LONG Yinghao,LI Xudong,CHENG Dongya.Topographic Differentiation of Vegetation Coverage Changes Between Shaded Slopes and Sunny Slopes in Mountainous Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(05):268-275,282.
山区植被覆盖度变化的地形分异特征——以贵州开阳县为例
- Title:
- Topographic Differentiation of Vegetation Coverage Changes Between Shaded Slopes and Sunny Slopes in Mountainous Areas
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2022)05-0268-08
- Keywords:
- vegetation; shady slope; sunny slope; terrain; mountainous area; Kaiyang; Guizhou Province
- 分类号:
- K903
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 植被覆盖度是生态恢复的重要指示器,研究其变化特征可为资源合理利用、生态恢复提供科学参考。以贵州省开阳县为研究区,基于landsat4-5 TM,Landsat8 OLI遥感影像,获取2002年、2019年30 m分辨率植被覆盖度数据,从阴坡与阳坡视角研究山区植被覆盖度变化和地形分异特征。结果表明:(1)2002—2019年阴坡与阳坡植被覆盖度总体呈南高北低分布,期间阴坡与阳坡植被总体处于恢复趋势。(2)研究时段内阴坡与阳坡植被覆盖度随海拔上升表现为增加趋势; 海拔小于600 m的地区阳坡和阴坡植被覆盖度差距最大; 2019年二者植被覆盖度在海拔小于600 m的地区下降明显,高于800 m的地区均有较大提升。(3)阴坡和阳坡植被覆盖度随坡度增加总体呈上升趋势,坡度大于35°后二者差异增强; 植被覆盖度增量随坡度增加总体表现为上升—下降特点。(4)阴坡和阳坡植被覆盖度随地形起伏度增加呈上升趋势。2002年阳坡各等级地形起伏度的植被覆盖度总体高于阴坡,2019年二者植被覆盖度差异性随地形起伏度上升而增强。综上,阴坡和阳坡植被覆盖度与海拔、坡度、地形起伏度呈正相关关系,二者在不同等级地形梯度上具有较大差异性。地形因子对山区阴坡、阳坡植被覆盖度的影响是多方面的,不仅从海拔和坡向上影响水热组合条件,也从坡度和地形起伏度上影响人类对山区林地资源的开发利用。
- Abstract:
- Vegetation coverage is important indicator of ecological restoration. Studying change characteristics of vegetation coverage can provide scientific references for the rational use of resources and restoration of the ecological environment. Kaiyang County in Guizhou Province was chosen as an example. Based on landsat4-5 TM and Landsat8 OLI remote sensing images, the vegetation coverage data of 30 m resolution in 2002 and 2019 were obtained. From the perspectives of shaded and sunny slopes, the vegetation coverage changes and topographic differentiation characteristics were analyzed. The results showed that:(1)the vegetation coverage on the shaded and sunny slopes from 2002 to 2019 was generally high in the south and low in the north; during this period, the vegetation coverage on the shade and sunny slopes was generally recovering;(2)during the study period, the vegetation coverage on the shade and sunny slopes showed an increasing trend with the elevation; vegetation coverage difference between sunny and shady slopes was the largest in areas with an altitude of less than 600 m; in 2019, the vegetation coverage of the sunny and shady slopes decreased significantly in areas with an altitude of less than 600 m, and increased significantly in areas above 800 m;(3)the vegetation coverage of shaded and sunny slopes showed an overall upward trend with the increase of slope gradient, and the difference between the two increased when the slope was greater than 35°; the increase in vegetation coverage showed an upward-declining characteristic with the increase of slope gradient;(4)the vegetation coverage on the shade and sunny slopes showed an increasing trend with the increase of terrain undulations; in 2002, the vegetation coverage of sunny slopes at all levels of terrain undulations was generally higher than that of shaded slopes; in 2019, the difference in vegetation coverage between the two increased with the increase of terrain undulations. In summary, the vegetation coverage of shady and sunny slopes is positively correlated with altitude, slope, and terrain relief, and the two have great differences in different grades of terrain gradients. The influences of terrain factors on the vegetation coverage of shady and sunny slopes in mountainous areas are multi-facets. It not only affects the combination of water and heat conditions from altitude and slope, but also affects the development and utilization of forestland resources in mountainous areas from the slope and terrain relief.
参考文献/References:
[1] 孟浩斌,周启刚,李明慧,等.基于MODIS像元尺度的三峡库区植被覆盖度变化的地形分布特征[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(8):1790-1799.
[2] 吴志杰,何国金,黄绍霖,等.南方丘陵区植被覆盖度遥感估算的地形效应评估[J].遥感学报,2017,21(1):159-167.
[3] 田海静,曹春香,戴晟懋,等.准格尔旗植被覆盖度变化的时间序列遥感监测[J].地球信息科学学报,2014,16(1):126-133.
[4] 穆少杰,李建龙,陈奕兆,等.2001—2010年内蒙古植被覆盖度时空变化特征[J].地理学报,2012,67(9):1255-1268.
[5] 张亮,丁明军,张华敏,等.1982—2015年长江流域植被覆盖度时空变化分析[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(12):2084-2097.
[6] 裴志林,杨勤科,王春梅,等.黄河上游植被覆盖度空间分布特征及其影响因素[J].干旱区研究,2019,36(3):546-555.
[7] 韦小茶,周秋文,张继,等.1982—2016年广西NDVI时空变化及其影响因素[J].山地学报,2020,38(4):520-531.
[8] 王伟军,赵雪雁,万文玉,等.2000—2014年甘南高原植被覆盖度变化及其对气候变化的响应[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(9):2494-2504.
[9] 程东亚,李旭东.喀斯特地区植被覆盖度变化及地形与人口效应研究[J].地球信息科学学报,2019,21(8):1227-1239.
[10] 赵婷,白红英,邓晨晖,等.2000—2016年秦岭山地植被覆盖变化地形分异效应[J].生态学报,2019,39(12):4499-4509.
[11] 贵阳市统计局,国家统计局贵阳调查总队.贵阳统计年鉴2020[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2020.
[12] 宋家鹏,陈松林.基于生态系统服务簇的福州市生态系统服务格局[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(3):1045-1053.
[13] 付陶猗,廖和平,刘愿理,等.重庆市县域尺度地形起伏度与多维贫困的耦合关系研究[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2020,42(10):55-64.
[14] 周万村.三峡库区土地自然坡度和高程对经济发展的影响[J].长江流域资源与环境,2001,10(1):15-21.
[15] 贵阳市统计局,国家统计局贵阳调查总队.贵阳市国民经济和社会发展统计公报(2003,2020)[R].贵阳:贵州省统计局国家统计局贵州调查总队,2003,2020.
[16] 陈怀珠. RS和GIS在监测城市环境变化和环境质量评价中的应用[D].福州:福建农林大学,2004.
[17] 赵婷,白红英,邓晨晖,等.2000—2016年秦岭山地植被覆盖变化地形分异效应[J].生态学报,2019,39(12):4499-4509.
[18] 汤巧英,戚德辉,宋立旺,等.基于GIS和RS的延河流域植被覆盖度与地形因子的相关性研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):198-203.
[19] 位宏,徐丽萍,李晓蕾,等.玛纳斯河流域植被覆盖度随地形因子的变化特征[J].中国农业气象,2018,39(12):814-824.
[20] 田地,刘政,胡亚林.福州市植被覆盖度时空特征及与地形因子的关系[J].浙江农林大学学报,2019,36(6):1158-1165.
[21] 郭辉,黄粤,李向义,等.基于多尺度遥感数据的塔里木河干流地区植被覆盖动态[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(5):1472-1480.
[22] 殷刚,孟现勇,王浩,等.1982—2012年中亚地区植被时空变化特征及其与气候变化的相关分析[J].生态学报,2017,37(9):3149-3163.
相似文献/References:
[1]肖培青,姚文艺,张海峰.黄土高原植被固土减蚀作用研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):282.
XIAO Pei-qing,YAO Wen-yi,ZHANG Hai-feng.Research Progress of the Role of Vegetation in Soil Conservtion and Soil Erosion Reduction on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):282.
[2]汪有科,吴钦孝,韩冰.黄土高原植被建造优化模式[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(03):87.
Wang Youke,Wu Qinxiao,Han Bin.Optimum Patterns to Building Vegetation on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(05):87.
[3]王礼先.植被生态建设与生态用水——以西北地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(03):5.
WANG Li-xian.Vegetative Eco-environment Construction and Water Use of Eco-environment——Taking Northwestern Area for An Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(05):5.
[4]李鹏,李占斌,郑良勇.植被保持水土有效性研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):76.
LI Peng,LI Zhan-bin,ZHENG Liang-yong.Advances in Researches of the Effectiveness for Vegetation Conserving Soil and Water[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(05):76.
[5]张源润,蔡进军,李振永,等.宁南半干旱退化山区林草植被快速恢复技术研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):12.
ZHANG Yuan-run,CAI Jin-jun,LI Zhen-yong,et al.Research on Vegetation Recovery Technology in Semi-arid Degenerated Mountainous Area in South Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):12.
[6]杨树,温雨金,刘鸿雁.内蒙古中部地区退耕还林还草后植被与土壤性状的变化[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):143.
YANG Shu,WEN YU-jin,LIU Hong-yan.Ecological Effects of Mandatory Conversion of Marginal Farmland to Forestland and Grassland in Central Inner Mongolia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):143.
[7]马绍休,王涛,张建民,等.民勤地区供水和生态需水量分析[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(06):58.
MA Shao-xiu,WANG Tao,ZHANG Jian-min,et al.The Theory of Ecological Water Requirement for Vegetation and Its Application to Minqin Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):58.
[8]鄢朝勇,叶建军,韦书勇.植被对边坡浅层稳定的影响[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(01):24.
YAN Chao-yong,YE Jian-jun,WEI Shu-yong.Influence of Vegetation on Slope Shallow Stability[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(05):24.
[9]杨永红,王成华,刘淑珍,等.不同植被类型根系提高浅层滑坡土体抗剪强度的试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(02):233.
YANG Yong-hong,WANG Cheng-hua,LIU Shu-zhen,et al.Experimental Research on Improving Shear Strength of Soil in Surface Landslide by Root System of Different Vegetation Type[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(05):233.
[10]王海龙,秦富仓,余新晓,等.黄土区森林植被对不同尺度坡地产流产沙的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(03):182.
WANG Hai-long,QIN Fu-cang,YU Xin-xiao,et al.Effect of Forest Vegetation on Runoff and Sediment Production in Sloping Lands at Different Scales of Loess Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(05):182.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-05-26 修回日期:2021-07-24
资助项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41261039); 贵州省科技厅项目(黔科合J字[2009]2253)
第一作者:龙映豪(1997—),男,四川岳池人,硕士研究生,主要从事资源利用与低碳发展研究。E-mail:shslyh@163.com
通信作者:李旭东(1969—),男,湖南邵东人,博士,教授,主要从事人口地理与区域发展,应对气候变化与低碳经济研究。E-mail:616507732@qq.com