DU Ruizhe,LI Wendong,GAO Wenhao,et al.Influence of Climate and Surface Cover Changes on Spatiotemporal Changes of Wind Erosion in Pisha Sandstone Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):31-40.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.050.]
气候、地表覆被变化对砒砂岩区风蚀时空变化的影响
- Title:
- Influence of Climate and Surface Cover Changes on Spatiotemporal Changes of Wind Erosion in Pisha Sandstone Area
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)05-0031-10
- Keywords:
- Pisha Sandstone Area; wind erosion; Modified WEQ Mode; spatiotemporal change; impact contribution; elastic coefficient
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]揭示气候、地表覆被变化对黄土高原北部砒砂岩区风蚀时空变化的影响,阐明砒砂岩区风蚀减弱的主控因素,进而为研究区风蚀综合治理提供科技支撑。[方法]基于修正WEQ(Wind Erosion Equation)风蚀模型和研究区1980—2017年日气象数据,1990年、1995年、2005年、2015年4期Landsat遥感影像和土地利用图,30 m分辨率DEM数据及土壤数据,利用GIS和RS技术分析了砒砂岩区1980s,1990s,2000s,2010—2017年风蚀强度的时空变化特征,基于像元尺度剖析风蚀气象因子(W)、植被覆盖度(VC)和土地利用变化对风蚀时空变化的影响。[结果]随着年代推移,风蚀气象因子先降低后升高并超过初始值、植被覆盖度持续升高并趋于平稳,土地利用中草地和耕地变化明显。4个时期的平均风蚀模数分别为4 187 t/(km2·a),599 t/(km2·a),724 t/(km2·a)和870 t/(km2·a),风蚀呈先明显减弱后局部地区略有增强的趋势,其中,1990s风蚀在全境急剧减弱,2000s—2010s在西北、东南及北部局部地区侵蚀加重; 强烈以上侵蚀区集中于西北、东南边缘及南部河沟地区。 4个时期,风蚀模数与W呈显著正相关(相关系数0.248～0.678),W值增大会加剧风蚀波动增强; 风蚀与VC呈显著负相关(相关系数-0.556～-0.490),低植被覆盖区易出现风蚀波动增强; 草地、耕地是风蚀主要发生区,2000s—2010s草地区风蚀增幅较大,1990s后林地风蚀强度最小。覆土砒砂岩区风蚀对VC最为敏感,而覆沙砒砂岩区和裸露砒砂岩区则对W较敏感。VC和W对风蚀减弱贡献率之和在覆土区、覆沙区和裸露砒砂岩区分别为54%,72%,83%,其他因素对这3个区减蚀的贡献率分别为46%,28%和17%。[结论]VC和W对砒砂岩区风蚀减弱贡献率较大,植被覆盖度的提升对减蚀影响深远,未来应继续加强植被与工程措施的建设。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The aim of this study is to explore the influence of climate and surface cover changes on spatiotemporal changes of wind erosion in Pisha Sandstone Area in the northern Loess Plateau as well as its main control factors, and then to provide scientific support. [Methods] Based on Modified Wind Erosion Model(WEQ)and daily meteorological data from 1980 to 2017, Landsat remote sensing images and land use maps of four periods(1990, 1995, 2005, 2015), 30 m resolution DEM data and soil data of the study area, we analyzed the spatiotemporal change characteristics of wind erosion intensity in Pisha Sandstone Area in 1980s, 1990s, 2000s and 2010—2017 using GIS and RS technologies, and the impacts of wind erosion meteorological factors(W), vegetation coverage(VC)and land use change on the spatiotemporal changes of wind erosion based on the pixel scale. [Results] With the passage of time, the meteorological factors of wind erosion first decreased and then increased and exceeded the initial value, the vegetation coverage continued to increase and stabilized, and the changes of grassland and cultivated land in land use were obvious. The average wind erosion modulus in the four periods were 4 187 t/(km2·a), 599 t/(km2·a), 724 t/(km2·a)and 870 t/(km2·a), respectively, and the wind erosion showed a trend of obvious weakening and then slightly strengthening in local areas. In the four periods, the wind erosion modulus was significantly positively correlated with W(correlation coefficient 0.248～0.678), and the increase of W value would aggravate the increase in wind erosion fluctuation; wind erosion and VC showed the significant negative correlation(correlation coefficient-0.556～-0.490), and the low vegetation cover area was prone to wind erosion fluctuation enhancement; grassland and cultivated land were the main areas of wind erosion, and the increase of wind erosion in grassland area in 2000s—2010s was large, and the wind erosion intensity of forest land was the smallest after 1990 s. Wind erosion was most sensitive to VC in soil-covered region of Pisha Sandstone Area, while it was more sensitive to W in sand-covered region and bare region of Pisha Sandstone Area. The total contribution rates of VC and W to the reduction of wind erosion were 54%, 72% and 83% in soil-covered region, sand-covered region and bare region of Pisha Sandstone Area, respectively, and the contribution rates of other factors to erosion reduction in these three regions were 46%, 28% and 17%, respectively. The improvement of vegetation coverage had a far-reaching impact on the reduction of wind erosion. [Conclusion] VC and W are the main control factors of wind erosion reduction in Pisha Sandstone Area, and the improvement of vegetation cover has a profound impact on erosion reduction. The construction of vegetation and engineering measures should be continually strengthened in the future.
参考文献/References:
[1] 张寒冰,高阳,崔艳智.基于RWEQ模型的典型沙区风蚀治理成效研究[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2019,55(2):342-350.
[2] 吴芳芳,曹月娥,卢刚,等.准东地区土壤风蚀影响因子分析与风蚀量估算[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):56-60.
[3] 邢丽珠,张方敏,邢开成,等.基于RWEQ模型的内蒙古巴彦淖尔市土壤风蚀变化特征及归因分析[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(5):111-119.
[4] 郑洋,郝润梅,吴晓光,等.典型农牧交错区土地利用变化对土壤风蚀的影响:以内蒙古四子王旗为例[J].西南农业学报,2021,34(3):575-583.
[5] 江凌,肖燚,欧阳志云,等.基于RWEQ模型的青海省土壤风蚀模数估算[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):21-25,32.
[6] 姚文艺,李长明,张攀,等.砒砂岩侵蚀机理研究与展望[J].人民黄河,2018,40(6):1-7,65.
[7] 杨晓东,盛明,乔旺林,等.鄂尔多斯市风蚀规律试验研究[J].内蒙古水利,2010,(1):9-11.
[8] 李晓丽,于际伟,刘李杰.鄂尔多斯砒砂岩土壤侵蚀与气候条件关系的研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报:自然科学版,2014,35(3):105-109.
[9] 张攀,姚文艺,刘国彬,等.砒砂岩区典型小流域复合侵蚀动力特征分析[J].水利学报,2019,50(11):1384-1391.
[10] 付金霞,王静,张宝利,等.砒砂岩原状坡面不同季节复合侵蚀动力的贡献研究[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(11):66-73.
[11] 伍光和.自然地理学 [M].4版.北京:高等教育出版社,2008.
[12] 武诗琪,饶良懿.砒砂岩不同类型区坡谱特征与空间分异[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(8):125-132.
[13] 王愿昌,吴永红,寇权,等.砒砂岩分布范围界定与类型区划分[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(1):14-18.
[14] 赵国际.内蒙古砒砂岩地区水土流失规律研究[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(4):158-160.
[15] 吴永红,胡建忠,闫晓玲,等.砒砂岩区沙棘林生态工程减洪减沙作用分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(1):68-73.
[16] 唐政洪,蔡强国,李忠武,等.内蒙古砒砂岩地区风蚀、水蚀及重力侵蚀交互作用研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(2):25-29.
[17] Woodruff N P, Siddoway F H. A Wind Erosion Equation[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1965,29(5):602-608.
[18] Fryrear D W, Bilbro J D, Saleh A, et al. RWEQ: improved wind erosion technology[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000,55:183-189.
[19] Mandakh N, Tsogtbaatar J, Dash D, et al. Spatial assessment of soil wind erosion using WEQ approach in Mongolia[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016,26(4):473-483.
[20] 迟文峰,白文科,刘正佳,等.基于RWEQ模型的内蒙古高原土壤风蚀研究[J].生态环境学报,2018,27(6):1024-1033.
[21] 雷金银,吴发启,马璠,等.毛乌素沙地土壤风蚀的气候因子分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(2):104-105.
[22] Nourzadeh M, Bahrami H A, Goossens D, et al. Determining soil erosion and threshold friction velocity at different soil moisture conditions using a portable wind tunnel[J]. Zeitschrift Für Geomorphologie, Nf, 2013,57(1):97-109.
[23] 董治宝. Wind Erosion in Arid and Semiarid China: An Overview [J].中国沙漠,2000,20(2):134-139.
[24] Chepil W. Measurement of wind erosiveness of soils by dry sieving procedure[J]. Scientific Agriculture, 1942,23(3):154-160.
[25] JIn F, Yang W, Fu J, et al. Effects of vegetation and climate on the changes of soil erosion in the Loess Plateau of China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021,773:145514.
[26] 王丰,刘金铜,付同刚,等.基于RUSLE模型的太行山区土壤侵蚀时空分异特征及影响因子研究[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2022,30(7):1064-1076.
[27] 刘宝元,郭索彦,李智广,等.中国水力侵蚀抽样调查[J].中国水土保持,2013,(10):26-34.
[28] Bilbro J D, Fryrear D W. Wind Erosion Losses as Related to Plant Silhouette and Soil Cover[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1994,86(3):550-553.
[29] 张树磊,杨大文,杨汉波,等.1960—2010年中国主要流域径流量减小原因探讨分析[J].水科学进展,2015,26(5):605-613.
[30] Zhang S, Yang H, Yang D, et al. Quantifying the effect of vegetation change on the regional water balance within the Budyko framework[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2016,43(3):1140-1148.
[31] Li Z, Li Q, Wang J, et al. Impacts of projected climate change on runoff in upper reach of Heihe River basin using climate elasticity method and GCMs[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,716:137072.
[32] 姚文艺,肖培青,王愿昌,等.砒砂岩区侵蚀治理技术研究进展[J].水利水电科技进展,2019,39(5):1-9,15.
[33] 马晓妮,任宗萍,谢梦瑶,等.砒砂岩区植被覆盖度环境驱动因子量化分析:基于地理探测器[J].生态学报,2022,42(8):3389-3399.
[34] 刘连友.区域风沙蚀积量和蚀积强度初步研究:以晋陕蒙接壤区为例[J].地理学报,1999,54(1):61-64,66-70.
[35] Zhang H, Fan J, Cao W, et al. Response of wind erosion dynamics to climate change and human activity in Inner Mongolia, China during 1990 to 2015[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,639:1038-1050.
相似文献/References:
[1]康熠,侯华敏,秦新平.建立砒砂岩区坝系相对稳定规模模型的探讨——以内蒙古皇甫川西黑岱沟小流域坝系为例[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(04):22.
KANG Yi,HOU Hua-min,QIN Xin-ping.Exploration on Founding the Pattern in Scale of a Relatively Stable Dam System in Sandstone Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(05):22.
[2]王举位,张征,邹伟,等.砒砂岩区沙棘人工林生态系统服务功能价值变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(03):263.
WANG Ju-wei,ZHANG Zheng,ZOU Wei,et al.Study on Dynamic Change of Ecosystem Service Value of Seabuckthorn Plantation in the Soft Rock Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(05):263.
[3]盛艳,秦富仓,张艳杰.砒砂岩区小流域土地利用格局变化与优化研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(02):76.
SHENG Yan,QIN Fu-cang,ZHANG Yan-jie.Study on Land-use Change and Pattern Optimization of Small Watershed in Soft Rock Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):76.
[4]李晓娜,王 超,万秀云,等.延怀盆地不同土地利用类型土壤风蚀物特征[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(01):14.
LI Xiaona,WANG Chao,WAN Xiuyun,et al.Characteristics of Wind Erosion Dust Under Different Land Uses of Yanhuai Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(05):14.
[5]张若曦,秦富仓,李 龙,等.砒砂岩区坡面微地貌变化与侵蚀产沙的响应关系[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(06):21.
ZHANG Ruoxi,QIN Fucang,LI Long,et al.Responses of Slope Micro-geomorphology to Erosion and Sediment Yield in Arsenic Sandstone Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(05):21.
[6]朱志卓,李 龙,张 鹏,等.水力侵蚀下砒砂岩区植被格局对微地形和侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(03):10.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.040]
ZHU Zhizhuo,LI Long,ZHANG Peng,et al.Influence of Vegetation Pattern on Microtopography and Erosion Under Hydraulic Erosion in Feldspathic Sandstone Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):10.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.040]
[7]马郡粒,杨振奇,郭建英,等.砒砂岩区坡面产流产沙对土地利用方式的响应[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(01):136.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.021]
Ma Junli,Yang Zhenqi,Guo Jianying,et al.Response of Slope Runoff and Sediment Yield to Land Use in the Pisha Sandstone Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(05):136.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.021]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-07-08 修回日期:2022-11-01
资助项目:国家重点研发计划项目课题(2022YFF1300805); 国家自然科学基金项目(U2243210,41807070)
第一作者:杜睿哲(1996—),男,内蒙古乌兰察布人,硕士研究生,主要从事生态水文与土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:duruizhe0808@163.com
通信作者:付金霞(1978—),女,甘肃靖远人,副教授,博士,主要从事气候变化、土地利用覆被变化与土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:fujinxia405@nwsuaf.edu.cn