WANG Peng,ZHAO Wei,KE Xinli.Evaluation and Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecological Vulnerability of Qianjiang Based on SRP Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):347-354.
基于SRP模型的潜江市生态脆弱性评价及时空演变
- Title:
- Evaluation and Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecological Vulnerability of Qianjiang Based on SRP Model
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2021)05-0347-08
- Keywords:
- ecological vulnerability; geo-informatic spectrum; space principal component analysis; kilometer grid; Qianjiang City
- 分类号:
- X826
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以潜江市为研究区域,利用SRP模型从生态敏感性、生态恢复力和生态压力度3个层面选取14个指标构建评价指标体系,采用空间主成分分析、地学信息图谱等方法,从1 km格网尺度上对2008—2017年潜江市生态脆弱性进行了综合定量评价及时空演变分析。结果表明:(1)潜江市生态脆弱性受人类活动和自然条件共同影响,人类活动对生态环境的影响随时间推移逐渐加强。(2)2008—2017年潜江市微度和轻度脆弱面积总占比均在70%左右,说明生态脆弱性整体处于良好水平; 极度脆弱、重度脆弱、中度脆弱、轻度脆弱和微度脆弱由城市建成区向外依次呈圈层结构发散分布。(3)2008—2017年潜江市生态脆弱性程度有所加深,绝大多数乡镇生态脆弱性综合指数有所增加,浩口镇和泰丰街道分别下降0.32,0.10; 生态脆弱性等级发生变化图谱单元面积为1176.40 km2,其中“轻度→中度”、“微度→轻度”、“轻度→微度”、“中度→重度”图谱类型最为显著,对应面积分别占变化单元面积的26.11%,22.38%,15.55%,8.83%; 涨落势图谱中,中度脆弱涨势最强,转入面积为410.52 km2,轻度脆弱落势最强,转出面积达556.77 km2。研究结果可为潜江市生态保护和修复提供科学依据。
- Abstract:
- In order to explore the ecological vulnerability of city in Central China,14 indicators were selected based on Ecological Sensitivity-Ecological Recovery-Ecological Pressure(SRP)model,and spacial principal component analysis and geo-informatic spectrum method were employed. A case study of Qiangjiang was carried out to assess its ecological vulnerability as well as spatio-temporal evolution from 2008 to 2017 on the kilometer-grid scale. The results show that:(1)the ecological vulnerability of Qianjiang was influenced by human activities and natural conditions,and the influence of human activities was gradually strengthening during the period;(2)from 2008 to 2017,areas of slight and light vulnerability accounted for about 70% of Qianjiang,indicating that the overall ecological vulnerability kept at a good level; the areas of severe,strong,moderate,light and slight vulnerability distributed in circles from the center of urban built-up;(3)during the research period,the ecological vulnerability of Qianjiang increased slightly; the index of ecological vulnerability increased for most towns,but it decreased by 0.32 and 0.10 for Haokou and Taifeng; the TUPU with changing ecological vulnerability was summed to 1 176.40 km2,in which ‘light to moderate',‘slight to light',‘light to slight' and ‘moderate to strong' were the major transforms,with a percentage of 26.11%,22.38%,15.55% and 8.83%,respectively; as the top rising and top falling TUPU,the moderate vulnerability increased by 410.52 km2 and the light vulnerability reduced by 556.77 km2. These results could provide useful help for the protection and restoration of ecological environment in the study area.
参考文献/References:
[1] 赵桂久.生态环境综合整治与恢复技术研究取得重大成果[J].中国科学院院刊,1996(4):289-292.[2] 卢亚灵,颜磊,许学工.环渤海地区生态脆弱性评价及其空间自相关分析[J].资源科学,2010,32(2):303-308.[3] 徐广才,康慕谊,贺丽娜,等.生态脆弱性及其研究进展[J].生态学报,2009,29(5):2578-2588.[4] 田超,杨夏捷,鞠园华,等.吉林省西部地区生态脆弱性的动态评价[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):298-303.[5] 王贝贝,丁明军,管琪卉,等.基于格网的南昌市生态环境脆弱性评价[J].生态学报,2019,39(15):5460-5472.[6] Song G B,Chen Y,Tian M R,et al. The ecological vulnerability evaluation in southwestern mountain region of China based on GIS and AHP method[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences,2010,2:465-475.[7] 马骏,李昌晓,魏虹,等.三峡库区生态脆弱性评价[J].生态学报,2015,35(21):7117-7129.[8] 孙平军,修春亮,王忠芝.基于PSE模型的矿业城市生态脆弱性的变化研究:以辽宁阜新为例[J].经济地理,2010,30(8):1354-1359.[9] 薛联青,王晶,魏光辉.基于PSR模型的塔里木河流域生态脆弱性评价[J].河海大学学报:自然科学版,2019,47(1):13-19.[10] 魏明欢,胡波洋,杨鸿雁,等.山区县域土地利用变化对生态脆弱性的影响:以青龙满族自治县为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):322-328.[11] 于伯华,吕昌河.青藏高原高寒区生态脆弱性评价[J].地理研究,2011,30(12):2289-2295.[12] 乔青,高吉喜,王维,等.生态脆弱性综合评价方法与应用[J].环境科学研究,2008,21(5):117-123.[13] 邱彭华,徐颂军,谢跟踪,等.基于景观格局和生态敏感性的海南西部地区生态脆弱性分析[J].生态学报,2007,27(4):1257-1264.[14] 王瑞燕,赵庚星,周伟,等.县域生态环境脆弱性评价及其动态分析:以黄河三角洲垦利县为例[J].生态学报,2009,29(7):3790-3799.[15] 赵乾坤,王治国,张光灿,等.山西省水土保持功能区生态脆弱性评[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(6):16-22.[16] 安士伟,万三敏,李小建.城市脆弱性的评估与风险控制:以河南省为例[J].经济地理,2017,37(5):81-86.[17] 张行,陈海,史琴琴,等.陕西省景观生态脆弱性时空演变及其影响因素[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(2):496-505.[18] 贾晶晶,赵军,王建邦,等.基于SRP模型的石羊河流域生态脆弱性评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(1):34-41.[19] 王金亮,邵景安,李阳兵.近20 a三峡库区农林地利用变化图谱特征分析[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(2):235-247.[20] 吕晓,史洋洋,黄贤金,等.江苏省土地利用变化的图谱特征[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(4):1077-1084.[21] 徐广才,康慕谊,Metzger M,等.锡林郭勒盟生态脆弱性[J].生态学报,2012,32(5):1643-1653.[22] 郭宾,周忠发,苏维词,等.基于格网GIS的喀斯特山区草地生态脆弱性评价[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(2):204-207.[23] 黄光球,刘权宸,陆秋琴.基于状态Petri网的矿区生态环境脆弱度动态评价方法[J].安全与环境学报,2017,17(4):1583-1588.[24] 李永化,范强,王雪,等.基于SRP模型的自然灾害多发区生态脆弱性时空分异研究:以辽宁省朝阳县为例[J].地理科学,2015,35(11):1452-1459.[25] Shao H Y,Liu M,Shao Q F,et al. Research on eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation of the Anning River Basin in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2014,72(5):1555-1568.[26] 郭椿阳,高尚,周伯燕,等.基于格网的伏牛山区土地利用变化对生态服务价值影响研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(10):3482-3493.[27] 南颖,吉喆,冯恒栋,等.基于遥感和地理信息系统的图们江地区生态安全评价[J].生态学报,2013,33(15):4790-4798.
相似文献/References:
[1]于法展,陈龙乾,沈正平,等.苏北低山丘陵区典型森林生态脆弱性评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):188.
YU Fa-zhan,CHEN Long-qian,SHEN Zheng-ping,et al.Assessment of Ecological Vulnerability of Typicality Forest of Low Mountains and Hills in Northern Jiangsu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):188.
[2]叶正伟.淮河流域湿地的生态脆弱性特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(04):24.
YE Zheng-wei.Discussion on the Ecological Vulnerability in the Wetland of Huaihe River Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(05):24.
[3]叶正伟.洪泽湖湿地生态脆弱性的驱动力系统与评价[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(06):245.
YE Zheng-wei.A Study and Appraisal on Ecological Vulnerability System in Hongze Lake Wetland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(05):245.
[4]赵冰,张杰,孙希华.基于GIS的淮河流域桐柏一大别山区生态脆弱性评价[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(03):135.
ZHAO bing,ZHANG Jie,SUN Xi-hua.Eco-environmental Vulnerability Evaluation Based on GIS in Tongbai-Dabie Mountain Area of Huai River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(05):135.
[5]张鑫,杜朝阳,蔡焕杰.黄土高原典型流域生态环境脆弱性的集对分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(04):96.
ZHANG Xin,CAI Huan-jie.Assessment of Ecological Vulnerability Based on Set Pair Analysis in Typical Loess Plateau Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(05):96.
[6]卢远,苏文静,华璀.基于景观格局和生态敏感性的左江流域生态脆弱性分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(03):78.
LU Yuan,SU Wen-jing,HUA Cui.Analysis of Ecological Vulnerability in Zuojiang River Basin Based on Landscape Pattern and Ecosystem Sensitivity[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(05):78.
[7]封建民,郭玲霞,李晓华.基于景观格局的榆阳区生态脆弱性评价[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):179.
FENG Jianmin,GUO Lingxia,LI Xiaohua.Analysis of Ecological Vulnerability in Yuyang District Based on Landscape Pattern[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):179.
[8]田超,杨夏捷,鞠园华,等.吉林省西部地区生态脆弱性的动态评价[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(04):298.
TIAN Chao,YANG Xiajie,JU Yuanhua,et al.Dynamic Evaluation of Ecological Vulnerability in Western Jilin Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(05):298.
[9]魏明欢,胡波洋,杨鸿雁,等.山区县域土地利用变化对生态脆弱性的影响——以青龙满族自治县为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(06):322.
WEI Minghuan,HU Boyang,YANG Hongyan,et al.Effects of Land Use Transformation on Ecological Vulnerability in Mountainous Counties—Taking Qinglong Manchu Autonomous County as an Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(05):322.
[10]苏胜亮,高 明,徐锦娟,等.宁夏海原县生态脆弱性与经济贫困空间耦合关系[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(03):327.
SU shengliang,GAO Ming,XU Jinjuan,et al.Spatial Coupling Relationship Between Ecological Fragility and Economic Poverty in Haiyuan County of Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(05):327.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-10-09 修回日期:2020-10-29资助项目:国家自然科学基金“城市生态用地破碎化与土地功能演变的互馈机理研究”(41971240); 湖北省自然资源厅科研计划项目“基于大数据技术的自然资源生态安全监测预警研究”(ZRZY2020KJ02); 湖北省自然资源厅科研计划项目“基于地理本体论的多源自然资源调查数据融合研究”(ZRZY2020KJ11)第一作者:王鹏(1996—),男,湖北省随州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为国土综合整治与生态评价。E-mail:1182703920@qq.com通信作者:赵微(1980—),男,浙江省湖州人,博士,副教授,研究方向为国土综合整治。E-mail:zhaow@mail.hzau.edu.cn.