TIAN Pei,WANG Zhe,YU Haijun,et al.Quantitative Evaluation of Spatiotemporal Pattern and Influencing Factors of Soil and Water Loss in Hilly Areas of Northwestern Hubei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):76-85.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.054]
鄂西北山丘区水土流失时空格局及影响因子定量评价
- Title:
- Quantitative Evaluation of Spatiotemporal Pattern and Influencing Factors of Soil and Water Loss in Hilly Areas of Northwestern Hubei Province
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)03-0076-10
- Keywords:
- soil erosion modulus; soil erosion factors; spatiotemporal distribution; runoff plot; RUSLE; Shiyan City
- 分类号:
- S157.2
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]揭示十堰市水土流失时空格局及影响因子,可对该区域水土保持及丹江口水库水质保护工作提供科学依据。[方法]基于2005—2020年十堰市水土流失动态监测数据及监测站点长时序观测数据,探究十堰市水土流失时空变化特征,并借鉴RUSLE模型定量评价其主要影响因子。[结果]十堰市水土流失在2005—2011年处于遏制阶段、2012—2020年处于相对稳定阶段; 2020年十堰市中部地区水土流失呈现面积小、强度高的特点,南部三区呈现面积广、强度低的特点,而北部地区呈现面积广、强度高的特点。对于不同土地利用类型的径流小区,裸地小区平均土壤侵蚀模数最高〔2 320 t/(km2·a)〕,随后依次为耕地、经济林和草地小区; 3个坡度等级(0°～10°,10°～20°,20°～30°)小区平均土壤侵蚀模数分别为〔616.73,1 226.65,2 080.26 t/(km2·a)〕,表明坡度超过10°后水土流失严重加剧; 与天然植被覆盖小区相比,紫穗槐植物篱和土坎梯田小区的水土流失明显减弱,且紫穗槐植物篱的水土保持效果更优; 不同土地利用类型小区的土壤侵蚀模数与坡度、侵蚀性降水量之间均呈显著二元线性或指数函数关系。[结论]十堰市水土流失的重点区域为郧西县和郧阳区,土地利用类型、坡度、植被覆盖类型及侵蚀性降水量均为该区域水土流失的重要影响因子,研究结果可为鄂西北地区水土保持措施优化配置及侵蚀模型构建提供科学依据。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]Disclosesing the spatiotemporal pattern and influencing factors of soil erosion in Shiyan City plays an important guiding role in soil and water conservation and water quality protection of Danjiangkou Reservoir. [Methods] Based on the dynamic monitoring data of soil and water loss and long-term observation data of monitoring stations in Shiyan City from 2005 to 2020, the temporal and spatial variation characteristics of soil and water losses in Shiyan City were explored, and the main influencing factors were quantitatively evaluated by RUSLE model. [Results] Soil and water loss in Shiyan City was in the containment stage from 2005 to 2011 and in the relatively stable stage from 2012 to 2020. In 2020, the soil erosion in the central area of Shiyan City showed the characteristics of small area and high intensity. The three southern areas showed the characteristics of wide area and low intensity, while the northern area showed the characteristics of wide area and high intensity. For runoff plots with different land use types, the average soil erosion modulus of bare land plot was the highest 〔2 320 t/(km2·a)〕, followed by cultivated land, economic forest and grassland plot. The average soil erosion moduli of the three slope grades(0°～10°, 10°～20°, 20°～30°)were 616.73 t/(km2·a), 1 226.65 t/(km2·a ), 2 080.26 t/(km2·a), respectively, indicating that the soil erosion was seriously aggravated after the slope gradient exceeded 10°. Compared with the natural vegetation coverage area, the soil erosion rates of Amorpha fruticosa hedgerow and ridge terrace area were significantly reduced, and the soil and water conservation effect of Amorpha fruticosa hedgerow was better. There was a significant binary linear or exponential function relationship between soil erosion modulus and slope and erosive precipitation in different land use types. [Conclusion] Yunxi County and Yunyang District are the key areas of soil and water losses in Shiyan City. The land use type, slope, vegetation cover type and erosive precipitation are the important influencing factors on soil and water losses in this area. These research results can provide scientific basis for the optimal allocation of soil and water conservation measures and the construction of erosion model in northwest Hubei Province.
参考文献/References:
[1] 刘国华,傅伯杰,陈利顶,等.中国生态退化的主要类型、特征及分布[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):14-20.
[2] 韩旭,田培,黄建武,等.基于2009—2018年径流小区观测数据的武汉市土壤侵蚀因子定量评价[J].生态学报,2021,41(10):3878-3890.
[3] 欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):10-13.
[4] 徐文佳,李天宏,贾振邦,等.十堰市非点源污染状况及其区域分布特征[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2010,46(4):667-673.
[5] 姜娜,邵明安.黄土高原小流域不同坡地利用方式的水土流失特征[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(6):36-41.
[6] Xiong Muqi, Sun Ranhao, Chen Liding. Effects of soil conservation techniques on water erosion control: A global analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,645(15):753-760.
[7] Zhao Jianlin, Yang Zhiqiang, Govers Gerard. Soil and water conservation measures reduce soil and water losses in China but not down to background levels:Evidence from erosion plot data[J]. Geoderma, 2019,337(1):729-741.
[8] Tian Pei, Gong Yuwei, Hao Fanghua, et al. Comparing erosion and rill development processes by simulated upslope inflow in two red soils from subtropical China[J]. Catena, 2022,213:106139.
[9] Tian Pei, Zhu Zhanliang, Yue Qimeng, et al. Soil erosion assessment by RUSLE with improved P factor and its validation: Case study on mountainous and hilly areas of Hubei Province, China[J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2021,9(3):433-444.
[10] Cerdan O, Govers G, Le Bissonnais Y, et al. Rates and spatial variations of soil erosion in Europe:A study based on erosion plot data[J]. Geomorphology, 2010,122(1/2):176-177.
[11] Maetens W, Poesen J, Vanmaercke M. How effective are soil conservation techniques in reducing plot runoff and soil loss in Europe and the Mediterranean?[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2012,115(1/2):21-36.
[12] Egbueri Johnbosco C, Igwe Ogbonnaya, Ifediegwu Stanley I. Erosion risk mapping of Anambra State in southeastern Nigeria: soil loss estimation by RUSLE model and geoinformatics[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,1435-9529,2022,81(3):1-15.
[13] Allois L, John O, Christian O, et al. Soil Loss Assessment Using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation(RUSLE)Model[J]. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2022,2022(4):1-14.
[14] 王海斌.不同水土保持措施下径流小区降雨与产流产沙关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):63-66.
[15] 孙从建,林若静,郑振婧,等.基于水土流失经验模型(RUSLE模型)的黄河中游典型小流域水土流失特征分析[J].西南农业学报,2022,35(1):200-208.
[16] 纪念.十堰市水土保持生态建设刍议[J].亚热带水土保持,2006,18(4):35-36,51.
[17] 吴宜进,奚悦,涂文娜,等.生态敏感区景观安全评价与时空变化研究:以湖北省十堰市为例[J].人民长江,2018,49(23):32-37.
[18] 马方正,于兴修,胡砚霞,等.丹江口市土壤侵蚀敏感性时空变化特征[J].农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(6):999-1009.
[19] 王坎,吴兴华,文威,等.湖北省丹江口库区生态系统格局遥感监测评估[J].环境科学与技术,2020,43(S2):250-254.
[20] 李学敏,文力,刘琛,等.丹江口水库库区及周边地区水土流失空间分布特征及影响因素[J].湖南农业科学,2018(9):54-59.
[21] 李建,尹炜,贾海燕,辛小康,王超.汉江中下游水华防控生态调度研究[J/OL].湖泊科学,2022,34(3):740-751.
[22] 井柳新,马乐宽,续衍雪,等.“十四五”丹江口库区及上游生态环境保护思路研究[J].环境保护,2021,49(14):59-62.
[23] 十堰市水利和湖泊局.十堰市水土保持规划(2018—2030年)[R].十堰市水利和湖泊局.2018.
[24] Suryawanshi Ashwini, Nema Anupam Kumar, Jaiswal Rahul Kumar, et al. Identification of Soil Erosion Prone Areas of Madhya Pradesh using USLE/RUSLE[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2022,58(2):178-191.
[25] Saoud, Mohammed, Meddi, et al. Mapping of Erosion Using USLE, GIS and Remote Sensing in Wadi El Hachem Watershed(Northern Algeria):Case Study[J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2022,50(3):569-581.
[26] Petr Karásek, Michal Pochop, Jana Koneˇ/cná, et al. Comparison of the Methods for LS Factor Calculation when Evaluating the Erosion Risk in a Small Agricultural Area Using the USLE Tool[J]. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 2022,23(1):100-109.
[27] 王秀颖,刘和平,刘宝元.变雨强人工降雨条件下坡长对径流的影响研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(6):1-5.
[28] 刘宝元,张科利,焦菊英.土壤可蚀性及其在侵蚀预报中的应用[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(4):345-350.
[29] 吴发启,林青涛,路陪,等.我国坡地土壤侵蚀影响因子C的研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(6):1-11,159.
[30] 张岩,袁建平,刘宝元.土壤侵蚀预报模型中的植被覆盖与管理因子研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):1033-1036.
[31] 王海,黄跃飞,赵泉,等.2009—2019年湖北省土壤侵蚀时空变化分析[J].中国水土保持,2021(6):43-46.
[32] 芦婕.湖北省2005—2015年水土流失时空变化分析[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2019.
[33] 湖北省水利厅.2020年湖北省水土保持公报[R].武汉:湖北省水利厅,2021.
[34] 中华人民共和国水利部.SL 190-2007,土壤侵蚀分类分级标准.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.
[35] 李险峰,郭昭滨.森林水土保持功能与生态效益评价[J].防护林科技,2018,8(179):62-63.
[36] Sonia Gannouni, Hamdi Kahri, Abir Marzouki, et al. The comparison between the Universal Soil Loss Equation(USLE)and the HEUSCH model for the assessment and mapping of water erosion of the Sidi Saad dam watershed in Tunisia[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2022,15(6):1-17.
[37] M. Koulouri, Chr. Giourga. Land abandonment and slope gradient as key factors of soil erosion in Mediterranean terraced lands[J]. Catena, 2006,69(3):274-281.
[38] 王新才,吴敏.关于加强南水北调中线水源地保护和管理的思考[J].长江科学院院报,2019,36(9):1-5.
[39] 白亮,许全喜,董炳江.丹江口水库蓄水以来汉江中下游河床冲淤变化研究[J].人民长江,2021,52(12):15-20.
[40] 左建,林云发.丹江口水库兴利效益影响因素分析[J].长江科学院院报,2022,39(5):22-27.
[41] 阮舒荷,庄艳华,王立辉,等.汉江中下游流域土壤侵蚀高风险期及优先控制区协同分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(6):1491-1501.
[42] 张玉娇,曾杰,陈万旭,等.基于适应性循环的丹江口库区生态风险评价[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(1):349-360.
相似文献/References:
[1]杨子生,贺一梅.中国西南边疆山区耕地水土流失研究——以云南省为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):1.
YANG Zi-sheng,HE Yi-mei.Soil Erosion of Cultivated Land in Mountainous Areas at China’s Southwest Border—A Case Study in Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):1.
[2]汤崇军,郑海金,谢颂华.不同土壤抗蚀性指标对侵蚀泥沙影响的灰色关联度分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):1.
TANG Chong-jun,ZHENG Hai-jin,XIE Song-hua.Effects of Different Anti-erodibility Parameters on Soil Erosion Based on Grey Correlation Degree Analysis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):1.
[3]顾璟冉,张兴奇,顾礼彬,等.黔西高原侵蚀性降雨特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(02):39.
GU Gingran,ZHANG Xingqi,GU Libin,et al.Characteristics of Erosive Rianfall Events in West Guizhou Plateau Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):39.
[4]杨贤均,邓云叶,段林东.三种不同林分的保护水土功能分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(02):177.
YANG Xianjun,DENG Yunye,DUAN Lindong.Analysis on Soil and Water Protection Functions of Three Types of Stands[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):177.
[5]高儒学,高华端,宋江平,等.坡长对贵州喀斯特区黄壤坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(02):53.
GAO Ruxue,GAO Huaduan,SONG Jiangping,et al.Influence of Slope Length on Soil Erosion in Yellow Sloping Farmland of Karst[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(03):53.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-05-19 修回日期:2022-06-23
资助项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41907061); 湖北省自然科学基金面上项目(2021CFB550); 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室资助项目(A314021402-2005)
第一作者:田培(1988—),男,湖北大悟人,博士,副教授,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持、水文水资源研究。E-mail:tianpei@ccnu.edu.cn
通信作者:喻海军(1988—), 男,湖北大悟人,博士,高级工程师,主要从事防洪减灾研究。E-mail:leivi@gmx.com