[1]刘殿君,于森淼,孟庆东,等.黄河流域鄂尔多斯十大孔兑淤地坝减沙效应[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(02):42-49.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.005]
　LIU Dianjun,YU Senmiao,MENG Qingdong,et al.Effect of Check Dams on Sediment Retention of the Ten Tributaries in the Ordos Basin of the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):42-49.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.005]
点击复制

黄河流域鄂尔多斯十大孔兑淤地坝减沙效应

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 30 期数: 2023年02期 页码: 42-49 栏目: 出版日期: 2023-03-10
Title:
Effect of Check Dams on Sediment Retention of the Ten Tributaries in the Ordos Basin of the Yellow River Basin
文章编号:
1005-3409(2023)02-0042-08
作者:
刘殿君1, 于森淼2, 孟庆东3, 陈正新1, 王百群4, 于 洋5
(1.内蒙古自治区水利科学研究院, 呼和浩特 010051; 2.南水北调中线信息科技有限公司, 北京 100038; 3.鄂尔多斯市水利局, 内蒙古 鄂尔多斯 017200; 4.中国科学院 水利部 水土保持研究所 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌 712100; 5.北京林业大学 水土保持学院, 北京 100083)
Author(s):
LIU Dianjun1, YU Senmiao2, MENG Qingdong3, CHEN Zhengxin1, WANG Baiqun4, YU Yang5
(1.Inner Mongolia Hydraulic Research Institute, Hohhot 010051, China; 2.Information Technology Co., Ltd., of South-to-North Water Diversion Middle Route Project, Beijing 100038, China; 3.Ordos Water Conservancy Bureau, Ordos, Inner Mongolia 017200, China; 4.State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China; 5.School of Soil......)
关键词:
黄河流域;  十大孔兑;  淤地坝;  减沙量;  水土保持措施
Keywords:
Yellow River Basin;  Ten Tributaries;  check dam;  sediment retention;  soil and water conservation measures
分类号:
S157
DOI:
10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了定量评价十大孔兑地区淤地坝的减沙效益,基于历史资料整理与实地详查,统计了十大孔兑地区1986年以来现存淤地坝的数量和分布特征; 采用淤积体概化法,确定了影响淤地坝减沙量的主要参数,并计算了研究区354座淤地坝的减沙量。结果表明:十大孔兑354座淤地坝累计减沙3.205 61×107t,其中减沙量最大的孔兑为西柳沟,达1.239 76×107t; 通过分析不同时段淤地坝的减沙特征表明,1986—1999年、2000—2009年和2010—2018年3个时段的淤地坝减沙量分别为4.946 6×106t,1.155 57×107t,1.555 38×107t。十大孔兑地区淤地坝具有显著的减沙作用,具有很高的减沙指标(达5 720.33～58 141.81 t/座),2000年以后的两个时间段内,随着坡面林草措施的增加,淤地坝减沙量增加,表明在这一地区,淤地坝仍然是最有效的水土保持措施之一。
Abstract:
In order to quantitatively evaluate the sediment reduction benefits of the Yudi dams in the Ten Tributaries area, and according to the historical datasets collection and detailed field investigation, we counted the number and distribution characteristics of existing check dams in the Ten Tributaries since 1986, the generalization method was conducted to determine the main parameters affecting the sediment retention, a total of 354 check dams in the study area were surveyed. The results showed that the 354 check dams in the Ten Tributaries had trapped a total of 32.056 1 million tons of sediments; the largest amount of sediment reduction in the Xiliugou was observed, which reached up to 12.397 6 million tons; the results of the sediment reduction characteristics of the check dams in different periods showed that the amounts of sediment reduction were 4.946 6×106 tons, 1.155 57×107 tons, and 1.555 38×107 tons in 1986—1999, 2000—2009, and 2010—2018, respectively. The check dams in the Ten Tributaries area had significant sediment reduction effects,which had high sediment reduction index(5 720.33～58 141.81 tons per check dam). After 2000, the sediment reduction of the check dams still increased with the increase of forest and grass measures on the slope, suggesting that the check dams is the one of the most effective soil and water conservation measures in the Ten Tributaries area.

参考文献/References:

[1] 冉大川,李占斌,罗全华,等.黄河中游淤地坝工程可持续减沙途径分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(3):1-5.
[2] 李勉,姚文艺,史学建.淤地坝拦沙减蚀作用与泥沙沉积特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(5):111-115.
[3] 武志强,付福林,张锐.川掌沟流域治沟骨干工程建设的重大作用[J].中国水土保持,2000(6):15-19.
[4] 曾茂林,朱小勇,康玲玲,等.水土流失区淤地坝的拦泥减蚀作用及发展前景[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(2):127-134.
[5] 李景宗,刘立斌.近期黄河潼关以上地区淤地坝拦沙量初步分析[J].人民黄河,2018,389(1):1-6.
[6] 杨媛媛,李占斌,高海东,等.大理河流域淤地坝拦沙贡献率分析[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):85-89.
[7] 焦菊英,王万忠,李靖,等.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区淤地坝的减水减沙效益分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2001,15(1):78-83.
[8] 魏艳红,焦菊英,张世杰.黄土高原典型支流淤地坝减沙对输沙量减少的贡献[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(5):16-22.
[9] 段菊卿.小流域淤地坝建设的水土保持效益浅析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):144-147.
[10] 韩向楠,谢世友,高云飞.近年无定河流域淤地坝拦沙作用研究[J].人民黄河,2018,40(11):5-8,37.
[11] 刘晓燕,高云飞,马三保,等.黄土高原淤地坝的减沙作用及其时效性[J].水利学报,2018,49(2):145-155.
[12] 李莉,史学建,杨吉山,等.次暴雨下小理河流域淤地坝拦沙能力分析[J].中国水土保持,2020(12)31-33.
[13] 蒋凯鑫,于坤霞,李鹏,等.砒砂岩区典型淤地坝沉积泥沙特征及来源分析[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(1):47-53.
[14] 王永吉,杨明义,张加琼,等.水蚀风蚀交错带小流域淤地坝泥沙沉积特征[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):1-5.
[15] 王雄世,鄢玉英,牛占.小水库库容及淤积体的数学模型与简单测算[J].人民黄河,2009,31(8):29-32.
[16] 杨吉山,张晓华,宋天华,等.宁夏清水河流域淤地坝拦沙量分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(4):122-127.
[17] 韩向楠,谢世友,高云飞.近年无定河流域淤地坝拦沙作用研究[J].人民黄河,2018,40(11):5-8,37.
[18] 杨吉山,史学建,侯素珍,等.2016年“8·17”暴雨西柳沟土壤侵蚀产沙量分析[J].人民黄河,2020,42(1):82-85,90.

相似文献/References:

[1]郑明军,任于幽.谈水土保持在黄河流域经济持续发展中的地位和作用[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(03):10.
　Zheng Mingjun,Ren Yuyou.Status and Role of Soil and Water Conservation in Economy Sustainable Development of the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(02):10.
[2]张学成,王玲,乔永杰.黄河流域与长江流域生态环境建设的差异与重点[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):28.
　ZHANG Xue-cheng,WANG Ling,QIAO Yong-jie.Differences and Key Points of Eco-environmental Construction in the Yellow River Basin and Yangtze River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(02):28.
[3]裴新富.黄河流域退耕还林途径研究[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):122.
　PEI Xin-fu.Study on the Approach to Returning Farmland to Forests in the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(02):122.
[4]李道峰,田英,郝芳华.基于NDVI数据的黄河流域地表植被覆盖综合分类研究[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(04):88.
　LI Dao-feng,TIAN Ying,HAO Fang-hua.NDVI Data Based Study on Complex Classification of Vegetation Cover of Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(02):88.
[5]赵帮元,李志华,郭玉涛,等.遥感在黄河流域水土保持监测中的应用[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(02):47.
　ZHAO Bang-yuan,LI Zhi-hua,GUO Yu-tao,et al.The Applications of Remote Sensing in the Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring in the Yellow River Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(02):47.
[6]李春晖,杨志峰.黄河流域地表水资源可再生性模糊综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(01):182.
　LI Chun-hui,YANG Zhi-feng.Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment of the Surface Water Resources Renewability in the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(02):182.
[7]李万全.青海省黄河流域生态修复适宜性的初步探讨[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(06):68.
　LI Wan-quan.A Tentative Discussion of Feasibility of Ecological Recovery Along the Yellow River Valley Within Qinghai[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(02):68.
[8]殷贺,王仰麟,彭建.黄河中上游地区半个世纪降水与温度变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):69.
　YIN He,WANG Yang-lin,PENG Jian.Variation Analysis on Precipitation and Temperature in Upper Reach of Yellow River Basin from 1956 to 2006[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):69.
[9]师旭颖,郝芳华,林隆,等.黄河水电开发区域土地利用与景观格局分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(04):174.
　SHI Xu-ying,HAO Fang-hua,LIN Long,et al.The Analysis of Land Use and Landscape Pattern in Hydropower Cascade Exploitation Region of the Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):174.
[10]董国涛,樊东,杨胜天,等.GPM与TRMM降雨数据在黄河流域适用性分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):81.
　DONG Guotao,FAN Dong,YANG Shengtian,et al.Analysis on the Applicability of GPM and TRMM Precipitation Data in the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):81.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2021-06-24 修回日期:2021-08-10
资助项目:内蒙古自治区水利科技重大专项(213-03-10-303002-NSK2017-M2); 内蒙古自治区水利科技项目(NSK202109)
第一作者:刘殿君(1982—),男,内蒙古呼和浩特人,博士,高级工程师,主要从事水土保持与生态恢复研究。E-mail:liudianjun-kabo@163.com
通信作者:于洋(1985—),男,河北承德人,博士,副教授,主要从事植被恢复与流域治理研究。E-mail:theodoreyy@gmail.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-03-10