GAO Wei,HUANG Maogen,HUANG Yongrong,et al.Dynamic Characteristics of Litterfall and Carbon and Nitrogen Return in Three Forest Types in Subtropical China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(04):146-153.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.029.]
亚热带3种森林凋落物量及碳氮归还动态变化
- Title:
- Dynamic Characteristics of Litterfall and Carbon and Nitrogen Return in Three Forest Types in Subtropical China
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)04-0146-08
- Keywords:
- subtropical China; forest types; litterfall; nutrient return
- 分类号:
- S718.5
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探明亚热带不同森林类型的碳汇功能,为森林经营和针叶林改造中的树种选择提供指导。[方法]基于月动态监测,研究了罗卜岩自然保护区亚热带常绿阔叶林(米槠林)、常绿-落叶阔叶混交林(闽桦-闽楠林)和针叶林(马尾松林)3种森林类型的凋落物产量及碳氮归还动态变化。[结果](1)3种林分中马尾松林的年总凋落量最高〔9 815 kg/(hm2·a)〕,其次为闽桦-闽楠林〔9 207 kg/(hm2·a)〕,米槠林最低〔8 083 kg/(hm2·a)〕,叶是闽桦-闽楠林和马尾松林凋落物的主要组分,而米槠林凋落物以碎屑等其他组分为主; 3种森林的总凋落量、叶、花果和其他组分凋落量月动态均呈双峰型曲线,峰值分别出现在11—12月和次年的4—5月。(2)3种林分总凋落物碳归还量为马尾松林〔4 970 kg/(hm2·a)〕>闽桦-闽楠林〔4 458 kg/(hm2·a)〕>米槠林〔3 804 kg/(hm2·a)〕,总凋落物氮归还量为闽桦-闽楠林〔160 kg/(hm2·a)〕>马尾松林〔128 kg/(hm2·a)〕>米槠林〔113 kg/(hm2·a)〕,3种林分凋落物碳氮归还的月变化与其总凋落物量的月变化一致。(3)3种林分的凋落物质量差异显著,其中马尾松林的总凋落物碳氮比最高,闽桦-闽楠林最低; 闽桦凋落物的木质素浓度最高,米槠最低; 闽楠和马尾松凋落物的木质素/纤维素值最高,米槠最低。[结论]闽桦-闽楠林具有更高的年凋落物量和较快的潜在分解速率,可以更持续快速地为林地补充养分。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The aim of this study is to explore the carbon sink function of different forest types in subtropical China and better guide significance in tree species selection for forest management and coniferous forest transformation. [Methods] Based on monthly dynamic observation, the dynamic changes of litterfall and carbon(C)and nitrogen(N)return in three forest types including evergreen broad-leaved forest(the Castanopsis carlesii forest), evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved mixed forest(the Betula fujianensis and Phoebe bournei mixed forest)and coniferous forest(the Pinus massoniana forest)in Luoboyan Nature Reserve were studied from September 2018 to August 2019. [Results](1)The annual litterfall was highest in Pinus massoniana forest 〔9 815 kg/(hm2·a)〕, followed by Betula fujianensis and Phoebe bournei mixed forest 〔9 207 kg/(hm2·a)〕, and lowest in Castanopsis carlesii forest 〔8 083 kg/(hm2·a)〕. In terms of litter composition, the leaflitter of Betula fujianensis and Phoebe bournei mixed forest and Pinus massoniana forest was relatively high, while other components such as debris in Castanopsis carlesii forest accounted for the highest, followed by leaflitter. The monthly dynamics of total litterfall, leaf litter, flower, fruit and other components of three forests all showed double peak curve, and the peak appeared from November to December and from April to May in the next year, respectively.(2)The range of litter C return was Pinus massoniana forest 〔4 970 kg/(hm2·a)〕>Betula fujianensis and Phoebe bournei mixed forest 〔4 458 kg/(hm2·a)〕>Castanopsis carlesii forest 〔3 804 kg/(hm2·a)〕, and the range of litter N return was Betula fujianensis and Phoebe bournei mixed forest 〔160 kg/(hm2·a)〕>Pinus massoniana forest 〔128 kg/(hm2·a)〕>Castanopsis carlesii forest 〔113 kg/(hm2·a)〕. The dynamic characteristics of litter C and N return of the three forests was consistent with that of total litterfall.(3)Significant differences were observed in litter quality among three forests, and the litter C:N ratio was highest in Pinus massoniana forest, and lowest in Betula fujianensis and Phoebe bournei mixed forest, the litter lignin concentration was highest in Betula fujianensis, and the litter lignin: cellulose value was highest in Phoebe bournei and Pinus massoniana, and lowest in Castanopsis carlesii. [Conclusion] The Betula fujianensis and Phoebe bournei mixed forest has higher annual litterfall and faster potential decomposition rate, which can supplement nutrients more continuously and quickly.
参考文献/References:
[1] 张远东,刘彦春,顾峰雪,等.川西亚高山5种主要森林类型凋落物组成及动态[J].生态学报,2019,39(2):502-508.
[2] 林文泉,高伟,叶功富,等.南亚热带海岸沙地不同林分凋落物量及养分归还[J].森林与环境学报,2019,39(3):225-231.
[3] Yang W Q, Wang K Y, Kellomaeki S, et al. Litter dynamics of three subalpine forests in western Sichuan[J]. Pedosphere, 2005,15(5):653-659.
[4] Lin H, Hong T, Wu C Z, et al. Monthly variation in litterfall and the amount of nutrients in an Aleurites montana plantation[J]. Forest Ecosystems, 2012,14(1):30-35.
[5] Zhou L L, Shalom A D D, Wu P F, et al. Litterfall production and nutrient return in different-aged Chinese fir(Cunninghamia lanceolata)plantations in South China[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2015,26(1):79-89.
[6] Malhi Y, Doughty C, Galbraith D. The allocation of ecosystem net primary productivity in tropical forests[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 2011,366(1582):3225-3245.
[7] Chapin F S, Matson P A, Mooney H A. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2011.
[8] Costa A N, Bartimachi A, Vasconcelos H L, et al. Annual litter production in a Brazilian Cerrado woodland savanna[J]. Southern Forests: A Journal of Forest Science, 2020,82(1):65-69.
[9] 施昀希,黎建强,陈奇伯,等.滇中高原5种森林类型凋落物及营养元素储量研究[J].生态环境学报,2018,27(4):617-624.
[10] Vogt K A, Grier C C, Vogt D J. Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above-and belowground detritus of world forests[J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 1986,15:303-377.
[11] Vernon M, Box E O, Richard T. World patterns and amounts of terrestrial plant litter production[J]. Bioscience, 1982,32(2):125-128.
[12] Matthews E. Global litter production, pools, and turnover times: Estimates from measurement data and regression models[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1997,102:18771-18800.
[13] Lonsdale W M. Predicting the amount of litterfall in forests of the world[J]. Annals of Botany, 1988,61(3):319-324.
[14] Haase R. Litterfall and nutrient return in seasonally flooded and non-flooded forest of the Pantanal, Mato Grosso, Brazil[J]. Forest Ecology & Management,1999,117(1/3):129-147.
[15] 付淑月,王天秀,张清月,等.刺槐林凋落物输入量变化对土壤有机碳的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2021,49(6):18-26.
[16] 段斐,方江平,周晨霓.西藏原始暗针叶林凋落物有机碳释放特征与土壤有机碳库关系研究[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):349-355.
[17] Facelli J M, Pickett S T A. Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure[J]. Botanical Review, 1991,57:1-32.
[18] Guo L B, Sims R E H. Litter production and nutrient return in New Zealand eucalypt short-rotation forests: implications for land management[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 1999,73(1):93-100.
[19] 费世民.火炬松人工林养分体内转移与内循环研究[J].林业科学,2001,37(3):14-19.
[20] 刘蕾,申国珍,陈芳清,等.神农架海拔梯度上4种典型森林凋落物现存量及其养分循环动态[J].生态学报,2012,32(7):2142-2149.
[21] 春敏莉,谢宗强,赵常明,等.神农架巴山冷杉天然林凋落量及养分特征[J].植物生态学报,2009,33(3):492-498.
[22] Elias M. Biological decomposition of some types of litter from north American forests[J]. Ecology, 1930,11(1):72-101.
[23] Fogel R, Cromack K. Effect of habitat and substrate quality on Douglas-fir litter decomposition in western Oregon[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany, 1977,55:1632-1640.
[24] Vitousek P M, Turner D R, Parton W J, et al. Litter decomposition on the Mauna Loa environmental matrix, Hawai'i: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Models[J]. Ecology, 1994,75(2):418-429.
[25] Yue K, Peng C H, Yang W Q, et al. Study type and plant litter identity modulating the response of litter decomposition to warming, elevated CO2, and elevated O3: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2015,120:441-451.
[26] 高伟,黄雍容,林建丽,等.濒危树种闽桦天然林优势种群种间相关性[J].林业科学,2021,57(10):1-14.
[27] 高伟,黄石德,林建丽,等.亚热带3种森林类型的群落特征与物种多样性的耦合关系[J].热带作物学报,2021,42(6):1756-1763.
[28] 黄茂根.中亚热带3种森林类型凋落物现存量及碳氮储量[J].福建林业,2018(5):37-40.
[29] 曾昭霞,刘孝利,宋希娟,等.桂西北喀斯特区原生林与次生林凋落物储量及其降解[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(2):201-207.
[30] 卢晓强,杨万霞,丁访军,等.茂兰喀斯特地区原始林凋落物量动态与养分归还[J].生态与农村环境学报,2014,30(5):614-619.
[31] 魏翠翠,刘小飞,林成芳,等.凋落物输入改变对亚热带两种米槠次生林土壤酶活性的影响[J].植物生态学报,2018,42(6):692-702.
[32] 吴君君,杨智杰,翁发进,等.米槠天然林和人工林土壤呼吸的比较研究[J].环境科学,2014,35(6):2426-2432.
[33] 林德喜,樊后保.马尾松林下补植阔叶树后森林凋落物量、养分含量及周转时间的变化[J].林业科学,2005,41(6):7-15.
[34] Gtustafson F G. Decomposition of the leaves of some forest trees under field conditions[J]. Plant Physiology, 1943,18:704-707.
[35] Taylor B R, Parkinson D, Parsons W F J. Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates: A microcosm test[J]. Ecology, 1989,70:97-104.
[36] 张晓曦,刘慧,王博雅,等.云杉与阔叶树种新鲜凋落叶混合分解特征[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(2):235-244.
相似文献/References:
[1]张欣影,宁秋蕊,李守中,等.亚热带红壤侵蚀区马尾松针叶生态化学计量特征[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):156.
ZHANG Xinying,NING Qiurui,LI Shouzhong,et al.Stoichiometric Characteristics of Pinus massoniana Plantation in the Subtropical Red Soil Erosion Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):156.
[2]尹世燕,毛方杰,周国模,等.中国亚热带干旱多尺度时空格局及演变趋势[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(06):242.
YIN Shiyan,MAO Fangjie,ZHOU Guomo,et al.Multi-scalar Spatiotemporal Pattern and Evolution Trend of Drought in Subtropical China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):242.
[3]王 平,丁智强,李璐杉,等.滇中主要森林类型土壤团聚体稳定性及其变化机制[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(05):232.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.007]
Wang Ping,Ding Zhiqiang,Li Lushan,et al.Stability and Mechanisms of Soil Aggregates in Major Forest Types in Central Yunnan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):232.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.007]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-06-14 修回日期:2022-07-05
资助项目:福建省林业科学研究项目(2023FKJ031); 福建省南平市自然科学基金(N2021J014); 福建林业职业技术学院科研创新团队研究项目(2021LK01); 福建林业职业技术学院博士科研启动基金
第一作者:高伟(1985—),男,山东青岛人,博士,高级工程师,主要从事森林生态系统碳氮循环研究。E-mail:gao01271@163.com
通信作者:黄石德(1982—),男,福建仙游人,博士,高级工程师,主要从事森林生态系统碳氮循环研究。E-mail:hsd9876@126.com