ZHANG Junmin,RONG Cheng,DONG Guosong.Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Landscape Ecological Vulnerability in Lijiang River Basin from 2000 to 2020[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(05):283-292.
2000-2020年漓江流域景观生态脆弱性时空分异
- Title:
- Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Landscape Ecological Vulnerability in Lijiang River Basin from 2000 to 2020
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2022)05-0283-10
- Keywords:
- landscape pattern; spatiotemporal differentiation; landscape ecological vulnerability; geodetector
- 分类号:
- F301.24
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 漓江流域是我国南方脆弱岩溶环境的重要生态安全屏障。通过景观生态脆弱性评价优化国土空间治理,可为岩溶区生态修复和脱贫攻坚成果提供科学依据。基于土地利用、遥感信息和GIS空间分析平台,应用景观指数、时空统计、空间分析、地理探测等方法,从多维时空尺度分析了漓江流域景观生态脆弱性及其时空变化规律。结果表明:(1)漓江流域以林地、耕地为主体景观,面积占全流域的90%,近20年其变率小于0.37%,扩张强度小于3.59%,流域景观格局稳定; 建设用地增长最快,扩张强度高达72.97%,动态度明显高于其他地类,城镇化进程是景观格局的主要驱动因素;(2)景观生态系统以中低级脆弱区为主,占总面积的56.53%,高危脆弱区面积占比小于10%; 形成城镇化中心低值聚集,山地区高值连片的分异格局; 近20年一级、五级脆弱区扩张强度分别为1.70%,1.36%,中高级脆弱区面积扩张强度-2.59%,流域景观生态脆弱性减弱。(3)LEV空间分异呈现人工景观低值化与自然景观高值化格局。桂林市区是低—低相邻的冷点,周边山区为高—高相邻的热点,近20年冷点、热点范围都略有扩大,景观生态脆弱性与城镇化有显著的正向空间依赖性。(4)城镇化及坡度变化对脆弱性的解释度最大,其q值分别为0.2689,0.250 8,是LEV空间分异的核心驱动,自然和人工因素共同决定了LEV时空分异。漓江流域土地利用应坚持综合治理和系统规划的原则,统筹城乡土地利用和国土空间规划,系统融合城市与乡村、自然与人工景观类型及功能。
- Abstract:
- The Lijiang River Basin is an important ecological security barrier for the fragile karst environment in southern China. Optimizing the land space management through the assessment of landscape ecological vulnerability can provide a scientific basis for the ecological restoration and poverty alleviation achievements in karst areas. Based on land use, remote sensing information and GIS spatial analysis platform, landscape ecological vulnerability and temporal-spatial changes of landscape index of the Lijiang River Basin were analyzed from multi-dimensional temporal-spatial scales with the methods of landscape index, temporal-spatial statistics, spatial analysis, geodetector employed. The results indicate that the main landscape of the Lijiang River Basin is forestland and cultivated land, accounting for 90% of the total basin area; in the past 20 years, its area change rate was less than 0.37%, the expansion intensity was less than 3.59%, and the basin landscape pattern was stable; construction land had the fastest growth and significant expansion, its dynamic degree was significantly higher than other land type and the urbanization process was the main driver of the landscape pattern; the landscape ecosystem was dominated by low-and middle-level fragile areas, accounting for 56.53% of the total area, and high-risk fragile areas accounting for less than 10%, which formed a differentiation pattern of low-value clusters in urbanization centers and high-value contiguous mountain areas; in the past 20 years, the expansion intensities of level 1 and level 5 vulnerable zones were 1.70% and 1.36%, respectively, and the area expansion intensity of middle and high-level fragile areas was -2.59%, informing that the ecological fragility of the basin landscape weakened; the landscape ecosystem was dominated by low-and middle-level fragile areas, and the area of high-risk fragile areas accounted for less than 10%; a differentiation pattern of low-value clusters in urbanization centers and high-value contiguous mountain areas had been formed; In the past 20 years, the range of low-value areas had continued to expand while the area of middle and high-level fragile areas reduced, informing that the ecological fragility of the basin landscape weakened; LEV spatial differentiation presented a pattern of low-value artificial landscapes and high-value natural landscapes; the urban area of Guilin was a low-low adjacent cold spot, and the surrounding mountainous area was a high-high adjacent hot spot; the range of cold spots and hot spots had expanded slightly in the past 20 years, and the landscape ecological spatial pattern was relatively stable; urbanization and gradient changes had the greatest degree of explanation for vulnerability, with q values of 0.268 9 and 0.250 8, respectively, which were the core drivers of LEV spatial differentiation; natural and artificial factors jointly determined LEV temporal and spatial differentiation. The land use of the Lijiang River Basin should adhere to the principles of comprehensive management and systematic planning, coordinate urban and rural land use and land space planning, and systematically integrate the types and functions of urban and rural, natural and artificial landscapes.
参考文献/References:
[1] 刘纪远,张增祥,张树文,等.中国土地利用变化遥感研究的回顾与展望:基于陈述彭学术思想的引领[J].地球信息科学学报,2020,22(4):680-687.
[2] 赵东升,张雪梅.生态系统多稳态的研究进展[J].生态学报,2021,41(16):1-15.
[3] 李睿倩,李永富,胡恒.生态系统服务对国土空间规划体系的理论与实践支撑[J].地理学报,2020,75(11):2417-2430.
[4] Zhao Z N, Zhang T Z. Integration of ecosystem services into ecological risk assessment for implementation in ecosystem based river management:A case study of the Yellow River, China[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2013,19(1):80-97.
[5] 彭建,党威雄,刘焱序,等.景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望[J].地理学报,2015,70(4):664-677.
[6] 傅伯杰.地理学综合研究的途径与方法:格局与过程耦合[J].地理学报,2014,69(8):1052-1059.
[7] 张楚宜,胡远满,刘淼,等.景观生态学三维格局研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(12):4353-4360.
[8] 谢高地,张彪,鲁春霞,等.北京城市扩张的资源环境效应[J].资源科学,2015,37(6):1108-1114.
[9] 吴健生,宗敏丽,彭建.基于景观格局的矿区生态脆弱性评价:以吉林省辽源市为例[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(12):3213-3220.
[10] 杨靖,吴学灿,周瑞伍,等.基于景观格局的云南省富源县生态脆弱性空间特征分析[J].生态科学,2021,40(3):184-192.
[11] 韩鑫,胡江玲,刘传胜,等.基于遥感的山地景观健康诊断及格局演变研究:以新疆天山自然遗产地喀拉峻:库尔德宁为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(16):6451-6465.
[12] 王国玉,白伟岚,熊筱,等.京津冀城市群生态空间受损识别研究[J].城市规划,2021,45(8):9-19,41.
[13] 黄木易,岳文泽,方斌,等.1970—2015年大别山区生态服务价值尺度响应特征及地理探测机制[J].地理学报,2019,74(9):1904-1920.
[14] 左玲丽,彭文甫,陶帅,等.岷江上游土地利用与生态系统服务价值的动态变化研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(16):1-14.
[15] 张学渊,魏伟,周亮,等.西北干旱区生态脆弱性时空演变分析[J].生态学报,2021,41(12):4707-4719.
[16] 林增学.1985—2014年漓江流域景观格局动态变化研究[J].中国岩溶,2019,38(3):466-471.
[17] 向芸芸,蒙吉军.漓江流域旅游开发景观格局干扰的时空分异[J].山地学报,2014,32(1):11-20.
[18] 何毅,唐湘玲,代俊峰.漓江流域生态系统服务价值最大化的土地利用结构优化[J].生态学报,2021,41(13):5214-5222.
[19] 朱柏露,杨奇勇,谢运球,等.漓江流域土地石漠化空间分布及驱动因子分析[J].广西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2021,39(3):139-150.
[20] 陆丹丹,钟永德,杨永德,等.漓江上游土地利用与覆盖变化及其驱动力研究[J].生态经济,2015,31(9):128-131,146.
[21] 魏雨涵,钱建平,范伟伟,等.基于RSEI的漓江流域生态环境质量动态监测[J].中国水土保持科学,2021,19(1):122-131.
[22] 王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.
[23] 罗奎,方创琳,马海涛.基于生产函数视角的城镇化动力机制研究[J].地理科学,2017,37(3):394-399.
相似文献/References:
[1]文倩,李青松,孙水娟.中南丘陵区不同土壤类型下的土地利用景观格局分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):90.
WEN Qian,LI Qing-song,SUN Shui-juan.Research on the Land Use Landscape Pattern of Different Soil Types in Central-south Hilly Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):90.
[2]春风,银山.基于RS与GIS的鄂托克旗景观格局动态变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):100.
CHUN Feng,YIN Shan.Analysis on the Dynamic Change of Landscape Patterns in Etuoke County Based on RS and GIS[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):100.
[3]张桐艳,贺敬滢,李光录,等.基于水土流失风险的流域景观格局识别方法研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):175.
ZHANG Tong-yan,HE Jing-ying,LI Guang-lu,et al.Method of Watershed Landscape Pattern Analysis Based on the Risk of Soil and Water Loss[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):175.
[4]赵银兵,倪忠云,陈陵康,等.西藏曲水-桑日地区1988-2009年土地利用景观格局演变研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):180.
ZHAO Yin-bing,CHEN Ling-kang,NAN Xi,et al.Study on Landscape Evolution in Qushui-Sangri Area of Tibet from 1988 to 2009[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):180.
[5]赵志刚,王凯荣,向开成,等.冀东平原农业景观格局与生态服务价值研究——以滦县为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):221.
ZHAO Zhi-gang,WANG Kai-rong,XIANG Kai-cheng,et al.Assessment on Agricultural Landscape Pattern and Ecosystem Service Values of Jidong Plain——A Case Study of Luan County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):221.
[6]田媛,许月卿,吴艳芳.环京津冀北贫困带土地利用/覆被变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):82.
TIAN Yuan,XU Yue-qing,WU Yan-fang.Study on Land Use/Land Cover Change in the Northern Poverty Belt of Hebei Province around Beijing and Tianjin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):82.
[7]丁艳,王辉.生态脆弱带水土流失对农业景观的影响——以云南省丽江地区永胜县为例[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(02):100.
DING Yan,WANG Hui.Effects on Agriculture Landscape by Water and Soil Loss in Ecotone In a Case Study：Yongsheng County of Lijiang in Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(05):100.
[8]杨庆媛.小流域土地整理与农村经济可持续发展研究——以云南省牟定县飒马场小流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(04):109.
YANG Qing-yuan.Study on Land Consolidation and Sustainable Development of Rural Economy——A Case Study of Samachang Small Watershed,Mouding County,Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(05):109.
[9]张丽,王秀茹,刘兰华,等.黑河流域额济纳绿洲景观格局分析[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(04):124.
ZHANG Li,WANG Xiu-ru,LIU Lan-hua,et al.Analysis of Ejina Oasis Landscape Pattern of Heihe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(05):124.
[10]卜耀军,温仲明,焦峰,等.3S技术在现代景观格局中的应用[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(01):34.
BU Yao-jun,WEN Zhong-ming,JIAO Feng,et al.3S Technology and Its Application in Modern Landscape Pattern[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(05):34.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-08-14 修回日期:2021-08-21
资助项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41761030); 兵团社科项目(18ZD02); 广西社科基金(20FJY006)
第一作者:张军民(1964—),男,新疆吐鲁番人,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向为景观生态安全与城镇化发展。E-mail:zjm_tea@163.com