[1]苟俊菲,甘凤玲,刘春红.紫色土坡面细沟形态变化及其对产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(05):61-68,75.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.013.]
　GOU Junfei,GAN Fengling,LIU Chunhong.Variation of Rill Morphology and Its Effect on Runoff and Sediment Yield on Purple Soil Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):61-68,75.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.013.]
点击复制

紫色土坡面细沟形态变化及其对产流产沙的影响

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 30 期数: 2023年05期 页码: 61-68,75 栏目: 出版日期: 2023-08-10
Title:
Variation of Rill Morphology and Its Effect on Runoff and Sediment Yield on Purple Soil Slope
文章编号:
1005-3409(2023)05-0061-08
作者:
苟俊菲1,2, 甘凤玲1,2, 刘春红1,2
(1.重庆师范大学 三峡库区地表过程与环境遥感重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 401331; 2.重庆市三峡库区地表生态过程野外科学观测研究站, 重庆 401331)
Author(s):
GOU Junfei1,2, GAN Fengling1,2, LIU Chunhong1,2
(1.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Surface Process and Environment Remote Sensing in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China; 2.Chongqing Field Observation and Research Station of Surface Ecological Process in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Chongqing 401331, China)
关键词:
细沟形态;  产流率;  产沙率;  细沟侵蚀速率;  流量;  坡长;  紫色土坡面
Keywords:
rill morphology;  runoff yield rate;  sediment yield rate;  rill erosion rate;  flow discharge;  slope length;  purple soil slope
分类号:
S157.1
DOI:
10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.013.
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[目的]揭示紫色土坡面细沟形态特征及其对产流产沙的影响,阐明紫色土区影响细沟产流产沙的主控因素,进而为紫色土区水土流失治理提供参考依据。[方法]以紫色土坡耕地为研究对象,设计3个流量(6,8,10 L/min)和5个坡长(1,2,3,4,5 m),利用放水冲刷试验定量分析细沟形态和产流产沙变化特征,探讨细沟形态变化对产流产沙特征的影响。[结果]随流量增加,沟宽和沟深均呈增大趋势,宽深比则呈减小趋势; 随坡长增加,沟宽与宽深比呈先减小后增大的趋势,沟深变化规律则相反,且细沟形态在坡长3～4 m存在突变。流量与产流率、产沙率和细沟侵蚀速率呈正相关关系,坡长与产沙率呈正相关关系,而与产流率和细沟侵蚀速率呈负相关关系,其中产流率主要受流量的影响,而产沙率和细沟侵蚀速率受流量和坡长交互作用的影响较大。相关性分析表明,相比于产流(r=0.54,p<0.05),细沟形态与产沙关系更为密切(r>0.67,p<0.01)。通过多元逐步回归分析发现,沟宽是影响细沟侵蚀速率的关键因素(p<0.05),沟深是影响产沙率、累积产沙量的关键因素(p<0.01)。[结论]沟宽与沟深可用于预测紫色土坡面侵蚀程度,其中沟深是表征侵蚀产沙的最佳指标,未来细沟侵蚀防治措施重点应在控制沟深发育方面。
Abstract:
[Objective] The aim of this study is to explore the influence of rill morphology characteristics to runoff and sediment yield on purple soil slope as well as the main controlling factors affecting runoff and sediment yield in rill, and then to provide a reference for soil erosion control in purple soil area. [Methods] Purple sloping farmland was taken as the research object. A series of the scouring-erosion experiments were conducted under the different slope length(1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 m)and flow discharge(6, 8 and 10 L/min). The scouring-erosion experiments were used to quantitatively analyze the variation of rill morphology and the characteristics of runoff and sediment yield, and the influence of rill morphology variation on the characteristics of runoff and sediment yield was discussed. [Results] With the increase of flow discharge, the rill width and rill depth increased, and the width-depth ratio decreased. With the increasing of slope length, the rill width and width-depth ratio showed the decrease-increase trend, while the rill depth showed the contrary tendency, and the rill morphology had a sudden change in the slope length of 3～4 m. Flow discharge was positively correlated with runoff yield rate, sediment yield rate and rill erosion rate. Slope length was positively correlated with sediment yield rate, but negatively correlated with runoff yield rate and rill erosion rate. Runoff yield rate was mainly affected by flow discharge, sediment yield rate and rill erosion rate were mainly affected by the interaction of flow discharge and slope length. Rill morphology had a weak relationship with the runoff(r=0.54, p< 0.05), and was closely related to the sediment yield(r > 0.67, p< 0.01). Through multiple stepwise regression analysis, it was found that rill width was the key factor affecting the rill erosion rate(p< 0.05), and rill depth was the key factor affecting sediment yield rate and cumulative sediment yield(p< 0.01). [Conclusion] Rill width and rill depth could be used to predict the erosion degree of purple soil slope, and rill depth could be considered as the best indicator to characterize the sediment yield. In the future, rill erosion control measures should focus on the control of development of rill depth.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王振龙,杜明成,姜翠玲,等.基于人工降雨试验的淮北地区产流产沙差异性研究[J].水科学进展,2019,30(4):507-514.
[2] 侯宁,王勇,赵虎,等.耕作侵蚀对不同坡度下紫色土侵蚀产沙的影响[J].山地学报,2021,39(4):495-505.
[3] 王鹏飞,郑子成,张锡洲,等.玉米季横垄坡面细沟侵蚀特征及其影响因素[J].土壤学报,2016,53(4):869-880.
[4] 何育聪,郑浩杰,韩剑桥.间歇性与连续性降雨对黄土坡面细沟侵蚀影响的比较[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(6):8-13.
[5] Han Z, Zhong S Q, Ni J P, et al. Estimation of soil erosion to define the slope length of newly reconstructed gentle-slope lands in hilly mountainous regions [J]. Scientific Reports, 2019,9:4676.
[6] 苏远逸,李鹏,任宗萍,等.坡度对黄土坡面产流产沙过程及水沙关系的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(2):118-122.
[7] 吕刚,贾晏泽,刘雅卓,等.褐土与棕壤坡耕地细沟侵蚀发生的阶段性水沙变化[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):42-48.
[8] 王玲玲,范东明,王文龙,等.水蚀风蚀交错区不同坡长坡面产流产沙过程[J].人民黄河,2016,38(3):72-75.
[9] 方海燕,蔡强国,李秋艳.黄土丘陵沟壑区坡面产流能力及影响因素研究[J].地理研究,2009,28(3):583-591.
[10] 龙琪,韩剑桥,何育聪,等.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀强度的空间分布及形态分异特征[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(1):1-7.
[11] 张攀,唐洪武,姚文艺,等.细沟形态演变对坡面水沙过程的影响[J].水科学进展,2016,27(4):535-541.
[12] 和继军,宫辉力,李小娟,等.细沟形成对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J].水科学进展,2014,25(1):90-97.
[13] 裴冠博,龚冬琴,付兴涛.晋西黄绵土坡面细沟形态及其对产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):79-84,182.
[14] 倪世民,冯舒悦,王军光,等.不同质地重塑土坡面细沟侵蚀形态与水力特性及产沙的关系[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):149-156.
[15] Jiang Y M, Shi H J, Wen Z M, et al. The dynamic process of slope rill erosion analyzed with a digital close range photogrammetry observation system under laboratory conditions [J]. Geomorphology, 2019,350:106893.
[16] Sun L Y, Fang H Y, Cai Q G, et al. Sediment load change with erosion processes under simulated rainfall events [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019,29(6):1001-1020.
[17] Niu Y B, Gao Z L, Li Y H, et al. Characteristics of rill erosion in spoil heaps under simulated inflow:A field runoff plot experiment [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020,202:104655.
[18] 张恒,高照良,牛耀彬,等.两种工程堆积体坡面细沟形态与产沙关系对比研究[J].土壤学报,2021,58(1):115-127.
[19] 张媛静,张平仓,丁文峰.黄土与紫色土坡面侵蚀特征对比试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(4):60-62.
[20] 郑红丽,韦杰,陈国建,等.三峡库区紫色土坡耕地土壤侵蚀研究:进展与方向[J].重庆师范大学学报:自然科学版,2014,31(3):42-48.
[21] 刘冉,余新晓,蔡强国,等.坡长对坡面侵蚀、搬运、沉积过程影响的研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2020,18(6):140-146.
[22] 杨茹珍,张风宝,杨明义,等.急陡黄土坡面细沟侵蚀的水动力学特性试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(4):31-36.
[23] 沈海鸥,郑粉莉,温磊磊,等.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀形态试验[J].生态学报,2014,34(19):5514-5521.
[24] 张翔,高照良,卢茜.塿土堆积体坡面细沟形态及其沿程分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(5):53-59.
[25] 齐星圆,高照良,张翔,等.黄土堆积体变坡长坡面细沟动态发育过程[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):42-48.
[26] 刘淼,杨明义,张风宝.黄土坡面细沟发育及细沟与细沟间侵蚀比率研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(1):12-16.
[27] 吕刚,刘雅卓,陈鸿,等.褐土和棕壤坡耕地细沟侵蚀过程及侵蚀产沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):64-69.
[28] 王小燕,王天巍,蔡崇法,等.含碎石紫色土坡面降雨入渗和产流产沙过程[J].水科学进展,2014,25(2):189-195.
[29] Sun L Y, Zhou J L, Cai Q G, et al. Comparing surface erosion processes in four soils from the Loess Plateau under extreme rainfall events [J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2021,9(4):520-531.
[30] Luo J, Zheng Z V, Li T X, et al. Quantifying the contributions of soil surface microtopography and sediment concentration to rill erosion [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,752:141886.
[31] 戎玉博,骆汉,谢永生,等.雨强对工程堆积体侵蚀规律和细沟发育的影响[J].泥沙研究,2016(6):12-18.
[32] Lou Y C, Gao Z L, Sun G F, et al. Runoff scouring experimental study of rill erosion of spoil tips. [J]. Catena, 2022,214:106249.
[33] Shen H O, Zheng F L, Wen L L, et al. An experimental study of rill erosion and morphology [J]. Geomorphology, 2015,231:193-201.
[34] 王龙生,蔡强国,蔡崇法,等.黄土坡面细沟形态变化及其与流速之间的关系[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(11):110-117.

相似文献/References:

[1]张翔,高照良,卢茜.(土娄)土堆积体坡面细沟形态及其沿程分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(05):53.
　ZHANG Xiang,GAO Zhaoliang,LU Xi.Rill Morphological Characteristics and Distribution Characteristics on Lou Soil Mound[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(05):53.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2022-07-13 修回日期:2022-08-10
资助项目:国家青年科学基金项目(42107355); 重庆市基础研究与前沿探索项目(cstc2018jcyjAX0489); 重庆市教委科技项目(KJQN201800531,KJQN202100518); 重庆市科委面上项目(CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX1053)
第一作者:苟俊菲(1996—),女,四川广安人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:815950112@qq.com
通信作者:刘春红(1979—),女,河北冀州人,博士,副教授,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:20131490@cqnu.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-08-10