[1]范琳杰,李向义,林丽莎,等.2006—2018年策勒绿洲农田不同施肥量对土壤养分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):41-46.
　FAN Linjie,LI Xiangyi,LIN Lisha,et al.Effects of Different Fertilization Rates on Soil Nutrients in Cele Oasis from 2006 to 2018[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):41-46.
点击复制

2006—2018年策勒绿洲农田不同施肥量对土壤养分的影响

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 28 期数: 2021年05期 页码: 41-46 栏目: 出版日期: 2021-08-20
Title:
Effects of Different Fertilization Rates on Soil Nutrients in Cele Oasis from 2006 to 2018
文章编号:
1005-3409(2021)05-0041-06
作者:
范琳杰1,2,4,李向义1,3,林丽莎1,2,3,热甫开提·沙比提1,2,3,薛 伟5
(1.中国科学院 新疆生态与地理研究所,新疆荒漠植物根系生态与植被修复重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830011; 2.中国科学院 新疆生态与地理研究所,荒漠与绿洲生态国家重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830011; 3.新疆策勒荒漠草地生态系统国家野外科学观测试验站,新疆 策勒 848300; 4.中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 5.兰州大学,兰州 730000)
Author(s):
FAN Linjie1,2,4,LI Xiangyi1,3,LIN Lisha1,2,3,SHABITI·Refukaiti1,2,3,XUE Wei5
(1.Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Desert Plant Roots Ecology and Vegetation Restoration,Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Urumqi 830011,China; 2.State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology,Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Urumqi 830011,China; 3.Cele National Field Science Observation and Research Station of Desert Grassland Ecosystem,Cele,Xinjiang 848300, China; 4.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences......)
关键词:
土壤养分;  绿洲农田;  施肥管理;  极端干旱区
Keywords:
soil nutrient;  oasis fields;  fertilization management;  extremely arid region
分类号:
S157.4+1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究不同施肥量施入对策勒绿洲农田土壤养分的影响,以极端干旱环境下的塔里木盆地南缘策勒绿洲为研究区域,3种典型不同肥力投入农田以绿洲边缘3种典型不同肥力投入农田:高投入农田,常规投入农田,无施肥新垦农田为研究对象,并另选取一块未开垦样地为对照样地,自2006—2018年,采样时间为2006—2010年、2017—2018年,分析了4块样地土壤有机质含量等6项指标变化。结果表明:2006—2018年,研究区高投入农田样地的有机质含量、全氮含量、碱解氮含量、有效磷含量显著高于常规投入农田、无施肥新垦农田和未开垦对照样地; 未开垦对照样地速效钾含量显著高于其他3块样地; 对2006—2018年土壤养分平均值进行分析,高投入农田土壤养分提高效果更好,有机质含量、全氮含量、碱解氮含量、有效磷含量相比未开垦对照样地分别增加204.22%,146.73%,46.45%,633.75%; 各样地土壤pH值与有机质含量有极显著的正相关性(p<0.01),与速效钾含量呈显著或极显著的负相关性,有机质含量与全氮和有效磷含量有极显著的正相关性(p<0.01)。本研究可为绿洲开垦过程农田进行合理肥力投入及可持续性管理提供参考。
Abstract:
In order to study the effects of different fertilizer application rates on soil nutrients in Cele oasis,this study took Cele oasis in the southern margin of Tarim Basin as the research area under extreme arid environment,and three types of typical different fertility input of farmland at the edge of oasis. Three types of typical different fertility inputs of farmlands at the edge of oasis: high-input farmland,conventionally input farmland,and newly reclaimed farmland without fertilization were taken as the research samples. Another uncultivated sample plot was selected as a pair of conventional plots. From 2006 to 2018,the sampling time was from 2006 to 2010 and from 2017 to 2018,and the changes of 6 indicators such as soil organic matter content in four sample plots were analyzed. The results showed that: from 2006 to 2018,the organic matter content,total nitrogen content,alkalytic nitrogen content and available phosphorus content in the sample plots of high-input farmland in the study area were significantly higher than those of conventional input farmland,new reclaimed farmland without fertilization and unreclaimed pair farmland. The content of available potassium in uncultivated land was significantly higher than that in other three plots. By analyzing the average values of soil nutrients from 2006 to 2018,it was found that the soil nutrients in high-input farmland had a better improvement effect. The organic matter content,total nitrogen content,alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen content and available phosphorus content increased by 204.22%,146.73%,46.45% and 633.75%,respectively,compared with those of uncultivated farmland. There were significant positive correlation between pH value and organic matter content(p<0.01),a significant or significant negative correlation between pH value and available potassium content,and a significant positive correlation between organic matter content and total nitrogen and available phosphorus content(p<0.01). This study can provide reference for rational fertilizer input and sustainable management of farmland during oasis reclamation.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘艳,宋同清,蔡德所,等.喀斯特峰丛洼地不同土地利用方式土壤肥力特征[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(6):1561-1568.
[2] 张晗,赵小敏,朱美青,等.近30年南方丘陵山区耕地土壤养分时空演变特征:以江西省为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(2):58-65,71.
[3] 王燕,赵哈林,董治宝,等.荒漠绿洲农田盐渍化过程中土壤环境的演变过程[J].生态环境学报,2014,23(11):24-31.
[4] 桂东伟,雷加强,曾凡江.绿洲农田不同深度土壤粒径分布特性及其影响因素:以策勒绿洲为例[J].干旱区研究,2011,28(4):622-629.
[5] Gong L,Ran Q,He G,et al. A soil quality assessment under different land use types in Keriya river basin,Southern Xinjiang,China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2015,146:223-229.
[6] Chakrabarty Y,Akter S,Saifullah A S M,et al. Use of fertilizer and pesticide for crop production in agrarian area of tangail district,Bangladesh[J]. Environment and Ecology Research,2014,2(6):253-261.
[7] 桂东伟,穆桂金,雷加强,等.干旱区农田不同利用强度下土壤质量评价[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(4):894-900.
[8] 康日峰,任意,吴会军,等.26年来东北黑土区土壤养分演变特征[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(11):2113-2125.
[9] 张淑香,张文菊,沈仁芳,等.我国典型农田长期施肥土壤肥力变化与研究展望[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(6):1389-1393.
[10] 鲁艳红,廖育林,聂军,等.连续施肥对不同肥力稻田土壤基础地力和土壤养分变化的影响[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(21):4169-4178.
[11] 苏永中,杨荣,刘婷娜.施肥对新垦绿洲风沙土肥力及碳积累的影响[J].中国沙漠,2019,39(3):1-6.
[12] 杨振兴,周怀平,解文艳,等.长期施肥对褐土有机质、氮动态变化的影响[J].山西农业科学,2019,47(12):2131-2134.
[13] Lin Z,Chang X,Wang D,et al. Long-term fertilization effects on processing quality of wheat grain in the North China Plain[J]. Field Crops Research,2015,174:55-60.
[14] 段婧婧,耿庆龙,摆玮.和田地区耕层土壤养分含量分析[J].农村科技,2019,7(5):18-20.
[15] 邹陈,徐立帅,曾凡江,等.一次风沙过程对策勒绿洲棉花光合特性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(3):120-125.
[16] 桂东伟,雷加强,曾凡江,等.绿洲化过程中农田土壤粒径分布性质变化[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(6):1354-1361.
[17] 刘光崧.土壤理化分析与剖面描述[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1996.
[18] 宇万太,张璐,殷秀岩,等.下辽河平原农业生态系统不同施肥制度的土壤养分收支[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(12):1571-1574.
[19] 桂东伟,雷加强,曾凡江,等.绿洲边缘不同土地利用方式下的土壤质量变化及分析[J].环境科学,2010,31(9):265-270.
[20] 周晓兵,陶冶,吴林,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘荒漠绿洲过渡带不同土地利用影响下土壤化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2019,39(3):216-227.
[21] 王海明,陈治谏,廖晓勇,等.三峡库区坡耕地植物篱对土壤特性的影响研究[J].中国水土保持,2010(10):21-23.
[22] 李东,王子芳,郑杰炳,等.紫色丘陵区不同土地利用方式下土壤有机质和全量氮磷钾含量状况[J].土壤通报,2009,40(2):310-314.
[23] 路鹏,苏以荣,牛铮,等.红壤丘陵区村级农田土壤养分的空间变异与制图[J].浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版,2007,33(1):89-95.
[24] 陈文婷,付岩梅,隋跃宇,等.长期施肥对不同有机质含量农田黑土土壤酶活性及土壤肥力的影响[J].中国农业通报,2013,29(15):78-83.
[25] 徐华清,黄锦楼,王永荣,等.鄂尔多斯矿区不同土地利用方式土壤理化性质研究[J].林业调查规划,2014,39(2):106-111.
[26] 杜鹏飞,海春兴,赵明,等.阴山北麓春季土壤风蚀对不同土地利用表土有机质的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2007,21(12):89-92.
[27] 李建军,辛景树,张会民,等.长江中下游粮食主产区25年来稻田土壤养分演变特征[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(1):92-103.
[28] 秦川,何丙辉,蒋先军.三峡库区不同土地利用方式下土壤养分含量特征研究[J].草业学报,2016,25(9):10-19.
[29] 刘燕,唐立松,李彦.绿洲农田不同施肥处理对土壤养分和作物产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(3):151-156.
[30] 秦川,何丙辉,蒋先军.三峡库区不同土地利用方式下土壤养分含量特征研究[J].草业学报,2016,25(9):10-19.
[31] 葛玮健,常艳丽,刘俊梅,等.长期施肥对小麦—玉米轮作体系钾素平衡与钾库容量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2012,18(3):629-636.
[32] 陈银萍,罗永清,李玉强,等.兰州地区农田土壤速效磷与速效钾含量的变化特征[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(4):46-52.
[33] 张晓东,刘志刚,热沙来提·买买提.不同开垦年限对新疆绿洲农田土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(3):13-18.
[34] 苏永中,杨荣,刘婷娜.施肥对新垦绿洲风沙土肥力及碳积累的影响[J].中国沙漠,2019,39(3):1-6.
[35] Matson P A,Mcdowell W H,Townsend A R,et al. The globalization of N deposition:ecosystem consequences in tropical environments[J]. Biogeochemistry,1999,46(1):67-83.
[36] Slessarev,E W,Bing Y,et al. Water balance defines a threshold in soil chemistry at a global scale[J]. Nature,2016,540:567-569.
[37] Bowman W D,Cleveland C C,Halada U,et al. Negative impact of nitrogen deposition on soil buffering capacity[J]. Nature Geoence,2008,1(11):767-770.
[38] 陈继辉,李炎朋,熊雪,等.氮磷添加对草地土壤酸度和化学计量学特征的影响[J].草业科学,2017,34(5):33-39.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘占仁,王立志.不同土地利用方式对土壤养分及肥力的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):72.
　LIU Zhan-ren,WANG Li-zhi.Effect of Different Land Use on Soil Nutrient and Soil Fertility[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):72.
[2]张小娟,高照良,李晶,等.关中平原高速公路路堤边坡土壤养分与植被群落α多样性变化[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):157.
　ZHANG Xiao-juan,GAO Zhao-liang,LI Jing,et al.Variation of Soil Nutrients and Mode of α Diversity of Plant Community on the Embankment Slope of Highways in Guanzhong Plain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):157.
[3]王巧利,贾燕锋,王宁,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区自然恢复坡面植物根系的分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):16.
　WANG Qiao-li,JIA Yan-feng,WANG Ning,et al.Distribution of Root on Vegetation Recovery Slope in the Hilly and Gully Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):16.
[4]阳利永,吴献花,赵斌,等.滇池柴河流域不同土地利用方式土壤养分剖面分异[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):95.
　YANG Li-yong,WU Xian-hua,ZHAO Bin,et al.Effects of Different Land Uses on Profile Variability of Soil Nutrients in Chaihe Basin of Dianchi Lake[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):95.
[5]潘树林,周顺涛,辜彬.坡度和坡位对岩质边坡早期生态恢复土壤养分变异性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):289.
　PAN Shu-lin,ZHOU Shun-tao,GU Bin.Effect of Slope Degree and Slope Position on Soil Nutrient Variability in the Early Succession of Rocky Slope Revegetation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):289.
[6]腊贵晓,顾怀胜,刘国顺,等.喀斯特地区烟田土壤养分的空间变异特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):48.
　LA Gui-xiao,GU Huai-sheng,LIU Guo-shun,et al.Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Nutrients in Karst Tobacco-growing Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):48.
[7]霍小鹏,张兴华,李贤伟,等.川西米亚罗林区不同林分类型土壤养分性质研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):58.
　HUO Xiao-peng,ZHANG Xing-hua,LI Xian-wei,et al.Study on the Soil Nutrient in Different Forest Types in Miyaluo Forest Area of Western Sichuan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):58.
[8]刘秉正,吕俊杰.泥河沟流域土壤养分变化与生产力评价[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(01):18.
　LIU Bing-zheng,LÜ,Jun-jie.Variation of Soil Nutrient and Productivity Evaluation in Nihe Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(05):18.
[9]朱远达,张光远,蔡强国,等.侵蚀影响下土壤碳和养分空间变化及其过程模拟[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(04):126.
　ZHU Yuan-da,ZHANG Guang-yuan,CAI Qiang-guo,et al.Soil Carbon and Nutrient Change and Model Under Soil Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(05):126.
[10]庄舜尧,吴春艳,杨浩.红壤丘陵区沟谷养分的分布特征初探[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):112.
　ZHUANG Shun-yao,WU Chun-yan,YANG Hao.Distributions of Nutrients in Intervale Region of South China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(05):112.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2020-08-17 修回日期:2020-10-18
资助项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41877420); 中国科学院扶贫项目(KFJ-FP-201903); 新疆维吾尔自治区天池百人计划—创新项目(2017-Y842041)
第一作者:范琳杰(1996—),女,河南驻马店人,硕士研究生,主要从事干旱区植物生理方面研究。E-mail:fanlinjie18@mails.ucas.ac.cn
通信作者:李向义(1969—),男,河南清丰人,理学博士,研究员,主要从事荒漠植物生态适应与植被恢复等研究工作。E-mail:lixy@ms.xjb.ac.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-20