WANG Lei,SUO Linna,WEI Dan,et al.Ecological Control Characteristics of Non-point Source Pollution in Slope Farmland Under Different Plant Allocation Modes[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):29-34.
不同植物配置模式坡耕地面源污染生态阻控特征
- Title:
- Ecological Control Characteristics of Non-point Source Pollution in Slope Farmland Under Different Plant Allocation Modes
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2021)05-0029-06
- Keywords:
- runoff; vegetation allocation; non-point pollution; soil and wate loss
- 分类号:
- S157.2
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 利用8个差异化植被配置野外规模化径流小区的构建,探索自然降水环境下差异化植被配置给面源污染所形成的制约作用,其中主要参考5个指标,一是总氮(TN),二是总磷(TP),三是化学需氧量(COD),四是生物需氧量(BOD5),五是总有机碳(TOC),从而可为库区水土流失的治理防控供给一定借鉴作用。结果表明:(1)植物对于面源污染有着显著的控制效果,天然降雨条件下,减流作用最好的是板栗(Castanea mollissima)+苦参(Sophora flavescens)小区,平均减流作用为70.58%,板栗+雀麦(Bromus japonicus)最差,但相比板栗单种仍减流56%。(2)苦参、紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)、薄荷(Mentha haplocalyx)、野牛草(Buchloe dactyloides)和板栗的间作模式能有效地降低坡耕地的磷素流失,丹参(Salvia miltiorrhiza)和板栗间作模型可在一定程度上降低坡耕地的氮素流失。除雀麦和板栗间作小区外,其他间作模式小区,分别比对照小区径流水中的COD,BOD5,TOC消减率为29.10%～95.04%,31.49%～93.60%和16.76%～62.17%。(3)间作板栗+苦参对TN,TP等相关参数具有最优改善效果,可实现最佳配置效果,经过整体性评估从而得出,其具备最大推广价值。研究结果可为坡耕地生态阻控植物配置技术提供一定数据参考。
- Abstract:
- Miyun reservoir is not only the main surface drinking water source,but also the ecological conservation area in Beijing. With the rise of water level and the construction of soil and water conservation project in Miyun reservoir,a series of changes have taken place in its ecological environment. In order to provide a certain reference for the control and prevention of soil erosion in this area,differential vegetation coverage can restrict non-point source pollution. Five indicators such as total nitrogen(TN),total phosphorus(TP),chemical oxygen demand(COD),biological oxygen demand(BOD5),and total organic carbon(TOC)under natural rainfall conditions were studied by constructing 8 field standard runoff plots with different vegetation configurations. The results show that:(1)under natural rainfall conditions,the best runoff reduction effect was exerted by Castanea mollissima + Sophora flavescens plot,the average runoff reduction was 70.58%,the worst effect was exerted by Castanea mollissima + Bromus japonicus,but Castanea mollissima + Bromus japonicus still reduced the runoff by 56% compared with the single Castanea mollissima species;(2)the intercropping model of Sophora flavescens,Medicago sativa,Menthahaplocalyx,Buchloe dactyloides and Castanea mollissima could effectively reduce the loss of phosphorus in slope farmland,and the intercropping model of Bromus japonicus and Castanea mollissima could reduce the nitrogen loss of slope farmland to a certain extent; in addition to Bromus japonicus and Castanea mollissima intercropping plots,the reduction rates of COD,BOD5 and TOC in runoff of other intercropping plots were 29.10%～95.04%,31.49%～93.60% and 16.76%～62.17%,respectively;(3)intercropping Castanea mollissima and Sophora flavescens had the best effect on reducing TN,TP and other non-point source pollution indicators,and its allocation effect was the best. Comprehensive evaluation was the most suitable for large-scale promotion.
参考文献/References:
[1] Ji Fan,Lijiao Yan,Pei Zhang,et al. Effects of grass contour hedgerow systems on controlling soil erosion in red soil hilly areas,Southeast China[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research,2015,30(2):107-116.[2] Kinama J M,Stigter C J,Ong C K,et al. Contour hedgerows and grass strips in erosion and runoff control on sloping land in semi-arid Kenya[J]. Arid Land Research and Management,2007,21(1):1-19.[3] Zhao L S,Liang X L,Wu F Q. Soil surface roughness change and its effect on runoff and erosion on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Land,2014,6(4):400-409.[4] 黄欠如,章新亮,李清平,等.香根草篱防治红壤坡耕地侵蚀效果的研究[J].江西农业学报,2001,13(2):40-44.[5] 范洪杰,黄欠如,秦江涛,等.稻草覆盖和草篱对红壤缓坡旱地水土流失及作物产量的影响[J].土壤,2014,46(3):550-554.[6] Donjadee S,Tingsanchali T. Reduction of runoff and soil loss over steep slopes by using vetiver hedgerow systems[J]. Paddy and Water Environment,2013,11(1):573-581.[7] 李凯,程金花,陈仲旭.密云水库库滨带不同植被配置下面源污染特征分析[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(6):1183-1192.[8] 彭鹏,石慧.碱性过硫酸钾消解紫外分光光度法测定水样中的总氮[J].污染防治技术,2008(2):86-88.[9] 郑科,赵亚云,孙靖,等.地表水中总磷的2种测定方法的比对试验研究[J].绿色科技,2018(22):52-53.[10] 黄勇刚.重铬酸盐法测定化学需氧量新旧方法对比研究[J].资源节约与环保,2019,206(1):55-56.[11] 杨汉,彭晓燕.水样BOD5测定中稀释倍数的正确选取[J].环境污染与防治,1992,14(6):28-29.[12] 蔡旭东,周怡雯,刘窑军,等.南方红壤区坡耕地不同耕作措施综合生态效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):281-287.[13] 吴得荣,熊波,熊峰,等.大渡河流域水电工程区水土保持植物调查与分析[J].中国水土保持,2017(12):43-47.[14] 袁久芹,梁音,曹龙熹,等.红壤坡耕地不同植物篱配置模式减流减沙效益对比[J].土壤,2015,47(2):400-407.[15] 李海强,郭成久,李勇,等.植物篱对坡面土壤养分流失的影响[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(5):42-48.[16] 黎建强,张洪江,陈奇伯,等.三峡库区植物篱系统土壤颗粒分形特征及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(6):129-133,139.[17] 刘强,邓仕槐,敬子卉,等.不同植物篱系统对坡耕地农田径流污染物的去除效果[J].农业环境科学学报,2016,35(6):1136-1143.[18] 颜佩风.辽西坡耕地不同植物篱对水土流失及土壤养分空间分布的影响[J].水土保持应用技术,2017(2):4-6.[19] 胡雪琴,蒋平,彭旭东,等.紫色丘陵区不同土地利用类型径流泥沙及氮磷流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):35-39.[20] 黄生斌,刘宝元,刘晓霞,等.密云水库流域农业非点源污染基本特征分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(4):1219-1223.[21] 张雪莲,赵永志,廖洪,等.植物篱及过滤带防治水土流失与面源污染的研究进展[J].草业科学,2019,36(3):677-691.
相似文献/References:
[1]白桦,穆兴民,王双银.水土保持措施对秃尾河径流的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(01):40.
BAI Hua,MU Xing-min,WANG Shuang-yin.Impact of Soil and Water Conservation on River Flow of Tuwei River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(05):40.
[2]杨巍,汤洁,李昭阳,等.基于SWAT模型的大伙房水库汇水区径流与泥沙模拟[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):77.
YANG Wei,TANG Jie,LI Zhao-yang,et al.Streamflow and Sediment Simulation Based on SWAT Model in Dahuofang Reservoir Catchment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):77.
[3]刘士余,章俊霞,罗志军,等.近50年赣西北大坑小流域径流对降雨的响应[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):19.
LIU Shi-yu,ZHANG Jun-xia,LUO Zhi-jun,et al.Response of Runoff to Rainfall in Dakeng Small Watershed in Northwestern Jiangxi Province over the Last 50 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):19.
[4]白桦,穆兴民,高鹏,等.嘉陵江流域降水及径流演变规律分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):102.
BAI Hua,MU Xing-min,GAO Peng,et al.Analysis on Spatio-temporal Variation of Precipitation and Streamflow in the Jialingjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):102.
[5]吴钦孝,刘向东,赵鸿雁,等.宜川县油松人工林集水区水文状况分析[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):116.
Wu Qinxiao,Liu Xiangdong,Zhao Hongyan,et al.AN ANALYSIS ON HYDROSTATUS OF CATCHMENT IN ARTIFICIAL CHINESE PINE FOREST IN YICHUAN COUNTY[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(05):116.
[6]汪有科,李立,傅左,等.薪炭林水土保持效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,1992,(01):70.
Wang Yuke,Li Li,Fu Zuo,et al.A STUDY ON THE BENEFIT OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION FOR ENERGY FOREST[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(05):70.
[7]石生新,蒋定生.几种水土保持措施对强化降水入渗和减沙的影响试验研究[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(01):82.
Shi Shengxin,Jiang Dingsheng.Impacts of Several Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Strengthening Rainfall infiltration and Reducing Sediment Yield[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(05):82.
[8]曹全意.黄土高原地区提高山坡地径流利用率的有效途径[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(04):31.
Cao Quanyi.The Effective Way to Raise the Runoff Use Ratein Slope Land of Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(05):31.
[9]赵晓光,吴发启.坡面水蚀过程的力能体系及研究思路[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(01):23.
ZHAO Xiao-guang,WU Fa-qi.Research Frame for Force and Energy System in Water Erosion Process in Slopes of Gully[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(05):23.
[10]卢光辉.低度冲击径流抑制技术之功能与应用[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(04):91.
LU Guang-hui.Function and Application of Runoff Restraint Technique of Lowering Impact[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(05):91.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-10-26 修回日期:2020-11-13资助项目:多源有机垃圾折叠式快速腐解移动化技术、装备研发(2019YFD1100304-03),农林复合体系模式研究与示范项目(KJCX20200601),北京市农林科学院植物营养与资源研究所科技能力提升课题“密云水库水源保护区面源污染生态防控模式优化与应用”(YZS201910); 联合国开发计划属项目(The UNDP Project)密云水库面源污染生态控制与环境可持续发展研究(cpr/19/401)第一作者:王磊(1993—),男,甘肃庆阳人,研究实习员,硕士,主要从事农业面源污染治理研究。E-mail:314429112@qq.com通信作者:安志装(1969—),男,河南商丘人,研究员,博士,主要从事农业面源污染治理研究。E-mail:azzly@126.com