CHEN Xiangbiao,DING Wenrong.Spatial-temporal Evolution and Trade-off Synergy Relationships of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of Shilin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):285-293.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.043]
石林喀斯特岩溶区生态系统服务时空演变及权衡协同关系
- Title:
- Spatial-temporal Evolution and Trade-off Synergy Relationships of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of Shilin
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)02-0285-09
- Keywords:
- ecosystem services; temporal and spatial evolution; trade-off and synergy; spatial autocorrelation; Shilin karst areas
- 分类号:
- X171
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 喀斯特岩溶区是地球上最脆弱的自然生态系统之一,探明生态系统服务时空变化及权衡与协同关系,对区域生态治理决策和增进民生福祉具有重要意义。基于当量因子法、相关系数及空间自相关等方法,定量分析了2000—2020年石林生态系统服务的时空演变及权衡与协同关系。结果表明:(1)石林生态系统服务价值由2000年的20.47亿元持续增长至2020年的21.82亿元,增幅为6.60%,生态系统服务空间分布格局较为稳定,高等级区主要分布在水域地区以及植被覆盖较高的丘陵山区,低等级区集中分布在建设用地相对集中和岩溶石漠化严重的区域;(2)各土地利用类型生态系统服务价值敏感性指数均小于1,表明石林生态系统服务价值对修订后的生态服务价值系数缺乏弹性,研究结果可信;(3)研究期内,协同关系是石林生态系统服务的主导关系,协同率为68.60%,权衡关系主要存在于食物生产、维持养分循环与其他子系统关系中,权衡率达29.75%;(4)数量上,4种生态系统服务类型均存在显著的空间正向自相关,空间上,不同生态系统服务对权衡与协同关系异质性显著。研究结果可为石林优化国土空间格局及生态保护与修复提供参考依据。
- Abstract:
- The karst area is one of the most fragile natural ecosystems on the earth. To clarify the temporal and spatial changes of ecosystem services and the trade-offs synergy is of great significance to the decision-making of ecological governance in this area and the improvement of people's livelihood and well-being. Based on the equivalent factor method, correlation coefficient and spatial autocorrelation, the spatial and temporal evolution of stone forest ecosystem services from 2000 to 2020 and the trade-off synergy relationship were quantitatively analyzed. The results showed that:(1)the value of ecosystem services continued to increase from 2.047 billion in 2000 to 2.182 billion in 2020, with an increase rate of 6.60%; the spatial distribution pattern of ecosystem services was relatively stable; the high-grade areas mainly distributed in water areas and hilly and mountainous areas with high vegetation coverage, and the low-grade areas concentrated in areas with relatively concentrated construction land and serious karst rocky desertification;(2)the ecosystem service value sensitivity index of each land use type was less than 1, indicating that the stone forest ecosystem service value was inelastic to the revised ecological service value coefficient, and the research results were credible;(3)during the study period, the synergy relationship was the dominant relationship between stone forest ecosystem services, with a synergy rate of 68.60%; the trade-off relationship mainly existed in the relationships between food production, maintenance of nutrient circulation and other subsystems, with a trade-off rate of 29.75%;(4)quantitatively, the four types of ecosystem services all had significant spatial positive autocorrelation, and spatially, the trade-offs and synergy between different ecosystem service pairs were significantly heterogeneous. These research results can provide a reference for Shilin to optimize the spatial pattern of the land and provide a reference for ecological protection and restoration.
参考文献/References:
[1] Daily G. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington D C:Island Press, 1997.
[2] Costanza R, D'arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
[3] 傅伯杰,张立伟.土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(4):441-446.
[4] Millennium ecosystem assessment(MA). Ecosystems and human well-being[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2005.
[5] 李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J].地理研究,2013,32(8):1379-1390.
[6] 王鹏涛,张立伟,李英杰,等.汉江上游生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J].地理学报,2017,72(11):2064-2078.
[7] 彭建,胡晓旭,赵明月,等.生态系统服务权衡研究进展:从认知到决策[J].地理学报,2017,72(6):960-973.
[8] 戴尔阜,王晓莉,朱建佳,等.生态系统服务权衡/协同研究进展与趋势展望[J].地球科学进展,2015,30(11):1250-1259.
[9] 戴尔阜,王晓莉,朱建佳,等.生态系统服务权衡:方法、模型与研究框架[J].地理研究,2016,35(6):1005-1016.
[10] 郑德凤,郝帅,吕乐婷,等.三江源国家公园生态系统服务时空变化及权衡—协同关系[J].地理研究,2020,39(1):64-78.
[11] Brinkmann R, Parise M. Karst environments:problems, management, human impacts, and sustainability. An introduction to the special issue[J]. J. Cave Karst Stud., 2012,74(2):135-136.
[12] 宋贤威,高扬,温学发,等.中国喀斯特关键带岩石风化碳汇评估及其生态服务功能[J].地理学报,2016,71(11):1926-1938.
[13] Canedoli C, Ficetola G F, Corengia D, et al. Integrating landscape ecology and the assessment of ecosystem services in the study of karst areas[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2021:1-19.
[14] Goldscheider N, Chen Z, Auler A S, et al. Global distribution of carbonate rocks and karst water resources[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2020,28(5):1661-1677.
[15] 钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):868-879.
[16] 韩会庆,苏志华.喀斯特生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(3):352-358.
[17] 秦瑶,熊康宁,陈起伟,等.喀斯特地区生态系统服务变化及权衡协同关系[J].环境科学与技术,2021,44(9):228-236.
[18] Chen Ran, Wang Shijie, Bai Xiaoyong, et al. Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in southwestern China[J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2020,37(10):669-678.
[19] Wang Xiaofeng, Zhang Xinrong, Feng Xiaoming, et al. Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of China Driven by Grain-for-Green Program[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020,30(1):101-114.
[20] Tian Yichao, Wang Shijie, Bai Xiaoyong, et al. Trade-offs among ecosystem services in a typical Karst watershed, SW China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,566:1297-1308.
[21] 韩会庆,杨建强,陈思盈,等.喀斯特山区淡水生态系统服务权衡—协同关系的粒度效应[J].济南大学学报:自然科学版,2022(1):1-11
[22] 高江波,左丽媛,王欢.喀斯特峰丛洼地生态系统服务空间权衡度及其分异特征[J].生态学报,2019,39(21):7829-7839.
[23] 李玉辉,丁智强,吴晓月.基于Strahler面积—高程分析的云南石林县域喀斯特地貌演化的量化研究[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):973-985.
[24] 丁文荣,李玉辉.岩溶区植被覆盖变化与气候波动的相关性:以云南石林为例[J].水资源与水工程学报,2019,30(5):40-45,51.
[25] 谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1740-1746.
[26] 杨强强,徐光来,李爱娟,等.青弋江流域生态系统服务评估与权衡研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(23):9315-9327.
[27] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[28] 王航,秦奋,朱筠,等.土地利用及景观格局演变对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(4):1286-1296.
[29] 高振斌,王小莉,苏婧,等.基于生态系统服务价值评估的东江流域生态补偿研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(6):563-570.
[30] 邓元杰,侯孟阳,谢怡凡,等.退耕还林还草工程对陕北地区生态系统服务价值时空演变的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(18):6597-6612.
[31] 兰紫橙,贾岚,程煜.闽江流域生态系统服务价值评估及权衡协同关系[J].生态学报,2020,40(12):3909-3920.
[32] 马勇,凌旋,童昀.格网尺度下典型旅游城市生态服务价值估算和时空分异特征:以三亚为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(19):7542-7554.
[33] 李龙,吴大放,王芳,等.中国快速城市化区域生态系统服务价值预测及权衡研究:以佛山市为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(24):9023-9036.
[34] 郭椿阳,高尚,周伯燕,等.基于格网的伏牛山区土地利用变化对生态服务价值影响研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(10):3482-3493.
[35] 李坤,邢小艺,李逸伦,等.石林风景区不同石漠化人工修复方式对木本植物群落组成及种群生态位的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(13):4641-4650.
[36] 贺祥,姚尧.基于生态系统服务供需对喀斯特山区生态风险分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):202-212,220.
[37] 冯兆,彭建,吴健生.基于生态系统服务簇的深圳市生态系统服务时空演变轨迹研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(8):2545-2554.
[38] 韩增林,孟琦琦,闫晓露,等.近30年辽东湾北部区土地利用强度与生态系统服务价值的时空关系[J].生态学报,2020,40(8):2555-2566.
[39] 易武英,张建利,代丽华,等.典型喀斯特峰丛洼地生态系统生态服务功能价值评估:以贵州平塘县为例[J].湖南农业科学,2017(5):56-59.
相似文献/References:
[1]梁春玲,谷胜利.南四湖湿地生态系统能值分析与区域发展[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):185.
LIANG Chun-ling,GU Sheng-li.Analysis on Energy Value of Wetland Ecosystem of Nansi Lake in Shandong Province of China and Regional Development[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):185.
[2]王伟林,黄贤金,钟太洋.区域土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值响应——以南京市为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):212.
WANG Wei-lin,HUANG Xian-jin,ZHONG Tai-yang.Area Land Use Change Responses to the Ecosystem Service Value—A Case Study of Nanjing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):212.
[3]陈晓林,杨忠,熊东红,等.昌都地区生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(01):156.
CHEN Xiao-lin,YANG Zhong,XIONG Dong-hong,et al.The Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Changdu, Tibet[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(02):156.
[4]郭兵,姜琳,孙彩红,等.基于多源数据的岷江上游生态系统服务价值动态评估[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):131.
GUO Bing,JIANG Lin,SUN Caihong,et al.Dynamic Evaluation on Ecosystem Service Value of the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River Based on Multi-Source Data[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):131.
[5]吴丹,邵全琴,刘纪远,等.中国草地生态系统水源涵养服务时空变化[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):256.
WU Dan,SHAO Quanqin,LIU Jiyuan,et al.Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Water Regulation Service of Grassland Ecosystem in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):256.
[6]阿依努尔·艾尼,玉米提·哈力克,塔依尔江·艾山,等.利益相关者对塔里木河下游荒漠河岸林生态系统服务的认知度分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(01):205.
Ayinuer·Aini,Umut·Halik,Tayierjiang·Aishan,et al.Analysis of Stakeholders’ Cognition on Desert Riparian Forest Ecosystem Services in the Lower Reaches of Tarim River, China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):205.
[7]杜国明,孙晓兵,刘彦随.延安市退耕对生态的影响及其人文驱动因素分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):233.
DU Guoming,SUN Xiaobing,LIU Yansui.Analysis of Ecological Restoration on Ecosystem Services and Its Human Driving Factors in Yan’an City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):233.
[8]王敏,阮俊杰,姚佳,等.基于InVEST模型的生态系统土壤保持功能研究——以福建宁德为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):184.
WANG Min,RUAN Jun-jie,YAO Jia,et al.Study on Soil Conservation Service of Ecosystem Based on InVEST Model—A Case Study of Ningde City, Fujian Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(02):184.
[9]周涛,李天宏.陕西省退耕还林(草)前后LUCC对生态系统服务的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(01):246.
ZHOU Tao,LI Tian-hong.Influence of Land Use/Cover Changes on Ecosystem Services in Shaanxi Province before and after Returning Farmland to Forest/Grass[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(02):246.
[10]牛志君,周亚鹏,王树涛,等.县域土地利用变化对碳储量的影响与评价——以黑龙港流域巨鹿县为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):292.
NIU Zhijun,ZHOU Yapeng,WANG Shutao,et al.Influence and Evaluation of Land Use Change on Carbon Storage on County Scale—A Case Study of Julu County in Heilonggang Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):292.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-12-14 修回日期:2021-12-31
资助项目:国家自然科学基金项目“亚热带高原岩溶区陆地植被—湖泊湿地间的水文协同效应观测研究”(41761105)
第一作者:陈相标(1997—),男,云南曲靖人,硕士研究生,主要从事生态系统服务功能研究。E-mail:cxb6271@163.com
通信作者:丁文荣(1979—),男,云南昆明人,博士,副教授,主要从事水文水资源方面的研究工作。E-mail:dingwenrong@163.com