ZHANG Minghao,ZHANG Xin,WANG Tianhong,et al.Method of Determining Hydrological Response Units for Discretization of Microtopography[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(01):86-91+99.
微地形空间离散化水文响应单元确定方法
- Title:
- Method of Determining Hydrological Response Units for Discretization of Microtopography
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2022)01-0086-06
- Keywords:
- spatial discretization; hydrological response unit; CA; microtopography; slope water erosion
- 分类号:
- S157
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 空间离散化是分布式水文模型构建的充要条件。在90 mm/h雨强人工降雨试验、三维激光扫描构建微地形数字高程模型(M-DEM)的基础上,基于元胞自动机(CA)模型研究了人工掏挖微地形在5种不同坡度条件下侵蚀发育过程中不同大小格网/元胞的水沙汇集和传递关系,进而提出空间离散化水文响应单元(HRU)的确定方法。结果表明:基于CA模型所确定的5°,10°,15°,20°和25°坡在溅蚀阶段的最佳HRU大小为6 mm,5 mm,6 mm,5 mm,8 mm; 片蚀阶段的最佳HRU大小为6 mm,4 mm,6 mm,5 mm,5 mm,细沟侵蚀阶段的最佳HRU大小为4 mm,7 mm,5 mm,6 mm,6 mm,纳什效率系数均接近于1; 综合以上,90 mm/h雨强下人工掏挖微地形水蚀模拟最佳HRU应为6 mm。研究提出了一种微地形空间离散化的方法,为微地形尺度水蚀定量化研究提供了一定的技术支撑。
- Abstract:
- Spatial discretization is a necessary and sufficient condition for the construction of distributed hydrological models. Based on the 90 mm/h rain intensity artificial rainfall test and three-dimensional laser scanning to construct the digital elevation model of micro-topography(M-DEM), and the cellular automata(CA)model, the water-sediment collection and transfer relationship of different size grids/cells in the process of erosion development in the artificially excavated micro-topography on 5 different types of slopes were studied, and then a method for determining spatial discretization hydrological response unit(HRU)was proposed. The results show that the optimal HRU sizes for the 5°, 10°, 15°, 20° and 25° slopes determined by the CA model in the splash phase are 6 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm, 5 mm, 8 mm; the best HRU sizes at the sheet corrosion stage are 6 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 5 mm, 5 mm; the best HRU sizes for the rill erosion stage are 4 mm, 7 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm, 6 mm; the Nash efficiency coefficients are all close to 1. Comprehensively above, the best HRU for water erosion simulation of artificially excavated micro-terrain should be 6 mm under the rainfall intensity of 90 mm/h. This study puts forward a method for the spatial discretization of micro-topography, which can provide certain technical support for the quantitative study of water erosion at the micro-topography scale.
参考文献/References:
[1] Zhang J, Yang M, Zhang F, et al. Revealing soil erosion characteristics using deposited sediment sources in a complex small catchment in the wind-water erosion crisscross region of the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Geoderma, 2020,379(23):11-23.[2] 任磊,李光录,杨晨辉,等.坡面微地形DEM最佳分辨率的选择方法[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2015,43(5):129-134,142. [3] 张建文,李鹏,高海东,等.覆沙坡面微地形变化与侵蚀产沙的响应关系[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(3):220-227.[4] 张传才,秦奋,汪永新,等.流域地貌形态多尺度三维分形量化及尺度效应:以砒砂岩区二老虎沟为例[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(1):278-283,288.[5] 赵斯琦,王晓红,舒天竹,等.喀斯特地区区域尺度土壤侵蚀地形因子研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(5):97-103.[6] 高超,刘青,苏布达,等.不同尺度和数据基础的水文模型适用性评估研究:淮河流域为例[J].自然资源学报,2013,28(10):1765-1777.[7] 张莉,张青峰,赵龙山,等.黄土坡耕地地表糙度的空间异质性研究[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(12):2365-2373.[8] Steinmetz A A, Beskow S, Terra F S, et al. Spatial discretization influence on flood modeling using unit hydrograph theory[J]. Rbrh, 2019,24(7):133-144.[9] 宁吉才,刘高焕,刘庆生,等.水文响应单元空间离散化及SWAT模型改进[J].水科学进展,2012,23(1):14-20.[10] 孙毅中,杨静,宋书颖,等.多层次矢量元胞自动机建模及土地利用变化模拟[J].地理学报,2020,75(10):2164-2179.[11] 张文富,林广发,张明锋,等.基于元胞自动机模型的河道汇流过程模拟[J].地球信息科学学报,2017,19(7):880-885.[12] 王晓学,李叙勇,莫菲,等.基于元胞自动机的森林水源涵养量模型新方法:概念与理论框架[J].生态学报,2010,30(20):5491-5500.[13] 塔娜,王健,张慧荟,等.黄土耕作坡面溅蚀过程中微地形响应特征[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(1):110-114.[14] 任志国,郭健,李爱光,等.元胞自动机最短路径算法优化[J].遥感学报,2015,19(1):108-115.[15] 周成虎,孙战利,谢一春.地理元胞自动机研究[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.[16] 李俊超,马倩,陶钧.基于ArcGIS的水文流域分析及应用[J].地理空间信息,2012,10(6):121-123,2,1.[17] 田凯,李小青,鲁帆,等.坡面流侵蚀水动力学特性研究综述[J].中国水土保持,2010,31(4):44-47.[18] 张光辉.国外坡面径流分离土壤过程水动力学研究进展[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(3):112-115.[19] 马廷,周成虎,蔡强国.不同植物篱坡面的土壤侵蚀过程CA模拟[J].地理研究,2006,25(6):959-966.[20] 张娜娜,王兵,张宝琦,等.地表糙度测定方法研究[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(1):135-140,148.[21] 王鹏飞,郑子成,张锡洲.玉米苗期横垄坡面地表糙度的变化及其对细沟侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):30-34.[22] 郑子成,何淑勤,吴发启,等.地表糙度与水力糙率系数的关系[J].山地学报,2004,22(2):236-239.[23] 王瑾杰,丁建丽,张喆,等.奎屯河流域春季融雪期SCS-CN模型参数取值方法[J].生态学报,2017,37(13):4456-4465.[24] 赵龙山,宋向阳,梁心蓝,等.黄土坡耕地耕作方式不同时微地形分布特征及水土保持效应[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(2):64-70.
相似文献/References:
[1]许泉立,王 庆,洪 亮,等.滇池流域不透水表面动态模拟及其非点源污染风险评价[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(04):186.
XU Quanli,WANG Qing,HONG Liang,et al.Dynamic Simulation of Impervious Surface Expansion and Its Risk Assessment on Non-point Source Pollution in Dianchi Lake Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(01):186.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-12-18 修回日期:2021-02-10资助项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目“微地形条件下黄土耕作坡面水蚀发育过程的三维数值模拟与机理研究”(41371273)第一作者:张明浩(1997—),女,河南郑州人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为土地资源与空间信息技术。E-mail:zhang_mh@nwafu.edu.cn通信作者:张青峰(1974—),男,山西孝义人,教授,主要从事土地资源与空间信息技术方面的研究。E-mail:zhqf@nwsuaf.edu.cn