OUYang Tiantian,DUAN Xu,ZHAO Yangyi,et al.Characteristics of Soil Aggregates in the Preferential Flow Area and Matrix Flow Area of Typical Forest-Grassland in Yuanjiang Dry-Hot Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):146-153.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.014]
元江干热河谷典型林草地优先流区和基质流区土壤团聚体特征
- Title:
- Characteristics of Soil Aggregates in the Preferential Flow Area and Matrix Flow Area of Typical Forest-Grassland in Yuanjiang Dry-Hot Valley
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)03-0146-08
- 分类号:
- S152.7
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]明晰干热河谷区土壤优先流对红壤团聚体特征及其稳定性的影响,为该区植被恢复和水土流失防治提供理论依据。[方法]以元江干热河谷典型地段龙潭箐流域内的银合欢林地、扭黄茅荒草地为研究对象,基于染色示踪试验区分样地土壤优先流区和基质流区,利用干湿筛法结合分形理论分析两区内0—50 cm土层团聚体特征差异,并借助通径分析法表征各土壤理化因子对团聚体稳定性的影响。[结果]干湿筛后R0.25团聚体含量从大到小顺序为林地优先流区>林地基质流区>荒草地优先流区>荒草地基质流区,平均重量直径(MWD)和几何平均直径(GMD)与R0.25排序相同且呈现出随土层深度增加而减小的趋势,分形维数(D)与团聚体破坏率(PAD)则为相反规律并随土层加深D和PAD的值逐渐增大。对两区土壤团聚体稳定性影响较大的理化因子是土壤容重和黏粒含量,其决策系数分别为0.474和-0.644。[结论]荒草地土壤团聚体破坏率更高,土壤优先流区团聚体稳定性优于基质流区; 土壤团聚体稳定性主要受黏粒含量、容重、有机质等因子影响。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]The influence of soil priority flow on the characteristics and stability of red soil aggregates in the dry and hot valley area was clarified to provide a theoretical basis for vegetation restoration and soil erosion prevention and control in this area. [Methods] Based on the dyeing tracing experiment, the soil preferential flow area and the matrix flow area were distinguished, and the characteristics of the aggregates of 0—50 cm soil layer in the two areas were analyzed by dry and wet sieving method combined with fractal theory, and the effects of the physical and chemical factors of each soil on the stability of the aggregates were characterized by the path analysis method. [Results] After dry and wet sieves, the R0.25 aggregate contents decreased in the order: woodland priority flow area>woodland matrix flow area>barren grassland priority flow area>barren grassland matrix flow area, the change trends of average weight diameter(MWD)and geometric mean diameter(GMD)were the same as those of R0.25, and showed a decreasing tendency with the increase of soil depth, and the fractal dimension(D)and the agglomeration failure rate(PAD)were the opposite patterns and gradually increased with the depth of the soil layer. The physicochemical factors impacting the stability of soil aggregates in the two regions were soil bulk density and clay content, and their decision coefficients were 0.474 and-0.644, respectively. [Conclusion] The soil aggregate failure rate is higher in barren grassland, and the stability of the aggregate in the soil priority flow area is better than that in the matrix flow area. The stability of soil aggregates is mainly affected by factors such as clay content, bulk density, and organic matter.
参考文献/References:
[1] Ran H, Deng Q, Zhang B, et al. Morphology and influencing factors of rills in the steep slope in Yuanmou Dry-Hot Valley(SW China)[J]. Catena, 2018,165:54-62.
[2] 范建容,杨超,包维楷,等.西南地区干旱河谷分布范围及分区统计分析[J].山地学报,2020,38(2):303-313.
[3] Dong Y, Xiong D, Li J, et al. The distribution of and factors influencing the vegetation in a gully in the Dry-hot Valley of southwest China[J]. Catena, 2014,116:60-67.
[4] Yan J, Chen X, Cheng F, et al. Effect of soil fracture priority flow on soil ammonium nitrogen transfer and soil structure in mining area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018,34(2):120-126.
[5] Jarvis N J. A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores:principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2010,58(3):523-546.
[6] 张中彬,彭新华.土壤裂隙及其优先流研究进展[J].土壤学报,2015,52(3):477-488.
[7] Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, et al. A history of research on the link between(micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2004,79(1):7-31.
[8] Grant K N, Macrae M L, Ali G A. Differences in preferential flow with antecedent moisture conditions and soil texture:Implications for subsurface P transport[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2019,33(15):2068-2079.
[9] Zhang Q, Shao M, Jia X, et al. Understory vegetation and drought effects on soil aggregate stability and aggregate-associated carbon on the Loess Plateau in China[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2018,82(1):106-114.
[10] Spaccini R, Piccolo A. Effects of field managements for soil organic matter stabilization on water-stable aggregate distribution and aggregate stability in three agricultural soils[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2013,129:45-51.
[11] Nath A J, Rattan L A L. Effects of tillage practices and land use management on soil aggregates and soil organic carbon in the north Appalachian region, USA[J]. Pedosphere, 2017,27(1):172-176.
[12] 苟天雄,刘韩,帅伟,等.川西高寒山地不同海拔高度土壤团聚体特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,138(1):53-59.
[13] 姜敏,刘毅,刘闯,等.丹江口库区不同土地利用方式土壤团聚体稳定性及分形特征[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):265-270.
[14] Kalhoro S, Xu X, Chen W, et al. Effects of different land-use systems on soil aggregates:A case study of the Loess Plateau(Northern China)[J]. Sustainability, 2017,9(8):1-16.
[15] 王冰,张鹏杰,张秋良.寒温带兴安落叶松林土壤团聚体特征及其影响因素研究[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(1):44-52.
[16] 王赵男,辛颖,赵雨森.黑龙江省水源地优先流区与基质流区土壤特性分析[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):49-54.
[17] 武亚楠,张英虎,张振明,等.黄河三角洲湿地植物根区优先流区和基质流区土壤特性分布差异[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2021,57(1):69-75.
[18] 万艳萍,赵洋毅,段旭,等.干湿交替对干旱河谷区土壤优先流形成特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(7):2397-2406.
[19] 陈婷婷,段旭,赵洋毅,等.红河干旱河谷区典型地类植物根系特征对土壤大孔隙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,143(6):113-121.
[20] Bundt M, Jaggi M, Blaser P, et al. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics in preferential flow paths and matrix of a forest soil[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2001,65(5):1529-1538.
[21] 聂立水,王登之.土壤分析[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2019.
[22] 李娟,韩霁昌,陈超,等.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区土地利用方式对土壤团聚体特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):251-256,262.
[23] 杨培岭,罗远培.用粒径的重量分布表征的土壤分形特征[J].科学通报,1993,38(20):1896-1899.
[24] 胡磊,佘东立,杨震.晋西北黄土丘陵区小流域土壤团聚体稳定性及其分异特征[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(1):72-77.
[25] 林立文,邓羽松,王金悦,等.南亚热带人工林种植对赤红壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(11):53-62.
[26] 唐贤,黄伟濠,卢瑛,等.广东省赤红壤区土壤团聚体有机碳和铁氧化物特征及稳定性[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(2):200-209.
[27] 杜晓晴,牛健植,侯琨,等.华北土石山区优先流区与基质流区土壤特性分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(3):51-57.
[28] 孙龙,张洪江,程金花,等.重庆江津区柑橘地土壤大孔隙特征[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):194-198.
[29] Hong Y, Zhao D, Zhang F, et al. Soil water-stable aggregates and microbial community under long-term tillage in black soil of Northern China[J]. Ecotoxicology, 2021,30(8):1754-1768.
[30] 赵明松,张甘霖,王德彩,等.徐淮黄泛平原土壤有机质空间变异特征及主控因素分析[J].土壤学报,2013,50(1):1-11.
相似文献/References:
[1]方海东,纪中华,杨艳鲜,等.金沙江干热河谷新银合欢人工林物种多样性研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(01):135.
FANG Hai-dong,JI Zhong-hua,YANG Yan-xian,et al.The Study on Species Diversity of Leucaena leucocephala Plantation in Jinsha River Hot and Dry Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(03):135.
[2]王建英,王克勤.元谋干热河谷植被恢复中水平阶整地对土壤蒸发的影响[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(02):10.
WANG Jian-ying,WNAG Ke-qin.Effects of Level-terrace Site Preparation on Soil Evaporation in Recovering in Yuanmou Dry-hot River Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(03):10.
[3]王勇,李鹏,穆军,等.金沙江干热河谷水电站库区消落带生态修复对策研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(05):141.
WANG Yong,LI Peng,MU Jun,et al.Ecological Restoration in Level-fluctuating Zone Countermeasures of Dry-hot Valleys Reservoirs in the Jinsha River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):141.
[4]薛沛沛,王克勤,耿养会,等.金沙江干热河谷不同土壤水分对台湾青枣生理生态特性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(05):186.
XUE Pei-pei,WANG Ke-qin,GENG Yang-hui,et al.Effects of Different Soil Moistures on Ecological Physiology Characteristic of Zizyphus mauritiana Lam. in Dry-hot River Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):186.
[5]张明忠,朱红业,沙毓沧,等.金沙江干热河谷草被凋落物的分解率与持水性能[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(02):156.
ZHANG Ming-zhong,ZHU Hong-ye,SHA Yu-cang,et al.Grass Litter Decomposition Rate and Water-Holding Capacity in Dry-hot Valley of Jinshajiang River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):156.
[6]龙会英,金杰,张德,等.豆科牧草和灌木在元谋干热河谷小流域综合治理的应用研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(02):254.
LONG Hui-ying,JIN Jie,ZHANG De,et al.The Application Research of Leguminous Forage and Shrub Used in the Comprehensive Control of Small Watershed in the Arid-hot Valleys of Yuanmou, Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):254.
[7]龙会英,郑益兴,张燕平,等.元谋干热河谷辣木人工林地灌水后不同覆盖措施对土壤水分及辣木物候的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(01):232.
LONG Hui-ying,ZHENG Yi-xing,ZHANG Yan-ping,et al.Effect of Different Cover after Irrigation on Soil Moisture and Growth Period of Moringa Oleifera Lam in the Dry-hot Valley of Yunmou, Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):232.
[8]龙会英,沙毓沧,朱红业,等.元谋干热区种植豆科牧草和灌木生态效应[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):250.
LONG Hui-ying,SHA Yu-cang,ZHU Hong-ye,et al.Effects of Leguminous Grazing and Shrub on Ecological Restoration in Yuanmou Arid-hot Valleys[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):250.
[9]陈奇伯,王克勤,刘芝芹,等.金沙江干热河谷封禁管护坡面的产流产沙特征[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):217.
CHEN Qi-bo,WANG Ke-qin,LIU Zhi-qin,et al.Characteristic of Runoff and Sediment Production on Slope Land of Enclosure for Recovering Vegetation in Dry-hot Valley of Jinsha River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(03):217.
[10]张明忠,何光熊,方海东,等.元谋干热河谷优势乡土草群落水土保持效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):101.
ZHANG Mingzhong,HE Guangxiong,FANG Haidong,et al.Effects of Dominant Native Grasses Constructed Communities on Soil and Water Conservation in Dry-Hot Valley of Yuanmou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):101.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-03-22 修回日期:2022-04-18
资助项目:国家自然科学基金项目(42067005); 云南省基础研究计划面上项目(202001AT070136); 云南省万人计划青年拔尖人才专项(YNWR-QNBJ-2019-226,YNWR-QNBJ-2019-215); 云南省自然生态监测网络项目(2022-YN-13); 国家林草局林业科技创新平台运行项目“云南玉溪森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站”(2020132078); 云南玉溪森林生态系统国家长期科研基地(2020132550)
第一作者:欧阳田甜(1996—),女,云南昆明人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事森林土壤学研究。E-mail:2294724146@qq.com
通信作者:段旭(1983—),女,山西沁源人,副教授,博士,主要从事森林培育和生态水文研究。E-mail:feixue20012360@163.com