SU Mengbai,WANG Keqin,SONG Yali,et al.Reduction Effect of Returning Farmland to Forest on the Losses of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on the Slope of the Jianshan River in Central Yunnan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):154-162.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.026]
退耕还林措施对滇中尖山河坡地氮磷流失的削减效应
- Title:
- Reduction Effect of Returning Farmland to Forest on the Losses of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on the Slope of the Jianshan River in Central Yunnan
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)03-0154-09
- Keywords:
- nitrogen and phosphorus reduction; conversion of cropland to forestland; Jianshan River watershed
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探究滇中尖山河流域退耕还林措施下不同地类侵蚀性降雨、氮磷流失浓度、流失量的动态变化特征,对评价退耕还林生态工程对流域水体保护和面源污染的削减效应具有重要的指导意义。[方法]选择抚仙湖湖区典型流域尖山河小流域为研究区,以流域内退耕还林/坡耕地、人工林、灌木林和次生林为研究对象,对流域不同土地利用类型径流小区进行连续三年(2017—2019年)雨季(5—10月)定量监测。[结果]退耕还林后年侵蚀性降水量和年径流量分别降低37.16%和42.75%,产流量降低95.88%和94.29%。各态氮磷输出浓度分别削减:总氮34.32%、硝态氮32%、铵态氮61%、总磷73.4%和磷酸盐70.4%; 各态氮磷输出量分别减少了总氮70.40 mg/m2,硝态氮41.24 mg/m2,铵态氮20.56 mg/m2,总磷162.16 mg/m2和磷酸盐107.38 mg/m2,削减率分别为:79.29%,80.48%,88.20%,95.66%和97.06%。未退耕还林前坡耕地总氮、硝态氮、铵态氮、总磷和磷酸盐年均输出浓度分别为其他地类的156.80%,149.57%,173.15%,157.42%和153.82%,退耕还林后分别降至139.00%,117.66%,108.08%,123.18%和92.29%,虽仍高于流域其他地类,但削减和控制效应已逐年增加。[结论]在滇中尖山河流域进行退耕还林植被恢复,有效改善了流域面源污染和水土流失现状,为临湖流域水环境治理提供了科学依据和数据支持。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]It is of great guiding significance for evaluating the reduction effect of the ecological project of returning farmland to forests on the protection of water environment and non-point source pollution in the river watershed to explore the dynamic change characteristics of erosive rainfall, nitrogen and phosphorus loss concentrations and loss amounts of different land types under the measures of returning farmland to forests in the Jianshan River watershed of central Yunnan Province. [Methods] Jianshan River watershed, a typical watershed in Fuxian Lake area, was selected as the study area. The main research objects were returning farmland to forest/sloping farmland, artificial forest, shrub forest and secondary forest in the watershed. Through quantitative monitoring in the different land use type runoff area in rainy season(May—October)for three consecutive years(2017—2019), the concentration, amount and dynamic characteristics of erosive rainfall, nitrogen and phosphorus losses were studied. [Results]The annual erosive precipitation and annual runoff after returning farmland to forests decreased by 37.16% and 42.75%, respectively. Runoff decreased by 95.88% and 94.29%, respectively. The export concentrations of of total nitrogen, nitrate, ammonium nitrogen, total phosphorus, and phosphate reduced by 34.32%, 32%, 61%, 73.4% and 70.4%, respectively. The non-point source pollutantoutputs of for TN, NO-3-N, NH+4-N, TP and PO3-4-P decreased 70.40 mg/m2, 41.24 mg/m2, 20.56 mg/m2, 162.16 mg/m2,and 107.38 mg/m2, respectively. The reduction rates were 79.29%, 80.48%, 88.20%, 95.66% and 97.06%, respectively. The output concentrations of TN, NO-3-N, NH+4-N, TP and PO3-4-P of slope farmland before conversion were 156.80%, 149.57%, 173.15%, 157.42% and 153.82% of those of other land use types, respectively. After two years, they were 139.00%, 117.66%, 108.08%, 123.18% and 92.29% respectively, which were still higher than those of other land use types in the watershed, but the reduction and control effects on nitrogen and phosphorus had increased year by year. [Conclusion] The restoration of farmland to forests in the Jianshan River watershed has effectively improved the status of non-point source pollution and soil erosion in the watershed, and provided scientific basis and data support for the governance of the water environment in the lakeside watershed.
参考文献/References:
[1] Srinivas R, Singh A P, Dhadse K, et al. An evidence based integrated watershed modelling system to assess the impact of non-point source pollution in the riverine ecosystem[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,246:118963.
[2] 杨桂山,马荣华,张路,等.中国湖泊现状及面临的重大问题与保护策略[J].湖泊科学,2010,22(6):799-810.
[3] Seeger M, Errea M P, Beguera S, et al. Catchment soil moisture and rainfall characteristics as determinant factors for discharge/suspended sediment hysteretic loops in a small headwater catchment in the Spanish Pyrenees[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2004,288(3/4):299-311.
[4] 张灿强,张彪,李文华,等.森林生态系统对非点源污染的控制机理与效果及其影响因素[J].资源科学,2011,33(2):236-241.
[5] 任智慧,赵春发,王青青,等.复杂流域氮磷污染物输出特征及模拟:以南京市云台山河流域为例[J].农业环境科学学报,2021,40(1):174-184.
[6] Dong G, Gu J, Lv X, et al. Evaluate the effect of the grain for green project on vegetation variation in Xiliugou basin[C]//Iop Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science. Iop Publishing, 2021,668(1):012036.
[7] Wu L, Liu X, Ma X. Prediction of land-use change and its driving forces in an ecological restoration watershed of the Loess hilly region[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018,77(6):238-243.
[8] 王彦东.南水北调中线水源地农业面源污染特征及农户环境行为研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2019.
[9] 张淼淼,肖武,徐建飞,等.巢湖流域土地整治与面源污染时空过程及关系[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(1):360-367.
[10] 胡彦婷,张富,赵传燕,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地面源污染物负荷变化研究[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2018,53(3):28-36.
[11] 吴东,黄志霖,肖文发,等.三峡库区小流域土地利用结构变化及其氮素输出控制效应:以兰陵溪小流域为例[J].环境科学,2016,037(8):2940-2946.
[12] Hughes A O, Quinn J M. Before and after integrated catchment management in a headwater catchment:changes in water quality[J]. Environmental Management, 2014,54(6):1288-1305.
[13] 包鑫,江燕.半干旱半湿润地区流域非点源污染负荷模型研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(2):328-338.
[14] 刘祖英,王兵,赵雨森,等.长江中上游地区退耕还林成效监测与评价[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(8):2463-2469.
[15] Mamun Abdullah A L, Shams S, Nuruzzaman M. Review on uncertainty of the first-flush phenomenon in diffuse pollution control[J]. Applied Water Science, 2020,10(1):1-10.
[16] 王珠娜,王晓光,史玉虎,等.三峡库区秭归县退耕还林工程水土保持效益研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(1):68-72.
[17] 欧阳帅,项文化,陈亮,等.南方山地丘陵区森林植被恢复对水土流失调控机制[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):1-9.
[18] 刘政,叶晶萍,欧阳磊,等.彭冲涧小流域植被恢复的水文效应及其对年降水量响应的临界值[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(11):3705-3711.
[19] 王玲莉,张富,胡彦婷,等.侵蚀性降雨分类及植被类型对产流产沙的影响[J].人民黄河,2021,43(10):109-113.
[20] 李鹏,李占斌,郑良勇.植被恢复演替初期对模拟降雨产流特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(1):54-57,62.
[21] 刘辉,胡梦甜,韩永伟,等.8种面源污染防治种植模式对土壤温度、湿度和氮磷流失风险的影响[J].环境生态学,2019,1(8):28-34.
[22] 苏孟白,王克勤,宋娅丽,等.滇中尖山河流域不同土地利用类型产流及氮磷流失特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):24-31.
[23] 吴东,黄志霖,肖文发,等.三峡库区典型退耕还林模式土壤养分流失控制[J].环境科学,2015,36(10):3825-3831.
[24] 王全九,赵光旭,刘艳丽,等.植被类型对黄土坡地产流产沙及氮磷流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(14):195-201.
[25] 陈强,常恩福,毕波,等.滇东南岩溶地区3种退耕还林模式的水土保持效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(5):1-4.
[26] 张耀艺,倪祥银,杨静,等.中亚热带同质园不同树种氮磷重吸收及化学计量特征[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(4):1154-1162.
[27] Muratore C, Espen L, Prinsi B. Nitrogen uptake in plants:the plasma membrane root transport systems from a physiological and proteomic perspective[J]. Plants, 2021,10(4):681-684.
[28] 邓文鑫.合肥常见针叶树种养分利用效率及氮磷化学计量的研究[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2009.
[29] 陈婵,张仕吉,李雷达,等.中亚热带植被恢复阶段植物叶片、凋落物、土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2019,43(8):658-671.
[30] Postigo C, Ginebreda A, Barbieri M V, et al. Investigative monitoring of pesticide and nitrogen pollution sources in a complex multi-stressed catchment:the Lower Llobregat River basin case study(Barcelona, Spain)[J]. Science of the Total Encironment, 2021,755(1):142377-142387.
[31] 冯天骄.黄土丘陵区整地与植被恢复耦合作用的生态水文效应[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2018.
相似文献/References:
[1]贾云飞,李云飞,范天程,等.基于长时间序列NDVI的黄土高原延河流域及其沟壑区植被覆盖变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(04):240.
JIA Yunfei,LI Yunfei,FAN Tiancheng,et al.Analysis of Vegetation Cover Change in Yanhe Basin and Its Gully Area on the Chinese Loess Plateau Based on Long Time Series NDVI[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):240.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-03-21 修回日期:2022-04-17
资助项目:云南省科技计划项目(202203AC100001-03); 云南省科技计划重点研发项目(2018BB018); 云南省大学生创新创业训练计划项目(202010677047); 云南省水土保持监测站网玉溪尖山河小流域水土保持监测站点
第一作者:苏孟白(1998—),男,云南禄丰人,硕士研究生,主要从事生态恢复研究。E-mail:sumengbai980728@163.com
通信作者:宋娅丽(1985—),女,山西长治人,博士,副教授,主要从事生态系统功能研究。E-mail:songyali19851205@sina.com