WANG Jia,CHEN Wei,ZHANG Qiang,et al.Effects of Low Nitrogen Stress on Soil Nitrogen Converting Enzyme Activities Under Different Kinds of Tartary Buckwheat[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):47-53.
低氮胁迫对不同耐瘠性苦荞土壤氮转化酶活性的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Low Nitrogen Stress on Soil Nitrogen Converting Enzyme Activities Under Different Kinds of Tartary Buckwheat
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2021)05-0047-07
- Keywords:
- low nitrogen stress; nitrogen invertase activities; Tartary Buckwheat with different tolerance
- 分类号:
- S154.2
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为研究低氮胁迫对不同耐瘠性苦荞土壤氮转化酶活性的影响,以迪庆苦荞(DQ,耐低氮品种)和‘黑丰1号'(HF,不耐低氮品种)为研究对象,设置3个施氮水平:对照(CK,尿素0 mg/kg)、低氮量(N1,尿素80 mg/kg)、正常施氮量(N2,尿素160 mg/kg),对不同耐瘠性苦荞品种土壤的水肥状况及氮转化相关酶活性进行测定分析。结果表明:低氮胁迫对苦荞土壤的水肥状况有显著影响(p<0.05)。在低氮胁迫下,DQ的土壤含水量、pH、全氮、全磷、NO-3-N及产量比HF高。低氮胁迫对苦荞土壤氮转化相关酶活性亦有显著影响(p<0.05),在低氮胁迫下,HF的铵氧化酶活性、蛋白酶活性比DQ高37.61%,253.27%。同时,冗余分析表明品种(p=0.002),土壤含水量(p=0.002),NO-3-N(p=0.012),全钾(p=0.016),是影响土壤中氮转化过程关键酶活性最重要的环境因子。综上所述,迪庆苦荞对根际土壤水肥的保持度及产量高于黑丰,且成熟期迪庆苦荞氮转化酶活性较低,可能是迪庆苦荞通过对土壤中NH+4-N和NO-3-N的选择性吸收来改变根际土壤中的pH值从而影响氮转化酶的活性来调节环境中氮素的供给。因此,建议黄土高原土地养分贫瘠地区选用耐瘠性强苦荞品种,该结果可为黄土高原等土地养分贫瘠地区农业发展提供理论依据和实践参考。
- Abstract:
- In order to study the effect of low nitrogen stress on the soil nitrogen invertase activities of different kinds of barren-tolerant buckwheat,Diqing tartary buckwheat(DQ,low nitrogen-tolerant cultivar)and ‘Heifeng 1'(HF,low nitrogen-tolerant cultivar)were used as research subjects,three levels of nitrogen application: control(CK,urea 0 mg/kg),low nitrogen(N1,urea 80 mg/kg),normal nitrogen application(N2,urea 160 mg/kg)werer set,soil water and fertilizer status and nitrogen conversion related enzyme activities of different barren-tolerant buckwheat cultivars were analyzed. The results show that low nitrogen stress has the significant effect on the soil water and fertilizer status of soil planted to tartary buckwheat(p<0.05). Under low nitrogen stress,the soil water content,pH,total nitrogen,total phosphorus,NO-3-N and yield of DQ are higher than those of HF. Low nitrogen stress also has a significant effect on the enzyme activities related to nitrogen conversion in soil planted to tartary buckwheat(p<0.05). Under low nitrogen stress,the activities of ammonia oxidase and protease of HF are 37.61% and 253.27% higher than those of DQ. At the same time,redundant analysis shows that cultivars(p=0.002),soil water content(p=0.002),NO-3-N(p=0.012),total potassium(p=0.016)affect soil the most important environmental factor for key enzyme activities in the nitrogen conversion process. In summary,compared with HF,DQ has higher water and fertilizer retention and yield,but has lower soil enzyme activities because selective way of absorption nitrogen of the form of NO-3-N and NH+4-N affects the soil pH and controls the soil enzyme activities for the nitrogen usability and the selected characters cultivar and moisture had the greatest effect on soil nitrogen invertase activities. Therefore,it is recommended to select buckwheat cultivars with strong barren tolerance in the limited soil nutrient areas of the Loess Plateau. These results can provide theoretical basis and practical reference for agricultural development in the poor soil nutrient areas of the Loess Plateau.
参考文献/References:
[1] Jiang S,Liu Q,Xie Y,et al. Separation of five flavonoids from tartary buckwheat(Fagopyrum tataricum(L.)Gaertn)grains via off-line two dimensional high-speed counter-current chromatography[J]. Food Chemistry,2015,186:153-159.[2] Peng W,Hu C,Shu Z,et al. Antitumor activity of tatariside F isolated from roots of Fagopyrum tataricum(L.)Gaertn against H22 hepatocellular carcinoma via up-regulation of p53[J]. Phytomedicine,2015,22(7/8):730-736.[3] 黄兴富,赵声定,孙浩岩,等.荞麦中黄酮类化合物的研究进展[J].中国民族民间医药,2010,19(7):24-25.[4] Irvin N A,Bistline-East A,Hoddle M S. The effect of an irrigated buckwheat cover crop on grape vine productivity,and beneficial insect and grape pest abundance in southern California[J]. Biological Control,2016,93:72-83.[5] 王鹏科,高金锋,高小丽,等.苦荞地方种质资源的遗传多样性分析[J].西北植物学报,2010,30(2),255-261.[6] 王慧,杨媛,杨明君,等.晋北地区旱作苦荞麦品种筛选[J].山西农业科学,2013,41(4):321-323.[7] Jeong H L,Kee J P,Bum K K,et al. Effect of salinity stress on phenolic compounds and carotenoids in buckwheat(Fagopyrum esculentum M.)sprout[J]. Food Chemistry,2012,135(3):1065-1070.[8] Yao Y,Xuan Z,Yuan L,et al. Effects of ultraviolet-B radiation on crop growth,development,yield and leaf pigment concentration of tartary buckwheat(Fagopyrum tataricum)under field conditions[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2006,25(3):215-222.[9] 张锡洲,李廷轩,王永东.植物生长环境与根系分泌物的关系[J].土壤通报,2007,38(4):785-789.[10] 张楚,张永清,路之娟,等.低氮胁迫对不同苦荞品种苗期生长和根系生理特征的影响[J].西北植物学报,2017,37(7):1331-1339.[11] 赵涛,高小丽,高扬,等.轮作及连作条件下荞麦功能叶片衰老特性的比较[J].西北农业学报,2015,24(11):87-94.[12] 刘拥海,俞乐,彭新湘.不同氮素形态培养下荞麦叶片中草酸积累的变化[J].广西植物,2007,27(4):616-621.[13] Shi B,Zhang J,Wang C,et al. Responses of hydrolytic enzyme activities in saline-alkaline soil to mixed inorganic and organic nitrogen addition[J]. Scientific Reports,2018,8(1):1-12.[14] Jia X,Li X D,Zhao Y H,et al. Soil microbial community structure in the rhizosphere of Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings exposed to elevated air temperature and cadmium-contaminated soils for 4 years[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2019,650:2355-2363.[15] 陈伟,崔亚茹,杨洋,等.苦荞根系分泌有机酸对低氮胁迫的响应机制[J].土壤通报,2019,50(1):149-156.[16] 陈伟,孙从建,李卫红.低氮胁迫下苦荞根际土壤纤维素酶活性的响应机制:荧光光谱法测定[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2018,38(10):3159-3162.[17] 陈伟,杨洋,崔亚茹,等.低氮对苦荞苗期土壤碳转化酶活性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2019,37(4):132-138.[18] Poitout A,Crabos A,Petrik I,et al. Responses to systemic nitrogen signaling in Arabidopsis roots involve trans-Zeatin in Shoots[J]. The Plant Cell,2018,30(6):1243-1257.[19] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2007.[20] Kandeler. Methods in Soil Biology[M]. Springer-Verlag,1996:426.[21] Ladd J N,Butler J H A. Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and dipeptide derivatives as substrates[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1972,4(1):19-30.[22] Wardle D A. Communities and Ecosystems:linking the aboveground and belowground components [M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press,2013.[23] Bradley J A,Amend J P,Larowe D E. Bioenergetic controls on microbial ecophysiology in marine sediments[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2018,9:180,doi:10,3389/fmicb.2018.00180.[24] Hall E K,Bernhardt E S,Bier R L,et al. Understanding how microbiomes influence the systems they inhabit[J]. Nature Microbiology,2018,3(9):977-982.[25] Chen W,Hou H X,Sun C J,et al. The effect of elevated ozone concentration on enzymes increases NO-3 content in the soil at the jointing stage of wheat field[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2018,89:14-19.[26] Knoepp J D,Turner D P,Tingey D T. Effects of ammonium and nitrate on nutrient uptake and activity of nitrogen assimilating enzymes in western hemlock[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,1993,59(3/4):179-191.[27] Eliis S,Howe M T,Goulding K W T,et al. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics in a grassland soil with varying pH:effect of pH on the denitrification potential and dynamics of the reduction enzymes[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1998,30(3):359-367.[28] Geddes B A,Paramasivan P,Joffrin A,et al. Engineering transkingdom signalling in plants to control gene expression in rhizosphere bacteria[J]. Nature Communications,2019,10(1):1-11.[29] 陈伟,皇甫倩华,孙从建,等.大气O3升高对小麦根际土壤微生物量和氮素转化酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报,2017,48(3):623-630.[30] 任如冰.不同施肥方式对土壤钾素有效性及番茄产量品质的影响[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2018.[31] Geisseler D,Horwath W R. Relationship between carbon and nitrogen availability and extracellular enzyme activities in soil[J]. Pedobiologia,2009,53(1):87-98.[32] Wang C,Liu D W,Bai E. Decreasing soil microbial diversity is associated with decreasing microbial biomass under nitrogen addition[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2018,120:126-133.[33] Crowther T W,Van den Hoogen J,Wan J,et al. The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry[J]. Science,2019,365(6455),DOI:10,1126/science. aav0550.[34] Berendsen R L,Pieterse C M J,Bakker P A H M. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health[J]. Trends in Plant Science,2012,17(8):478-486.[35] Donaldson M A,Bish D L,Raff J D. Soil surface acidity plays a determining role in the atmospheric-terrestrial exchange of nitrous acid[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2014,111(52):18472-18477.[36] Fish M A,Fahey T. Microbial biomass and nitrogen cycling responses to fertilization and litter removal in young northern hardwood forests [J]. Biogeochemistry,2001,53(2):201-223.[37] 陈伟,崔亚茹,孙从建,等.低氮胁迫下不同苦荞品种开花前土壤养分含量特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(4):151-156.[38] Utriainen J,Holopainen T. Nitrogen availability modifies the ozone responses of Scots pine seedlings exposed in an open-field system[J]. Tree Physiology,2001,21(16):1205-1213.[39] Pivato B,Bru D,Busset H,et al. Positive effects of plant association on rhizosphere microbial communities depend on plant species involved and soil nitrogen level[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017,114:1-4.[40] 张楚,张永清,路之娟,等.苗期耐低氮基因型苦荞的筛选及其评价指标[J].作物学报,2017,43(8):1205-1215.[41] Dennis P G,Miller A J,Hirsch P R. Are root exudates more important than other sources of rhizodeposits in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities?[J]. Fems Microbiol Ecol.,2010,72(3):313-327.
相似文献/References:
[1]陈伟,崔亚茹,孙从建,等.低氮胁迫下不同苦荞品种开花前土壤养分含量特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(04):151.
CHEN Wei,CUI Yaru,SUN Congjian,et al.Characteristics of Soil Nutrient Contents in the Fields of Different Cultivated Varieties of Fagopyrum tataricum Before Flowering Under Low Nitrogen Stress[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(05):151.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-10-26 修回日期:2020-11-03资助项目:山西省研究生教改项目(2019JG123); 山西省留学人员科技活动择优资助项目(2020020); 山西省回国留学人员科研资助项目(2020-092)山西省高校科技创新项目(2020L0238,2020L0240); 国家青年资助项目(41601317)第一作者:王佳(1994—),女,山西省运城市人,在读研究生,主要从事土壤养分及土壤酶学的研究。E-mail:jiawang1716@163.com通信作者:陈伟(1987—),女,辽宁省铁岭市人,副教授,博士,主要从事土壤酶学及微生物学方面的研究。E-mail:wan_xin_chen@126.com