[1]李恒吉,逯承鹏,鹿晨昱,等.东北地区城市可持续发展的时空格局演变分析[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(06):407-411.
LI Hengji,LU Chengpeng,LU Chenyu,et al.Spatiotemporal Pattern Evolution of Urban Sustainable Development Capacity in Northeast China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(06):407-411.
点击复制
《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P]
卷:
28
期数:
2021年06期
页码:
407-411
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-10-10
- Title:
-
Spatiotemporal Pattern Evolution of Urban Sustainable Development Capacity in Northeast China
- 文章编号:
-
1005-3409(2021)06-0407-05
- 作者:
-
李恒吉1,2,逯承鹏3,鹿晨昱4,韩金雨1,徐 丽1
-
(1.中国科学院 西北生态环境资源研究院文献情报中心,兰州 730000; 2.兰州大学 资源环境学院,兰州 730000; 3.兰州大学 县域经济发展研究院&乡村振兴战略研究院,兰州 730000; 4.西北师范大学 地理与环境科学学院,兰州 730070)
- Author(s):
-
LI Hengji1,2,LU Chengpeng3,LU Chenyu4,HAN Jinyu1,XU Li1
-
(1.Information Center of Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China; 2.College of Earth and Environmental Science,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China; 3.Institute of County Economic Developments & Rural Revitalization Strategy,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China; 4.College of Geography and Environment Sciences,Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou 730070,China)
-
- 关键词:
-
城市可持续发展; TOPSIS; 耦合协调度模型; 时空演化格局; 东北地区
- Keywords:
-
urban sustainable development; TOPSIS; coupling-coordination model; spatiotemporal evolution; northeast China
- 分类号:
-
K902
- 文献标志码:
-
A
- 摘要:
-
为综合测度东北地区城市可持续发展能力服务东北振兴战略,采用变异系数TOPSIS法、耦合协调度模型及ArcGIS技术等分析方法,通过构建城市可持续发展能力评价模型,从城市经济、社会、生态环境及综合维度对东北地区34个地级市城市可持续发展能力和耦合协调度时空演化过程和空间分析格局进行了研究。结果表明:(1)研究期间,总体上东北三省城市综合可持续发展能力整体较低,城市经济、社会和生态环境子系统可持续发展能力在不同时期呈现出不同的时空演化特征;(2)从空间分异视角来看,辽宁省内沈阳和大连的“双核”特征较为显著,吉林和黑龙江两省整体上“中心—外围”特征较为突出,总体上表现为沈阳、大连、长春和哈尔滨4大城市引领格局,空间分异特征较为显著;(3)34个地级市经济、社会和生态环境子系统整体耦合度较高,各城市子系统之间相互依赖性较高,但城市耦合协调度水平较低,较多城市面临衰退失调的困境。因此,提升城市可持续发展能力整体水平和城市间以及各城市子系统内部的协调发展是新时代东北全面振兴过程中城市发展的关键问题。
- Abstract:
-
To comprehensively measure the urban sustainable development capacity in northeast China,serve the Northeast Revitalization Strategy,the coefficient of variation TOPSIS method,coupling coordination degree model and ArcGIS technology and other analytical methods were used to construct the urban sustainable development ability evaluation model to study the spatial-temporal evolution of sustainable development capacity and coupling-coordination process and spatial analysis pattern of 34 prefecture-level cities in northeast China from the urban economic,social,ecological environment and comprehensive dimensions. The results showed that:(1)during the study period,the overall urban sustainable development capacity in the three northeastern provinces was generally low,and the sustainable development capability of urban economic,social and ecological subsystems showed different spatiotemporal evolution characteristics in different periods;(2)from the perspective of spatial differentiation,the ‘dual-core' characteristics of Shenyang and Dalian in Liaoning Province were relatively significant; the ‘central-peripheral' characteristics of Jilin Province and Heilongjiang Province were relatively prominent; in general,they were represented by the leading pattern of Shenyang,Dalian,Changchun and Harbin,with significant spatial differentiation characteristics;(3)the economic,social and ecological environment subsystems of 34 prefecture-level cities had a high degree of overall coupling,and the interdependence of subsystems in each city was relatively high,but the level of urban coupling-coordination was low,and many cities faced the dilemma of recession. Improving the overall level of urban sustainable development capability and the coordinated development within cities and sub-systems are the key issues for urban development in the process of comprehensive revitalization of the northeast China in the new era.
参考文献/References:
[1] 傅伯杰.地理学:从知识、科学到决策[J].地理学报,2017,72(11):1923-1932.[2] 傅伯杰,冷疏影,宋长青.新时期地理学的特征与任务[J].地理科学,2015,35(8):939-945.[3] 朱高立,饶芳萍,李发志,等.基于生态足迹的沿海城市可持续发展能力评价及预测分析:以江苏盐城为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):360-366.[4] 莉迪亚·梅热耶夫斯卡,何娟.城市的可持续发展:系统性方法[J].南京工业大学学报:社会科学版,2019,18(4):8-14,111.[5] Singh G K,Mohammad S. Widening rural-urban disparities in all-cause mortality and mortality from major causes of death in the USA,1969—2009 [J]. Journal of Urban Health,2014,91(2):272-292.[6] Folke C. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses[J]. Global Environmental Change,2006,16(3):253-267.[7] Lu C P,Ren W X,Xue B,et al. Modelling impact of climate change and air pollution in cities [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability,2017,170(3):133-140.[8] 闻熠,高峻,徐迪,等.基于改进参数的长三角城市生态足迹分析及其可持续性评价[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):312-318,327.[9] 彭程,陈志芬,吴华瑞,等.基于ESDA的城市可持续发展能力时空分异格局研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(2):144-151.[10] 査奇芬,段梦杰.长三角城市可持续发展能力评价研究[J].农村经济与科技,2018,29(13):269-271.[11] 赵永超.资源型城市可持续发展能力:概念界定、提升路径与实施对策研究[J].管理现代化,2021,41(2):74-76.[12] 牛元文.可持续发展理论的内涵认知:纪念联合国里约环发大会20周年[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(5):9-14.[13] 郭荣中,申海建,杨敏华.基于改进生态足迹因子的长株潭地区可持续发展[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(5):174-180.[14] 杨青,逯承鹏,周锋,等.基于能值—生态足迹模型的东北老工业基地生态安全评价:以辽宁省为例[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(5):1594-1602.[15] 逯承鹏,陈兴鹏,张子龙,等.基于MFA的兰州市经济增长与环境压力关系变化分解分析[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2013,49(5):604-610.[16] Hwang C L,Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag,1981.[17] Lu C P,Ren W X,Xue B,et al. Sustainability investigation of resource-based cities in Northeastern China[J].Sustainability,2016,8(10). DOI:10.3390/su8101058.[18] 刘笑男,倪鹏飞.中国大中城市竞争力的耦合协调度分析[J].河北经贸大学学报,2019,40(2):57-64.
相似文献/References:
[1]文 倩,孙江涛,范利瑶,等.基于熵权TOPSIS的河南省农业水土资源承载力时空分异与关联分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(01):333.
WEN Qian,SUN Jiangtao,FAN Liyao,et al.Evaluation of Agricultural Soil-Water Resources Carrying Capacity(ASWCC)and Relation Analysis Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS in Henan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(06):333.
更新日期/Last Update:
2021-10-10