LIU Hongcai,ZHANG Huilan,XIA Shaoqin,et al.Runoff and Sediment Discharge Variations and Corresponding Driving Mechanism in Jinsha River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):107-115.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.021]
金沙江流域水沙变化及其驱动机制
- Title:
- Runoff and Sediment Discharge Variations and Corresponding Driving Mechanism in Jinsha River Basin
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)02-0107-09
- 分类号:
- P333.4
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了探究金沙江流域控制水文站屏山站水沙序列的趋势及突变特性,量化不同驱动因素对水沙变化的贡献。基于金沙江流域1954—2016年径流和输沙数据,从长时期及场次事件两个角度揭示了水沙关系的动态变化特征。结果表明:(1)63年间,径流量年均变化速率为-1.16×108m3/a; 输沙量年均变化速率为-2.0×106t/a; 1998年长江流域发生特大洪水,水沙序列在该年发生突变;(2)水沙关系的特征参数a值在1998年前后由上升改为下降趋势,退耕等坡面水保措施在1998年后发挥了重要作用; b值始终下降,河道影响因素始终发挥减沙作用; 在场次降雨尺度上,流域径流-悬移质泥沙环路(C-Q环路)以顺时针形环路为主,表明坡面泥沙物源充足,是影响流域产沙的重要因素;(3)流域内降水、温度及NDVI与径流和输沙之间有明显的相关性,人类活动与降水因素对径流量的贡献比为-1:2,而输沙量主要受人类活动影响,对应的贡献比为-6:1。综上,金沙江流域63年间的径流输沙受多种因素综合影响,径流量的变化主要由于降水的变化,输沙量受人类活动影响更大。
- Abstract:
- The relationship between runoff and sediment discharge in Jinsha River basin has undergone remarkable variations over recent years, which played significantly role in regional ecological sustainable development and the control of water and sediment in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. To investigate the trend and abrupt characteristics of runoff and sediment discharge sequences at the controlled hydrological station-Pingshan Station, and to quantify the contribution rates of different driving factors on runoff and sediment discharge, this study carried out statistical analyses on the records of runoff and sediment discharge during 1954 and 2016, and presented the dynamic variations of runoff and sediment discharge relatioinships from perspectives of long-term observations and shor-term events. The results showed that:(1)during the 63 years, the average annual change rate of runoff was -116 million m3, the average annual change rate of sediment discharge was -0.02 billion tons; a catastrophic flood occurred in the Yangtze River Basin in 1998, and the turning point of runoff and sediment sequence occurred in that year;(2)the featured parameter a value of the runoff-sediment discharge relationship changed from increasing trend to decreasing trend in the abrupt year 1998, which was potentially due to the Returning Rarmland to Forest Project after 1998; the featrued b value presented decreasing trends for both time stages, exhibiting the import role of river channels played on sediment reduction; on the rainfall event scale, the runoff-suspended sediment loop(C-Q loop)presented mainly clockwise type, indicating sufficient sediment source from the slope;(3)precipitation, temperature and NDVI showed obvious correlationship with runoff and sediment discharge sequences; precipitation played dominate role in runoff, and the contribution ratio of human activities and precipitation on runoff is -1:2, while the contribution ratio on sediment discharge is -6:1. In summary, the runoff and sediment transport of the Jinsha River Basin in 63 years were comprehensively affected by a variety of factors. The change of runoff was mainly due to the change of precipitation, and the sediment transport was more affected by human activities.
参考文献/References:
[1] 仁宗萍,张光辉,杨勤科.近50年延河流域水沙变化特征及其原因分析[J].水文,2012,32(5):81-86.
[2] 赵玉,穆兴民,何毅,等.1950—2011年黄河干流水沙关系变化研究[J].泥沙研究,2014(4):32-38.
[3] 黎铭,张会兰,孟铖铖.黄河皇甫川流域水沙关系特性及关键驱动因素[J].水利水电科技进展,2019,39(5):27-35.
[4] Hu B, Wang H, Yang Z, et al. Temporal and spatial variations of sediment rating curves in the Changjiang(Yangtze River)basin and their implications[J]. Quaternary International, 2011,230(1):34-43.
[5] 刘红英.降水变化和人类活动对北洛河上游水沙特性的影响研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.
[6] 张冠华,喻志强,易亮,等.近70年长江干流寸滩站以上流域水沙关系变化及其驱动因素[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):79-84.
[7] 王渺林,夏成阳,卢春生,等.金沙江流域水沙变化趋势分析[J].人民长江,2008,39(19):15-22.
[8] 万晓丹,周晓岚,赵丽霞,等.皇甫川流域水沙变化趋势及影响因素分析[J].中国农村水利水电,2019(12):90-93.
[9] Fan X, Shi C, Zhou Y, et al. Sediment rating curves in the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia reaches of the upper Yellow River and their implications[J]. Quaternary International, 2012,282:152-162.
[10] 史霏雨,李增永,李娜,等.金沙江流域1957—2016年气温时空变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(1):162-167.
[11] 刘强,尉飞鸿,常康飞,等.皇甫川流域水沙变化特征及其影响因素[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(6):1506-1513.
[12] 张小峰,闫昊晨,岳遥,等.近50年金沙江各区段年径流量变化及分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(10):2283-2292.
[13] 许全喜,石国钰,陈泽方.长江上游近期水沙变化特点及其趋势分析[J].水科学进展,2004,15(4):420-426.
[14] 张信宝,文安邦.长江上游干流和支流河流泥沙近期变化及其原因[J].水利学报,2002(4):56-59.
[15] 姜利玲,董炳江,汤成友.长江上游三峡水库入库泥沙沙峰传播时间研究[J].人民长江,2021,52(7):9-16.
[16] 丁文荣.金沙江下段植被NDVI变化趋势及其归因[J].南水北调与水利科技,2017,15(1):107-112.
[17] Asselman N E M. Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2000,234:228-248.
[18] 王冰洁,李二辉,王彦君,等.黄河中游日和年输沙率-流量关系空间变化及影响因素[J].清华大学学报:自然科学版,2020,60(5):440-448.
[19] 谢发兵,赵广举,穆兴民,等.黄河干流近70年来水沙关系变化[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2021,19(5):1-9.
[20] Gao P, Deng J, Chai X, et al. Dynamic sediment discharge in the Hekou-Longmen region of Yellow River and soil and water conservation implications[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,578; 56-66.
[21] 王随继,范小黎.黄河内蒙古不同河型段对洪水过程的响应特征[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(4):501-506.
[22] Oeurng C, Sauvage S, Sánchez-Pérez J M. Dynamics of suspended sediment transport and yield in a large agricultural catchment, southwest France[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2010,35(11):1289-1301.
[23] Klein M. Anti clockwise hysteresis in suspended sediment concentration during individual storms: Holbeck catchment; Yorkshire, England[J]. Catena,1984,11(2/3):251-257.
[24] 夏绍钦,张会兰,郝佳欣,等.长江涪江小河坝站水沙关系特性及其驱动因素研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(7):1603-1613.
[25] 姚文艺,冉大川,陈江南.黄河流域近期水沙变化及其趋势预测[J].水科学进展,2013,24(5):607-616.
[26] 张建,陈松伟.彭阳县小河流域水沙变化趋势及影响因素分析[J].中国水土保持,2020(12):47-49.
[27] 水利部长江水利委员会.金沙江干流综合规划报告[R].武汉:水利部长江水利委员会,2006.
[28] 王延贵,胡春宏,刘茜,等.长江上游水沙特性变化与人类活动的影响[J].泥沙研究,2016(1):1-8.
[29] 陆传豪,董先勇,唐家良,等.金沙江流域大型梯级水库对水沙变化的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(5):36-43.
[30] 秦蕾蕾,董先勇,杜泽东,等.金沙江下游水沙变化特性及梯级水库拦沙分析[J].泥沙研究,2019,44(3):24-30.
[31] 刘尚武,张小峰,许全喜,等.近50年来金沙江流域悬移质输沙特性研究[J].泥沙研究,2020,45(3):30-37.
[32] 邓贤贵.金沙江流域产沙区和泥沙输移特性分析[J].四川水力发电,1997,16(1):23-26.
[33] 王随继,范小黎.黄河内蒙古不同河型段对洪水过程的响应特征[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(4):501-506.
[34] 韩继冲,喻舒琳,杨青林,等.1999—2015年长江流域上游植被覆盖特征及其对气候和地形的响应[J].长江科学院院报,2019,36(9):51-57.
相似文献/References:
[1]方向京.云南省金沙江流域退耕还林还草工程的思考[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(04):97.
FANG Xiang-jing.On Thinking of the Project of Returning Farmland to Forest and Grassland in Jinshajang Basin, Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(02):97.
[2]孟广涛,方向京,李贵祥,等.云南金沙江流域不同植被类型水源涵养能力分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(04):160.
MENG Guang-tao,FANG Xiang-jing,LI Gui-xiang,et al.Analysis of Water Conservation Capacity of Different Vegetation Types in Jinshajiang Watershed of Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(02):160.
[3]夏既胜,杨树华,王玉朝,等.金沙江流域云南段景观格局特征及其变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(04):152.
XIA Ji-sheng,YANG Shu-hua.Study on Landscape Pattern Feature and Its Change in Jinsha River Watershed (Yunnan Part)[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(02):152.
[4]史雯雨,杨胜勇,李增永,等.近57年金沙江流域气温变化特征及未来趋势预估[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(01):211.
SHI Wenyu,YANG Shengyong,LI Zengyong,et al.Variation Characteristics and the Future Trend Estimation of Temperature in Chinsha River Basin Over the Past 57 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):211.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-11-18 修回日期:2022-01-15
资助项目:西南高山峡谷区水土流失综合防治技术与示范(2022YFF130009505); 国家自然科学基金(51309006); 国家重大水利资助项目三峡工程泥沙重大问题研究课题(12610100000018J129-01)
第一作者:柳宏才(1999—),男,甘肃平凉人,硕士,研究方向为流域水沙过程。E-mail:1780377405@qq.com
通信作者:张会兰(1984—),女,河北保定人,博士,教授,主要从事流域水沙过程和流域水文研究。E-mail:zhanghl@bjfu.edu.cn