WANG Yixin,FENG Tianjiao,XIAO Huijie,et al.Characteristics of Sap Flow Rate of Nitraria tangutorum Under Drought Stress and Different Plant Height and Basal Diameter[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):234-240,249.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.039.]
干旱胁迫和不同株高基径条件下的白刺液流速率特征差异
- Title:
- Characteristics of Sap Flow Rate of Nitraria tangutorum Under Drought Stress and Different Plant Height and Basal Diameter
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)05-0234-07
- Keywords:
- Hetao irrigation area; Nitraria tangutorum; sap flow; drought stress; vegetation morphology
- 分类号:
- S728.4
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]揭示内蒙古荒漠环境中不同株高基径的白刺液流差异,阐明不同形态白刺对干旱环境的适应情况,为干旱区荒漠绿洲植被恢复的白刺种植提供参考。[方法]在乌兰布和沙漠选择高株高组(HS)和粗基径组(BD)的典型白刺,并模拟防止水分横向流失的隔水处理条件(CG),采用野外定点观测的方法监测和分析白刺生长季液流速率变化情况及其与环境因子的关系。[结果](1)白刺液流速率在月尺度上的大小顺序为8月>7月>6月>9月>5月,隔水组(WS)白刺液流速率较正常组(NW)变化幅度大,液流速率中值分别为1.021 g/h,0.387 g/h; 基径大植株矮组(LS)白刺液流速率较基径小植株高组(SH)变化幅度大,液流速率中值分别为0.472 g/h,0.261 g/h。(2)在土壤水分长期匮缺的条件下,液流速率与气温(Ta)、风速(WVEL)呈显著正相关,与光合有效辐射(PAR)呈显著负相关,与空气湿度(RH)相关性不明显,环境因子对液流速率影响程度依次为:PAR>Ta>VPD>WVEL>RH; 30—150 cm深度土层土壤含水率对白刺液流速率均呈显著的正相关关系。(3)白刺液流速率与环境因子的回归方程表明,LS组较SH组液流速率受气象因子的影响更大,WS组白刺液流速率仅受30—50 cm土层土壤含水率的影响。[结论]大基径矮植株白刺较小基径高植株的白刺更能适应当地干旱的气候条件,粗矮形态的白刺更适应在缺水环境下生存。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The differences in the sap flow of Nitraria tangutorum in different plant height base diameters in the desert environment of Inner Mongolia were revealed, and the adaptation of different forms of Nitraria tangutorum to arid environment was elucidated, and the planting of Nitraria tangutorum in desert oasis vegetation restoration in arid area was provided. [Methods] Nitraria tangutorum of the tall plant height group(HS)and coarse basal diameter group(BD)were selected in Wulanbuhe desert, and water separation treatment(CG)was simulated, insitu observation was used to measure and analyze the change of sap flow rate and its relationship with environmental factors during growing season. [Results](1)The sap flow rate of Nitraria tangutorum was in the order: August>July>June>September>May on the monthly scale, and the sap flow rate of Nitraria tangutorum in water separation treatment(WS)was larger than that in non water tight treatment(NW), the mean values of sap flow rate were 1.021 g/hand 0.387 g/h, respectively. The sap flow rate of Nitraria tangutorum(LS)with large basal diameter was larger than that with small basal diameter and high plant(SH), the mean flow rates were 0.472 g/h and 0.261 g/h, respectively.(2)Under the condition of long-term soil moisture deficiency, the sap flow rate was positively correlated with air temperature(Ta)and wind velocity(WVEL), and negatively correlated with photosynthetic effective radiation(PAR), but not significantly correlated with air humidity(Rh), the influence degree of environmental factors on sap flow rate followed the order: PAR>Ta>VPD>WVEL>Rh, and soil water content in the depth of 30—150 cm had significant positive correlation with sap flow rate of Nitraria tangutorum.(3)The regression equation between the sap flow rate of Nitraria tangutorum and environmental factors showed that the sap flow rate of LS group was more affected by meteorological factors than that of SH group, and the liquid flow rate of WS group was only affected by the soil moisture content of 30—50 cm soil layer. [Conclusion] Dwarf Nitraria tangutorum with large base diameter is more suitable for local arid climatic conditions than high Nitraria tangutorum with smaller base diameter, and Nitraria tangutorum in large base diameter and dwarf form is more suitable for survival in water-scarce environments.
参考文献/References:
[1] 赵晨光, 庞德胜. 阿拉善白刺生长季需水量估算[J]. 防护林科技, 2018(4):24-27.
[2] 袁得润,徐先英.民勤沙区6种防护树种液流特征及其生态需水量估算[J].甘肃科技,2010,26(17):172-175,150.
[3] 李清河,刘建锋,张景波,等.乌兰布和沙漠东北部8种沙生灌木生长季末期的光合生理特性[J].西北植物学报,2006,26(11):2318-2323.
[4] 孙慧珍,李夷平,王翠,等.不同木材结构树干液流对比研究[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(12):1434-1439.
[5] 乌日娜,丁国栋,吴斌,等.沙木蓼蒸腾耗水特性及环境影响因子研究[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(3):68-72.
[6] 姚小英,蒲金涌,王澄海,等.甘肃黄土高原40 a来土壤水分蒸散量变化特征[J].冰川冻土,2007(1):126-130.
[7] 于界芬.树木蒸腾耗水特点及解剖结构的研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2003.
[8] 吕金林.黄土丘陵区两典型森林群落及主要建群种蒸腾耗水特征研究[D].陕西杨凌:中国科学院大学(中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2021.
[9] 温杰,陈云明,唐亚坤,等.黄土丘陵区油松、沙棘生长旺盛期树干液流密度特征及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(3):763-771.
[10] 徐军亮,马履一.土壤温度对油松(Pinustabulaeformis)树干液流活动的影响[J].生态学报,2008,28(12):6107-6112.
[11] 杨洁,吕金林,何秋月,等.黄土丘陵区辽东栎和刺槐树干液流时滞效应与蒸腾特征的关联性[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(8):2607-2613.
[12] 孙慧珍.东北东部山区主要树种树干液流动态及与环境因子关系[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2002.
[13] 王慧梅,孙伟,祖元刚,等.不同环境因子对兴安落叶松树干液流的时滞效应复杂性及其综合影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(12):3109-3116.
[14] 孙鹏飞,周宏飞,李彦,等.古尔班通古特沙漠原生梭梭树干液流及耗水量[J].生态学报,2010,30(24):6901-6909.
[15] 徐利岗,杜历,汤英,等.干旱区枸杞蒸腾耗水变化特征及其影响因子响应分析[J].干旱区地理,2016,39(6):1282-1290.
[16] 罗凤敏,辛智鸣,高君亮,等.沙棘液流动态变化及影响因素分析[J].草业科学,2015,32(11):1871-1877.
[17] 夏永辉,梁凤超,师庆东,等.准噶尔西部人工碳汇林原生荒漠植被梭梭蒸腾耗水研究[J].安徽农业科学,2014,42(33):11755-11759.
[18] 岳广阳,张铜会,赵哈林,等.科尔沁沙地黄柳和小叶锦鸡儿茎流及蒸腾特征[J].生态学报,2006,26(10):3205-3213.
[19] 单立山,李毅,张希明,等.灌溉对3种荒漠植物蒸腾耗水特性的影响[J].生态学报,2012,32(18):5692-5702.
[20] 杨强.降雨对毛乌素沙地油蒿和沙柳蒸腾特性的影响[D].北京:北京林业大学,2016.
[21] 郝少荣,裴志永,段广东,等.不同时间尺度下环境因子与沙柳茎流关系的差异研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(3):152-158.
[22] 李吉跃. 植物耐旱性及其机理[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1991, 13(3): 92-100.
[23] Du S, Wang Y L, Kume T, et al. Sapflow characteristics and climatic responses in three forest species in the semiarid Loess Plateau region of China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2011,151(1):1-10.
[24] Ford C R, Goranson C E, Mitchell R J, et al. Diurnal and seasonal variability in the radial distribution of sap flow:predicting total stem flow in Pinus taeda trees[J]. Tree Physiology,2004,24(9):951-960.
[25] Meinzer F C, James S A, Goldstein G. Dynamics of transpiration, sap flow and use of stored water in tropical forest canopy trees[J]. Tree Physiology,2004,24(8):901-909.
[26] Campbell G S, Norman J M. An introduction to environmental biophysics(Second Edition)[M]. New York: Springer,1998.
[27] Granier A. Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements[J]. Tree Physiology,1987,3(4):309-320.
[28] 种培芳.荒漠植物红砂、白刺和沙拐枣抗旱指标及抗旱性综合评价研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2010.
[29] Kozlowski T T. Water deficit and plant growth. Vol. 1. Development, control and measurement[M]. New York, London: Academic Press,1968.
相似文献/References:
[1]张锦娟,王冉,陆芳春,等.不同配置模式毛竹林水土流失特征[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(03):92.
ZHANG Jinjuan,WANG Ran,LU Fangchun,et al.Characteristics of Soil and Water Loss on Bamboo Forest Lands[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):92.
[2]隋媛媛,许晓鸿,张瑜,等.吉林省中东部低山丘陵区坡耕地和林地水量平衡——以东辽县杏木小流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(03):197.
SUI Yuan-yuan,XU Xiao-hong,ZHANG Yu,et al.Analysis of Water Balance in Sloping Land and Forest Land in the Low Mountain and Mound Area in Mid-eastern Jilin Province—A Case Study of Xingmu Small Watershed in Dongliao County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):197.
[3]陈蕾,高山雪,ZHOU George.施加炭基缓释肥对土壤氮素流失的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(06):53.
CHEN Lei,GAO Shanxue,ZHOU George.Effects of Application of Slow Release Fertilizer Coated with Biochar on the Nitrogen Loss in Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(05):53.
[4]张玉玉,王进鑫,马 戌,等.土壤干旱及复水对侧柏叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):242.
ZHANG Yuyu,WANG Jinxin,MA Xu,et al.Effects of Drought and Rewatering on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters of Platycladus orientalis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):242.
[5]毛 娜,刘 通,江 恒,等.蚯蚓对赤红壤草被恢复影响的试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(01):70.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20220304.001]
MAO Na,LIU Tong,JIANG Heng,et al.Effects of Earthworms on Grass Regeneration in Lateritic Red Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):70.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20220304.001]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-06-29 修回日期:2022-07-21
资助项目:中央高校基本科研业务费(BLX202005); 国家重点研发计划政府间国际创新合作专项中国和美国政府间合作项目(2019YFE0116500)
第一作者:王一心(1996—),女,辽宁丹东人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:林业生态工程。E-mail:18843182659@163.com
通信作者:冯天骄(1991—),男,内蒙古通辽人,博士,讲师,主要研究方向:生态系统水文过程研究。E-mail:fengtianjiao1991@bjfu.edu.cn