetation Rehabilitation in Northern Sichuan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(01):202.
[6]丁新新,洪伟,陈建忠,等.不同经营模式下毛竹林土壤水分物理性质比较[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(03):74.
DING Xin-xin,HONG Wei,CHEN Jian-zhong,et al.Comparison of Soil Water Physical Properties in Different Phyllostachys Pubescens Management Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):74.
[7]林培松,尚志海.韩江流域典型区不同森林类型土壤理化性质初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(03):117.
LIN Pei-song,SHANG Zhi-hai.A Primary Study on the Soil Properties of the Different Forest in Typical Area of Hanjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):117.
[8]毕珍,石辉,许五弟,等.四川盆地森林土壤的有机碳储量及其空间分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(05):83.
BI Zhen,SHI Hui,XU Wu-di,et al.Forest Soil Organic Carbon Storage and Characteristics of Spacial Distribution in Sichuan Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):83.
[9]段兴凤,宋维峰,曾洵,等.湖南紫鹊界梯田区森林土壤涵养水源功能初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(01):157.
DUAN Xing-feng,SONG Wei-feng,ZENG Xun,et al.Analysis Forest Soil on Soil and Water Conservation Function of Ziquejie Terrace[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(01):157.
[10]耿波,岳亚军.红河谷不同林分土壤养分状况研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):90.
GENG Bo,YUE Yajun.Research on Soil Nutrient Status under Different Stands in the Red River Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):90.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-11-07 修回日期:2022-11-20
资助项目:国家重点研发项目“典型森林生态系统碳汇提升经营技术与增汇潜力”(2021YFD2200405)
第一作者:王军(1998—),男,天津市人,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:imauwh@163.com
通信作者:满秀玲(1964—),女,黑龙江省哈尔滨市人,博士,教授,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:mannefu@163.com