ZHANG Xiaolei,PEI Yingchun,XIA Zhanghui,et al.Characteristics of Nitrogen Loss from Corn Field Surface Runoff in Typical Fluvo-aquic Soil Area of the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):113-121.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.038.]
黄河下游典型潮土区玉米地径流氮素流失特征
- Title:
- Characteristics of Nitrogen Loss from Corn Field Surface Runoff in Typical Fluvo-aquic Soil Area of the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)05-0113-09
- Keywords:
- nitrogen loss; non-point source pollution; fluvo-aquic soil area; runoff; lower reaches of the Yellow River
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]揭示自然降雨过程中黄河下游潮土区农田氮素随地表径流的流失特征,为地表径流水质预测及农业面源污染防控提供参考。[方法]采用定位试验的方法,在黄河下游典型潮土区进行夏季不同降雨条件下玉米地径流水质的连续监测,并分析了径流中TN(总氮)、DN(溶解态氮)、NN(硝态氮)和AN(铵态氮)的浓度变化过程、流失水平与强度及其影响因素。[结果](1)不同形态氮素浓度的峰值均出现在径流过程的前期,之后随降雨的持续,浓度曲线整体上呈下降的变化趋势;(2)径流中TN,DN,NN的EMC(次降雨事件污染物平均浓度)均超过或接近地表水Ⅴ类水质标准(2.00 mg/L),其中TN的EMC随降雨强度的增大依次是Ⅴ类水质标准的1.75,1.72,1.91,2.01倍,表明研究区域已存在明显的氮素污染风险;(3)径流中TN的流失以DN为主,而NN又以DN为流失主体,二者的EMC贡献率分别为56.75%～80.99%和72.78%～81.39%,并且在中、小降雨条件下贡献率更大;(4)TN,DN,NN,AN的流失强度和流失率均随降雨强度的增大而增大,各形态氮素流失强度和流失率的平均值分别为366.06,227.38,170.17,35.47 g/hm2和39.55,24.30,18.07,7.46 g/(h·hm2);(5)Pearson相关分析结果显示:径流量和TSS(悬浮物)对AN浓度的影响较小,但对TN,DN,NN浓度的影响却十分明显; 其中,中、小降雨条件下TN,DN,NN浓度与径流量之间均存在显著的正相关关系(p<0.05),且在小雨条件下相关性更为显著(p<0.01); 大、暴雨条件下,TN浓度受到径流量和TSS的双重影响(p<0.05),且降雨强度越大,影响越强烈,但二者对DN,NN浓度的影响却并未达到显著水平。[结论]黄河下游潮土区夏季玉米地径流中各形态氮素的流失特征存在明显差异,可根据降雨强度的大小采取适宜的氮素流失防控策略,且控制径流并减少水土流失对提高氮素流失防治效率具有十分重要的意义。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics of nitrogen loss from corn field surface runoff in the fluvo-aquic soil area of the lower reaches of the Yellow River during the natural rainfall, and to provide reference for predicting surface runoff quality and preventing agricultural non-point source pollution. [Methods] Based on the method of positioning test, the continuous monitoring of dryland surface runoff quality under different rainfall conditions in summer was carried out. The concentration change process, loss level, intensity and influencing factors of TN(total nitrogen), DN(dissolved nitrogen), NN(nitrate nitrogen)and AN(ammonium nitrogen)in runoff were analyzed. [Results] The peak values of different forms of nitrogen concentration appeared in the early stage of runoff process, and then the concentration curve showed a downward trend with the continuation of rainfall. The EMC(event mean concentration)of TN, DN and NN in runoff exceeded or approached the class V water quality standard of China's surface water(2.00 mg/L). With the increase of rainfall intensity, the EMC of TN were 1.75, 1.72, 1.91 and 2.01 times higher than that of the class V water quality standard, respectively, indicating that there was an obvious risk of non-point source nitrogen pollution in the study area. The loss of TN in runoff was mainly DN, and NN was the main loss of DN. Their EMC contribution rates were 56.75%～80.99% and 72.78%～81.39%, respectively, but the rates were seemed greater under the medium and small rainfall conditions. The loss intensities and loss rates of TN, DN, NN, AN both increased with the increase of rainfall intensity, and their average values of every rainfall were 366.06, 227.38, 170.17, 35.47 g/hm2 and 39.55, 24.30, 18.07, 7.46 g/(h·hm2), respectively. Pearson correlation analysis showed that runoff and TSS(suspended solids)had little effect on the concentration of AN, but had a very obvious effect on the concentrations of TN, DN and NN, and there was a significant positive correlation between TN, DN, NN concentrations and runoff under the medium and small rainfall conditions(p<0.05), and it seemed that the correlation was more significant under the smaller rainfall condition(p<0.01). Pearson correlation analysis also showed that the concentration of TN was both affected by runoff and TSS(p<0.05)under the condition of heavy rain and rainstorm, and the greater of the rainfall intensity was, the more stronger of their impact, but the impact on DN and NN concentration didn't reach the significant level. [Conclusion] There were significant differences in the characteristics of nitrogen losses of various forms in summer maize field runoff in the fluvo-aquic soil area of the lower reaches of the Yellow River. Appropriate nitrogen loss prevention and control strategies could be adopted based on the magnitude of rainfall intensity, and controlling runoff and reducing soil erosion could be of great significance to improving the efficiency of nitrogen loss prevention and control.
参考文献/References:
[1] 庞树江,王晓燕.流域尺度非点源总氮输出系数改进模型的应用[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(18):213-223.
[2] Ouyang W, Skidmore A K, Toxopeus A G, et al. Long-term vegetation landscape pattern with non-point source nutrient pollution in upper stream of Yellow River basin[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2010,389(3/4):373-380.
[3] 娄和震,吴习锦,郝芳华,等.近三十年中国非点源污染研究现状与未来发展方向探讨[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(5):1535-1549.
[4] US Environmental Protection Agency. National management measures to control nonpoint source pollution form agriculture[M]. Washington:Createspace, 2015.
[5] 生态环境部.第二次全国污染源普查公报[J].环境保护,2020,48(18):8-10.
[6] 程红光,岳勇,杨胜天,等.黄河流域非点源污染负荷估算与分析[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(3):384-391.
[7] Fang H. Effect of soil conservation measures and slope on runoff, soil, TN, and TP losses from cultivated lands in northern China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,126:107677.
[8] 冯小杰,郑子成,李廷轩.紫色土区坡耕地玉米季地表径流及其氮素流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):43-48.
[9] Janeau J L, Gillard L C, Grellier S, et al. Soil erosion, dissolved organic carbon and nutrient losses under different land use systems in a small catchment in northern Vietnam[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2014,146:314-323.
[10] Wu L, Long T Y, Liu X, et al. Modeling impacts of sediment delivery ratio and land management on adsorbed non-point source nitrogen and phosphorus load in a mountainous basin of the Three Gorges reservoir area, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013,70(3):1405-1422.
[11] Yao J J, Cheng J H, Zhou Z D, et al. Effects of herbaceous vegetation coverage and rainfall intensity on splash characteristics in northern China[J]. Catena, 2018,167:411-421.
[12] 王全九,赵光旭,刘艳丽,等.植被类型对黄土坡地产流产沙及氮磷流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(14):195-201.
[13] Wang R, Min J, Kronzucker H J, et al. N and P runoff losses in China's vegetable production systems:Loss characteristics, impact, and management practices[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,663:971-979.
[14] 吴小雨,李天阳,何丙辉.长期施肥和耕作下紫色土坡耕地径流TN和TP流失特征[J].环境科学,2021,42(6):2810-2816.
[15] Deng L, Sun T, Fei K, et al. Coupling loss characteristics of N-P-C through runoff and sediment in the hilly region of SE China under simulated rainfall[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021,28:37204-37216.
[16] 陈玲,刘德富,宋林旭,等.不同雨强下黄棕壤坡耕地径流养分输出机制研究[J].环境科学,2013,34(6):2151-2158.
[17] 王国强.河南自然条件与资源[M].北京:商务印书馆,2016.
[18] 彭舜磊,李鹏,王梓臣,等.河南省农业面源污染负荷估算及区划[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):225-230.
[19] 陶园,徐静,任贺靖,等.黄河流域农业面源污染时空变化及因素分析[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(4):257-264.
[20] Nangia V, Gowda P H, Mulla D J. Effects of changes in N-fertilizer management on water quality trends at the watershed scale[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010,97(11):1855-1860.
[21] 刘梅冰,陈兴伟,陈莹.流域非点源氮素流失空间分异特征的多时间尺度分析[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(7):2183-2191.
[22] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[23] Ostrom T K, Davis A P. Evaluation of an enhanced treatment media and permeable pavement base to remove stormwater nitrogen, phosphorus, and metals under simulated rainfall[J]. Water Research, 2019,166:115071.
[24] 宋娅丽,王克勤,董莉,等.滇中烤烟坡耕地地表径流氮素的动态变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(4):7-11.
[25] 李佳韵,童菊秀,夏传安,等.降雨条件下农田氮素地表径流流失特征研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2016,35(7):8-15.
[26] 连慧姝,刘宏斌,李旭东,等.典型入湖河流水体氮素变化特征及其对降雨的响应:以太湖乌溪港为例[J].环境科学,2017,38(12):5047-5055.
[27] Pan C, Shangguan Z. Runoff hydraulic characteristics and sediment generation in sloped grassplots under simulated rainfall conditions[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006,331(1/2):178-185.
[28] 包鑫,江燕,胡羽聪.潮河流域降雨径流事件污染物输出特征[J].环境科学,2021,42(7):3316-3327.
[29] Du X Z, Li X Y, Hao S N, et al. Contrasting patterns of nutrient dynamics during different storm events in a semi-arid catchment of northern China[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2014,69(12):2533-2540.
[30] 井光花,于兴修,刘前进,等.沂蒙山区不同强降雨下土壤的氮素流失特征分析[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(6):120-125.
[31] 薛鹏程,庞燕,项颂,等.模拟降雨条件下农田氮素径流流失特征研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(7):1362-1368.
[32] 罗义峰,陈方鑫,周豪,等.次降雨过程中不同土地利用配置对径流中氮流失的影响[J].环境科学,2021,42(5):2260-2267.
[33] 国家环境保护总局.地表水环境质量标准[S]. GB 3838-2002.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[34] 河南省生态环境厅.2020年河南省生态环境状况公报[EB/OL].
[35] 乔闪闪,吴磊,彭梦玲.人工模拟降雨条件下黄土坡面水—沙—氮磷流失特征[J].环境科学研究,2018,31(10):1728-1735.
[36] 宋林旭,刘德富,过寒超,等.三峡库区香溪河流域不同源类氮、磷流失特征研究[J].土壤通报,2013,44(2):465-471.
相似文献/References:
[1]陈志凡,赵烨.基于氮素流失对非点源污染研究的述评[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):49.
CHEN Zhi-fan,ZHAO Ye.Study Progress on Non-point Source Pollution Based on Loss of Nitrogen[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):49.
[2]李英俊,王克勤,宋维峰,等.自然降雨条件下农田地表径流氮素流失特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(04):19.
LI Ying-jun,WANG Ke-qin,SONG Wei-feng,et al.Nitrogen Loss in the Farmland Surface Runoff under the Natural Rainfall Conditions[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(05):19.
[3]王继增,彭琳,余存祖.侵蚀条件下黄绵土氮素流失规律的研究[J].水土保持研究,1990,(02):95.
Wang Jizeng,Peng Lin,Yu Cunzu.Nitrogen Loss of Cultivated Loessial Soil Under Erosion Condition[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1990,(05):95.
[4]陈蕾,高山雪,ZHOU George.施加炭基缓释肥对土壤氮素流失的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(06):53.
CHEN Lei,GAO Shanxue,ZHOU George.Effects of Application of Slow Release Fertilizer Coated with Biochar on the Nitrogen Loss in Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(05):53.
[5]吴晓妮,付登高,彭珮媛,等.基于生态化学计量方法识别农业面源污染防控重点区域[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):160.
WU Xiaoni,FU Denggao,PENG Peiyuan,et al.Identifying Key Areas of Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution Control Based on Ecological Stoichiometry[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(05):160.
[6]张淼淼,肖 武,徐建飞,等.巢湖流域土地整治与面源污染时空过程及关系[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(01):360.
ZHANG Miaomiao,XIAO Wu,XU Jianfei,et al.Spatiotemporal Processes and Relationships Between Land Consolidation and Non-point Source Pollution in Chaohu Lake Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):360.
[7]王 磊,索琳娜,魏 丹,等.不同植物配置模式坡耕地面源污染生态阻控特征[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):29.
WANG Lei,SUO Linna,WEI Dan,et al.Ecological Control Characteristics of Non-point Source Pollution in Slope Farmland Under Different Plant Allocation Modes[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):29.
[8]李刚浩,夏 颖,黄 敏,等.三峡库区坡耕地免耕秸秆覆盖下氮磷流失特征[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(02):93.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.017]
LI Ganghao,XIA Ying,HUANG Min,et al.Characteristics of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses on Sloping Farmland Under No-tillage and Straw Mulch in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):93.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.017]
[9]叶志成,朱 青,廖凯华,等.天目湖流域茶园不同施肥水平与方式对茶叶品质和土壤氮磷淋失浓度的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(04):53.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.001.]
YE Zhicheng,ZHU Qing,LIAO Kaihua,et al.Effects of Different Fertilization Levels and Methods on Tea Quality and Leaching Concentrations of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Soil in Tianmu Lake Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):53.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.001.]
[10]文高辉,王子诚,何 庆,等.洞庭湖平原化肥面源污染生态环境风险及脱钩效应[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(04):301.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.004.]
WEN Gaohui,WANG Zicheng,HE Qing,et al.Eco-environmental Risks and Decoupling Effects of Fertilizer Non-Point Source Pollution in Dongting Lake Plain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):301.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.004.]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-06-24 修回日期:2022-08-15
资助项目:河南省科技发展计划项目(202102310599,222400410344); 河南省高等学校重点科研计划项目(21B910001); 河南省科学院人才队伍建设专项(200401003); 河南省科学院科研开发专项(220601029)
第一作者:张小磊(1981—),男,河南漯河人,博士,副研究员,主要从事资源利用与环境保护研究。E-mail:skyxlzhang@126.com